For all those who think the Wii can't produce good graphics...

Rayman proves you wrong.

That looks about as fun as duck hunt.

I don't mean that as an insult because Duck Hunt ruled everyone's face... but that was like 20 years ago.

actually that just made me regret owning a wiiSup11722

How so?

Too blurry to tell if those are actual texture's or "picture's" used as scenery.

Rayman proves you wrong.

HappySunnGuy

Oh my God, that was...just SICK.

Nintendo fans kill me. You all really don't understand what other people dislaike about Nintendo, do you? You would have been better off NOT showing anyone that game (for graphics or gameplay).

It honestly did more harm than good. If I was starting to want to give Nintendo some credit, that game would cause me to take it back.

With games like this, how can you possibly say the Wii is aimed at casuals and kids?

The first Rayman on the Wii was the first game I'd played on the console. It almost put me off buying a Wii, it barely felt like gaming and the second one looks like more of the same.

Rayman proves you wrong.

HappySunnGuy

Seriousily, does sheep want to me to dislike the Wii? It's seems that way,

Obviously none of you have played the first Raving Rabbids. The game was actually a lot of fun, especially the shooting parts like that. Also, the game actually looks decent, expecially since it's main focus is multiplayer. People flame sheep for being all about "OMG, OUR GAMES ARE BETTER THAN YOURS!" whe lemmings and cows are way more like that than sheep. Raving Rabbids 1 was fun, and this one looks like it's going to out do it.HappySunnGuy

The problem is, everyone's definition of "fun" is different.

Shooting rabbits with a plunger gun (WTH?!?) is not anywhere NEAR fun to me.

Just from the game premise, there is no way I would even try it.

You can't make out how good the graphics are from a youtube video.

[QUOTE="Sup11722"]actually that just made me regret owning a wiiHappySunnGuy

How so?

For these reasons:

Xbox 360:http://youtube.com/watch?v=AQZQN6FBkQA

PS3:http://youtube.com/watch?v=THbM_CX0sjQ

PC:http://youtube.com/watch?v=x8mM0Pj20nw&mode=related&search=

[QUOTE="HappySunnGuy"]Obviously none of you have played the first Raving Rabbids. The game was actually a lot of fun, especially the shooting parts like that. Also, the game actually looks decent, expecially since it's main focus is multiplayer. People flame sheep for being all about "OMG, OUR GAMES ARE BETTER THAN YOURS!" whe lemmings and cows are way more like that than sheep. Raving Rabbids 1 was fun, and this one looks like it's going to out do it.TBoogy

The problem is, everyone's definition of "fun" is different.

Shooting rabbits with a plunger gun (WTH?!?) is not anywhere NEAR fun to me.

Just from the game premise, there is no way I would even try it.

Fair enough.

Rayman? Seriously?

First thing I noticed when I got my Wii on launch day and fired up Rayman was "Wow, this really looks like garbage."

Coming from a guy with all 3 consoles and an HDTV, I can safely say that no, Wii simply can't produce a good looking game (yet). Hopefully Super Mario Galaxy changes that. No More Heroes has the potential to look really good.

Problem is that no one plays to the Wii's strengths...instead most games accentuate it's weaknesses.

Rayman? Seriously?

First thing I noticed when I got my Wii on launch day and fired up Rayman was "Wow, this really looks like garbage."

Coming from a guy with all 3 consoles and an HDTV, I can safely say that no, Wii simply can't produce a good looking game (yet). Hopefully Super Mario Galaxy changes that. No More Heroes has the potential to look really good.

Problem is that no one plays to the Wii's strengths...instead most games accentuate it's weaknesses.

bryehngeocef

Did you watch the video? that video is showing Raving Rabbids 2.

[QUOTE="HappySunnGuy"]Obviously none of you have played the first Raving Rabbids. The game was actually a lot of fun, especially the shooting parts like that. Also, the game actually looks decent, expecially since it's main focus is multiplayer. People flame sheep for being all about "OMG, OUR GAMES ARE BETTER THAN YOURS!" whe lemmings and cows are way more like that than sheep. Raving Rabbids 1 was fun, and this one looks like it's going to out do it.TBoogy

The problem is, everyone's definition of "fun" is different.

Shooting rabbits with a plunger gun (WTH?!?) is not anywhere NEAR fun to me.

Just from the game premise, there is no way I would even try it.

then clearly you have not ever shot these rabbits with a plunger :lol: the game is hilarious.

Rayman Raving Rabbids 2 is the best ya got? On rails minigame? Was that supposed to be impressive?

i am pretty sure this is a joke thread... i think... but anyway i loved the first rayman raving rabbids and i cant wait for this sequal. it is the most fun i have had with a game in years. the whole game was just over the top and hilarious. this sequal is looking to be even better!

i dont know why people cant enjoy mini game collections some of them are great. plus who does nto love watching a bunny sufficate and crywhen you shoot a plunger over its face? it is always laugh worthy!

Not too bad. I think RE4 might look a little better, but it does look good. XL83

Oh, and :lol: at the people who took this thread seriously.Hoffgod

Looking at his avatar, his rated games, and how long he has been a member, I don't think he was joking...

one thing people need to realize is a game system cannot put out GOOD graphics unless it has a good artist behind it.

A good artist could use very little pollygons and make a game have good graphics... it just so happens that everyone is being really lazy with their Wii games. Look at RE4, if they really wanted to they could have pushed the CUBE a little harder than that... but the Wii is a little bit better...

That game looks great due to amazing ART directiona good artists doing the 3D models.

A systems power doesn't make a game have good graphics, the artist does... lots of power helps 'cause the artists can work a more freely without having to worry about something holding him back.

Now also poor hardware doesn't = kiddy graphics.

Good hardware doesn't mean the graphics will look more real--- it just means they CAN. They have the option if the artist is good enough to do so...

Game companies just need better artists for the Wii :P...

(Not saying that a good artist could make it look like a 360 game) (But poor hardware doesn't mean a game HAS to look Kiddy... as so many losers have said. Kiddy graphics could use just has much pollys has a realistic one.)

Wow a lot of people got owned here for saying game xxx looks better than that video. They clearly haven't watched it. Its real time video, recorded with a cemera, with rendered bunnies. And NO game looks better than real life, nor RE4 and no Oblivioni, well maybe Crysis :P

Seriously people. Don't spew crap unless you've seen the video.

I think it would have been better to direct all these people to the Smashbros.com website, instead.

Thats were the awsome is hanging out, for now.

is that pre-rendered background?

I thought pre-rendered was dead last gen....

Everybody Loves Rayman.

The graphics are impressive, but some details on the ground were kinda low poly.

is that pre-rendered background?

I thought pre-rendered was dead last gen....

TriangleHard

no way. haven't you seen ps3 games use them ;)

[QUOTE="TriangleHard"]

is that pre-rendered background?

I thought pre-rendered was dead last gen....

Ontain

no way. haven't you seen ps3 games use them ;)

which one? @.@

That game actually looks pretty nice.