EG 360 vs PS3 face off. "PS3 Dragon age has the best image quality"

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.dog_dirt

i wouldnt [arty just yet..........since for every superior ps3 multiplat there are 20 superior 360 multiplats.

not an exact ratio but u get the idea.

framerate problems irritate me far more than slightly worse graphics.

But teh gamespot is the only place that says PS3 DA:O > 360 version :( plz don't poststuff liek this :(

Who cares, best played on PC anyways.

The PS3 version has better loading times too, which wasn't even mentioned.

Also, as far as Framerate : "even the Microsoft platform struggles."

Obviously, PC is the best Bioware version (Go Figure) but now we can see guys your favortie EUROGAMER site has betrayed some of you...or is it that Gamespot's Kevin is right?

GAMESPOT's OFFICIAL DRAGON AGE IMAGE COMPARISON!

The PS3 version has better loading times too, which wasn't even mentioned.

Also, as far as Framerate : "even the Microsoft platform struggles."

Obviously, PC is the best Bioware version (Go Figure) but now we can see guys your favortie EUROGAMER site has betrayed some of you...or is it that Gamespot's Kevin is right?

SolidTy

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

LOL yeah ok comparing a port not even made by SEGA with BioWARE who is more used to 360 than PS3. I think you lose on this one lemming.Sollet

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.dog_dirt

So all of a sudden better multiplats equal power house?

Then I guess the 360 is an unstoppable beast

framerate problems irritate me far more than slightly worse graphics.

CaseyWegner

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="dog_dirt"]

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

Sollet

Calling me a lemming shows just how much you really know. Pretty much nothing.

Second, DVD is what killed DA for the 360. I mean, really think about it. There are a lotof games out there for the 360 that look a lot better. It's a shame Bioware had to compress the game so much to fit on one disc. If you think it has anything to do with any hardware limitations, you're sadly mistaken.

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] Bayonetta begs to differ.MortalDecay

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] Dragon Age > Bayonetta -FactPearlOfHeaven

And opinion is still an opinion, no matter how many people agree.

Yes we already knew that!PearlOfHeaven

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

Since the majority of system wars agrees.

PearlOfHeaven

Since when did your opinion become fact?MortalDecay

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"]Yes we already knew that!dog_dirt

[QUOTE="dog_dirt"][QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"]Yes we already knew that!delta3074

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] Since the majority of system wars agrees.

PearlOfHeaven

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23dog_dirt

Notice how he says "Judging DA:O in terms of PURE IMAGE QUALITY" . . .Take in point this paragraph you FAILED TO MENTION:

"It's also fair to say that both console games aren't strong performers. Dragon Age: Origins is v-synced for better image consistency, but the frame-rate is extremely variable - anything from 15 to 30 frames per second depending on the scene being rendered. In this area the Xbox 360 game has the advantage. . ."

So it's quite simple. Do you want marginally better graphics or better framerate?

we're talking small differences here. I remember Resident Evil 4 on Gamecube that totally destroyed the ps2 version and no one made a big deal out of ititalygamer

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] The majority doesn't mean anything. The majority of the world used to believe the world was flat. How did that turn out?MortalDecay

we're talking small differences here. I remember Resident Evil 4 on Gamecube that totally destroyed the ps2 version and no one made a big deal out of ititalygamer

[QUOTE="MortalDecay"][QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] Since the majority of system wars agrees.

PearlOfHeaven

Just pointing out, Bioware didn't make the console versions. Edge of Reality did. Bioware only made the PC version of DA:O.

[QUOTE="italygamer"]we're talking small differences here. I remember Resident Evil 4 on Gamecube that totally destroyed the ps2 version and no one made a big deal out of itdelta3074

framerate problems irritate me far more than slightly worse graphics.

CaseyWegner

this is the truth. framerate problems are a real boner-killer.

Mad World got an 7.5, same developers. When comparing them to Bioware, they can't be great developers, only decent developers.

PearlOfHeaven

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] The majority doesn't mean anything. The majority of the world used to believe the world was flat. How did that turn out?mythrol

Just pointing out, Bioware didn't make the console versions. Edge of Reality did. Bioware only made the PC version of DA:O.

