Farcry vs. Half-Life 2 vs. Halo 2 vs. Killzone vs. Doom 3

Half Life 2. Easily. It was everything a sequel should be and a benchmark for computer gaming.

Farcry was an amazing first effort, Crysis looks to build upon it as HL2 did for it's origional.

Doom 3 was an amazing experience, worth one play through and zero time for the multiplayer.

Killzone was too hyped for what it was. I liked it, but I really didn't buy into it like other people. It was a solid FPS.

Halo 2 was probibly the biggest let down out of them all for me. It really didn't bring anything new to the table in single player, except dual wield. Playing as the covenant was not fun. I want Master Chief or no body. Certainly better than Killzone, and alot of other FPSs but it sold well because of Halo 1, not because it was the best game ever. Multiplayer was excellent, but not quite up to Counter Strike level of awesome.

Although Half Life 2 was an innovative title, I somehow enjoyed Halo 2 more. Overall - mainly due to multiplayer - I came away from Halo 2 with a greater sense of satisfaction.

How does Killzone always end up on one of these lists?DaysAirlines