For What its Worth: Cartridges

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Seraphimon
Seraphimon

89

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Seraphimon
Member since 2003 • 89 Posts

I kinda wish we could go back to them(outrageous prices notwithstanding).

They eliminated load times for the most part, were terrible for video compression, so they forced developers to render using in-game graphics alone, and damn if they weren't hella durable.

Disk read errors(wtfis that?).

The only aspect of worth to the cd imo, is the cheapness of it. Aside from that, cartridges were a godsend.

Avatar image for XaosII
XaosII

16705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 XaosII
Member since 2003 • 16705 Posts

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

Avatar image for Swift_Boss_A
Swift_Boss_A

14579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Swift_Boss_A
Member since 2007 • 14579 Posts
meeemoooriieees.... *sigh* as much as I love cartridges the games industry needs to move forward not back, no current gen game will be possible on cartridges unless you heavily change the game and lose all the txtures, lighting etc etc. Anyway Blu-ray is where its at :D the disks are strong and durable plus they never get scratched and developers have enough space to create bigger games or much more content.
Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#4 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts

meeemoooriieees.... *sigh* as much as I love cartridges the games industry needs to move forward not back, no current gen game will be possible on cartridges unless you heavily change the game and lose all the txtures, lighting etc etc. Anyway Blu-ray is where its at :D the disks are strong and durable plus they never get scratched and developers have enough space to create bigger games or much more content.Swift_Boss_A

Shame sony dont see it like that and are dropping Blu-ray for Digital Distribution.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#5 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

Flash memory could become a viable alternative when it becomes cheaper and with more capacity.

But I am not bothered by the rather small load times we currently have.

Avatar image for Kratos_OMEGA
Kratos_OMEGA

2872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Kratos_OMEGA
Member since 2007 • 2872 Posts
Load times>>>>>>Paying more.
Avatar image for Arjdagr8
Arjdagr8

3865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Arjdagr8
Member since 2003 • 3865 Posts
but i remember having to constantly blow the cartridge or the console. annoyance.
Avatar image for Swift_Boss_A
Swift_Boss_A

14579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Swift_Boss_A
Member since 2007 • 14579 Posts

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]meeemoooriieees.... *sigh* as much as I love cartridges the games industry needs to move forward not back, no current gen game will be possible on cartridges unless you heavily change the game and lose all the txtures, lighting etc etc. Anyway Blu-ray is where its at :D the disks are strong and durable plus they never get scratched and developers have enough space to create bigger games or much more content.Dibdibdobdobo

Shame sony dont see it like that and are dropping Blu-ray for Digital Distribution.

link or false.

DD is still a way off and has many disadvantages. If DD does become standard for games than expect never to get a full game from the start, you will get it in episodic content which you would probably to still have to pay for. I much prefer hard copy over DD any day and am sure many gamers do also.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="Dibdibdobdobo"]

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]meeemoooriieees.... *sigh* as much as I love cartridges the games industry needs to move forward not back, no current gen game will be possible on cartridges unless you heavily change the game and lose all the txtures, lighting etc etc. Anyway Blu-ray is where its at :D the disks are strong and durable plus they never get scratched and developers have enough space to create bigger games or much more content.Swift_Boss_A

Shame sony dont see it like that and are dropping Blu-ray for Digital Distribution.

link or false.

DD is still a way off and has many disadvantages. If DD does become standard for games than expect never to get a full game from the start, you will get it in episodic content which you would probably to still have to pay for. I much prefer hard copy over DD any day and am sure many gamers do also.

I think Dib is trying to use Sony's planned video store as more than it is. Its an added feature, not Sony dropping Blu-Ray by any means, as DD cannot compete with Blu-Ray ATM in overall quality.

Avatar image for CuDDKiDD
CuDDKiDD

4727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 CuDDKiDD
Member since 2004 • 4727 Posts

I kinda wish we could go back to them(outrageous prices notwithstanding).

They eliminated load times for the most part, were terrible for video compression, so they forced developers to render using in-game graphics alone, and damn if they weren't hella durable.

