Final Fantasy 7 Remake 360 Only (Fake Topic)

  • 65 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RyanShazam
RyanShazam

6498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 RyanShazam
Member since 2006 • 6498 Posts

So at the rate Microsoft is getting exclusives and stealing past exclusives, would a Final Fantasy 7 HD remake 360 exclusive make Playstation Fanboys get a 360?

Avatar image for Animal-Mother
Animal-Mother

27362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#2 Animal-Mother
Member since 2003 • 27362 Posts

So at the rate Microsoft is getting exclusives and stealing past exclusives, would a Final Fantasy 7 HD remake 360 exclusive make Playstation Fanboys get a 360?

RyanShazam
I swear the universe would combust if that happened
Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts
I'm pretty sure every PS3 owner would jump ship and board the XBOX360.
Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#4 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts
I'm in no rush for a remake. Square should take a page from EVERYOTHER developer's book and release the game for download, with better scripting.
Avatar image for All_that_is_Man
All_that_is_Man

2044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 All_that_is_Man
Member since 2008 • 2044 Posts

So at the rate Microsoft is getting exclusives and stealing past exclusives, would a Final Fantasy 7 HD remake 360 exclusive make Playstation Fanboys get a 360?

RyanShazam

>.> would never happen but I would so buy a 360 if I didn't own one already

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts
Why does every console gamer out their want a remake of something?
Avatar image for cloudff7tm
cloudff7tm

3975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 cloudff7tm
Member since 2006 • 3975 Posts
If I didn't have a 360 already and that happned, I would beg for one so badly.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
Squaresoft favors the PS3 over the 360.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f4694ac412a8
deactivated-5f4694ac412a8

8599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5f4694ac412a8
Member since 2005 • 8599 Posts
I think a Final Fantasy VII Remake will come out within the next five years... Why else haven't they put it for download on the PSN? I was wondering why they didn't put Chrono Trigger on the VC until I saw the DS port. I am not really sure which platform it'd be on. It coculd be on DS or Wii for all we know. Don't be at all surprised if this happens.
Avatar image for whodeysay85
whodeysay85

3237

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 whodeysay85
Member since 2006 • 3237 Posts
As a ps3 owner i will go on record that if they released a FF7 remake on the 360 only I would most definitely buy a 360 immediately.
Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#11 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
I'm in no rush for a remake. Square should take a page from EVERYOTHER developer's book and release the game for download, with better scripting.Lionheart08
Agreed. I find used copies of his game for around 40 - 50 bucks. That's revenue that Square-Enix is NOT ever going to see.
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

Wasn't FF7 published by Sony?

Doesn't really bother me either way i own both but i don't think we will ever see FF7 on 360 and if we do then it wont be exclusive

just my 2 cents

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#13 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
On the contrary, if a FFVII remake were to be announced exclusively to Sony's console (tenfold more likely), I would buy a PS3.
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
Squaresoft favors the PS3 over the 360. hakanakumono
So far the PS3 has the least number of Square games of any of the current gen systems.
Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#15 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]Squaresoft favors the PS3 over the 360. HarlockJC
So far the PS3 has the least number of Square games of any of the current gen systems.

As a publisher, not a developer.
Avatar image for CleanPlayer
CleanPlayer

9822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#16 CleanPlayer
Member since 2008 • 9822 Posts
It'd be a shocker, I would enjoy the achievements. Overall, I would be surprised if a lot of people jumped in to the 360.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]Squaresoft favors the PS3 over the 360. HarlockJC
So far the PS3 has the least number of Square games of any of the current gen systems.

Square Enix published games.

Not squaresoft games. Square Enix publishes Tri Ace games like Star Ocean etc.

Avatar image for dragonpuppy
dragonpuppy

952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 dragonpuppy
Member since 2006 • 952 Posts
Wouldn't happen. Final Fantasy VII is published by Sony.
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts

[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]Squaresoft favors the PS3 over the 360. hakanakumono

So far the PS3 has the least number of Square games of any of the current gen systems.

Square Enix published games.

Not squaresoft games. Square Enix publishes Tri Ace games like Star Ocean etc.

Currently on the Wii there is Dragon Quest Swords, FF:CD, and FFCC: My life has a king. On the 360 there is The Last Remnant. Are there any Square titles on the PS3 right now?
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

[QUOTE="HarlockJC"] So far the PS3 has the least number of Square games of any of the current gen systems. HarlockJC

Square Enix published games.

