Favorite Call of Duty

What Is Your Favorite Call of Duty?

My Favorite is Call of Duty 2

COD, COD2, and COD4 were all great.

I will say COD2 for now...but COD4 was really enjoyable.

The original on PC is hands down my favorite.

MoH:AA ;)PBSnipes

Best MoH ever....

MoH:AA ;)PBSnipes

COD1

It destroys 2, and is better than 4.

Been playing COD since the first was released.

Now the series seems to be going down the path of Medal of Honor.

COD1

It destroys 2, and is better than 4.

Been playing COD since the first was released.

Now the series seems to be going down the path of Medal of Honor.

skrat_01

Which is ironic.

P.S. Call of Duty is also my favorite.

Which is ironic.

P.S. Call of Duty is also my favorite.

Locke562

The Iward guys are post MoH AA guys... Yikes....

Single play : CoD1 + UO

Multiplayer: CoD2

Who in their right mind would be BRO instead of United Offensive?

Anyway, the first one for me. A lot more punishing and immersive.

cod2, though i never played the original.

Loving the love for cod3 right now :lol:

I should get United Offensive sometime. >.>

Anyways, the first Call of Duty is my favourite of all that I've played (And the only other one that I haven't played is Big Red One mind you.). Unlike the other entries in the series, enemies didn't respawn and you didn't have regenerating health. Because of that, there wasn't any 'trench warfare' where you could sit in the same spot for an hour and not go anywhere. The first also has my favourite missions in the series, namely the crossing of the Volga River, the charge into Stalingrad, and the capture of Berlin.

big red one i liked ........ps3wizard45

Woo, me too. I played that game over and over again, it was great fun just killing people, that's what makes an FPS's singleplayer enjoyable, not scripted events that you know will happen everytime, but how fun it is to shoot people. If you shot everyone and they just disappeared it'd suck but if you shoot them and the bleed and flop everywhere it's fun.

CoD4

Cod2 is not bad at all though. I prefer the modern stting I guess

COD1 on PC

COD4 on 360

The original on PC is hands down my favorite.

Puckhog04

COD1 made WW2 games cool again. Probably the best IMO singleplayer wise.

United Offence was excellent

But NOTHING beats CoD2, the SP is easily the best in the series, CoD4 had a terrible SP

All of them are great but the story is too short.lesner87

Six years is pretty long if you ask me. :P

All of them are great but the story is too short.lesner87

Full lenghty American, British and Russian campaigns plus the 3 large final missions.

Far longer than all the predacessors.

Tie between the first and last. Back in 2002 it was all very wow and impressive. Call of Duty 4 feels sort of like the culmination of that type of game design, it has cool scenarios and is well-scripted and all that. But it's starting to feel a bit stale.

Everything inbetween those two games are fail as far as I'm concerned.

Tie between the first and last. Back in 2002 it was all very wow and impressive. Call of Duty 4 feels sort of like the culmination of that type of game design, it has cool scenarios and is well-scripted and all that. But it's starting to feel a bit stale.

Everything inbetween those two games are fail as far as I'm concerned.

InsaneBasura

Tie between the first and last. Back in 2002 it was all very wow and impressive. Call of Duty 4 feels sort of like the culmination of that type of game design, it has cool scenarios and is well-scripted and all that. But it's starting to feel a bit stale.

Everything inbetween those two games are fail as far as I'm concerned.

InsaneBasura

COD2 felt like two steps backwards from COD1 - it lacked the intensity, memorable scenarios, and climax of the first. It was not epic at all. The recharge health system sapped away any threat of dying or keeping on your toes.

COD3 was just meh. Worse singleplayer than the other two, worse multiplayer than the other two, even though it was attempting to do what United Offensive did far better.

COD4 my thoughts are pretty much the same. Its good, of course, has some cool moments... but the game design is being stretched beyond beleif, and it feels far more like a cinematic rails shooter... or interactive movie, than a war game like COD1. Its multiplayer was good, but take away the perks system and it was nothing very fresh. Im still wondering how I put 30 hours into mp.

The COD franchise is heading down the path of medal of honour. Smack into mega popularity, with mediocre titles compared to the original being whipped out on the same template - difference is Iward changed time frames to keep it 'fresh'.

[QUOTE="InsaneBasura"]

Tie between the first and last. Back in 2002 it was all very wow and impressive. Call of Duty 4 feels sort of like the culmination of that type of game design, it has cool scenarios and is well-scripted and all that. But it's starting to feel a bit stale.

Everything inbetween those two games are fail as far as I'm concerned.

skrat_01

COD2 felt like two steps backwards from COD1 - it lacked the intensity, memorable scenarios, and climax of the first. It was not epic at all. The recharge health system sapped away any threat of dying or keeping on your toes.

COD3 was just meh. Worse singleplayer than the other two, worse multiplayer than the other two, even though it was attempting to do what United Offensive did far better.

COD4 my thoughts are pretty much the same. Its good, of course, has some cool moments... but the game design is being stretched beyond beleif, and it feels far more like a cinematic rails shooter... or interactive movie, than a war game like COD1. Its multiplayer was good, but take away the perks system and it was nothing very fresh. Im still wondering how I put 30 hours into mp.

The COD franchise is heading down the path of medal of honour. Smack into mega popularity, with mediocre titles compared to the original being whipped out on the same template - difference is Iward changed time frames to keep it 'fresh'.

[QUOTE="skrat_01"][QUOTE="InsaneBasura"]

Tie between the first and last. Back in 2002 it was all very wow and impressive. Call of Duty 4 feels sort of like the culmination of that type of game design, it has cool scenarios and is well-scripted and all that. But it's starting to feel a bit stale.

Everything inbetween those two games are fail as far as I'm concerned.

FirstDiscovery

COD2 felt like two steps backwards from COD1 - it lacked the intensity, memorable scenarios, and climax of the first. It was not epic at all. The recharge health system sapped away any threat of dying or keeping on your toes.

COD3 was just meh. Worse singleplayer than the other two, worse multiplayer than the other two, even though it was attempting to do what United Offensive did far better.

COD4 my thoughts are pretty much the same. Its good, of course, has some cool moments... but the game design is being stretched beyond beleif, and it feels far more like a cinematic rails shooter... or interactive movie, than a war game like COD1. Its multiplayer was good, but take away the perks system and it was nothing very fresh. Im still wondering how I put 30 hours into mp.

The COD franchise is heading down the path of medal of honour. Smack into mega popularity, with mediocre titles compared to the original being whipped out on the same template - difference is Iward changed time frames to keep it 'fresh'.

CoD2.

All are beyond amazing.

big red one i liked ........ps3wizard45

Yeah that game is pretty good. Should have gotten at least a 8.0 IMO.

But Call of Duty 2 is my favorite CoD game.

MoH:AA ;)PBSnipes

Man I need to get that game lol. I play most of the MoH games, and I call myself a big WWII shooter fan yet I didn't play MoH:AA.:P

Been playing Call of Duty since the original, which is still the best.
So yeah, 'Call of Duty' is my favourite.

Personally, I think you should have had United Offensive in the poll, instead of BRO.