Don't care much for what engine is being used... Performance is an issue with every Bethesda rpg, so that concerns me, but mostly I'm looking for a fallout designed around the hardware in 2015. Not the hardware in 2005
I think it looks great -- my only disappointment is that Obsidian isn't at the helm. The did an almost perfect work with Fallout: New Vegas. Fallout 3 wasn't even close.
@magicalclick: They showed Bethesda how to make a proper Fallout game with New Vegas. They're more fit to take the helm, because they'll actually do something substantial with it.
I would've guessed that the Void Engine would've been the answer to some limitations, but seeing that it's only been two years since Bethesda made that trademark, i'm a bit worried that it'll run on Skyrim's engine because I really don't think that it only took two years for Bethesda to learn id Tech 5, modify it to fit their needs, and have enough assets ready for a trailer.
Not going to lie, when I first saw the visuals I didn't know what the **** to think... If the engine has worked in the past though they might as well save some money and use it again. With some of the great looking engines out there though, it just shows how afraid companies are to take risks now a days, play it safe, people will still buy the game and I mean a lot of people..
They are thinking pure profit here and nothing more...Personally I think the Fallout series is starting to get stale and they need to be careful here.
This will probably mark when I get a new PC build. I really don't want to play a Bethesda game on consoles. Looks good enough to me and I'm sure it will be great, love the universe they have made around Fallout and I can only imagine how massive it will be with loads of great DLC to follow.
That was embarrassing, 2013 lighting, 2012 textures, 2001 animations. Bethesda are just a terrible company, they really are. I look forward to not paying for this game.
Naw the problem is when devs cave to a few elitest and blow their budget on some super high tech engine just to polish a couple of rocks... and leave a game world stale and lacking content...
Look at FF... did everything you asked, but haters still gone hate due to lack of content.... and by the time they were used to the programming, they were 3 games deep and people were bored of the world... but I already discussed this in my earlier post on 1st page
Game looks good enough to me, we haven't even seen any gameplay. I'll reserve my judgement until after E3. Who knows, maybe the world will be filled with survivors, all moving, interacting with one another, a hustling,bustling ecosystem of scum and villainy. There's got to be something that makes this a 2015 game right?
Game looks good enough to me, we haven't even seen any gameplay. I'll reserve my judgement until after E3. Who knows, maybe the world will be filled with survivors, all moving, interacting with one another, a hustling,bustling ecosystem of scum and villainy. There's got to be something that makes this a 2015 game right?
GTAV was good enough. This should at least be close to Witcher3/ACUnity. Not worse than GTAV.
Not going to lie, when I first saw the visuals I didn't know what the **** to think... If the engine has worked in the past though they might as well save some money and use it again. With some of the great looking engines out there though, it just shows how afraid companies are to take risks now a days, play it safe, people will still buy the game and I mean a lot of people..
They are thinking pure profit here and nothing more...Personally I think the Fallout series is starting to get stale and they need to be careful here.
what do you mean you didn't know what to think? DID IT LOOK GOOD OR BAD? things can't look like i dunno what im seeing did it look good or not bro
what im gathering is from the masses is everyones gonna buy this game, they all like it but it looks like shit and ppl are calling em out on it
so i mean its gonna be hit, its gonna be fun but it looks really bad
T othe people shitting about the graphics - they're fine. The game is open world, has probably tons of missions to do and an awesome story. Time to enjoy games more peeps.
@speedfog: the problem isn't the graphics, it never has been with Bethesda. The problem is the shitty animations, it's embarrassing. That dog running... are you kidding me? No chance in hell I'm paying for a game with animations that look like that.
It's 100% immersion breaking. Bethesda are infamous for having terrible animations, nothing has changed. Not buying the game, not supporting archaic game developers that can't even make a dog run properly.
@speedfog: the problem isn't the graphics, it never has been with Bethesda. The problem is the shitty animations, it's embarrassing. That dog running... are you kidding me? No chance in hell I'm paying for a game with animations that look like that.
It's 100% immersion breaking. Bethesda are infamous for having terrible animations, nothing has changed. Not buying the game, not supporting archaic game developers that can't even make a dog run properly.
The graphics suck balls as well; the game's varied and vibrant color palette and its retro-futuristic character designs are cool, but its flat textures and boxy object-shapes are below standard.
The only thing I need is for my NPCs not to walk off the map... and be where they are suppose to be. IF they can make this happen, in addition to making it look as good as the trailer... then that will be a significant improvement.
Log in to comment