Eventually there will only be one console

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for alexfla
alexfla

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 alexfla
Member since 2010 • 393 Posts

For the same reason that there's only one movie format. Of course there was the VHS vs Beta war and more recently the HD DVD vs Blu-Ray war. But from the beginning we all knew only one could survive.

I remember back in the 8-bit days there were very few multiplat games. Today almost every game is a multiplat. In my opinion this is a place holder for the future where every game is available on one console.

Eventually graphics will evolve to the point where it will not make any sense to fragment the hardware market. When we reach this level, a games graphics will not be determined so much by the console's hardware, but rather by the games budget.

The time for this is not as far away as you think. I predict that this will happen no later than 2020. 10 short years from now, everyone will be gaming on one console. And yes, PC gaming will die or change radically to go along with this.

Which hardware company deserves to win the ultimate console war and monopolize the industry. Well, let's look at the big 3 closer.

Nintendo is #1 in sales worldwide and in my opinion they are the top software company in the world. They have truly innovated in this industry and I feel they deserve major credit for their hardware innovations. The always come up with amazing controller designs for example. They invented the standard D-pad with buttons. Then added more buttons. And when gaming went to 3D, they re-invented analog controllers. Their weakness is crappy hardware specs lately, slow to change, terrible online implementation. But they're #1 because amazing software and ground breaking controls is enough.

Sony always creates the most powerful console in the universe. Or at least they try to make it seem this way. To their credit I think they do a great job. They are truly hardware gurus. What I don't like about them is that they put strange processors in their system so that developers will not be able to easily port games from their system to other consoles and as a result they get more exclusives by default. Also their originality hasn't been so good. They have the same controller since the PS1 and everything else they've straight copied from the competition. But I give them credit for huge power and not to mention marketing.

Microsoft is a great software company. I mean aren't most of us typing here using windows? And the truth is they keep getting better. With xbox the hardware is always good but it seems as they struggle in that department. They either lose money on it or we have horrendous reliability. They would be happier if the hardware was already in place like on the PC. MS has great software and they've innovated with this greatly in the console market. Look at what they did with xbox Live. Look at achievements, Live Arcade games, indie games, movies, tv shows, netflix etc. Their software expertise has benefited gaming a great deal.

I'm thinking each console manufacturer should split the business 3 ways. Sony designs the hardware. Nintendo designs the controller. Microsoft builds the software and online network. This would benefit gamers the most IMHO.

I would hate to see any of the current 3 have the entire business to themselves. But if they unite, what would happen to system wars?

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

Avatar image for NaveedLife
NaveedLife

17179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NaveedLife
Member since 2010 • 17179 Posts

Wow. you might wanna rethink what you just said.

Avatar image for VideoGameGuy
VideoGameGuy

7695

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 VideoGameGuy
Member since 2002 • 7695 Posts
i think publishers should just make games that can be played in any console.
Avatar image for Hahadouken
Hahadouken

5546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 Hahadouken
Member since 2009 • 5546 Posts
Well, I think you're wrong, but have at 'er!
Avatar image for deltamirage
deltamirage

559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 deltamirage
Member since 2007 • 559 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner

I think this guy has a more relevant depiction on the future of gaming the the OP does.

Avatar image for myke2010
myke2010

2747

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 myke2010
Member since 2002 • 2747 Posts

So PC gaming will die before consoles? You really think the market will give up a completely open system that does pretty much anything and everything in favor of a single gaming system with fixed hardware? Yeah, I'm going to have to go with a big whopping NO on that one.

Avatar image for Tresca_
Tresca_

869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Tresca_
Member since 2008 • 869 Posts

The time for this is not as far away as you think. I predict that this will happen no later than 2020. 10 short years from now, everyone will be gaming on one console. And yes, PC gaming will die or change radically to go along with this.

alexfla

Seeing anything else in your crystal ball?

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner
im sure this will happen eventually. though i guess your idea sounds kind of cool.
Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner
far more likely... the thought of standardisation of an open platform far more positive and much more likely than a monopoly of a single brand. Hopefully Linux will become a standard of some sort, someday. EDIT: maybe UNIX...
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

so sone day thre will only be one car? one car maker?...ect

in buisness there can never be a singular entity it wont work, there has to be competition for buisness to thrive.

