FCC data point at a 2.75 GHZ maximum speed for the PS4 CPU.

Sony's PS4 dev kit passed by the FCC roughly a week ago, and now its consumer-oriented counterpart has passed through Uncle Sam's offices. Not only do the federal documents show the consoles' polished exterior, but they once again note a "max clock frequency" of 2.75GHz, teasing just what kind of horsepower sits inside the black parallelogram.

http://www.engadget.com/2013/07/22/sony-playstation-4-fcc/

Interesting it was once hint that sony increased the CPU speed who knows,if they do like the PSP and increment the speed as they move on.

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

deeliman

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

deeliman

It was already address as the memory speed..

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=72312121&postcount=256

Damn thread failed i wanted to so bad to hear sertain poster make claim that the xbox one could go as high as 4.0 ghz because on PC they can..:lol:

 but they once again note a "max clock frequency" of 2.75GHz,

That's a max peak. It probably won't be practical to hit that all the time 

 but they once again note a "max clock frequency" of 2.75GHz,seanmcloughlin

That's a max peak. It probably won't be practical to hit that all the time 

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

deeliman

[QUOTE="deeliman"]

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

faizan_faizan

How is that any different from any other part with a theorical max.?

People this is confirmed to be the memory speed,not the CPU one,read my second post...:lol:

Some of you are to blind and join the thread without reading apparently..:lol:

Lol 2.75 being max.dramaybaz

 

 

People this is confirmed to be the memory speed,not the CPU one,read my second post...:lol:

 

Some of you are to blind and join the thread without reading apparently..:lol:

 

tormentos

Why are you creating a misleading topic then?

People this is confirmed to be the memory speed,not the CPU one,read my second post...:lol:

Some of you are to blind and join the thread without reading apparently..:lol:

tormentos

[QUOTE="deeliman"]

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

tormentos

It was already address as the memory speed..

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.php?p=72312121&postcount=256

Damn thread failed i wanted to so bad to hear sertain poster make claim that the xbox one could go as high as 4.0 ghz because on PC they can..:lol:

FX 8350 can do 8ghz on 1 core with liquid nitrogen, you think this is normal?

My 2500k can do 5.2ghz on 4 cores, you think that is normal?

These rumours remind me on 3DS and WiiU "theoretical" maximum clock speeds...

But I think the Jaguar could run at 1.8-2.4 GHz range without overheating.

As for DF...

In reference to http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-saboteur-aa-blog-entry and I quote.

"In the meantime, what we have is something that's new and genuinely exciting from a technical standpoint. We're seeing PS3 attacking a visual problem using a method that not even the most high-end GPUs are using."

Eurogamer didn't factor in AMD's http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/AA-HPG09.pdf

It was later corrected by Christer Ericson, director of tools and technology at Sony Santa Monica and I quote

"The screenshots may not be showing MLAA, and it's almost certainly not a technique as experimental as we thought it was, but it's certainly the case that this is the most impressive form of this type of anti-aliasing we've seen to date in a console game. Certainly, as we alluded to originally, the concept of using an edge-filter/blur combination isn't new, and continues to be refined. This document by Isshiki and Kunieda published in 1999 suggested a similar technique, and, more recently, AMD's Iourcha, Yang and Pomianowski suggested a more advanced version of the same basic idea".

AMD's Iourcha, Yang and Pomianowski's papers refers to http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/AA-HPG09.pdf

To quote AMD's paper "This filter is the basis for the Edge-Detect Custom Filter AA driver feature on ATI Radeon HD GPUs".

Eurogamer's "not even the most high-end GPU are using" assertion would be wrong. From top to bottom GPUs, current ATI GPUs supports Direct3D 10.1 and methods menstioned AMD's AA paper.

These console jokers doesn't know about AMD.

They haven't factored in AMD's PRT and X1's ESRAM.

 

As for DF...

 

In reference to http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-saboteur-aa-blog-entry and I quote.

"In the meantime, what we have is something that's new and genuinely exciting from a technical standpoint. We're seeing PS3 attacking a visual problem using a method that not even the most high-end GPUs are using."

Eurogamer didn't factor in AMD's http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/AA-HPG09.pdf

It was later corrected by Christer Ericson, director of tools and technology at Sony Santa Monica and I quote

"The screenshots may not be showing MLAA, and it's almost certainly not a technique as experimental as we thought it was, but it's certainly the case that this is the most impressive form of this type of anti-aliasing we've seen to date in a console game. Certainly, as we alluded to originally, the concept of using an edge-filter/blur combination isn't new, and continues to be refined. This document by Isshiki and Kunieda published in 1999 suggested a similar technique, and, more recently, AMD's Iourcha, Yang and Pomianowski suggested a more advanced version of the same basic idea".

AMD's Iourcha, Yang and Pomianowski's papers refers to http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/AA-HPG09.pdf

To quote AMD's paper "This filter is the basis for the Edge-Detect Custom Filter AA driver feature on ATI Radeon HD GPUs".

 

Eurogamer's "not even the most high-end GPU are using" assertion would be wrong. From top to bottom GPUs, current ATI GPUs supports Direct3D 10.1 and methods menstioned AMD's AA paper.

 

These console jokers doesn't know about AMD.

 

 

freedomfreak

Awesome! :lol:

Nice news! Oh here was the insperation for the design also.

 

FX 8350 can do 8ghz on 1 core with liquid nitrogen, you think this is normal?

 

My 2500k can do 5.2ghz on 4 cores, you think that is normal?

AMD655

You most have confuse me with some one who gives a damn about your sh** PC,upgrade already that sh** 480GTX is under power vs the PS4.

They haven't factored in AMD's PRT and X1's ESRAM.

 

As for DF...

 

In reference to http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-saboteur-aa-blog-entry and I quote.

"In the meantime, what we have is something that's new and genuinely exciting from a technical standpoint. We're seeing PS3 attacking a visual problem using a method that not even the most high-end GPUs are using."

Eurogamer didn't factor in AMD's http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/AA-HPG09.pdf

It was later corrected by Christer Ericson, director of tools and technology at Sony Santa Monica and I quote

"The screenshots may not be showing MLAA, and it's almost certainly not a technique as experimental as we thought it was, but it's certainly the case that this is the most impressive form of this type of anti-aliasing we've seen to date in a console game. Certainly, as we alluded to originally, the concept of using an edge-filter/blur combination isn't new, and continues to be refined. This document by Isshiki and Kunieda published in 1999 suggested a similar technique, and, more recently, AMD's Iourcha, Yang and Pomianowski suggested a more advanced version of the same basic idea".

AMD's Iourcha, Yang and Pomianowski's papers refers to http://developer.amd.com/gpu_assets/AA-HPG09.pdf

To quote AMD's paper "This filter is the basis for the Edge-Detect Custom Filter AA driver feature on ATI Radeon HD GPUs".

 

Eurogamer's "not even the most high-end GPU are using" assertion would be wrong. From top to bottom GPUs, current ATI GPUs supports Direct3D 10.1 and methods menstioned AMD's AA paper.

 

These console jokers doesn't know about AMD.

 

 

freedomfreak

You stolen Ronvalencia post..:lol:

[QUOTE="AMD655"]

 

FX 8350 can do 8ghz on 1 core with liquid nitrogen, you think this is normal?

 

My 2500k can do 5.2ghz on 4 cores, you think that is normal?

tormentos

You most have confuse me with some one who gives a damn about your sh** PC,upgrade already that sh** 480GTX is under power vs the PS4.

What the hell are you talking about??

Reak of butthurt.

:lol: someone cant read and has the blinders on! :lol:

development kits do not not directly mirror the consumer version of the console.

The development kit has extra ports, and is substantially bigger than the consumer units will be presumably to assist with cooling. The documents state a maximum clock frequency of 2.75GHz for dev kit.....

Also should note that the clockrate could be directly related the GDDR5 clockrate giving  as its dual data rate then effective clock is 5.5GHz

You do know that the Xbox One is using the same CPU! :|

Even though this may not be the frequency it runs at, the PS4 runs much, much cooler than the PS3 did. I'm curious to see how far they can push it.

It's not reaching max to keep temps and power draw down.

:lol: someone cant read and has the blinders on! :lol:

development kits do not not directly mirror the consumer version of the console.

The development kit has extra ports, and is substantially bigger than the consumer units will be presumably to assist with cooling. The documents state a maximum clock frequency of 2.75GHz for dev kit.....

Also should note that the clockrate could be directly related the GDDR5 clockrate giving  as its dual data rate then effective clock is 5.5GHz

04dcarraher

It was the system not the dev kit,the dev kit was already aproved a month ago,talkig about no reading...:lol:

And i already pointed at the GDDR5 data clockrate it was was my second post on the thread basically 2 or 3 minutes after i made the thread,so you are a day late and a dollar short.:lol:

Why would they bump up the CPU speed if they can get 1.84 TFLOPS on the stock speed at 1.6ghz??

