EDGE Review scores - August

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for -PuLse
-PuLse

538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 -PuLse
Member since 2009 • 538 Posts

Prototype - 8
Arma 2 - 7
Monster Hunter Freedom Unite - 7
The Conduit - 4
Battlefield 1943: Pacific - 9
Indiana Jones and the staff of kings - 3
Overlord 2 - 6
Call of Juarez: Bound in blood - 7
Fight night round 4 - 8
Red Faction: Guerilla - 7
Killing Floor - 6
Prinny: Can I really be the hero? - 4
Another code R - 4
Bonsai Barber - 7

Ouch on some of those scores.

Link

Avatar image for Kicker_of_Cans
Kicker_of_Cans

444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Kicker_of_Cans
Member since 2009 • 444 Posts

In B4 "LOL Edge :roll:"

Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts

Awsome BF1943 score. 1st day buy for me

Avatar image for Thunderdrone
Thunderdrone

7154

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Thunderdrone
Member since 2009 • 7154 Posts
old
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Jeez they really hate them Prinnies.
Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

great score for BF 1943....man they need to release it quick. Conduit got 4 :lol: sheeps = owned. RFG deserves more

Avatar image for 2-10-08
2-10-08

2775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#7 2-10-08
Member since 2008 • 2775 Posts

PSP still bringing the failure I see

Avatar image for kingkui
kingkui

883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 kingkui
Member since 2008 • 883 Posts

PSP still bringing the failure I see

2-10-08

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

Avatar image for TR800
TR800

1814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 TR800
Member since 2009 • 1814 Posts
lol at EDGE.
Avatar image for TR800
TR800

1814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 TR800
Member since 2009 • 1814 Posts
[QUOTE="kingkui"]

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

PSP still bringing the failure I see

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

Yep edge is crap.
Avatar image for -Feath-
-Feath-

1452

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 -Feath-
Member since 2005 • 1452 Posts

In B4 "LOL Edge :roll:"

Kicker_of_Cans

LOL Edge :roll:

Avatar image for -PuLse
-PuLse

538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 -PuLse
Member since 2009 • 538 Posts

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

PSP still bringing the failure I see

kingkui

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

Because they use the whole scale, not like other review outlets that think 7 is an average game.

Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

PSP still bringing the failure I see

kingkui

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

id argue that EDGE is more credible than most gaming websites. ive been reading EDGE for nearly 15 years now and always found their reviews spot on.
Avatar image for GabeNewellsPie
GabeNewellsPie

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 GabeNewellsPie
Member since 2008 • 1147 Posts

[QUOTE="kingkui"]

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

PSP still bringing the failure I see

wayne_kar

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

id argue that EDGE is more credible than most gaming websites. ive been reading EDGE for nearly 15 years now and always found their reviews spot on.

I agree with this.Instead of complaining about a number,if anyone actually took the time to,y'know,read the mag or the website,they'd find EDGE contains some of the most articulate and well-written games-based journalism in the business.

Theres a reason why their scores are different from the likes of GS or IGN- as someone said earlier they actually use the whole 1-10 scale properly. A 5 from EDGE isn't a bad score;it just means the game is average with no remarkable features.While a 5 from GS would suggest the game is technically broken or unplayable in some way.

Avatar image for eveileb-ekam
eveileb-ekam

1578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 eveileb-ekam
Member since 2009 • 1578 Posts

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"][QUOTE="kingkui"]

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

GabeNewellsPie

id argue that EDGE is more credible than most gaming websites. ive been reading EDGE for nearly 15 years now and always found their reviews spot on.

I agree with this.Instead of complaining about a number,if anyone actually took the time to,y'know,read the mag or the website,they'd find EDGE contains some of the most articulate and well-written games-based journalism in the business.

Theres a reason why their scores are different from the likes of GS or IGN- as someone said earlier they actually use the whole 1-10 scale properly. A 5 from EDGE isn't a bad score;it just means the game is average with no remarkable features.While a 5 from GS would suggest the game is technically broken or unplayable in some way.

Spot on. Ive been reading EDGE for a while now, and whilst I dont always agree with their reviews, they back up their points well, and write their articles properly. Every other gaming mag I read seems so juvenile in comparison, especially the official magazines. Lets face it, most gaming journalists are usually little more than professional fanboys, so I dont know why EDGE gets more stick than anywhere else. Besides, arent the actual review scores in EDGE extremely minor? I cant even remember seeing them prominently, if at all. People should read the reviews instead of **** about an arbitrary number.

Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts
[QUOTE="kingkui"]

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

PSP still bringing the failure I see

wayne_kar

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

id argue that EDGE is more credible than most gaming websites. ive been reading EDGE for nearly 15 years now and always found their reviews spot on.

So, I'm not alone here. EDGE is actually the only magazine about video games that I respect and I hold a lot of respect both to their professionalism, level of journalism and its content. They are criminally misunderstood and nit-picked to death by many, though.
Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

[QUOTE="wayne_kar"] id argue that EDGE is more credible than most gaming websites. ive been reading EDGE for nearly 15 years now and always found their reviews spot on. eveileb-ekam

I agree with this.Instead of complaining about a number,if anyone actually took the time to,y'know,read the mag or the website,they'd find EDGE contains some of the most articulate and well-written games-based journalism in the business.