Avatar image for firefluff3
firefluff3

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 firefluff3
Member since 2010 • 2073 Posts

1 Console = bad 1st party games (There wouldn't need to be any console sellers), and you think that pc gaming will die? Come on, it's an open platform, no royalty fees to microsoft, sony or nintento.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

so sone day thre will only be one car? one car maker?...ect

in buisness there can never be a singular entity it wont work, there has to be competition for buisness to thrive.

WilliamRLBaker

yes, but current console gaming is more like there would be separate roads for every brand of car. Imagine owning an Audi and then not being able to drive through BWM highway :)

THat's why I think PC gaming (not necessary WIndows, just general gaming done on personal computing devices) will win in the end. It will be like dvds, one standart, but different competing manufacturers. Altough for that to happen we propably will first need to reach the point where only resources put into development, instead of technology willlimit the graphics quality

Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="WilliamRLBaker"]

so sone day thre will only be one car? one car maker?...ect

in buisness there can never be a singular entity it wont work, there has to be competition for buisness to thrive.

AdrianWerner

yes, but current console gaming is more like there would be separate roads for every brand of car. Imagine owning an Audi and then not being able to drive through BWM highway :)

THat's why I think PC gaming (not necessary WIndows, just general gaming done on personal computing devices) will win in the end. It will be like dvds, one standart, but different competing manufacturers. Altough for that to happen we propably will first need to reach the point where only resources put into development, instead of technology willlimit the graphics quality

actually with as much as the consoles share, its not really like that at all, multiplatform is the same road and they all play it the same it seems. Or drive on it the same. I dont think PC gaming will be the winner, its still the most expensive hobby PC gaming.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
I remember back in the 8-bit days there were very few multiplat games. alexfla
this is just plain wrong,the spectrum 48k,commodore 64 and amstrad 464 (third generation) shared all there games, the megadrive and snes (4th generation) shared most of theres as well, exclusives didn't really become common until the Ps1 (5th generation) with most games being exclusive to the Ps1.
Avatar image for AdjacentLives
AdjacentLives

1173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 AdjacentLives
Member since 2009 • 1173 Posts

Monopolies almost never stay that way for very long, so no, eventually there will not be only one console.

Avatar image for Kane04
Kane04

2115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Kane04
Member since 2006 • 2115 Posts
For the same reason that there's only one movie format. Of course there was the VHS vs Beta war and more recently the HD DVD vs Blu-Ray war. But from the beginning we all knew only one could survive.(...)alexfla
stop reading here. what does have to do with consoles? its a known fact video games are profitable, the business grows every year even if 2 of the 3 stopped making consoles tomorrow others would replace their place for sure. trying to get a slice of the market wouldn't be easy at all with 3 companies already trying to get peoples attention like they are, but if there was only one i bet other electronic companies like samsung maybe would step in trying to get a cut imo there will always be 2~4 different consoles
Avatar image for Valiant_Rebel
Valiant_Rebel

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Valiant_Rebel
Member since 2009 • 4197 Posts

If there is ever a situation where there is only 1 console in the future, pretty much every developer will be all over PC like white on rice. There would be no competition to go against the console which would allow a company of said console to charge any price of the console and their royalty fees. If anything, the prices of games would become insane.

A console monopoly would not help the industry at all. It would basically hurt and diminish the industry. Sony, Nintendo, and Microsoft knows this. I won't say that they are mean or awful to each other, but they know that competition helps the industry. Working together to make a unified console would be outright terrible.

Avatar image for AmayaPapaya
AmayaPapaya

9029

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#20 AmayaPapaya
Member since 2008 • 9029 Posts

I see the industry staying more of the same for awhile. If there every is a crash again, Consoles will be the first to die. The last remaining would most likely be Handhelds and PCs, and at a much smaller and weak state than before.

