EA developer: 360 > PS3

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

so an ea dev called in just to make these claims? yeah ok..InfamousC

LOLz!

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

dannyc9

The sure thing was that on 360 would have 2x better textures, AA, and HDR/lighting, but now to know that it does 30fps more too, just makes PS3 feel like Gameboy comparing to 360

No offense, but ea games isn't the best company for programing, for example they can't get need for speed carbon to run on windows vista cause there too lazy. The Sims 2 can't run at high frame rates on top of the line machines. (I was so disapointed when I got my Alienware and it was still choppy). Other developers say it's not too difficult to program for. silversurfergold

ok, the war has been settled. This forum can now close.EvilAlgorithm

LOL 

if its saying PS3 sux or 360 sux,their games still suck.still mad at EA for releasing BS like Def JAm Icon.piss off EA and the Dev for dumbing down def jam!i wont buy ur Crappy games until u release something that will make up for that BS u call icon.

I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?TrueReligion_

Last i checked the majority of ps3 fanboys hate ea, so why would they care?

on-topic

i call bs. 

[QUOTE="TrueReligion_"]I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?Zenkuso

Last i checked the majority of ps3 fanboys hate ea, so why would they care?

on-topic

i call bs.

$$ is why they would care.

[QUOTE="silversurfergold"]No offense, but ea games isn't the best company for programing, for example they can't get need for speed carbon to run on windows vista cause there too lazy. The Sims 2 can't run at high frame rates on top of the line machines. (I was so disapointed when I got my Alienware and it was still choppy). Other developers say it's not too difficult to program for. Harbadakus

Oh no it's not running horribly I thought I'd see a major improvement from my low end system, it's great, but games like Oblivion run on very high settings.  It's just ea games that don't run so well 

[QUOTE="Zenkuso"]

[QUOTE="TrueReligion_"]I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?TrueReligion_

Last i checked the majority of ps3 fanboys hate ea, so why would they care?

on-topic

i call bs.

$$ is why they would care.

Off topic:are you a mod or something?your name is puprle

On Topic:they can say whatever they want about PS3,doesnt change the fact that most of their games are rushed pieces of BS

yeah, the war is over because this random ea dev who just "called in" is the one and only dev who has gone on to say which console is better, right?........oh wait.Flame1

you know that the devs at valve (you know, the guys who make that little game called...half...oh yeah half life) and the head of the company absolutley HATE the PS3.

So there you go, one of the best devs around thinks the 360 is much better than the ps3. happy now? 

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

dannyc9

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools. 

[QUOTE="dannyc9"]

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

ShmenonPie

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools.

YES! The lazy devs excuse for the 1 billionth time! HOOORAAYYY! HAZAAAA!

How are devs lazy? I'd like some examples. You most know SO much about developing for video games, right?

I'm listening. 

I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?TrueReligion_

Because the ps3 version will still look good for a ps3 game? but the 360 version will be better, as expected :D 

[QUOTE="dannyc9"]

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

ShmenonPie

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools. 

Right, the last gen GPU and lower than 360 ram have nothing to do with it

lol... "an EA developer has called in..."

ooooookaaaaayyyyy.......

but if what this dev is saying is true you probably can't blame him...

if you're making the same game on two platforms applying a similar level of effort... and version one just turns out better to be than the other.... what else is there to say

[QUOTE="Flame1"]yeah, the war is over because this random ea dev who just "called in" is the one and only dev who has gone on to say which console is better, right?........oh wait.KAS3Y_JAM3Z

you know that the devs at valve (you know, the guys who make that little game called...half...oh yeah half life) and the head of the company absolutley HATE the PS3.

So there you go, one of the best devs around thinks the 360 is much better than the ps3. happy now?

oh just a while ago, an ea dev called me and ...and... he said xbox 360 sucks.

so an ea dev called in just to make these claims? yeah ok..InfamousC

I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?TrueReligion_

No offense, but ea games isn't the best company for programing, for example they can't get need for speed carbon to run on windows vista cause there too lazy.  The Sims 2 can't run at high frame rates on top of the line machines.  (I was so disapointed when I got my Alienware and it was still choppy).  Other developers say it's not too difficult to program for.  silversurfergold

[QUOTE="dannyc9"]

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

ShmenonPie

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools. 

Yet this same logic fails to apply to developers who kneel in front of Sony. Lol, atleast its coming from a neutral source, not an exclusive developer to a brand. In my opinion, its more believeable than all that Insomniac and Factor 5 jibberish. I honestly don't care. Efficiency: X360 > PS3. Look at the visuals X360 is pumping out on DVD9, the 'inferior' format, the last gen format. 5X the code queue than standard DVDs and it still can't best a console with 2005 specs. IMO, power is not just specs, but resources+tools+specs+support will always be greater than something with just higher numbers.

"Buh bu wait, just wait 2009" "teh lazy devs" First I thought Ubi sucks, then Capcom, now its EA? Pretty soon, you PS3 fanboys won't have any games to play.

EDIT: Not saying X360 is more powerful, Its just more efficient, OBVIOUSLY.

