Even though Gears franchise went to sh..t, Gear Tactics look freaking dope!!

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Poll Even though Gears franchise went to sh..t, Gear Tactics look freaking dope!! (15 votes)

Hell yah I'll be playing it on the PC 67%
NO, I'll be too busy playing other games 33%

So pumped for this.

 • 
Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#1 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73973 Posts

Let's see, an overrated 360 game that is finally being realized for what it is has suddenly "gone to shit " is more like it took you about a decade to realize how mediocre it always was.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46947 Posts

I’ve always really enjoyed the Gears of War games, even Judgement which I thought had some interesting things going on in it. I think this game looks quite interesting as well but if this is PC only then I guess I won’t be playing it. Hopefully it comes to the Xbox consoles as well.

Avatar image for daredevils2k
daredevils2k

5001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 daredevils2k
Member since 2015 • 5001 Posts

@Pedro:

@Pedro said:

Let's see, an overrated 360 game that is finally being realized for what it is has suddenly "gone to shit " is more like it took you about a decade to realize how mediocre it always was.

dude gear of war for the 360 was aweome when it was released. i had tons of fun with buddies

Avatar image for freedomfreak
freedomfreak

52559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 freedomfreak
Member since 2004 • 52559 Posts

This would work better as a full blown RTS.

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25349

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5  Edited By Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25349 Posts

This reminds me of NuXCOM.

Which is a good thing. But I want to see more before I buy.

Avatar image for cainetao11
cainetao11

38076

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 77

User Lists: 1

#6 cainetao11
Member since 2006 • 38076 Posts

After playing the best Gears this year if that’s “went to shit” then thank you God for different tastes.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18265

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18265 Posts

Aye looks good. A turn based strategy also makes a lot of sense as a spin off for the series.

I have so many turn based tactics games to play on my backlog though so it could be quite some time before i take another look at it. Looks good though.

Note to self....finish raving rabbids.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts

Gears of War were pretty fun game with clunky mechanics that never got fixed and the series hasn’t evolve at all in 12 years.

Avatar image for Pedro
Pedro

73973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 0

#9 Pedro
Member since 2002 • 73973 Posts

@daredevils2k said:

@Pedro:

dude gear of war for the 360 was aweome when it was released. i had tons of fun with buddies

Mediocre games can be fun.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#10 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58715 Posts

Honestly, it was time for a new change in the Gears of War formula, much similar to God of War 4 went into a new change is what this Gears series needed the most. I'm hype for this and "Hell yah I'll be playing it on the PC" because KB/M will be more helpful for this type of RTS game.

All in all, I'm just happy we're finally learning what happened to Ukkon.

Avatar image for djoffer
djoffer

1856

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 djoffer
Member since 2007 • 1856 Posts

Think gears of war is pretty shit, but this definitely looks good! Anyone know if It will base building and overhead map like xcom?

Avatar image for deactivated-6092a2d005fba
deactivated-6092a2d005fba

22663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-6092a2d005fba
Member since 2015 • 22663 Posts

@Archangel3371 said:

I’ve always really enjoyed the Gears of War games, even Judgement which I thought had some interesting things going on in it. I think this game looks quite interesting as well but if this is PC only then I guess I won’t be playing it. Hopefully it comes to the Xbox consoles as well.

Rod Fergusson confirmed its coming to Xbox, so fear not.

I'm no Gears fan but I do love me some turn based combat, so I might have to keep an eye on this :)

Avatar image for R4gn4r0k
R4gn4r0k

49080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 R4gn4r0k  Online
Member since 2004 • 49080 Posts

Reminds me of that Killzone game for PSP. Same concept.

But yeah, this looks dope. I'll play this on PC, as I'll get gamepass next year (Psychonauts, ori, gears, age of empires,...)

Avatar image for floppydics
floppydics

415

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#14 floppydics
Member since 2014 • 415 Posts

Man this looks awesome. Xcom with gears skin and tone yes please.

Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#15 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62867 Posts

Looks alright, kind of sick of Xcom clones.

They could have been more original.

Avatar image for Archangel3371
Archangel3371

46947

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 Archangel3371
Member since 2004 • 46947 Posts

@i_p_daily: Great to hear that. Will definitely be checking this game out then.

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#17 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

Gears of War were pretty fun game with clunky mechanics that never got fixed and the series hasn’t evolve at all in 12 years.

Nothing about Gears of War is particularly clunky (tho that description of games is weirdly misused) so much as that Gears is just limiting. In the context of designing strong, chunky feeling shooting that you can reliably stay accurate with around analog sticks the cover shooter set up makes sense. Limit the players movements to a horizontal plane, create a more stop n pop vibe, etc.

The trade off tho was that its a skeleton of a gameplay loop that became the whole game and has endured sadly to this day. Multiplayer it works fine, because the nature of moving player gets people moving, and arena shooter concepts like power weapons creating points of interest creates a clean speed chess formula, especially when paired with wall bouncing and wall cancels in gears. A more finesse player can ping pong around players, and overcome the rnjesus vibe of gnasher battles, lesser players gotta hold that shit.

Personally Gears 5 is solid (tho the campaign is boring n busted), tho it could use way better maps, and it would have been nice if Team Deathmatch was never added to Gears of War. But it's a far cry from the greatest multiplayer shooters or even the best Microsoft multiplayer IP.

Tho it is on a very short list of TPS games with reasonably good multiplayer.

