Excuse me but when was COD5 confirmed for WWII or being made by Treyarch?

Modern would be cool, WWIII modern would be super cool.wemhim

A battle for New York city would be a cool level in a WW3 game.

id like Call of Duty: The Crusades.

or Call of Duty: Shogun warfare.

or Call of Duty: Roman Warfare.

[QUOTE="wemhim"]Modern would be cool, WWIII modern would be super cool.Stabby2486

A battle for New York city would be a cool level in a WW3 game.

It doesn't make sense?

Handing over a series to another dev while you are making the "actual" sequel so you can make more money makes perfect sense. They are making COD like madden and releasing a game every year with the same gameplay.

I don't know who is worse; Ubisoft, EA, or Activision?

iw has made what cod1, cod2, cod4.

but activision likes to milk the series and iw doesnt want to make a game every year. so activision hired treyarch to make the game also for milking fun. treyarch made cod3 and cod big red one i believe. not sure on all that but basically this is what happens. and its not new news this is very old news since like cod2 was finished.

It doesn't make sense?

Handing over a series to another dev while you are making the "actual" sequel so you can make more money makes perfect sense. They are making COD like madden and releasing a game every year with the same gameplay.

I don't know who is worse; Ubisoft, EA, or Activision?

II-FBIsniper-II

[QUOTE="Stabby2486"]

[QUOTE="wemhim"]Modern would be cool, WWIII modern would be super cool.wemhim

A battle for New York city would be a cool level in a WW3 game.

A part with the Empire State Building would cool, where you start as Mark 19 gunner circling the building, then you start fighting floor to floor, with parts where you're a sniper providing support for units on the ground and where you can direct artillery, mortars, and airstrikes. I think a cool moment would be when you're so high the flares deploy level with the floor you're on and you're able to see shadows cast by enemies next to the windows.

id like Call of Duty: The Crusades.

or Call of Duty: Shogun warfare.

or Call of Duty: Roman Warfare.

WARxSnake

Don't forget Call of Duty: Assault of Troy. That would be epic.

[QUOTE="wemhim"][QUOTE="Stabby2486"]

[QUOTE="wemhim"]Modern would be cool, WWIII modern would be super cool.Stabby2486

A battle for New York city would be a cool level in a WW3 game.

A part with the Empire State Building would cool, where you start as Mark 19 gunner circling the building, then you start fighting floor to floor, with parts where you're a sniper providing support for units on the ground and where you can direct artillery, mortars, and airstrikes. I think a cool moment would be when you're so high the flares deploy level with the floor you're on and you're able to see shadows cast by enemies next to the windows.

IW has a policy about making games , they believe that a great game cannot be made in 1 year but takes about 2-3 years. which is the case with cod1(2003)-cod2(2005)-cod4(2007), while treyarch makes the lame console spinoffs- big red one, cod3 etc.

and im NOT making this stuff up, it was said by IW themselves

It doesn't make sense?

Handing over a series to another dev while you are making the "actual" sequel so you can make more money makes perfect sense. They are making COD like madden and releasing a game every year with the same gameplay.

I don't know who is worse; Ubisoft, EA, or Activision?

II-FBIsniper-II

[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]

It doesn't make sense?

Handing over a series to another dev while you are making the "actual" sequel so you can make more money makes perfect sense. They are making COD like madden and releasing a game every year with the same gameplay.

I don't know who is worse; Ubisoft, EA, or Activision?

club-sandwich

I'm not saying i don't believe but so far all i've seen is speculation we all know that Treyarch is making a game but were speculating that it's COD5 which seems odd. why would IW after having the biggest success ever hand over the next installment, that will have big shoes to fill, to a mediocore dev team. and why after so man WWII games and having COD4 being in the present go back to WWII? all of this just doesn't make sense and until i hear it from activion or IW i'm not believing itRagashahs

Its because Treyarch is making a direct sequal to COD3 with the same technology, they dont have time to trash everything and start from scratch. IW is making the sequal to COD4.