This developer speaks the truth, PS3 is not as good as 360.NickyJD

 Im curious, is that Fact or Opinion?

[QUOTE="InfamousC"]so an ea dev called in just to make these claims? yeah ok..Pro_wrestler

I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?TrueReligion_

No offense, but ea games isn't the best company for programing, for example they can't get need for speed carbon to run on windows vista cause there too lazy.  The Sims 2 can't run at high frame rates on top of the line machines.  (I was so disapointed when I got my Alienware and it was still choppy).  Other developers say it's not too difficult to program for.  silversurfergold

[QUOTE="dannyc9"]

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

ShmenonPie

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools. 

Yet this same logic fails to apply to developers who kneel in front of Sony. Lol, atleast its coming from a neutral source, not an exclusive developer to a brand. In my opinion, its more believeable than all that Insomniac and Factor 5 jibberish. I honestly don't care. Efficiency: X360 > PS3. Look at the visuals X360 is pumping out on DVD9, the 'inferior' format, the last gen format. 5X the code queue than standard DVDs and it still can't best a console with 2005 specs. IMO, power is not just specs, but resources+tools+specs+support will always be greater than something with just higher numbers.

"Buh bu wait, just wait 2009" "teh lazy devs" First I thought Ubi sucks, then Capcom, now its EA? Pretty soon, you PS3 fanboys won't have any games to play.

EDIT: Not saying X360 is more powerful, Its just more efficient, OBVIOUSLY.

Developers that re not devleoping only for PS3, always say 360 is far better, The Darkness devs said 360 has better GPU and ram, and indirectly through the delays of Colin for PS3 and the fact that both GTA and Assasins Creed have been shown ONLY on 360 so far, indicate the simple fact that all games run amazing and with miniimum effort on 360, then devleopers strive to make them run on PS3, they might succeed as with Oblivion that at least was comparable to 360, even though they did remove AA, and the colors were crap, OR they might not as with games like Splinter Cell 4, Enchanted Arms, Fear that look 100x worst on PS3

So, if anyone gets a PS3 for multiplatform games too, must know will probably get a worst than 360 version 99% of the time, and pray that the PS3 one will at least run and look as good

I can imagine the situation

*ring ring ring*

"Hello?"

"Yeah, this is an EA dev. Teh pos3 suxorz!!!1 loLZ!!!" 

If epic can make UT3 on PS3 why should I believe these guys who been hating on PS3 before it's released? Not lazy more like inexperienced devs. The playstation edge will fix that, I hope EA doesn't get it.darkmanure

Remember that we have seen nothing of how it looks like on PS3 yet, all posted pics are from a super high end pc

[QUOTE="darkmanure"]If epic can make UT3 on PS3 why should I believe these guys who been hating on PS3 before it's released? Not lazy more like inexperienced devs. The playstation edge will fix that, I hope EA doesn't get it.greg_splicer

Remember that we have seen nothing of how it looks like on PS3 yet, all posted pics are from a super high end pc

[QUOTE="darkmanure"]If epic can make UT3 on PS3 why should I believe these guys who been hating on PS3 before it's released? Not lazy more like inexperienced devs. The playstation edge will fix that, I hope EA doesn't get it.greg_splicer

Remember that we have seen nothing of how it looks like on PS3 yet, all posted pics are from a super high end pc

I've seen a video of the ps3 version and it looks pretty good.

LOL

BU BU PS3 120 FPS.

[QUOTE="dannyc9"]

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

ShmenonPie

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools. 

And yes, people who work 18 hours a day for months on end are lazy.....:|

[QUOTE="ShmenonPie"][QUOTE="dannyc9"]

EA Developer: Xbox 360 will triumph over PS3 due to performance and support

An EA developer has called in to let us know that he believes the Xbox 360 will triumph over the PS3 due to its better performance and more rounded support. These claims come on the revelation that development of Army of Two on the Xbox 360 manages to yield a maximum of 60fps while the PS3 version struggles to reach 30fps currently. Army of Two is expected to hit retail shelves during November.

 

http://www.maxconsole.net/?mode=news&newsid=16757

heretrix

The only reason Army of Two isn't getting a decent framerate on the PS3 is the devs are being lazy and not using the PS3's different dardware, and letting its potential go untapped. The fools. 

And yes, people who work 18 hours a day for months on end are lazy.....:|

lol, yea people need to get some sense it's not easy being a dev.

Thats because Valve is a PC dev and it's easier for them to "dev" for 360 then PS3. I'll downplay both of these devs with a Link that Epic stating UT3 and Unreal Engine can be done for PS3, shows who's the better dev.

http://www.gamepro.com/news.cfm?article_id=107420

What engine is better Source or Unreal? 

I don't believe that article. Why would a developer risk losing PS3 customers by saying that to the public, even if it was true?TrueReligion_

same here

Whatever .... The PS3 has more power than the 360 and that is a FACT. I will admit certain games look just as good or better than some PS3 titles, but overall everything I have seen or played on the PS3 is better overall. Speed and graphics wise. JDW_games

nope xbox360 more powerful, developer even said so, are you developer? no GTHO.