Theres a reason why their scores are different from the likes of GS or IGN- as someone said earlier they actually use the whole 1-10 scale properly. A 5 from EDGE isn't a bad score;it just means the game is average with no remarkable features.While a 5 from GS would suggest the game is technically broken or unplayable in some way.

Spot on. Ive been reading EDGE for a while now, and whilst I dont always agree with their reviews, they back up their points well, and write their articles properly. Every other gaming mag I read seems so juvenile in comparison, especially the official magazines. Lets face it, most gaming journalists are usually little more than professional fanboys, so I dont know why EDGE gets more stick than anywhere else. Besides, arent the actual review scores in EDGE extremely minor? I cant even remember seeing them prominently, if at all. People should read the reviews instead of **** about an arbitrary number.

they did actually try removing review scores for a while.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

I like Edge. They are Brutally honest and have a solid review scale.

Avatar image for wayne_kar
wayne_kar

2090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 wayne_kar
Member since 2009 • 2090 Posts

I like Edge. They are Brutally honest and have a solid review scale.

heretrix
but they go against the culture of anything less that a 8.5 is a flop. so the kids hate it
Avatar image for Salt_The_Fries
Salt_The_Fries

12480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 Salt_The_Fries
Member since 2008 • 12480 Posts
I also must say that I admire their 3rd person style of writing, excluding first person singular forms and its possessive pronouns. Quite frankly, it's actually my favourite and preferred style of writing, and a style I use myself.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#21 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
The Conduit, lol. Good scores for Prototype, FNR4, Red Faction: Guerilla and Battlefield.
Avatar image for ps3wizard45
ps3wizard45

12907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#22 ps3wizard45
Member since 2007 • 12907 Posts

prototype and battlefrild scored good atleast...

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#23 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

Poor the Conduit.

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts
[QUOTE="TR800"][QUOTE="kingkui"]

[QUOTE="2-10-08"]

PSP still bringing the failure I see

No, EDGE just sucks why do people even show their review scores

Yep edge is crap.

Gotta agree here, Edge is garbage.
Avatar image for Silent-Hal
Silent-Hal

9795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#25 Silent-Hal
Member since 2007 • 9795 Posts
I like the fact that they don't think a 7 is average. I swear games reviewers are the only critics that do this...
Avatar image for 12345678ew
12345678ew

2353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 12345678ew
Member since 2008 • 2353 Posts

Prototype - 8
Arma 2 - 7
Monster Hunter Freedom Unite - 7
The Conduit - 4
Battlefield 1943: Pacific - 9
Indiana Jones and the staff of kings - 3
Overlord 2 - 6
Call of Juarez: Bound in blood - 7
Fight night round 4 - 8
Red Faction: Guerilla - 7
Killing Floor - 6
Prinny: Can I really be the hero? - 4
Another code R - 4
Bonsai Barber - 7

Ouch on some of those scores.

Link

-PuLse

what are they on? a 7 for rfg?

Avatar image for DaBrainz
DaBrainz

7959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 DaBrainz
Member since 2007 • 7959 Posts

what's edge?

Avatar image for Silent-Hal
Silent-Hal

9795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#28 Silent-Hal
Member since 2007 • 9795 Posts

what are they on? a 7 for rfg?

12345678ew

A 7 is a good score. I don't see what the problem is.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#29 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts
I like the fact that they don't think a 7 is average. I swear games reviewers are the only critics that do this...Silent-Hal
Yea, I really like that about them. Too many publications use the 7-10 scale.
Avatar image for XturnalS
XturnalS

5020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 XturnalS
Member since 2004 • 5020 Posts

[QUOTE="Silent-Hal"]I like the fact that they don't think a 7 is average. I swear games reviewers are the only critics that do this...WAIW
Yea, I really like that about them. Too many publications use the 7-10 scale.

I think the reason why people like the 5-10 scale is because thats how Grading is usually done in the US. Most people identify with 10 being excellent and 5 and below being terrible.

The difference between a 1 and 5 isn't really big to most people an F is an F. But a C and an A are pretty big differences. Thats the reason why EDGE gets flak because a lot of people are used to the Academic standard of grading. I don't know how the rest of the world grades but thats how its done here and almost all publications go with that system. Hell 1up just straight adopted letter grades.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#31 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

[QUOTE="WAIW"][QUOTE="Silent-Hal"]I like the fact that they don't think a 7 is average. I swear games reviewers are the only critics that do this...XturnalS

Yea, I really like that about them. Too many publications use the 7-10 scale.

I think the reason why people like the 5-10 scale is because thats how Grading is usually done in the US. Most people identify with 10 being excellent and 5 and below being terrible.