Not squaresoft games. Square Enix publishes Tri Ace games like Star Ocean etc.

Currently on the Wii there is Dragon Quest Swords, FF:CD, and FFCC: My life has a king. On the 360 there is The Last Remnant. Are there any Square titles on the PS3 right now?

Enix, Side game, Side game, ??? (I'm not sure if its Enix or Tri-Ace or who)?

The PS3 is getting two of squaresoft's biggest titles, Final Fantasy XIII and Final Fantasy XIII versus.

They're just taking longer to make because of the attention and resources that have to be put into them.

Avatar image for Toriko42
Toriko42

27562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#21 Toriko42
Member since 2006 • 27562 Posts
It could happen, more likely then Metal Gear Solid 4...
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#22 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

Square Enix published games.

Not squaresoft games. Square Enix publishes Tri Ace games like Star Ocean etc.

hakanakumono

Currently on the Wii there is Dragon Quest Swords, FF:CD, and FFCC: My life has a king. On the 360 there is The Last Remnant. Are there any Square titles on the PS3 right now?

Enix, Side game, Side game, ??? (I'm not sure if its Enix or Tri-Ace or who)?

You may not like the games but it does not change the fact that so far Square has put out games on every system on the market but the PS3. There is no way you can point out that the PS3 is getting better treatment than the other systems, Yes, you may be able to name games like FFV13 that is coming out but this does not change the fact that the main game is also on the 360. In fact Square themselves have said they are going to treat all systems the same this gen even if with the current lineups you could not see how this could be true because of the lack of any Square games even "Published" for the PS3. So I have no idea where your Square likes the PS3 better comes from. Please show me where I am wrong, I don't mind being so. I have all three systems and have noticed the lack of Square support for awhile now.
Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#23 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

Square Enix published games.

Not squaresoft games. Square Enix publishes Tri Ace games like Star Ocean etc.

hakanakumono

Currently on the Wii there is Dragon Quest Swords, FF:CD, and FFCC: My life has a king. On the 360 there is The Last Remnant. Are there any Square titles on the PS3 right now?

Enix, Side game, Side game, ??? (I'm not sure if its Enix or Tri-Ace or who)?

The PS3 is getting two of squaresoft's biggest titles, Final Fantasy XIII and Final Fantasy XIII versus.

They're just taking longer to make because of the attention and resources that have to be put into them.

What's a "side project". Either way they're published and developed by Square-Enix.

The Last Remnant was actually developed and published by Square-Enix.

Btw, there is no such thing as Squaresoft. It became defunct in 2003.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#24 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
Wouldn't happen. Final Fantasy VII is published by Sony.dragonpuppy
That means nothing. Eidos Interactive actually published a version of the game for windows.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="HarlockJC"] Currently on the Wii there is Dragon Quest Swords, FF:CD, and FFCC: My life has a king. On the 360 there is The Last Remnant. Are there any Square titles on the PS3 right now?HarlockJC

Enix, Side game, Side game, ??? (I'm not sure if its Enix or Tri-Ace or who)?

You may not like the games but it does not change the fact that so far Square has put out games on every system on the market but the PS3. There is no way you can point out that the PS3 is getting better treatment than the other systems, Yes, you may be able to name games like FFV13 that is coming out but this does not change the fact that the main game is also on the 360. In fact Square themselves have said they are going to treat all systems the same this gen even if with the current lineups you could not see how this could be true because of the lack of any Square games even "Published" for the PS3. So I have no idea where your Square likes the PS3 better comes from. Please show me where I am wrong, I don't mind being so. I have all three systems and have noticed the lack of Square support for awhile now.

Yes I can. The PS3 is getting 2 of Square's biggest Franchise - Final Fantasy XIII and Final Fantasy XIII Versus. Square's most important title.

Square-Enix may publish a lot of titles, but its the Squaresoft team behind Final Fantasy XIII and Versus. The 360 is essentially getting a port of that title.

Note that Tri-Ace is part of Square, but Tri-Ace is doing their own thing. Tri-Ace worked with microsoft and Tri-Ace is continuing to work with Microsoft. Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="HarlockJC"] Currently on the Wii there is Dragon Quest Swords, FF:CD, and FFCC: My life has a king. On the 360 there is The Last Remnant. Are there any Square titles on the PS3 right now?Johnny-n-Roger

Enix, Side game, Side game, ??? (I'm not sure if its Enix or Tri-Ace or who)?