"It's definitely the case that the PS3 version has a collection of small technical advantages. Texture filtering is superior, the lighting model looks a bit more accurate, and the depth-of-field effect is more accomplished too (even compared to the PC version). Judging Dragon Age: Origins in terms of pure image quality, the PS3 version is the console version to have."

WoW. PS3 is showing itself as the true graphics power house again.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/xbox-360-vs-ps3-face-off-round-23

dog_dirt

Yes, that difference is stunning....

Man, people need to get out more.

"In summary, technologically speaking the PC original is the winner here. While the PS3 version is closer to it in many ways, it can't make up for the frame-rate and the cut-down visuals, and the lack of utilisation of the Blu-ray storage space is peculiar. For Xbox 360 owners, the visual downgrade is a touch more impactful, but the game is less prone to the PS3 code's frame-rate drops.

Dragon Age: Origins remains a strong game wherever you play it to a greater or lesser extent, but the PC really is the place to be. The user interface is stronger, it looks much prettier and it's much more fun to play. Failing that, the console conversions are about equal; their technical differences essentially cancel each other out."

Yay for selectively quoting out of a mult-page article.

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"]Mad World got an 7.5, same developers. When comparing them to Bioware, they can't be great developers, only decent developers.

[QUOTE="italygamer"]we're talking small differences here. I remember Resident Evil 4 on Gamecube that totally destroyed the ps2 version and no one made a big deal out of itdelta3074

"In summary, technologically speaking the PC original is the winner here. While the PS3 version is closer to it in many ways, it can't make up for the frame-rate and the cut-down visuals, and the lack of utilisation of the Blu-ray storage space is peculiar. For Xbox 360 owners, the visual downgrade is a touch more impactful, but the game is less prone to the PS3 code's frame-rate drops.

Dragon Age: Origins remains a strong game wherever you play it to a greater or lesser extent, but the PC really is the place to be. The user interface is stronger, it looks much prettier and it's much more fun to play. Failing that, the console conversions are about equal; their technical differences essentially cancel each other out."

Yay for selectively quoting out of a mult-page article.

topgunmv

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"]Mad World got an 7.5, same developers. When comparing them to Bioware, they can't be great developers, only decent developers.

The PS3 version has better loading times too, which wasn't even mentioned.

Also, as far as Framerate : "even the Microsoft platform struggles."

Obviously, PC is the best Bioware version (Go Figure) but now we can see guys your favortie EUROGAMER site has betrayed some of you...or is it that Gamespot's Kevin is right?

SolidTy

Or you could read the article and see that they rated the two console versions equally.

[QUOTE="mythrol"]

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] You're right, the majority don't mean anything. The Quality of bioware games means much more.PearlOfHeaven

Just pointing out, Bioware didn't make the console versions. Edge of Reality did. Bioware only made the PC version of DA:O.

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="kolkov01"] sonic chronicles a game made by bioware got a 6.5

kolkov01

[QUOTE="delta3074"][QUOTE="italygamer"]we're talking small differences here. I remember Resident Evil 4 on Gamecube that totally destroyed the ps2 version and no one made a big deal out of itkolkov01

[QUOTE="kolkov01"][QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] That's a DS games, and it was an unoriginal from bioware. it wasn't a game bioware wasn't taking seriouslyPearlOfHeaven

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="mythrol"]

Just pointing out, Bioware didn't make the console versions. Edge of Reality did. Bioware only made the PC version of DA:O.

mythrol

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

The PS3 version has better loading times too, which wasn't even mentioned.

Also, as far as Framerate : "even the Microsoft platform struggles."

Obviously, PC is the best Bioware version (Go Figure) but now we can see guys your favortie EUROGAMER site has betrayed some of you...or is it that Gamespot's Kevin is right?

topgunmv

Or you could read the article and see that they rated the two console versions equally.

Yes I noticed this too. It's funny that SolidTy builds himself as the manticore KING of SW. . .when little comments like theses show his Cow lean.

In multiple spots they pointed out that the 360's frame rate was better than the PS3's yet he key's in on 5 words about framerate. The Summary pretty well makes it clear that better PS3 visuals can't make up for the drop in framerate.