The difference between a 1 and 5 isn't really big to most people an F is an F. But a C and an A are pretty big differences. Thats the reason why EDGE gets flak because a lot of people are used to the Academic standard of grading. I don't know how the rest of the world grades but thats how its done here and almost all publications go with that system. Hell 1up just straight adopted letter grades.

Sounds like a logical explanation to me. Unfortunately, the explanation doesn't make the hate logical.
Avatar image for Gamerz1569
Gamerz1569

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Gamerz1569
Member since 2008 • 2087 Posts

Never really read EDGE. But I'm wondering is it ubiased or is it as biased as Game Informer?

Avatar image for -Oath
-Oath

8014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 -Oath
Member since 2008 • 8014 Posts

They gave Prinny and The Conduit a 4? *leaves*

Avatar image for Brawl578
Brawl578

895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#35 Brawl578
Member since 2008 • 895 Posts

[QUOTE="sikanderahmedgreat score for BF 1943....man they need to release it quick. Conduit got 4 :lol: sheeps = owned. RFG deserves more

We got owned because of a crappy reviewer giving Conduit a 4? :roll:

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#36 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

Never really read EDGE. But I'm wondering is it ubiased or is it as biased as Game Informer?

Gamerz1569
In what way is Game Informer biased? Make no mistakes, I think they're an awful magazine. But their awfulness is well-rounded so that everything they cover is tainted.
Avatar image for finalfantasy94
finalfantasy94

27442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 finalfantasy94
Member since 2004 • 27442 Posts

Prinny 4? really? I guess it was to hard for them. Edge has always sucked so its to be expected. Being brutal with scores doesint equal good. I think its jsut to get attention. Im pretty sure if someone gave halo a 4 or even a 5 attention would be drawn there.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#38 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts
[QUOTE="Brawl578"]

[QUOTE="sikanderahmedgreat score for BF 1943....man they need to release it quick. Conduit got 4 :lol: sheeps = owned. RFG deserves more

We got owned because of a crappy reviewer giving Conduit a 4? :D

Which reviewer gave the Conduit a 4 and why is he crappy?
Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

Hey, is this the Game Magazine that gave Banjo-Kazoooie XBLA a 5 and Banjo-Tooie XBLA a 7? Yeah, I don't take them seriously after that crappy Banjo-Kazooie XBLAreview their's. They're just WAY too harsh on some games IMO.

Avatar image for WAIW
WAIW

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#40 WAIW
Member since 2008 • 5000 Posts

Hey, is this the Game Magazine that gave Banjo-Kazoooie XBLA a 5 and Banjo-Tooie XBLA a 7? Yeah, I don't take them seriously after that crappy Banjo-Kazooie XBLAreview their's. They're just WAY too harsh on some games IMO.

gmc2u_64
So you don't like them because they're harsh?
Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

Prinny 4? really? I guess it was to hard for them. Edge has always sucked so its to be expected. Being brutal with scores doesint equal good. I think its jsut to get attention. Im pretty sure if someone gave halo a 4 or even a 5 attention would be drawn there.

finalfantasy94

I agree. You want to read a VERY Harsh/Crappy review by EDGE? Read the Banjo-Kazooie XBLA review.

Avatar image for gmc2u_64
gmc2u_64

2402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#42 gmc2u_64
Member since 2005 • 2402 Posts

[QUOTE="gmc2u_64"]

Hey, is this the Game Magazine that gave Banjo-Kazoooie XBLA a 5 and Banjo-Tooie XBLA a 7? Yeah, I don't take them seriously after that crappy Banjo-Kazooie XBLAreview their's. They're just WAY too harsh on some games IMO.

WAIW

So you don't like them because they're harsh?

Yeah. There's a HUGE difference between being a critic (who judges things FAIRLY (unlike EDGE)) and being WAY too Harsh. EDGE falls into the WAY too Harsh catigory IMO.

Avatar image for Gamerz1569
Gamerz1569

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Gamerz1569
Member since 2008 • 2087 Posts

[QUOTE="Gamerz1569"]

Never really read EDGE. But I'm wondering is it ubiased or is it as biased as Game Informer?

WAIW

In what way is Game Informer biased? Make no mistakes, I think they're an awful magazine. But their awfulness is well-rounded so that everything they cover is tainted.

Every now and then the writer of an article can be biased. I read an article on Game Informer a couple of weeks ago about the Fallout MMO case. It was pretty biased saying something like this "I hope Bethesda wins that way we can get a defenitve Fallout MMO" or something like that. Journalists should be unbiased not taking any side.

Avatar image for deactivated-594be627b82ba
deactivated-594be627b82ba

8405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#44 deactivated-594be627b82ba
Member since 2006 • 8405 Posts

to give my favorite psp game a 4, ihow can i find them credible

Avatar image for roddollente
roddollente

1543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 roddollente
Member since 2008 • 1543 Posts

lol they gave prinny a 4 wtf is that. they're not as credible as you think. they're just like Apple. they're elitists. they think their reviews are sooo good that they give every game a low socre so that they would appear unique and credible. pffftt...