Finished Mass Effect Yesterday and...

I haveto sayit was much better than blue dragon . story wise and character wise. the planets were decent. but thestory was so awesomeley executed. i really like the end of the game. i wanna see what the humans are going to be like in the next mass effect. i could carelessif its exclusive or not though. i also finished it in 17 hours on casual buti plan to play again on normal i also completed like half the sidequest.

Put this in your blog - it doesn't belong here. Also, this isn't game wars.raynimrod

The blog parts fine, albeit such a cliche thing to say nowadays.

As for the game part, the entire purpose of these "systems" we play and argue over is to play games. Games are equally important if not more so than the systems we play them on. :|

I haveto sayit was much better than blue dragon . story wise and character wise. the planets were decent. but thestory was so awesomeley executed. i really like the end of the game. i wanna see what the humans are going to be like in the next mass effect. i could carelessif its exclusive or not though. i also finished it in 17 hours on casual buti plan to play again on normal i also completed like half the sidequest.

deavincalhoun

wow ... that game is quite short for an rpg ... but as long as it is a good 17 hours .... nothing wrong with it.

[QUOTE="deavincalhoun"]

I haveto sayit was much better than blue dragon . story wise and character wise. the planets were decent. but thestory was so awesomeley executed. i really like the end of the game. i wanna see what the humans are going to be like in the next mass effect. i could carelessif its exclusive or not though. i also finished it in 17 hours on casual buti plan to play again on normal i also completed like half the sidequest.

humber_matus

wow ... that game is quite short for an rpg ... but as long as it is a good 17 hours .... nothing wrong with it.

My first play through was 40 hours on Normal.

Not only is it a waste to play it on Casual (everything becomes mind numbingly easy) it's a waste to only do half of the side quests.

17 hrs? no thanks.

17 hrs? no thanks.

Gam3smar7

Not as life consuming as WoW, huh?

[QUOTE="Gam3smar7"]

17 hrs? no thanks.

BioShockOwnz

Not as life consuming as WoW, huh?

please don't compare the greatness of Wow to Mass Effect :wink:

and i'm more concerned of the DVD compacity, is it because DVD 9 can't hold much data thats why the game is so short?

17 hrs? no thanks.

Gam3smar7

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Gam3smar7"]

17 hrs? no thanks.

Gam3smar7

Not as life consuming as WoW, huh?

please don't compare the greatness of Wow to Mass Effect :wink:

and i'm more concerned of the DVD compacity, is it because DVD 9 can't hold much data thats why the game is so short?

Haha greatness of Wow:lol:

No, game-length has nothing to do with the space capacity of dvd 9, we have destroyed that myth a long time ago. Besides they could just do it on two dvd's if need be...

cows need to stop saying crap about mass effect..

not only is it better then the entire ps3 library if a cow was to actually play it they would throw their ps3 in the trash

[QUOTE="Gam3smar7"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="Gam3smar7"]

17 hrs? no thanks.

Blommen

Not as life consuming as WoW, huh?

please don't compare the greatness of Wow to Mass Effect :wink:

and i'm more concerned of the DVD compacity, is it because DVD 9 can't hold much data thats why the game is so short?

Haha greatness of Wow:lol:

No, game-length has nothing to do with the space capacity of dvd 9, we have destroyed that myth a long time ago. Besides they could just do it on two dvd's if need be...

The Burning Crusade destroys any game I have played this year...including Mass Effect.