Avatar image for Dogswithguns
Dogswithguns

11359

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#21 Dogswithguns
Member since 2007 • 11359 Posts
Won't happen. either Pepsi or Coke of choice.
Avatar image for AmnesiaHaze
AmnesiaHaze

5685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 AmnesiaHaze
Member since 2008 • 5685 Posts
[QUOTE="alexfla"]I remember back in the 8-bit days there were very few multiplat games. delta3074
this is just plain wrong,the spectrum 48k,commodore 64 and amstrad 464 (third generation) shared all there games, the megadrive and snes (4th generation) shared most of theres as well, exclusives didn't really become common until the Ps1 (5th generation) with most games being exclusive to the Ps1.

yeah thats not true ,i remember it was more like everything was multiplat except sonic & mario
Avatar image for reveiwer
reveiwer

650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 reveiwer
Member since 2008 • 650 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner
thats sounds like an evolved version of google tv
Avatar image for Beautifulpimp
Beautifulpimp

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Beautifulpimp
Member since 2010 • 187 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner
lol that made me laugh
Avatar image for Elian2530
Elian2530

3658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 Elian2530
Member since 2009 • 3658 Posts

so sone day thre will only be one car? one car maker?...ect

in buisness there can never be a singular entity it wont work, there has to be competition for buisness to thrive.

WilliamRLBaker
Except Gamestop. Gamestop rules all. Sadly..
Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#26 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

actually with as much as the consoles share, its not really like that at all, multiplatform is the same road and they all play it the same it seems. Or drive on it the same. I dont think PC gaming will be the winner, its still the most expensive hobby PC gaming.WilliamRLBaker
You still have to separare your game into multiple platforms though. And really...Facebook is propably the biggest gaming platform nowadays. The moment we reach the tech level required for close to photorealisitc graphics might spell the doom for any dedicated gaming device

Avatar image for TheEroica
TheEroica

24447

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 TheEroica  Moderator
Member since 2009 • 24447 Posts

I know how all you system wars folk get v ery polorized on this topic and very passionate about how it'll never be a once console future, but I hate to tell you that it basically already is. Ps3 and 360 are basically the exact same thing. they share 95% of their game libraries and a similar online service yet you feel justified in buying both consoles. Sony and MS are laughing at you all the way to the bank.

Avatar image for sam_nintendo
sam_nintendo

2066

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 sam_nintendo
Member since 2005 • 2066 Posts
I have one reason that trumps all of yours: capitalism. These companies are in it for money, and one console means less buying.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62030 Posts

What was the reason for PC gaming dying off or radically changing. It may just be me, but you seemed to breeze over it without offering any arguments as to the cause. Seems like you were stating it out of necessity to your argument, rather than based off actual occurrences.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#30 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

You really want a market with zero competition?

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts

There won't, for the same reason there's more than one fast food franchise.

Avatar image for CentricStorm
CentricStorm

337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 CentricStorm
Member since 2010 • 337 Posts
Eventually all gaming will be done on a single device, something along the lines of a futuristic PC. Although it is unknown whether or not the market will be streaming audio/video from a supercomputer server to this futuristic PC, or streaming game data to run on the extremely powerful future home computer, what we do know is that while there will be only one device, the PC, there will be hardware competition between developers/manufacturers. There will be also be competition between service providers who will all try and deliver the game data or game stream the best; whether this means the fastest, or with exclusives to this service provider, or enhanced features/streamling, is another unknown.
Avatar image for monson21502
monson21502

8230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 monson21502
Member since 2009 • 8230 Posts

wishfull thinking, but no chance.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18255 Posts
no. it would be a disaster and its in none of the current makers interests to do that...so there not going to do it. what is more likely is we will see a one standard/many console market like the DVD/plu-ray player market. neither sony nor MS or ninty will push this but i think at some point 3rd parties are going to put the foot down and say "you console has to have XYZ and have A level of performance and implement certain APIs. if it doesnt then we wont support it". as we now know....its 3rd parties that hold most of the cards now so they can do this. 3rd parties have no vested interest in particular hardware and they dont want to go 50 rounds with strange hardware to batter it into behaving (which just wastes time and money). most just want to make games. not even engines..they can buy those.....they just want to make games.
Avatar image for Nintendo_Ownes7
Nintendo_Ownes7

30973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#35 Nintendo_Ownes7
Member since 2005 • 30973 Posts

There might be only one dominant movie format but there are multiple companies who make the same product in this case it is a DVD Player or Blu-ray Player.

That is what keeps cost down is the companies making the products lowering the prices to compete in the same market.

There will always be more then one console just like there is always going to be more then one company making the devices that we play the movie formats in.

Avatar image for alextherussian
alextherussian

2642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 alextherussian
Member since 2009 • 2642 Posts
Eventually personal hardware will die and complete internet connectivity replaces every form of media.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#37 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
I kinda agree, consoles have become to similar its almost pointless to keep being rivals, plus budgets these days are causing multi-millions to be lost so by combining efforts of sony and xbox then you get the ultimate machine that makes sense... Still rivals are rivals and don't want this sort of thing.
Avatar image for gamecubepad
gamecubepad

7214

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -12

User Lists: 0

#38 gamecubepad
Member since 2003 • 7214 Posts

If there's still profit to be had from selling consoles, and exclusive games, controls, and content to got with it, why would companies stop selling them?

Consoles in 2020...

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
You should look in to real object scanning. It's only in it's infancy but when it's fully developed it will make a high res 3D model from a real item in just a few minutes. Crytek also used real texture mapping by taking pictures of real objects against a blue screen and extracting them to put into Crysis.
Avatar image for menes777
menes777

2643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 menes777
Member since 2003 • 2643 Posts

[QUOTE="alexfla"]I remember back in the 8-bit days there were very few multiplat games. delta3074
this is just plain wrong,the spectrum 48k,commodore 64 and amstrad 464 (third generation) shared all there games, the megadrive and snes (4th generation) shared most of theres as well, exclusives didn't really become common until the Ps1 (5th generation) with most games being exclusive to the Ps1.

I wouldn't say common until PS1. Remember when the Final Fantasy series was exclusive to only Nintendo systems? The same as Phantasy Star was the Genesis' RPG line. If you wanted to play Mario you pretty much had to go Nintendo and if you wanted Sonic it was Sega. I agree there were plenty of multi-plats going on but there were also exclusive lines as well.

Avatar image for AdobeArtist
AdobeArtist

25184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 AdobeArtist  Moderator
Member since 2006 • 25184 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner

I once postulated, quite a long time back, that consoles would evolve to the point of eventually becoming brand name Gaming PCs, much like Alienware. That a future Playstation wouldn't just play games and media, but have full PC capability to install and run any software, from office suites, to Photoshop, to web and video development apps, and so on. This line of thought coming from seeing how far consoles have come and how many PC features they adopted over the generations.

However.... yes there's a however here; the idea of a no console future where all gaming is on PC still needs to address a very important fact of why there's a console market in the first place - simplicity & cost.

If all gaming is on PCs only, could it be offered on low cost machines with the simplicity of consoles? I'm talking simple to no set up, game installations that are automated like what consoles have today, and cost of $400 or less for pre-built store bought brands (that can still run any app as expected from PCs), as there will always be people who just don't want to build their own electronics setup. Since PCs aren't uniform hardware like consoles, we need to address that games can't be automaitically assumed to run on one person's given system, where the console market offered assurance to just buy a game and know it will run.

Avatar image for CAPSROGUE
CAPSROGUE

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 CAPSROGUE
Member since 2008 • 863 Posts

No, eventually console gaming will die and will be replaced by pcgaming, which will evolve to cover also media centers. And most likely games will be streamed through web browsers, making them independent from the hardware and OSes, so you will be able to see play the same game on your PC, on your TV, on your tablet and phone.

AdrianWerner

I partially agree. Although OnLive and other streaming services will have their place I think that most would much rather stream games from our OWN [Insert PC/Console/Device] instead of paying a hefty monthly fee for a streaming service with a range of drawbacks.

My guess is that Microsoft will be the first to bring the software that would make this possible to the market to counter OnLive aswell as other streaming services that could - potentially - pose a threat to the XBOX platform and to a lesser extent Windows.

Avatar image for gundaicut
gundaicut

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 gundaicut
Member since 2010 • 456 Posts
well it started off with pc gaming but pc gaming died with the newer gen consoles at the end i think microsoft would be the last 1 standing
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts

No this will never happen because of one thing competition.

Avatar image for alexfla
alexfla

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 alexfla
Member since 2010 • 393 Posts

so sone day thre will only be one car? one car maker?...ect

in buisness there can never be a singular entity it wont work, there has to be competition for buisness to thrive.