That'd be an awesome game, especially next gen, or for the PC of course. It could be an entire game even(In NYC I mean), NYC is huge with lots of diversity, Harlem to east Manhattan, not enough urban warfare in games, exterior and interior. Having civilians would be really exciting too, especially if they're allies(Assuming you're allied with the USA, or ARE the USA), which means protection(You protecting them....).
poster

They could also do a scenario where China goes on the offense and they attack Malaysia and NATO fights backs and fighting takes place at the Petronas Towers which are 2 of the tallest buildings in the world which are right next to each other with a bridge linking them together.

[QUOTE="poster"]That'd be an awesome game, especially next gen, or for the PC of course. It could be an entire game even(In NYC I mean), NYC is huge with lots of diversity, Harlem to east Manhattan, not enough urban warfare in games, exterior and interior. Having civilians would be really exciting too, especially if they're allies(Assuming you're allied with the USA, or ARE the USA), which means protection(You protecting them....).
Stabby2486

They could also do a scenario where China goes on the offense and they attack Malaysia and NATO fights backs and fighting takes place at the Petronas Towers which are 2 of the tallest buildings in the world which are right next to each other with a bridge linking them together.

Thank-you. There is not one link on the net that confirms that Tretarch is making CoD5, that IW is NOT making CoD5, or that CoD5 is even a WWII game.

I don't know why people are jumping to conclusions here.

Thank-you. There is not one link on the net that confirms that Tretarch is making CoD5, that IW is NOT making CoD5, or that CoD5 is even a WWII game.

I don't know why people are jumping to conclusions here.

goblaa

actually there was a story on it but no one has bothered to link it yet...including myself...

[QUOTE="goblaa"]

Thank-you. There is not one link on the net that confirms that Tretarch is making CoD5, that IW is NOT making CoD5, or that CoD5 is even a WWII game.

I don't know why people are jumping to conclusions here.

blues3531

actually there was a story on it but no one has bothered to link it yet...including myself...

[QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="goblaa"]

Thank-you. There is not one link on the net that confirms that Tretarch is making CoD5, that IW is NOT making CoD5, or that CoD5 is even a WWII game.

I don't know why people are jumping to conclusions here.

Ragashahs

actually there was a story on it but no one has bothered to link it yet...including myself...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/rumor/call-of-duty-5-heading-for-the-pacific-331754.php

best I could find.

Treyarch is definately making CoD5, as stated on the official forums for CoD4 by moderators and IW employees. CoD5 will in fact be set back in WWII, but to be honest, if IW isn't making it, I could care less. I rented CoD3 and thought it was terrible. Don't expect the next Call of Duty to be anything as good as CoD4.

Oh and for fellow PC Gamers, Treyarch is making a PC version, which will release with the 360/PS3 versions. I don't know any PC Gamers that are looking forward to a Call of Duty that isn't made by IW though. This is meh all the way around for me.

Bah, the CoD games (Yes, even the good "IW" ones) are getting milked like hell just so Activision can compete with EA. I hope Treyarch can keep the same quality as the IW CoDs, because I want IW to start a new series without being nagged by Activision to keep people on the CoD series. Face it, the only move forward they made in CoD4 was shooting through walls - and that's pretty minor. I feel less compelled to buy any CoD games - unless they put something really new in them.

I hope to god that COD5 stays with the modern Warfare theme cause WW2 is gettin real old. I wouldnt mind if it went futuristic a bit.comptonst

hehehe, I agree though, Modern Warfare was the **** !

[QUOTE="Ragashahs"][QUOTE="blues3531"][QUOTE="goblaa"]

Thank-you. There is not one link on the net that confirms that Tretarch is making CoD5, that IW is NOT making CoD5, or that CoD5 is even a WWII game.

I don't know why people are jumping to conclusions here.

Wartzay

actually there was a story on it but no one has bothered to link it yet...including myself...

http://kotaku.com/gaming/rumor/call-of-duty-5-heading-for-the-pacific-331754.php

best I could find.

"While (if true) the move back to well-worn WWII is mostly disappointing, if this game can branch out and explore some of the less "popular" aspects of the conflict (China, Burma, New Guinea), it might not be so bad."

if this was confirmed why the if true part?