Sony decided to put the game in 1080p instead of 720p, so what your left with is low res soft textures. That is why it just looks OKAY. They should have put it in 720p and high res crisp textures.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Sony decided to put the game in 1080p instead of 720p, so what your left with is low res soft textures. That is why it just looks OKAY. They should have put it in 720p and high res crisp textures.
Who cares, wipeoutHD looks great in 1080p, even thouh the game isn't strictly speaking that good looking - it's the resolution.
I got a friend to dump XBOX 360 and grab a PS3 off of the GOW3 E3 demo so it looks pretty good I'm guessing. I understand however XBOX Fanboys I would be upset as well if I saw a game like that and knew it was never coming to my system.
graphically its halfway decent.
first off can anyone confirm the 1080p or 60fps? because as far as i know the demo is 720p
but from direct screens from the guys at beyond3d the textures are average theyre on par, some weak ones here and there but overall not bad, the character models are good but no wheres near as good as what was promised, theres AA issues galore, the object quality of the environment is average, the lighting is mediocre over using bloom.
so no theyre not bad, theyre just nothing special or great.
It is 720p 30 fps. I dunno where he is getting his source.graphically its halfway decent.
first off can anyone confirm the 1080p or 60fps? because as far as i know the demo is 720p
but from direct screens from the guys at beyond3d the textures are average theyre on par, some weak ones here and there but overall not bad, the character models are good but no wheres near as good as what was promised, theres AA issues galore, the object quality of the environment is average, the lighting is mediocre over using bloom.
so no theyre not bad, theyre just nothing special or great.
washd123
It is 720p 30 fps. I dunno where he is getting his source.its more then 30fps in some scenes just like MGS4...it wont dip any lower but it can go up to 60 in some parts...atleast i remember the devs saying that somewhere[QUOTE="washd123"]
graphically its halfway decent.
first off can anyone confirm the 1080p or 60fps? because as far as i know the demo is 720p
but from direct screens from the guys at beyond3d the textures are average theyre on par, some weak ones here and there but overall not bad, the character models are good but no wheres near as good as what was promised, theres AA issues galore, the object quality of the environment is average, the lighting is mediocre over using bloom.
so no theyre not bad, theyre just nothing special or great.
nhh18
its more then 30fps in some scenes just like MGS4...it wont dip any lower but it can go up to 60 in some parts...atleast i remember the devs saying that somewherestereointegrity
actually thats wrong.
when developers lock a game at a framerate it never goes over not never goes under. it certainly does go under.
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]its more then 30fps in some scenes just like MGS4...it wont dip any lower but it can go up to 60 in some parts...atleast i remember the devs saying that somewherewashd123
actually thats wrong.
when developers lock a game at a framerate it never goes over not never goes under. it certainly does go under.
its not locked at 30[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]its not locked at 30washd123
but im saying it will go under.
if its not locked then it can go over but it can also go under.
click the link i provided.....[QUOTE="nhh18"]It is 720p 30 fps. I dunno where he is getting his source.its more then 30fps in some scenes just like MGS4...it wont dip any lower but it can go up to 60 in some parts...atleast i remember the devs saying that somewhereIt also dips below 30 fps. From what I've been hearing it is more at ~30 fps.[QUOTE="washd123"]
graphically its halfway decent.
first off can anyone confirm the 1080p or 60fps? because as far as i know the demo is 720p
but from direct screens from the guys at beyond3d the textures are average theyre on par, some weak ones here and there but overall not bad, the character models are good but no wheres near as good as what was promised, theres AA issues galore, the object quality of the environment is average, the lighting is mediocre over using bloom.
so no theyre not bad, theyre just nothing special or great.
stereointegrity
its more then 30fps in some scenes just like MGS4...it wont dip any lower but it can go up to 60 in some parts...atleast i remember the devs saying that somewhereIt also dips below 30 fps. From what I've been hearing it is more at ~30 fps.here....[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="nhh18"]It is 720p 30 fps. I dunno where he is getting his source.
nhh18
here....
stereointegrity
i havnt played the demo so i cant speak on that but from the e3 videos and others i watched there were times when slowdown was very noticeable and yes below 30fps, during scenes with a lot of enemies (which if this is still present just shows bad optimization on their part since all the enemies are carbon clones with rudimentery AI), so unless its fixed theyre lying.
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]
here....
washd123
i havnt played the demo so i cant speak on that but from the e3 videos and others i watched there were times when slowdown was very noticeable and yes below 30fps, during scenes with a lot of enemies (which if this is still present just shows bad optimization on their part since all the enemies are carbon clones with rudimentery AI), so unless its fixed theyre lying.
i have the demo and it never goes below 30......it might get down into the 30-40 range but never below....I have the God of War 3 demo, and in no fashion does it look bad. It's one of the better looking games I've played this year. Huge step up from the PS2 games, especially in regards to the laughable looking NPCs.