WilliamRLBaker



The difference is that the PS3 and 360 share over 95% of their software. When their life cycles increase to over 20 years as is the case with movie formats today, it will be ridiculous to for both consoles to exist with mostly the same games. If you add Nintendo then there would be the same game copied 3 times for greater than 20 year cycles.

That does not work and will not happen.

Avatar image for lamprey263
lamprey263

45444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#46 lamprey263
Member since 2006 • 45444 Posts

competition between console makers has yielded good things, except for maybe the attention grabbing gimmicky things, but Microsoft started an arms race with Sony and this generation we saw some powerful consoles hit the shelves with impressive exclusives and as a result 3rd party publishers and developers can also take advantage of the hardware, competition meant Microsoft streamlining online console multiplayer, downloadable games, Netflix, friends list and party chat, DLC... fair to say, Sony is trying to follow to keep up and these features will probably remain standard on next gen consoles, thuswhat competition yielded

think if MS had not been in this race, where would we be, I can say for certain the PS3 wouldn't have been developed as advance as it was to compete with the Xbox 360, rather it would have been developed to just be better than the Wii which wouldn't have been hard at all, if we had a one console system there'd be no desire to put advanced hardware in these machines, no desire to launch new consoles to compete with others

if anything a one console maker system would be an anti-capitalistic monopoly and surely lawsuits would arise

publishers have a lot to gain too, with different systems suiting different tastes the userbase for both is really big and multiplatform sales have had a good chance to take advantage of the large combined userbase, but they're also able to exploit the console fanboy area, for instance fanboys jump on exclusives all the time, all one publisher has to do is be like "we're going to make an exclusive for this system because it's the best" and fanboys are like "haaaa, this is going to rock I'm sooo going to get this", and they will even if it's a piece of crap because the publisher learned how to touch a nerve that yields loyalty to their product

Avatar image for alexfla
alexfla

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 alexfla
Member since 2010 • 393 Posts

1 Console = bad 1st party games (There wouldn't need to be any console sellers), and you think that pc gaming will die? Come on, it's an open platform, no royalty fees to microsoft, sony or nintento.

firefluff3



1 movie format equals bad 1st party movies, right? There wouldn't be any need for Blu-ray or DVD player sellers, right?

Avatar image for alexfla
alexfla

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 alexfla
Member since 2010 • 393 Posts

[QUOTE="alexfla"]I remember back in the 8-bit days there were very few multiplat games. delta3074
this is just plain wrong,the spectrum 48k,commodore 64 and amstrad 464 (third generation) shared all there games, the megadrive and snes (4th generation) shared most of theres as well, exclusives didn't really become common until the Ps1 (5th generation) with most games being exclusive to the Ps1.



Let's start with NES vs Master System. Out of THOUSANDS OF GAMES, there were like 5 multiplats.

SNES vs Genesis, there were a lot of multiplats but it was maybe 30% of games were multiplat. Most games were exclusives.

PS1 we went back to exclusives because the Saturn was such a failure so it didn't make sense to port the games to the Saturn. When the generation started there were a lot of multiplats between saturn and PS1. The N64 was completely different and pretty much everything on it was exclusive.

Avatar image for edo-tensei
edo-tensei

4581

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 edo-tensei
Member since 2007 • 4581 Posts

i sure hope it happens, just to see sw be turned into publisher wars :|

Avatar image for alexfla
alexfla

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 alexfla
Member since 2010 • 393 Posts

[QUOTE="alexfla"]For the same reason that there's only one movie format. Of course there was the VHS vs Beta war and more recently the HD DVD vs Blu-Ray war. But from the beginning we all knew only one could survive.(...)Kane04
stop reading here. what does have to do with consoles? its a known fact video games are profitable, the business grows every year even if 2 of the 3 stopped making consoles tomorrow others would replace their place for sure. trying to get a slice of the market wouldn't be easy at all with 3 companies already trying to get peoples attention like they are, but if there was only one i bet other electronic companies like samsung maybe would step in trying to get a cut imo there will always be 2~4 different consoles



The problem is you're thinking console generations will always last 5 years. Imagine 20+ year console generations. That will be reality by 2020.