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

:lol: someone cant read and has the blinders on! :lol:

development kits do not not directly mirror the consumer version of the console.

The development kit has extra ports, and is substantially bigger than the consumer units will be presumably to assist with cooling. The documents state a maximum clock frequency of 2.75GHz for dev kit.....

Also should note that the clockrate could be directly related the GDDR5 clockrate giving  as its dual data rate then effective clock is 5.5GHz

tormentos

It was the system not the dev kit,the dev kit was already aproved a month ago,talkig about no reading...:lol:

And i already pointed at the GDDR5 data clockrate it was was my second post on the thread basically 2 or 3 minutes after i made the thread,so you are a day late and a dollar short.:lol:

Aww denial once again? Poor el tormentos..... its about

 Federal Communications Commission report about the 2.75 ghz wifi transceiver

Even though this may not be the frequency it runs at, the PS4 runs much, much cooler than the PS3 did. I'm curious to see how far they can push it.

PinkiePirate

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

:lol: someone cant read and has the blinders on! :lol:

development kits do not not directly mirror the consumer version of the console.

The development kit has extra ports, and is substantially bigger than the consumer units will be presumably to assist with cooling. The documents state a maximum clock frequency of 2.75GHz for dev kit.....

Also should note that the clockrate could be directly related the GDDR5 clockrate giving  as its dual data rate then effective clock is 5.5GHz

04dcarraher

It was the system not the dev kit,the dev kit was already aproved a month ago,talkig about no reading...:lol:

And i already pointed at the GDDR5 data clockrate it was was my second post on the thread basically 2 or 3 minutes after i made the thread,so you are a day late and a dollar short.:lol:

Aww denial once again? Poor el tormentos..... its about the dev kit

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

 

It was the system not the dev kit,the dev kit was already aproved a month ago,talkig about no reading...:lol:

 

And i already pointed at the GDDR5 data clockrate it was was my second post on the thread basically 2 or 3 minutes after i made the thread,so you are a day late and a dollar short.:lol:

lowkey254

Aww denial once again? Poor el tormentos..... its about the dev kit

about the  Federal Communications Commission and the wirless

 Federal Communications Commission 2.75 GHz is the max speed of the wifi transceiver Thats where you get that equivalentto mass produced  the PS4 and dev kit will have same wifi

[QUOTE="lowkey254"][QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Aww denial once again? Poor el tormentos..... its about the dev kit

about the Federal Communications Commission and the wirless

04dcarraher

Federal Communications Commission 2.75 GHz is the max speed of the wifi transceiver Thats where you get that equivalentto mass produced the PS4 and dev kit will have same wifi

All chips in the computer emits EM radiation.

2.75 Ghz refers to GDDR5's WCLK (for 5.5Gbps).

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="lowkey254"] Why does the image indicate that the "sample is equivalent to mass-produced items?" Just curious.ronvalencia

Federal Communications Commission 2.75 GHz is the max speed of the wifi transceiver Thats where you get that equivalentto mass produced the PS4 and dev kit will have same wifi

All chips in the computer emits EM radiation.

2.75 Ghz refers to GDDR5's WCLK (for 5.5Gbps).

Sweeeeet. SDC!

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

[QUOTE="tormentos"]

 

It was the system not the dev kit,the dev kit was already aproved a month ago,talkig about no reading...:lol:

 

And i already pointed at the GDDR5 data clockrate it was was my second post on the thread basically 2 or 3 minutes after i made the thread,so you are a day late and a dollar short.:lol:

lowkey254

Aww denial once again? Poor el tormentos..... its about the dev kit

[QUOTE="ronvalencia"]

[QUOTE="04dcarraher"]

Federal Communications Commission 2.75 GHz is the max speed of the wifi transceiver Thats where you get that equivalentto mass produced the PS4 and dev kit will have same wifi

04dcarraher

All chips in the computer emits EM radiation.

2.75 Ghz refers to GDDR5's WCLK (for 5.5Gbps).

Waiting on rovalencia's charts.rjdofu

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

deeliman

FX 8350 can do 8ghz on 1 core with liquid nitrogen, you think this is normal?

My 2500k can do 5.2ghz on 4 cores, you think that is normal?

AMD655

We really should start introducing liquid N to computer cooling systems, it'd solve a lot of problems :P

[QUOTE="deeliman"]

That's probably just the theoratical max, but because of heat issues they'll never achieve it.

ShadowriverUB