No you won't. It's not a PC game.i think you will have an option to play it in 720p with better textures.
ZoomZoom2490
graphically its halfway decent.
first off can anyone confirm the 1080p or 60fps? because as far as i know the demo is 720p
but from direct screens from the guys at beyond3d the textures are average theyre on par, some weak ones here and there but overall not bad, the character models are good but no wheres near as good as what was promised, theres AA issues galore, the object quality of the environment is average, the lighting is mediocre over using bloom.
so no theyre not bad, theyre just nothing special or great.
Thats what I heard on the PS3 vs 360 video on youtube, but if thats not true than wow, it's even worse than I thought if it's 720 with those low res textures, thats even worse. The games graphics still look GOOD. But a game of this caliber and budget should def look better is all im saying.[QUOTE="washd123"][QUOTE="stereointegrity"]
here....
stereointegrity
i havnt played the demo so i cant speak on that but from the e3 videos and others i watched there were times when slowdown was very noticeable and yes below 30fps, during scenes with a lot of enemies (which if this is still present just shows bad optimization on their part since all the enemies are carbon clones with rudimentery AI), so unless its fixed theyre lying.
i have the demo and it never goes below 30......it might get down into the 30-40 range but never below.... Oh yeah, it'll dip below 30. MGS4 did it. Uncharted did it. Demon's Souls did it. It'll dip below 30, possibly even 20 at a few points in the game.[QUOTE="stereointegrity"][QUOTE="washd123"]i have the demo and it never goes below 30......it might get down into the 30-40 range but never below.... Oh yeah, it'll dip below 30. MGS4 did it. Uncharted did it. Demon's Souls did it. It'll dip below 30, possibly even 20 at a few points in the game.i havnt played the demo so i cant speak on that but from the e3 videos and others i watched there were times when slowdown was very noticeable and yes below 30fps, during scenes with a lot of enemies (which if this is still present just shows bad optimization on their part since all the enemies are carbon clones with rudimentery AI), so unless its fixed theyre lying.
DragonfireXZ95
The average frame rate is 38, and it goes as high as 56, and the low is 24. I got all that from this link
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-godofwar3-performance-blog-post
Thats what I heard on the PS3 vs 360 video on youtube, but if thats not true than wow, it's even worse than I thought if it's 720 with those low res textures, thats even worse. The games graphics still look GOOD. But a game of this caliber and budget should def look better is all im saying.digitalman42
it was supposed to be. but its not. and again its not bad its just nothing impressive.
i mean add to all those things i mentioned the fact that it has no physics at all (confirmed by the dev) and the AI is like i said rudimentary at best, and the technical aspects simply arent that impressive at all.
people had this notion that the devs were some kind of technical gods (lol) after GOWII even though that game was more impressive due to the art rather tha nthe actual tech.
GOW3 Graphics = Average???....or heck slightly above average???
For those who don't know about the GOW devs, Sony Santa Monica, read up on them......this is the thing about Sony's 1st party Devs...they will continue to one up each other after every release.......when GOW3 releases early next year, it will be the console graphics king.
http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-godofwar3-performance-blog-post
The texture work is of an outstanding quality throughout, special effects are used in a subtle and reserved manner, lighting is exemplary. The code appears to be using 2x multisamping anti-aliasing, but similar to Killzone 2, the choice of colour palette helps in adding to the edge-smoothing effect.
And:
Sony decided to put the game in 1080p instead of 720p, so what your left with is low res soft textures. That is why it just looks OKAY. They should have put it in 720p and high res crisp textures.
digitalman42
TC, did you watch this video?
Because you said pretty much exactly the same thing as the the guy in that vid lol
For a graphics comparison between the major first party games of Sony and Microsoft, GOW3 looks better than halo 3.
[QUOTE="stereointegrity"]its more then 30fps in some scenes just like MGS4...it wont dip any lower but it can go up to 60 in some parts...atleast i remember the devs saying that somewherewashd123
actually thats wrong.
when developers lock a game at a framerate it never goes over not never goes under. it certainly does go under.
They aren't locking the framerate.
I'm one who cares for graphics, but some people go over the edge.
If a game plays good at 30 fps, what's the problem? Anything under PC level is just mediocre?
[QUOTE="Stringerboy"]It doesn't top KZ2 or Uncharted 2, therefore it has bad graphics...God of war 3 does not have bad graphics :?
themyth01
To think that some people (not you) actually believe this blows my mind.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment