Link
Not a big deal or anything, but it's system wars, haha.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I played both demos and I can barely see anything different. Then again I never paused and zoomed it every 5 seconds.
i heard the opposite... either way ps3 gets exclusive "Joker" gameplayLink
Not a big deal or anything, but it's system wars, haha.
Squall18
I told you cows. 360 owns.BioShockOwns
Is it just me or are you a level 3 with 4 posts? Oh new account. ;)
Anyways, who freakin cares? The differences are microscopic.
They're equal since cows get the Joker. Almost like Bioshock, slightly worse graphics with more content.
mitu123
More content doesn't make the game look better. ;)
[QUOTE="BioShockOwns"]I told you cows. 360 owns.WiiMan21
When did you tell us? plus there saying the DEMO, not the fully finished product.
Aliasing, man. That's all I got to say/[QUOTE="mitu123"]
They're equal since cows get the Joker. Almost like Bioshock, slightly worse graphics with more content.
wapahala
More content doesn't make the game looks better. ;)
An extra pixel here and there doesn't make games look much better, either.[QUOTE="Squall18"]i heard the opposite... either way ps3 gets exclusive "Joker" gameplay Exclusive to be taken with a grain of salt, no doubt it'll be available for 5 dollars in a few months, sucks but it's true.Link
Not a big deal or anything, but it's system wars, haha.
StealthKnife
I played it completely maxed at 1920*1080. It's very nice looking but it's not that great imo.
I made a special note of the fact that there was practically no difference between 4xAA and 16xQ at that reslution :!: (apart from framerate).
Also, am I the only one who thought it was very "press attack to win"?
I told you cows. 360 owns.BioShockOwns
But honestly, I rather have the Joker DLC instead of better graphics, but that's just me.
Yeah some like to game, some like to count polygons and perform corporate bookeeping. :P I doubt any visual differences will be worth acknowledging, as usual.I played both demos and I can barely see anything different. Then again I never paused and zoomed it every 5 seconds.
finalfantasy94
[QUOTE="finalfantasy94"]Yeah some like to game, some like to count polygons and perform corporate bookeeping. :P I doubt any visual differences will be worth acknowledging, as usual.I played both demos and I can barely see anything different. Then again I never paused and zoomed it every 5 seconds.
Shhadow_Viper
Well, i agree most times the differences are so small they are not worth talking but the fact that some cows still believe that PS3 is tecnically superior is what make these threads fun :P
Not this again. And IGN favors the PS3 over 360, see what I did there?:P[QUOTE="mitu123"]
[QUOTE="Ninten007"]
Says the biased Eurogamer.
W1NGMAN-
Yea Euro isn't bias they're just lame.
I like their written reviews, but not the scores. I read them, like Killzone 2 for example, they gave it a 9 but complained about a lot of things.They gave Halo 3 a 10 and said there's nothing wrong with it.:lol: And some of their comparisons aren't right, I do watch them.They're equal since cows get the Joker. Almost like Bioshock, slightly worse graphics with more content.
mitu123
Didnt the PS3 version of Bioshock have better graphics? Regardless i played the demos on both and there is no diffrence . 2xAA vs No AA on a 1080p tv is not even noticeable i even fliped back on forth to see each. The games look identical the fact is the PS3 version is better because you can play as the JOKER!!!
[QUOTE="WiiMan21"][QUOTE="BioShockOwns"]I told you cows. 360 owns.BioShockOwns
When did you tell us? plus there saying the DEMO, not the fully finished product.
Aliasing, man. That's all I got to say/ Oh i see.It's a comparison of the demo. Has SW really sunk low enough to comparing demoes rather than final products?
I actually thought the game looked fantastic! U shouldnt see any difference with AA on such high resolutions because the textures are already VERY sharp. I dont even bother with AA when playing on my rig at 1080P. You lose FPS for no good reason.I played it completely maxed at 1920*1080. It's very nice looking but it's not that great imo.
I made a special note of the fact that there was practically no difference between 4xAA and 16xQ at that reslution :!: (apart from framerate).
Also, am I the only one who thought it was very "press attack to win"?
Filthybastrd
[QUOTE="Filthybastrd"]I actually thought the game looked fantastic! U shouldnt see any difference with AA on such high resolutions because the textures are already VERY sharp. I dont even bother with AA when playing on my rig at 1080P. You lose FPS for no good reason.Exactly. 2x is more than enough for a game with low texture rez...I played it completely maxed at 1920*1080. It's very nice looking but it's not that great imo.
I made a special note of the fact that there was practically no difference between 4xAA and 16xQ at that reslution :!: (apart from framerate).
Also, am I the only one who thought it was very "press attack to win"?
KingAsmodai
[QUOTE="mitu123"]
They're equal since cows get the Joker. Almost like Bioshock, slightly worse graphics with more content.
wapahala
More content doesn't make the game looks better. ;)
And minor graphical differences do?Yay 360 version looks slightly better. Now that its out of the way can we um actually talk about the game and not something so insignificant?
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment