EGM refused to review MGS4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jrpgliker
jrpgliker

663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 jrpgliker
Member since 2006 • 663 Posts

http://kotaku.com/5012146/egm-refuse-to-review-mgs4-because-konami-imposed-limitations

To recap: Konami are imposing restrictions on what publications can and cannot talk about when reviewing Metal Gear Solid 4. No mention of 90-minute cutscenes please, and while you're at it, no talky-talky about install sizes either, K? IGN are cool with that. EGM, refreshingly, are not. Due to "limitations Konami wanted to impose on our comments", the editorial team decided to refrain from giving the game a score, and in lieu of a "review" posted a lengthy roundtable discussion about the game instead. It's hardly a gloved fist on an Olympic dias, but it is nice seeing somebody do something about such an...unsavoury practice.

Avatar image for kenshinhimura16
kenshinhimura16

7009

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#2 kenshinhimura16
Member since 2005 • 7009 Posts

http://kotaku.com/5012146/egm-refuse-to-review-mgs4-because-konami-imposed-limitations

To recap: Konami are imposing restrictions on what publications can and cannot talk about when reviewing Metal Gear Solid 4. No mention of 90-minute cutscenes please, and while you're at it, no talky-talky about install sizes either, K? IGN are cool with that. EGM, refreshingly, are not. Due to "limitations Konami wanted to impose on our comments", the editorial team decided to refrain from giving the game a score, and in lieu of a "review" posted a lengthy roundtable discussion about the game instead. It's hardly a gloved fist on an Olympic dias, but it is nice seeing somebody do something about such an...unsavoury practice.

jrpgliker

yet the 90 minutes cutscenes was debunked by almost every person who reviewed the game.

Avatar image for kingman03
kingman03

5202

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 kingman03
Member since 2003 • 5202 Posts
There is no 90 min cutscene and i've been waiting for this game for a very, very long time so install times will not bother me one bit.
Avatar image for Lab392
Lab392

6217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Lab392
Member since 2006 • 6217 Posts

See the sticky up a the top of the page? It's the only spot where MGS4 should be discussed. Go there.

Avatar image for Coredog777
Coredog777

333

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Coredog777
Member since 2008 • 333 Posts
who cares hopefully PS3 gets its first AAAE after 3 years of talk.
Avatar image for travt-down
travt-down

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 travt-down
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts
[QUOTE="jrpgliker"]

http://kotaku.com/5012146/egm-refuse-to-review-mgs4-because-konami-imposed-limitations

To recap: Konami are imposing restrictions on what publications can and cannot talk about when reviewing Metal Gear Solid 4. No mention of 90-minute cutscenes please, and while you're at it, no talky-talky about install sizes either, K? IGN are cool with that. EGM, refreshingly, are not. Due to "limitations Konami wanted to impose on our comments", the editorial team decided to refrain from giving the game a score, and in lieu of a "review" posted a lengthy roundtable discussion about the game instead. It's hardly a gloved fist on an Olympic dias, but it is nice seeing somebody do something about such an...unsavoury practice.

kenshinhimura16

yet the 90 minutes cutscenes was debunked by almost every person who reviewed the game.

Because they were not allowed to discuss it...duh.

And Edge said there were 2 scenes near 90 mins.

Avatar image for blazinpuertoroc
blazinpuertoroc

12245

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 blazinpuertoroc
Member since 2004 • 12245 Posts
very lame indeed..EGM sucks
Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51575 Posts
[QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"][QUOTE="jrpgliker"]

http://kotaku.com/5012146/egm-refuse-to-review-mgs4-because-konami-imposed-limitations

To recap: Konami are imposing restrictions on what publications can and cannot talk about when reviewing Metal Gear Solid 4. No mention of 90-minute cutscenes please, and while you're at it, no talky-talky about install sizes either, K? IGN are cool with that. EGM, refreshingly, are not. Due to "limitations Konami wanted to impose on our comments", the editorial team decided to refrain from giving the game a score, and in lieu of a "review" posted a lengthy roundtable discussion about the game instead. It's hardly a gloved fist on an Olympic dias, but it is nice seeing somebody do something about such an...unsavoury practice.

travt-down

yet the 90 minutes cutscenes was debunked by almost every person who reviewed the game.

Because they were not allowed to discuss it...duh.

And Edge said there were 2 scenes near 90 mins.

If they did say that that would contradict these rumors would it not?

Avatar image for VirtuaCast
VirtuaCast

840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 VirtuaCast
Member since 2008 • 840 Posts

Eurogamer had some interesting thing to say about MGS4 cut scenes.

"An unbelievably lengthy and self-indulgent epilogue - you can't call it a cut-scene, it's an entire film in its own right, and a deeply boring one too"

"Such is the luxurious length and mind-numbing detail of the cut-scenes and codec conversations that you could put the pad down for almost half the game's ample length. "

"Take note, however, that there are several minutes of install time to be endured, not just at the start, but before each act - albeit graced with a fantastic animated graphic of Snake smoking next to some health warnings."

Maybe EGM agrees.

Avatar image for travt-down
travt-down

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 travt-down
Member since 2008 • 1549 Posts
[QUOTE="travt-down"][QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"][QUOTE="jrpgliker"]

http://kotaku.com/5012146/egm-refuse-to-review-mgs4-because-konami-imposed-limitations

To recap: Konami are imposing restrictions on what publications can and cannot talk about when reviewing Metal Gear Solid 4. No mention of 90-minute cutscenes please, and while you're at it, no talky-talky about install sizes either, K? IGN are cool with that. EGM, refreshingly, are not. Due to "limitations Konami wanted to impose on our comments", the editorial team decided to refrain from giving the game a score, and in lieu of a "review" posted a lengthy roundtable discussion about the game instead. It's hardly a gloved fist on an Olympic dias, but it is nice seeing somebody do something about such an...unsavoury practice.

Chutebox

yet the 90 minutes cutscenes was debunked by almost every person who reviewed the game.

Because they were not allowed to discuss it...duh.

And Edge said there were 2 scenes near 90 mins.

If they did say that that would contradict these rumors would it not?

Or they said 'screw Konami'. Heres your 8.0

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51575 Posts
[QUOTE="Chutebox"][QUOTE="travt-down"][QUOTE="kenshinhimura16"][QUOTE="jrpgliker"]

http://kotaku.com/5012146/egm-refuse-to-review-mgs4-because-konami-imposed-limitations

To recap: Konami are imposing restrictions on what publications can and cannot talk about when reviewing Metal Gear Solid 4. No mention of 90-minute cutscenes please, and while you're at it, no talky-talky about install sizes either, K? IGN are cool with that. EGM, refreshingly, are not. Due to "limitations Konami wanted to impose on our comments", the editorial team decided to refrain from giving the game a score, and in lieu of a "review" posted a lengthy roundtable discussion about the game instead. It's hardly a gloved fist on an Olympic dias, but it is nice seeing somebody do something about such an...unsavoury practice.

travt-down

yet the 90 minutes cutscenes was debunked by almost every person who reviewed the game.

Because they were not allowed to discuss it...duh.

And Edge said there were 2 scenes near 90 mins.

If they did say that that would contradict these rumors would it not?

Or they said 'screw Konami'. Heres your 8.0

If that's what you believe.

Avatar image for 100Gamer
100Gamer

1701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 100Gamer
Member since 2007 • 1701 Posts

wow. thats just pathetic. konami sinks to a new low