FAR CRY 2-Good news for PC and BAD for consoles...

I want to thanks GenTom for posting this.....

LINK

Bad for consoles?

they still look great in their own regards, just not as good as PC. why are hermits so obsessed about graphics?

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

Is anyone suprised?The PC version at at max will more than likely destroy the console versions.

But even more interestingly,ANOTHER multiplat that is superior on the 360,if the preview is to be believed.

Who didn't see this coming? HOnestly.Vandalvideo

a blind guy?

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Who didn't see this coming? HOnestly.Franko_3

a blind guy?

:lol:

I see no lies here and neither does the blind guy.

Ah well, it will still be a great game for all platforms.

Far cry 2? Who cares? First one wasn't that great, second one does look like it has some new stuff. But it's a rent at most for me

Far cry 2? Who cares? First one wasn't that great, second one does look like it has some new stuff. But it's a rent at most for me

Aerosmith_Lova

so? this isn't even something to brag about anymore. it's so obvious. a few differences in graphics? not stopping me from getting whichever version I want :roll:

Obviously it looks better on a high end PC ..DUH ...

Gosh Eurogamer is so dumb ...they shouldnt be allowed to play games , let alone review them.

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

-GhostMLD-

I'm sure thats what they do ... and that was the purpose of Crysis.

[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

AtrumRegina

I'm sure thats what they do ... and that was the purpose of Crysis.

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

Vandalvideo

I'm sure thats what they do ... and that was the purpose of Crysis.

yet it couldn't hold my attention for more than one playthrough. even with big levels and environments, it didn't do it for me. it only accounts for the first half of the game anyways since the second half was much more linear. the aliens just ruined it for me.

yet it couldn't hold my attention for more than one playthrough. even with big levels and environments, it didn't do it for me. it only accounts for the first half of the game anyways since the second half was much more linear. the aliens just ruined it for me. bulletsword

I want to thanks GenTom for posting this.....

LINK

marinosapollon

Bad for consoles?

they still look great in their own regards, just not as good as PC. why are hermits so obsessed about graphics?

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

-GhostMLD-

Consolites (like you) are far more obsessed with graphics. For every PC graphic related thread, there's 10 console graphic related threads.

There's always PS3 vs 360 graphic comparison threads.....you guys are obsessed with fighting for 2nd place. I don't get it.

[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

Bad for consoles?

they still look great in their own regards, just not as good as PC. why are hermits so obsessed about graphics?

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

mudman91878

Consolites (like you) are far more obsessed with graphics. For every PC graphic related thread, there's 10 console graphic related threads.

There's always PS3 vs 360 graphic comparison threads.....you guys are obsessed with fighting for 2nd place. I don't get it.

what do you expect? when it comes to graphics, the PS3 and 360 are the only two in the same league

"Far Cry 2 is also a beautiful game, at least on PC. Clever shading based on layers not textures means the game can scale to your PC, and the powerful demonstration machine displayed a crisp, sun-drenched, coherent and detailed landscape; one both functional and flattering, given the decision to all but scrap a HUD. Requirements will be typically lower than bitter rival Crysis, we're told, but Far Cry 2 will happily get the most out of even the most monstrous rig. Redding describes the console versions as comparable to a "medium load-out on PC", and warns us that, "graphically you're going to notice slight differences". Which we did. The Xbox 360 was the better of the two with its anti-aliasing, but both looked unspectacular and even drab in points. Far from ugly, mind you."

What the fook is up with this? d:

Far cry 2? Who cares? First one wasn't that great, second one does look like it has some new stuff. But it's a rent at most for me

Aerosmith_Lova

This thread was already created today, it is a duplicate thread...moderators.

Thats, duplicate thread

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/duplicate

du·pli·cate (dpl-kt, dy-) adj. 1. Identically copied from an original. 2. Existing or growing in two corresponding parts; double. 3. Denoting a manner of play in cards in which partnerships or teams play the same deals and compare scores at the end: duplicate bridge. n. 1. An identical copy; a facsimile. 2. One that corresponds exactly to another, especially an original. 3. Games A card game in which partnerships or teams play the same deals and compare scores at the end. v. (-kt) du·pli·cat·ed, du·pli·cat·ing, du·pli·cates v.tr. 1. To make an exact copy of. 2. To make twofold; double. 3. To make or perform again; repeat: a hard feat to duplicate. v.intr. To become duplicate.

Bad for consoles?

they still look great in their own regards, just not as good as PC. why are hermits so obsessed about graphics?

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

-GhostMLD-

Well it's not like there weren't any threads about Gears of War 2 vs Drakes Fortune. :roll:

Also, WoW and the Sims------------ DESTROY!!!!!!!!!------------ your piss poor abortion of an assumption. :lol:

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="AtrumRegina"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

bulletsword

I'm sure thats what they do ... and that was the purpose of Crysis.

yet it couldn't hold my attention for more than one playthrough. even with big levels and environments, it didn't do it for me. it only accounts for the first half of the game anyways since the second half was much more linear. the aliens just ruined it for me.

ever heard of the drug...ritalin?

[QUOTE="marinosapollon"]

I want to thanks GenTom for posting this.....

LINK

Cipher92

No, the multiplats (quake 4, COD2) looked worse on 360 than a high end PC, and FEAR was considered the best looking game at the time which was released a year later on the 360.

Back on topic though... I dont think anyone one was naive enough to actualy think the game would look "equal" especialy when PC's can drasticaly increase AA/AF and resolution of the game.

Hermits are the only group in system wars not allowed to brag about graphics! You know why?

It hurts the feelings of consolites lol :P

On a serious note, I do agree with those who say this was no big surprise. At this stage in the console cycle, and multiplat is going to be drastically better looking on a pc on higher settings. Thats why, with such cheap high end cards out now, its a good time to be a hermit.

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

Vandalvideo

I'm sure thats what they do ... and that was the purpose of Crysis.

Didn't Far Cry 1 do that . Or S.T.A.L.K.E.R ?

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="AtrumRegina"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

Do you admire your graphics card more then actually playing games?

AtrumRegina

I'm sure thats what they do ... and that was the purpose of Crysis.

Didn't Far Cry 1 do that . Or S.T.A.L.K.E.R ?

Yes, Farcry had big open environments for the time and Crysis takes it further. Can't remember the name of the level where you're fighting a huge battle against the Koreans and you have to take down the AA guns but there is a whole battle going on and you can go about your mission anyway you want.

Stalker isn't as open world as I thought it was going to be. It's zoned off.

Crysis isn't completely open world, it is based on levels, its just that the levels are sooo huge.