The PS3 is getting two of squaresoft's biggest titles, Final Fantasy XIII and Final Fantasy XIII versus.

They're just taking longer to make because of the attention and resources that have to be put into them.

What's a "side project". Either way they're published and developed by Square-Enix.

The Last Remnant was actually developed and published by Square-Enix.

Btw, there is no such thing as Squaresoft. It became defunct in 2003.

Square-Enix is Squaresoft and Enix sharing their earnings instead of being competetors. Enix is still making Dragon Quest games. Squaresoft is still making Kingdom Hearts and Final Fantasy.

There is clearly a division between the square projects and the Enix projects.

Edit: A Side Project is a game on the side. Like Resident Evil Outbreak. And Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles. Published yes. Developed is a different story.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#27 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

Enix, Side game, Side game, ??? (I'm not sure if its Enix or Tri-Ace or who)?

hakanakumono

You may not like the games but it does not change the fact that so far Square has put out games on every system on the market but the PS3. There is no way you can point out that the PS3 is getting better treatment than the other systems, Yes, you may be able to name games like FFV13 that is coming out but this does not change the fact that the main game is also on the 360. In fact Square themselves have said they are going to treat all systems the same this gen even if with the current lineups you could not see how this could be true because of the lack of any Square games even "Published" for the PS3. So I have no idea where your Square likes the PS3 better comes from. Please show me where I am wrong, I don't mind being so. I have all three systems and have noticed the lack of Square support for awhile now.

Yes I can. The PS3 is getting 2 of Square's biggest Franchise - Final Fantasy XIII and Final Fantasy XIII Versus. Square's most important title.

Square-Enix may publish a lot of titles, but its the Squaresoft team behind Final Fantasy XIII and Versus. The 360 is essentially getting a port of that title.

Note that Tri-Ace is part of Square, but Tri-Ace is doing their own thing. Tri-Ace worked with microsoft and Tri-Ace is continuing to work with Microsoft. Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

Final Fantasy XIII will be ported to the XBOX360? Link?

Last I heard the developers were using the multi platform Crystal Tools engine

Avatar image for Koba123
Koba123

1739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#28 Koba123
Member since 2005 • 1739 Posts
There's no way they'll make it exclusive, it's obviously going to be multiplatform
Avatar image for HarlockJC
HarlockJC

25546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#29 HarlockJC
Member since 2006 • 25546 Posts
Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

hakanakumono

You still do not make your point that the PS3 is more well liked by Square, yes it takes longer to make a game but has proven with how many titles for the WIi have come out Sqaure can make more than a couple of games at a time. The PS3 has been out not going on 2 and half years. Look at all the great games other companies have had come out during that time. Then we just found out that Square's second biggest title Dragon Quest is going to be a Wii only game. Not a PS3 title like many though we they heard DQ9 was going to be on the DS. Then you bring up two titles which are not out yet and one which will be on the 360 anyways. If anything all you are proving is that Square is not backing the PS3 has much as other systems. You say Tri-Ace does their own thing but there are other companies which Square could pay to make games for the PS3 if they saw a profit in it or these other companies like Tri-Ace could ask Square to publish games for the PS3. If you are going to say that Square favors the PS3 then your going to need something to back that statement. So far I am sorry to say it all just sound s like excuses. I do not mean that has an attack on you. But look at it from another person stand point and you would see what I mean.

Edit: If there is a reply to this, I will check it after some sleep and reply tomorrow.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#30 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"] Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

You still do not make your point that the PS3 is more well liked by Square, yes it takes longer to make a game but has proven with how many titles for the WIi have come out Sqaure can make more than a couple of games at a time. The PS3 has been out not going on 2 and half years. Look at all the great games other companies have had come out during that time. Then we just found out that Square's second biggest title Dragon Quest is going to be a Wii only game. Not a PS3 title like many though we they heard DQ9 was going to be on the DS. Then you bring up two titles which are not out yet and one which will be on the 360 anyways. If anything all you are proving is that Square is not backing the PS3 has much as other systems. You say Tri-Ace does their own thing but there are other companies which Square could pay to make games for the PS3 if they saw a profit in it or these other companies like Tri-Ace could ask Square to publish games for the PS3. If you are going to say that Square favors the PS3 then your going to need something to back that statement. So far I am sorry to say it all just sound s like excuses. I do not mean that has an attack on you. But look at it from another person stand point and you would see what I mean.