Avatar image for Juub1990
Juub1990

12622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18  Edited By Juub1990
Member since 2013 • 12622 Posts
@jg4xchamp said:

Nothing about Gears of War is particularly clunky (tho that description of games is weirdly misused) so much as that Gears is just limiting. In the context of designing strong, chunky feeling shooting that you can reliably stay accurate with around analog sticks the cover shooter set up makes sense. Limit the players movements to a horizontal plane, create a more stop n pop vibe, etc.

The trade off tho was that its a skeleton of a gameplay loop that became the whole game and has endured sadly to this day. Multiplayer it works fine, because the nature of moving player gets people moving, and arena shooter concepts like power weapons creating points of interest creates a clean speed chess formula, especially when paired with wall bouncing and wall cancels in gears. A more finesse player can ping pong around players, and overcome the rnjesus vibe of gnasher battles, lesser players gotta hold that shit.

Personally Gears 5 is solid (tho the campaign is boring n busted), tho it could use way better maps, and it would have been nice if Team Deathmatch was never added to Gears of War. But it's a far cry from the greatest multiplayer shooters or even the best Microsoft multiplayer IP.

Tho it is on a very short list of TPS games with reasonably good multiplayer.

I do mean clunky in its proper sense. Some problems stems from the horizontal nature of the cover system that has the player stick to cover. Mainly that when there are adjacent or close by covers, you can find yourself in the wrong ones which in higher difficulty is a death sentence. You might wanna take one wall cover but are 1cm too close to the next and then you wound up taking the one you didn't want and it's gg.

That and the multiplayer especially in 2 tended to devolve into dumbshit shotgun battles at close range because everything else was much less effective because once again, the stop n pop nature made it pretty damn difficulty to sprint and then stop to take aim. The characters sprinted while crouching which didn't even make it that much harder to pick them off if you were stationary but made it a bitch to counter someone who was already aiming at you.

I understand the game is meant to feel weighty and heavy but that's exactly what I mean by "clunky" mechanics. It's not always bad but at times it can seriously **** up the flow of the game and lend to repetitive and boring tactics.

By clunky I stress heavy and sort of difficult to move. The literal definition of the word.

Avatar image for pdogg93
pdogg93

1849

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 pdogg93
Member since 2015 • 1849 Posts

I thought gears 5 was awesome, so I disagree with you op

Avatar image for jg4xchamp
jg4xchamp

64057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#20 jg4xchamp
Member since 2006 • 64057 Posts

@Juub1990 said:

I do mean clunky in its proper sense. Some problems stems from the horizontal nature of the cover system that has the player stick to cover. Mainly that when there are adjacent or close by covers, you can find yourself in the wrong ones which in higher difficulty is a death sentence. You might wanna take one wall cover but are 1cm too close to the next and then you wound up taking the one you didn't want and it's gg.

That and the multiplayer especially in 2 tended to devolve into dumbshit shotgun battles at close range because everything else was much less effective because once again, the stop n pop nature made it pretty damn difficulty to sprint and then stop to take aim. The characters sprinted while crouching which didn't even make it that much harder to pick them off if you were stationary but made it a bitch to counter someone who was already aiming at you.

I understand the game is meant to feel weighty and heavy but that's exactly what I mean by "clunky" mechanics. It's not always bad but at times it can seriously **** up the flow of the game and lend to repetitive and boring tactics.

By clunky I stress heavy and sort of difficult to move. The literal definition of the word.

*shrugs*

I can't say either on pad or mouse I've felt that way with how Gears controls n moves. As limiting as it can be and overly dependent on the A button (which PC gears has let you rebind some of A's commands to different keys, I put a lot of them on my mouse buttons for instance) generally pointing the stick n tapping A or holding A got me the result I needed, especially when you learn to pair it with cancels n animations to get out of stuff.

Like shit like this

https://twitter.com/Beyond_Toxin/status/1172633381831622656?s=20\

Isn't accident and some proper finessing on the players part, and the reward is a more difficult target to hit, and proper jukes n shotgun battles. Were those two mechanics not in Gears multiplayer, I'd still be against using clunky and focus on the root of all its problems: limiting.

The trade off for limiting options is always the loss of finer decisions to make in combat, and in action games that's paramount. It's what makes them fun, especially shooters which aren't exactly known for being complex. But I get what you're saying.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45477 Posts

Looks like a Gears themed XCOM, and since it'll be on GamePass then I see no reason for me not to try it.

Avatar image for Ghost120x
Ghost120x

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Ghost120x
Member since 2009 • 6060 Posts

Looks better than gears 4 and 5. I haven't been excited for gears in a long time.

Avatar image for hypegaming
Hypegaming

15

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#23 Hypegaming
Member since 2019 • 15 Posts

Xcom vibes. I'd try this out.

Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22688 Posts

@cainetao11 said:

After playing the best Gears this year if that’s “went to shit” then thank you God for different tastes.

Lol I know... Gears 5 could arguably be the best in the series (from campaign perspective anyway).

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60828

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60828 Posts

I like the idea, hell I enjoy tactics/turn-based combat games in general.

But I can't help but feel they're going to half-ass this game, make it a quick cash-grab.

Hope they go full XCOM with it, include base building, some sort of economy, and so on.

What'd be really awesome is something before the Locust, something around the Pendulum War, human vs human.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10956 Posts

@Pedro:

Overrated = My negative opinion is the only correct opinion, and every other positive opinion is wrong.

Avatar image for Litchie
Litchie

36121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#27  Edited By Litchie
Member since 2003 • 36121 Posts

It's gone to shit? How? It's been the same all the time.

Plus, wasn't Gears 5 surprisingly popular?