Disk read errors(wtfis that?).

The only aspect of worth to the cd imo, is the cheapness of it. Aside from that, cartridges were a godsend.

Seraphimon

I still remember having to blow into my Duck Hunt cartridge. Ahhhhh the good ol days.

Avatar image for JLF1
JLF1

8263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 JLF1
Member since 2005 • 8263 Posts

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

XaosII

Isn't flash memory almost a cartridge?
Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts

Flash memory could become a viable alternative when it becomes cheaper and with more capacity.

But I am not bothered by the rather small load times we currently have.

SpruceCaboose
The capacity is there (Samsung has a 64GB card), but yeah, the price is still insane.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"]

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

JLF1


Isn't flash memory almost a cartridge?

Similar in concept. Vastly different in use.

Avatar image for BuryMe
BuryMe

22017

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 104

User Lists: 0

#14 BuryMe
Member since 2004 • 22017 Posts
I wish we'd go back. I miss the fast laoding, and not having to worry about scratches
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"]

Flash memory could become a viable alternative when it becomes cheaper and with more capacity.

But I am not bothered by the rather small load times we currently have.

Sooshy

The capacity is there (Samsung has a 64GB card), but yeah, the price is still insane.

True, there are also solid state HDDs that could become a functional alternative, but until manufacturing and parts become much cheaper, discs are the cost effective way to go.

Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts
[QUOTE="XaosII"]

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

JLF1

Isn't flash memory almost a cartridge?

I think so. I think the carts that you can save your game to use flash memory. Not sure about this, though.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#17 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="XaosII"]

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

Sooshy


Isn't flash memory almost a cartridge?

I think so. I think the carts that you can save your game to use flash memory. Not sure about this, though.

Not really. Cartridges like the ones in older game systems are ROM cartridges. They saved using an internal battery, of which, I think Zelda was the first.

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38934 Posts
[QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="XaosII"]

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

Sooshy


Isn't flash memory almost a cartridge?

I think so. I think the carts that you can save your game to use flash memory. Not sure about this, though.

carts were ROM memory.. flash is a rewritable technology. very different.

Avatar image for Dibdibdobdobo
Dibdibdobdobo

6683

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Dibdibdobdobo
Member since 2008 • 6683 Posts
[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="Dibdibdobdobo"]

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]meeemoooriieees.... *sigh* as much as I love cartridges the games industry needs to move forward not back, no current gen game will be possible on cartridges unless you heavily change the game and lose all the txtures, lighting etc etc. Anyway Blu-ray is where its at :D the disks are strong and durable plus they never get scratched and developers have enough space to create bigger games or much more content.SpruceCaboose

Shame sony dont see it like that and are dropping Blu-ray for Digital Distribution.

link or false.

DD is still a way off and has many disadvantages. If DD does become standard for games than expect never to get a full game from the start, you will get it in episodic content which you would probably to still have to pay for. I much prefer hard copy over DD any day and am sure many gamers do also.

I think Dib is trying to use Sony's planned video store as more than it is. Its an added feature, not Sony dropping Blu-Ray by any means, as DD cannot compete with Blu-Ray ATM in overall quality.

Sony dont stick to any given format. PSX = CD, PS2 = DVD, PS3 = Blu Ray, PS4 = ?! I can honestly see Sony moving towards DD by the time the PS4 is out! This is on the assumption that the PS3 meets sony's assumption of lasting 10 years! Intenet speeds have vastly improved since i owned my 1st PC from 56k Dial-up to my current connection of 8MB which in several years will be inferior just like 56k Dial up is now.

I hope to god i'm wrong and that Sony do not attempt to force this upon us! I love owning my games and i love trading in my old games for new games or cash but if DD becomes the next format then were all screwed.

Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts
[QUOTE="Sooshy"][QUOTE="JLF1"][QUOTE="XaosII"]

We're not gonna go back. They are too expensive to manufacture.

In the future most games will either be on Flash memory or entirely done through digital distribution. Flash memory may have some loading time, but it will be far less than what discs have.

comp_atkins


Isn't flash memory almost a cartridge?

I think so. I think the carts that you can save your game to use flash memory. Not sure about this, though.

carts were ROM memory.. flash is a rewritable technology. very different.

I'm talking about the carts where you could write to the cart. If Wikipedia is to be believed, "some carts contained flash memory, allowing some read-write action."
Avatar image for DrCortex
DrCortex

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 DrCortex
Member since 2008 • 185 Posts
Carts are so dumb. They had problems, too.
Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
Don't miss them at all. Lower prices is more than enough for me.
Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts
Don't miss them at all. Lower prices is more than enough for me.jack_russel
Yeah, but we're getting up there in terms of cost with the current formats. Games with a MRSP of $60 has forced me to start using GameFly.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18249 Posts

with current prices no. i dont cherish the idea of paying around 200 quid for a game due to its massive cart size + paying for the game itself.

from a technical standpoint they are superior accross the board. they can hold a hell of alot of storage and there much faster then any cd based tech (HDDs are generally faster than flash memory). but even a 10GB capacity memory module would make the cost of games massive.

personally i think the manufacturers should either be looking at a disc based game format (lets face it: CD, dvd and blu-ray are for movies and are designed for movies. no drive this gen in the PS3 or 360 has shown that its up to the job of meeting the demands of new games.) or ensure that HDDs are standard in all consoles for caching (and have a fast drive to work with it...none of that panzy 2X slow crap). or move to DD.

Avatar image for jack_russel
jack_russel

6544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 jack_russel
Member since 2004 • 6544 Posts
[QUOTE="jack_russel"]Don't miss them at all. Lower prices is more than enough for me.Sooshy
Yeah, but we're getting up there in terms of cost with the current formats. Games with a MRSP of $60 has forced me to start using GameFly.

True, but I'd hate to think how high they would be if we were still using cartridges. I remember stuff on the neo-geo was like $100+, and that was a long time ago. Over the past 10-15 years, the price of games has only gone up by like $10. Thats pretty good.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
digital distrubution and your problem is solved
Avatar image for dragonpuppy
dragonpuppy

952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 dragonpuppy
Member since 2006 • 952 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"][QUOTE="Dibdibdobdobo"]

[QUOTE="Swift_Boss_A"]meeemoooriieees.... *sigh* as much as I love cartridges the games industry needs to move forward not back, no current gen game will be possible on cartridges unless you heavily change the game and lose all the txtures, lighting etc etc. Anyway Blu-ray is where its at :D the disks are strong and durable plus they never get scratched and developers have enough space to create bigger games or much more content.Dibdibdobdobo

Shame sony dont see it like that and are dropping Blu-ray for Digital Distribution.

link or false.

DD is still a way off and has many disadvantages. If DD does become standard for games than expect never to get a full game from the start, you will get it in episodic content which you would probably to still have to pay for. I much prefer hard copy over DD any day and am sure many gamers do also.

I think Dib is trying to use Sony's planned video store as more than it is. Its an added feature, not Sony dropping Blu-Ray by any means, as DD cannot compete with Blu-Ray ATM in overall quality.

Sony dont stick to any given format. PSX = CD, PS2 = DVD, PS3 = Blu Ray, PS4 = ?! I can honestly see Sony moving towards DD by the time the PS4 is out! This is on the assumption that the PS3 meets sony's assumption of lasting 10 years! Intenet speeds have vastly improved since i owned my 1st PC from 56k Dial-up to my current connection of 8MB which in several years will be inferior just like 56k Dial up is now.

I hope to god i'm wrong and that Sony do not attempt to force this upon us! I love owning my games and i love trading in my old games for new games or cash but if DD becomes the next format then were all screwed.

DD is not currently possible for most of the world. Not everyone can get an 8MB connection like you can. Until internet providers can provide a stable connection for everyone, don't expect DD to take off. I believe Blu-ray is here to stay for at another 3-5 years.