I don't know what causes the misconception that a non-Final Fantasy numbered sequel is NOT a "Squaresoft" game.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="HarlockJC"] You may not like the games but it does not change the fact that so far Square has put out games on every system on the market but the PS3. There is no way you can point out that the PS3 is getting better treatment than the other systems, Yes, you may be able to name games like FFV13 that is coming out but this does not change the fact that the main game is also on the 360. In fact Square themselves have said they are going to treat all systems the same this gen even if with the current lineups you could not see how this could be true because of the lack of any Square games even "Published" for the PS3. So I have no idea where your Square likes the PS3 better comes from. Please show me where I am wrong, I don't mind being so. I have all three systems and have noticed the lack of Square support for awhile now. Johnny-n-Roger

Yes I can. The PS3 is getting 2 of Square's biggest Franchise - Final Fantasy XIII and Final Fantasy XIII Versus. Square's most important title.

Square-Enix may publish a lot of titles, but its the Squaresoft team behind Final Fantasy XIII and Versus. The 360 is essentially getting a port of that title.

Note that Tri-Ace is part of Square, but Tri-Ace is doing their own thing. Tri-Ace worked with microsoft and Tri-Ace is continuing to work with Microsoft. Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

Final Fantasy XIII will be ported to the XBOX360? Link?

Last I heard the developers were using the multi platform Crystal Tools engine

I wasn't aware that it was a multiplatform tool. I do know that there will be a special team responsible for reworking XIII so that it works on the 360.

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"] Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

HarlockJC

You still do not make your point that the PS3 is more well liked by Square, yes it takes longer to make a game but has proven with how many titles for the WIi have come out Sqaure can make more than a couple of games at a time. The PS3 has been out not going on 2 and half years. Look at all the great games other companies have had come out during that time. Then we just found out that Square's second biggest title Dragon Quest is going to be a Wii only game. Not a PS3 title like many though we they heard DQ9 was going to be on the DS. Then you bring up two titles which are not out yet and one which will be on the 360 anyways. If anything all you are proving is that Square is not backing the PS3 has much as other systems. You say Tri-Ace does their own thing but there are other companies which Square could pay to make games for the PS3 if they saw a profit in it or these other companies like Tri-Ace could ask Square to publish games for the PS3. If you are going to say that Square favors the PS3 then your going to need something to back that statement. So far I am sorry to say it all just sound s like excuses. I do not mean that has an attack on you. But look at it from another person stand point and you would see what I mean.

Edit: If there is a reply to this, I will check it after some sleep and reply tomorrow.

Dragon Quest is an Enix game published under Square Enix. Just like Final Fantasy CC is a Squaresoft game published under squaresoft.

Tri-Ace is developing games on an engine that was developed with microsoft's cooperation, hence 360 lock.

Square doesn't see profit in PS3 but they're putting their biggest franchise on it?

Haha, this is system wars not real life. I'm not emotionally attached to game consoles. I do understand what you mean. It seems like Square is abandoning sony at a glance. But if you look deeper thats not the case, especially if youy factor in the PSP. It seems that alhtough Square, Enix, Tri Ace, and whatever companies are absorbed by the great "Square-Enix" - here's looking at you Game Arts - they still uphold their individuality as game developers.

Avatar image for Droopeh
Droopeh

638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Droopeh
Member since 2008 • 638 Posts
Didn't SCEA public Final Fantasy VII?
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts

Didn't SCEA public Final Fantasy VII?Droopeh

What does that have to do with anything? Did Nintendo publishing VI matter when it was ported to the Playstation?

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#35 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
Didn't SCEA public Final Fantasy VII?Droopeh
Yeah. Eidos Interactive did a version for Windows as well. What's your point?
Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#36 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="HarlockJC"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"] Why has squaresoft released games for the wii before the PS3? Because the wii in itself is far less demanding than the PS3, not to mention the fact that the Final Fantasy XIII is obviously going to be a high budget game with a lot of effort into it.

You still do not make your point that the PS3 is more well liked by Square, yes it takes longer to make a game but has proven with how many titles for the WIi have come out Sqaure can make more than a couple of games at a time. The PS3 has been out not going on 2 and half years. Look at all the great games other companies have had come out during that time. Then we just found out that Square's second biggest title Dragon Quest is going to be a Wii only game. Not a PS3 title like many though we they heard DQ9 was going to be on the DS. Then you bring up two titles which are not out yet and one which will be on the 360 anyways. If anything all you are proving is that Square is not backing the PS3 has much as other systems. You say Tri-Ace does their own thing but there are other companies which Square could pay to make games for the PS3 if they saw a profit in it or these other companies like Tri-Ace could ask Square to publish games for the PS3. If you are going to say that Square favors the PS3 then your going to need something to back that statement. So far I am sorry to say it all just sound s like excuses. I do not mean that has an attack on you. But look at it from another person stand point and you would see what I mean.

