The detail:shock:
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Not a single post with pictures of Uncharted, Gears or Killzone, Are console sheep finally learning?
Not a single post with pictures of Uncharted, Gears or Killzone, Are console sheep finally learning?
mrfrosty151986
No, I think it's just that even they recognize trolling when it's this obvious. Even if what you're saying is completely true, this is still pretty lowbrow. I expect better from my fellow master racers.
Not a single post with pictures of Uncharted, Gears or Killzone, Are console sheep finally learning?
mrfrosty151986
Well, people aren't stupid enough to challenge consoles with PC.
It's basically like this...
Show me a console that launched 7 years ago that can do all the things a $300 PC can do.A better Find me might be.
Find a PC that cost $300 7seven years ago, has had no upgrades and can run that game.
muffin200
[QUOTE="muffin200"]Show me a console that launched 7 years ago that can do all the things a $300 PC can do.A better Find me might be.
Find a PC that cost $300 7seven years ago, has had no upgrades and can run that game.
mrfrosty151986
$300 PC's from 7 years ago are Home PC designed for something else completely. You are talking about Photo shop, Office and Goggle being better than yes of course it's because that what the PC was made to do. Consoles are made to play games with some other stuff tacked on. Which one has more uses outside of games? It's a agument that is a best made to distract from can a 7 year old PC run that can and at worst an argument made for the sake of arguing.
Show me a console that launched 7 years ago that can do all the things a $300 PC can do.mrfrosty151986
Atleast my PC from almost 9 years back is still working.
Most people had to replace their 360.
Heck my Friend has already gone through 3 Xbox 360s and is on his 4th.
A better Find me might be.
Find a PC that cost $300 7seven years ago, has had no upgrades and can run that game.
muffin200
A PC from 7 years ago, could actually run games in naitive 1080p. Didn't consoles back then cost like $599 anyway?
[QUOTE="muffin200"]
A better Find me might be.
Find a PC that cost $300 7seven years ago, has had no upgrades and can run that game.
ultimate-k
A PC from 7 years ago, could actually run games in naitive 1080p. Didn't consoles back then cost like $599 anyway?
The Ps3 did.[QUOTE="ultimate-k"][QUOTE="muffin200"]
A better Find me might be.
Find a PC that cost $300 7seven years ago, has had no upgrades and can run that game.
freedomfreak
A PC from 7 years ago, could actually run games in naitive 1080p. Didn't consoles back then cost like $599 anyway?
The Ps3 did.Thank you, Captain Obvious.
The Ps3 did.[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="ultimate-k"]
A PC from 7 years ago, could actually run games in naitive 1080p. Didn't consoles back then cost like $599 anyway?
GamerwillzPS
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
Did you miss the part where he actually asked something?[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] The Ps3 did.freedomfreak
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
Did you miss the part where he actually asked something?Everybody knows that PS3 had a $599 price tag to begin with.
It's been discussed to hell here in SW.
Did you miss the part where he actually asked something?[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
Thank you, Captain Obvious.
GamerwillzPS
Everybody knows that PS3 had a $599 price tag to begin with.
It's been discussed to hell here in SW.
And that makes it forbidden to reply to someone asking it? don't think so.[QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"][QUOTE="freedomfreak"] Did you miss the part where he actually asked something?freedomfreak
Everybody knows that PS3 had a $599 price tag to begin with.
It's been discussed to hell here in SW.
And that makes it forbidden to reply to someone asking it? don't think so.And that makes it forbidden to reply to someone asking it? don't think so.[QUOTE="freedomfreak"][QUOTE="GamerwillzPS"]
Everybody knows that PS3 had a $599 price tag to begin with.
It's been discussed to hell here in SW.
GamerwillzPS
--stupid picture--
So if someone asks a question, and the answer is obvious to 'you', it therefor must be obvious to everyone and whoever answers is Capt. Obvious?If you are referring to technical quality of the texture (i.e. resolution), your task is probably impossible to accomplish since consoles dont have enough RAM for such high res textures. Console textures therefore would probably look a bit more blurry.
Was there a point you wanted to prove, or did you really just want us to find you a picture?
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]Show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You do for posting that comment, especially swearing too...... :lol:
The detail:shock:
AmazonTreeBoa
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]
:D
Inconsistancy
The texture's so good that the shell casings are 2d!
So?
Modern games are still rather low-poly.
Crisp texture > blocky 3D model, tbh.
Bring on voxels if you want full 3D graphics...
[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]
[QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]
:D
nameless12345
The texture's so good that the shell casings are 2d!
So?
Modern games are still rather low-poly.
Crisp texture > blocky 3D model, tbh.
Bring on voxels if you want full 3D graphics...
Voxels, why? Then you're going to have stupid little square bullets, unless you use a quadrillion voxels to define one casing instead of a 96 poly one.[QUOTE="nameless12345"][QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]
The texture's so good that the shell casings are 2d!
Inconsistancy
So?
Modern games are still rather low-poly.
Crisp texture > blocky 3D model, tbh.
Bring on voxels if you want full 3D graphics...
Voxels, why? Then you're going to have stupid little square bullets, unless you use a quadrillion voxels to define one casing instead of a 30~ poly one.Voxels aren't geometry limited so a quadrillion voxels would be possible if you had a beefy CPU and lots of RAM.
They don't make any use of GPU acceleration, tho, and that's also the reason why they haven't established themselves.
But with modern GPUs supporting GPGPU, they could be used to render voxels too.
[QUOTE="Inconsistancy"]Comparing textures from a game that can use 2gb of vram to consoles with a grand total of 512. Who will win!?Rocker6
This...
What a boring and overused flame bait, please, find some new material...
This. Post something about corrupt mainstream media.Attention people:
Please attempt to learn more than the word "textures" when describing the graphics of games, because here for example there is more going on then simply having the game display a high res texture. Consoles are perfectly capable of outputting high res textures in the right situations, but what you're also seeing in this particular screenshot is features of DX11 called tessellation and parallax occlusion mapping.
I hate reading this forum because nobody seems to know what they're talking about!
[QUOTE="AmazonTreeBoa"][QUOTE="mrfrosty151986"]Show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You do for posting that comment, especially swearing too...... :lol: I am a hermit you clueless dumbass, so try again. Like I said, show me a console gamer that even gives a sh!t. You can't because they don't. Also, your reply leads me to believe you aren't to bright seeing that ignorance was the best response you could come up with.
The detail:shock:
mrfrosty151986
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment