First in game screen of MAG

Sorry if this is old, but here is MAG in non-CGI. Looks pretty good but it's a very low-rez picture

MASSIV AKSHUN GAYM!!!1!11

t3hTwinky

...ok

Doesn't look very in game to me.ONLYDOD

Doesn't look very in game to me.ONLYDOD

in engine...its not gameplay but it IS in game

[QUOTE="ONLYDOD"]Doesn't look very in game to me.footfoe2

When im promised 'in game' shots I expect them to be as if somebody is actually playing the game, not a potentially in game promo shot.

[QUOTE="ONLYDOD"]Doesn't look very in game to me.hockeyruler12

in engine...its not gameplay but it IS in game

[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

[QUOTE="ONLYDOD"]Doesn't look very in game to me.THE_Rob_Himself

in engine...its not gameplay but it IS in game

well the website said in game lol

im just quoting them

Looks pretty good but it's a very low-rez picture

hockeyruler12

Well console games are usually pretty low res so that's a given.

[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

Looks pretty good but it's a very low-rez picture

Jade_Monkey

Well console games are usually pretty low res so that's a given.

haha true

[QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

Looks pretty good but it's a very low-rez picture

Jade_Monkey

Well console games are usually pretty low res so that's a given.

lmfao

This game's basic concept bores me, as does its visual setting.

As of now, I KIND of want this game. alwayspureblood

right... MAG is a rediculous (sp?) concept. Why on earth would you want 256 players on the same map? That's *whips out calculator* 128 people on both teams. Did they conquer LAG? And would your death really mean anything to your other 127 teammates? Your just another soldier. Around 24 should be the max online. Anything else is just about pushing it. And good luck getting a room of 256 people.MuffinPunk

more players = more realistic.

In a war does death of 1 soldier really mean anything?

right... MAG is a rediculous (sp?) concept. Why on earth would you want 256 players on the same map? That's *whips out calculator* 128 people on both teams. Did they conquer LAG? And would your death really mean anything to your other 127 teammates? Your just another soldier. Around 24 should be the max online. Anything else is just about pushing it. And good luck getting a room of 256 people.MuffinPunk

Joint Ops had 150 people per server and when full it was a lot of fun. Of course the maps were 50 sq KM each.

[QUOTE="MuffinPunk"]right... MAG is a rediculous (sp?) concept. Why on earth would you want 256 players on the same map? That's *whips out calculator* 128 people on both teams. Did they conquer LAG? And would your death really mean anything to your other 127 teammates? Your just another soldier. Around 24 should be the max online. Anything else is just about pushing it. And good luck getting a room of 256 people.Adonymous

more players = more realistic.

In a war does death of 1 soldier really mean anything?

what if it's the last soldier?

[QUOTE="Adonymous"]

[QUOTE="MuffinPunk"]right... MAG is a rediculous (sp?) concept. Why on earth would you want 256 players on the same map? That's *whips out calculator* 128 people on both teams. Did they conquer LAG? And would your death really mean anything to your other 127 teammates? Your just another soldier. Around 24 should be the max online. Anything else is just about pushing it. And good luck getting a room of 256 people.hockeyruler12

more players = more realistic.

In a war does death of 1 soldier really mean anything?

what if it's the last soldier?

then he should just surrender

[QUOTE="MuffinPunk"]right... MAG is a rediculous (sp?) concept. Why on earth would you want 256 players on the same map? That's *whips out calculator* 128 people on both teams. Did they conquer LAG? And would your death really mean anything to your other 127 teammates? Your just another soldier. Around 24 should be the max online. Anything else is just about pushing it. And good luck getting a room of 256 people.Adonymous

more players = more realistic.

In a war does death of 1 soldier really mean anything?

exactly my point. I want to play a game not real life. I mean MAG is an ambitous (sp?) game, and if they can make it so you won't die every other second then I might buy it. But if you don't see why its a bit insane then... I have Warhawk and that's just 32 payers max and someone is always being killed. 128 vs 128 will be crazy, and not exactly fun.

[QUOTE="MuffinPunk"]right... MAG is a rediculous (sp?) concept. Why on earth would you want 256 players on the same map? That's *whips out calculator* 128 people on both teams. Did they conquer LAG? And would your death really mean anything to your other 127 teammates? Your just another soldier. Around 24 should be the max online. Anything else is just about pushing it. And good luck getting a room of 256 people.Adonymous

more players = more realistic.

In a war does death of 1 soldier really mean anything?

I hope you could shoot holes in those parachutes.

[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="hockeyruler12"]

[QUOTE="ONLYDOD"]Doesn't look very in game to me.hockeyruler12

in engine...its not gameplay but it IS in game

well the website said in game lol

im just quoting them

One thing Planetside taught me was that the massive lag fest battles are only fun until the "awe" of fighting with a huge army wore off. It's not long before you start branching off from the major battles in order to find smaller skirmishes where you will actually make some sort of impact.

What does this mean for a game like MAG? If this game turns out to be focused primarily on short, 30 minute, zerg fests on a random map, people will loose interest quick.