Edit: If there is a reply to this, I will check it after some sleep and reply tomorrow.

Dragon Quest is an Enix game published under Square Enix. Just like Final Fantasy CC is a Squaresoft game published under squaresoft.

Tri-Ace is developing games on an engine that was developed with microsoft's cooperation, hence 360 lock.

Square doesn't see profit in PS3 but they're putting their biggest franchise on it?

Haha, this is system wars not real life. I'm not emotionally attached to game consoles. I do understand what you mean. It seems like Square is abandoning sony at a glance. But if you look deeper thats not the case, especially if youy factor in the PSP. It seems that alhtough Square, Enix, Tri Ace, and whatever companies are absorbed by the great "Square-Enix" - here's looking at you Game Arts - they still uphold their individuality as game developers.

Square (as well as alot of developers) obviously doesn't find Sony's system to be as profitable. It's a nightmare to develop for in comparison to Microsoft's machine. That's why they won't release any of their lesser known titles to the PS3.
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts

[QUOTE="Droopeh"]Didn't SCEA public Final Fantasy VII?Johnny-n-Roger
Yeah. Eidos Interactive did a version for Windows as well. What's your point?

Dude stop trying to make out that a publisher has no say what so ever because that is total BS

neither you nor anyone else here knows what was in that contract , so yes FFVII could very well be exclusive to a Sony console

Did you see a FFVII on any other console other than a Sony one ? Its funny as well with all the FF remakes Square has been doing for the DS what 1,2,3,4,5,6 but no 7 just something to note

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#38 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts

[QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="Droopeh"]Didn't SCEA public Final Fantasy VII?micky4889

Yeah. Eidos Interactive did a version for Windows as well. What's your point?

Dude stop trying to make out that a publisher has no say what so ever because that is total BS

neither you nor anyone else here knows what was in that contract , so yes FFVII could very well be exclusive to a Sony console

Did you see a FFVII on any other system other than a Sony one ? Its funny as well with all the FF remakes Square has been doing for the DS what 1,2,3,4,5,6 but no 7 just something to note

Windows isn't a Sony system :|
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"]

[QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"] Yeah. Eidos Interactive did a version for Windows as well. What's your point?Johnny-n-Roger

Dude stop trying to make out that a publisher has no say what so ever because that is total BS

neither you nor anyone else here knows what was in that contract , so yes FFVII could very well be exclusive to a Sony console

Did you see a FFVII on any other system other than a Sony one ? Its funny as well with all the FF remakes Square has been doing for the DS what 1,2,3,4,5,6 but no 7 just some;thing to note

Windows isn't a Sony system :|

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

Dude stop trying to make out that a publisher has no say what so ever because that is total BS

neither you nor anyone else here knows what was in that contract , so yes FFVII could very well be exclusive to a Sony console

Did you see a FFVII on any other system other than a Sony one ? Its funny as well with all the FF remakes Square has been doing for the DS what 1,2,3,4,5,6 but no 7 just some;thing to note

micky4889

Windows isn't a Sony system :|

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Hahaha brilliant.

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#41 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

Dude stop trying to make out that a publisher has no say what so ever because that is total BS

neither you nor anyone else here knows what was in that contract , so yes FFVII could very well be exclusive to a Sony console

Did you see a FFVII on any other system other than a Sony one ? Its funny as well with all the FF remakes Square has been doing for the DS what 1,2,3,4,5,6 but no 7 just some;thing to note

micky4889

Windows isn't a Sony system :|

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"] Windows isn't a Sony system :|Johnny-n-Roger

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.

Those are both on sony consoles, just so you know. o.o;

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#43 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.

Those are both on sony consoles, just so you know. o.o;

Your point being? It was purely Square-Enix's disgression, as Sony doesn't have publishing rights to either game.
Avatar image for Darth_Stalin
Darth_Stalin

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Darth_Stalin
Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts
Won't happen, but if it does......SW would probably shut down....
Avatar image for Nerd_Man
Nerd_Man

13819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Nerd_Man
Member since 2007 • 13819 Posts
I would really care less. I'm not even interested in the new Final Fantasy(s) coming out, and Final Fantasy anything just doesn't interest me one bit.
Avatar image for micky4889
micky4889

2668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#46 micky4889
Member since 2006 • 2668 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"] Windows isn't a Sony system :|Johnny-n-Roger

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.

Dude im not saying it wont be multiplat im just saying that Sony does have some say in what happens to it and to say other wise is laughable but then again like i said earlier in this thread i dont care if its muiltiplat i just cant wait to play this game again in HD :)
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"] Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.Johnny-n-Roger

Those are both on sony consoles, just so you know. o.o;

Your point being? It was purely Square-Enix's disgression, as Sony doesn't have publishing rights to either game.

Uhm, they're not Final Fantasy VII ... They're side games ... That are on sony systems defeating your point. ._.;

Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#48 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="micky4889"]

have a read again ;)

"Sony console"

edit: sorry my bad you missed my edit lol

Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.

Dude im not saying it wont be multiplat im just saying that Sony does have some say in what happens to it and to say other wise is laughable but then again like i said earlier in this thread i dont care if its muiltiplat i just cant wait to play this game again in HD :)

How is believing or not disbelieving something that hasn't been proven "laughable"? Assuming Sony does have rights, they only go as far as Europe and North America. The regional conflict of rights is probably why there will never be a remake of the game for ANY console. Why is S-E as a developer and publisher going to develop a game if they're going to have to cough it up to Sony at the expense of some profits when they can release a spin-off (Crisis Core) and publish it themselves. In that scenario, it would not so much be a conflict between Sony retaining exclusivity from Microsoft Nintendo as much as a conflict between Square-Enix to acquire publishing rights to the game before they even begin thinking about putting it into development.
Avatar image for Johnny-n-Roger
Johnny-n-Roger

15151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#49 Johnny-n-Roger
Member since 2003 • 15151 Posts
[QUOTE="hakanakumono"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"][QUOTE="hakanakumono"]

Those are both on sony consoles, just so you know. o.o;

Your point being? It was purely Square-Enix's disgression, as Sony doesn't have publishing rights to either game.

Uhm, they're not Final Fantasy VII ... They're side games ... That are on sony systems defeating your point. ._.;

I'm still not sure what you're trying to say. I was arguing the point that all FFVII are sony exclusive, which they are. I countered by saying that it was purely S-E's decision not based on publishing rights. If you talking about my regards for Square-Enix not supporting the PS3, it's completely unrelated. From a few minutes into the game you can tell that The Last Remnant was obviously force to a dead-line. Most likely a deadline that couldn't have been met had it been in development for the PS3. The cell is a more complicated processor therefore more difficult to program for.
Avatar image for hakanakumono
hakanakumono

27455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 hakanakumono
Member since 2008 • 27455 Posts
[QUOTE="micky4889"][QUOTE="Johnny-n-Roger"] Dirge of Cerberus and Crisis core are both published by Square-Enix. Their exclusivity to Sony's consoles has nothing to do with publishing rights. Final Fantasy VII has never been remade on ANY console, therefore it's difficult to assume that is related to publishing rights either. I'm not saying that Sony doesn't have some sort of contract with Square Enix regarding the title (maybe even nonapplicable in certain regions), but you can't also assume that the game will remain a Sony exclusive based on the game's original publisher.Johnny-n-Roger
Dude im not saying it wont be multiplat im just saying that Sony does have some say in what happens to it and to say other wise is laughable but then again like i said earlier in this thread i dont care if its muiltiplat i just cant wait to play this game again in HD :)

How is believing or not disbelieving something that hasn't been proven "laughable"? Assuming Sony does have rights, they only go as far as Europe and North America. The regional conflict of rights is probably why there will never be a remake of the game for ANY console. Why is S-E as a developer and publisher going to develop a game if they're going to have to cough it up to Sony at the expense of some profits when they can release a spin-off (Crisis Core) and publish it themselves. In that scenario, it would not so much be a conflict between Sony retaining exclusivity from Microsoft Nintendo as much as a conflict between Square-Enix to acquire publishing rights to the game before they even begin thinking about putting it into development.

What regional conflict are you talking about? o_O; Why would sony rights only go as far as Europe and North America? Square-Enix owns the rights to Final Fantasy, it was re-released for playstation under the green label under Square-Enix in 2003.

Doesn't sony take a cut on ALL games sold on sony consoles?