This topic is locked from further discussion.
San Andreas was the worst GTA from the series.
GTA2> GTA Vice City> GTA 3> GTA 1 & London> GTA San Andreas
Weslii
Agreed 100%!
San Andreas was the worst GTA from the series.Agree 100% as well. Hell I played liberty city stories for the PsP more than San Andres. Also I hate to sound like a cow, but if they stuck to a single console it might have been the PS3 due to the whole hard drive problem with the 360 core users.
GTA2> GTA Vice City> GTA 3> GTA 1 & London> GTA San Andreas
Weslii
[QUOTE="Weslii"]San Andreas was the worst GTA from the series.
GTA2> GTA Vice City> GTA 3> GTA 1 & London> GTA San Andreas
BioShockOwnz
Agreed 100%!
Agreed but I never played GTA2 or GTA1 or GTA London; but I agree with the other orders GTA Vice City is better then GTAIII and both are better then GTA San Andreas.San Andreas was the worst GTA from the series.
GTA2> GTA Vice City> GTA 3> GTA 1 & London> GTA San Andreas
Weslii
Agreed.
In sheer size it won't surpass San Andreas.
But it's too early to tell of anything else.
Also haters, San Andreas is currently the best GTA game technically, no matter how much you people hate the atmosphere.
What "corners" did they cut to make it work on both?
DarthKalo
Well it does look like ass. Probably pushing both systems well though..... although I'm sure it would be much better technically as a PS3 exclusive. And no that's not a fanboy statement the standard HDD and large disc space would allow for much better streaming in an open game like GTA. Probably better geometry too.
What "corners" did they cut to make it work on both?
DarthKalo
they had to make it slightly more awesome so snooty 360 gamers would pick it up.
i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.Silenthps
i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.Silenthps
Yeah seriously, Vice City was basically GTAIII with better lighting, a different atmoshere, bikes, and the ability to use aircraft.
San Andreas actually had improved gameplay and technology. The aiming system was alot better, the camera controls were improved, you could now pull up on ledges, there were no load screens during gameplay, YOU COULD ACTUALLY SWIM, not only that you could submerge etc.
Some closed minded people just don't want to give San Andreas it's credit because of the gangsta/hood thing. The game is much more than that..
[QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.Weslii
Meh, it lacked the mobster feel and replaced it with the "gangsta" crap or w/e.
Still doesn't make it a bad game. And is still currently the best GTA.
[QUOTE="Weslii"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.OmegaOrtega
Meh, it lacked the mobster feel and replaced it with the "gangsta" crap or w/e.
Still doesn't make it a bad game. And is still currently the best GTA.
"gangstas" think they are "harder" than the mob, but its only because they watch too much BET.
Actually i heard that it'll be about the same size as san andreas but it wont be filled with a bunch of empty desert and such.In sheer size it won't surpass San Andreas.
But it's too early to tell of anything else.
Also haters, San Andreas is currently the best GTA game technically, no matter how much you people hate the atmosphere.
OmegaOrtega
But alot of people are obviously gonna pick a pretty bright 80's themed game in miami over a wannabe compton despite the fact that artistically, both atmospheres were pulled off excellently.
[QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.OmegaOrtega
Yeah seriously, Vice City was basically GTAIII with better lighting, a different atmoshere, bikes, and the ability to use aircraft.
San Andreas actually had improved gameplay and technology. The aiming system was alot better, the camera controls were improved, you could now pull up on ledges, there were no load screens during gameplay, YOU COULD ACTUALLY SWIM, not only that you could submerge etc.
Some closed minded people just don't want to give San Andreas it's credit because of the gangsta/hood thing. The game is much more than that..
so with VC you didn't like the cool soundtrack, planes, helicopters or new missions then?
I agree with your SA comment, very true that people are quick to diss the hood vibe and pass GTA off as casual trash.
[QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="Weslii"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.krp008
Meh, it lacked the mobster feel and replaced it with the "gangsta" crap or w/e.
Still doesn't make it a bad game. And is still currently the best GTA.
"gangstas" think they are "harder" than the mob, but its only because they watch too much BET.
I think gang crap is stupid, but I didn't let it ruin the game for me.
[QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.hongkingkong
Yeah seriously, Vice City was basically GTAIII with better lighting, a different atmoshere, bikes, and the ability to use aircraft.
San Andreas actually had improved gameplay and technology. The aiming system was alot better, the camera controls were improved, you could now pull up on ledges, there were no load screens during gameplay, YOU COULD ACTUALLY SWIM, not only that you could submerge etc.
Some closed minded people just don't want to give San Andreas it's credit because of the gangsta/hood thing. The game is much more than that..
so with VC you didn't like the cool soundtrack, planes, helicopters or new missions then?
I agree with your SA comment, very true that people are quick to diss the hood vibe and pass GTA off as casual trash.
No no no.
Don't get me wrong my friend. I loved VC's soundtrack.
The aircrafts were a nice addition too.
I'm just stressing the sheer improvements in gameplay and technology in SA, and how it doesn't get the credit thats due.
[QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"]Actually i heard that it'll be about the same size as san andreas but it wont be filled with a bunch of empty desert and such.In sheer size it won't surpass San Andreas.
But it's too early to tell of anything else.
Also haters, San Andreas is currently the best GTA game technically, no matter how much you people hate the atmosphere.
Silenthps
But alot of people are obviously gonna pick a pretty bright 80's themed game in miami over a wannabe compton despite the fact that artistically, both atmospheres were pulled off excellently.
I see. Though I did love driving through the deserts and forest like areas.
Also I agree, I loved VC's theme. But I also loved SA's. Either way though, I won't let a theme, atmosphere, style or w/e we can call it ruin the gameplay for me. Gameplay is what it's all about.
I hate country, but if there was a country themed GTA I'd still enjoy it if the game was put together well.
[QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="Weslii"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.krp008
Meh, it lacked the mobster feel and replaced it with the "gangsta" crap or w/e.
Still doesn't make it a bad game. And is still currently the best GTA.
"gangstas" think they are "harder" than the mob, but its only because they watch too much BET.
i wonder if u guys would feel th same if san andreas had a caucasian protagonist instead of a black one, yes bringin it out there because a lot of people i know dont like it simply cause u have to play as an african american character.
[QUOTE="krp008"][QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="Weslii"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.Agamespotingboy
Meh, it lacked the mobster feel and replaced it with the "gangsta" crap or w/e.
Still doesn't make it a bad game. And is still currently the best GTA.
"gangstas" think they are "harder" than the mob, but its only because they watch too much BET.
i wonder if u guys would feel th same if san andreas had a caucasian protagonist instead of a black one, yes bringin it out there because a lot of people i know dont like it simply cause u have to play as an african american character.
Yeah I ran into a few people who didn't like San Andreas just because of that.
Pretty silly.
[QUOTE="hongkingkong"][QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.OmegaOrtega
Yeah seriously, Vice City was basically GTAIII with better lighting, a different atmoshere, bikes, and the ability to use aircraft.
San Andreas actually had improved gameplay and technology. The aiming system was alot better, the camera controls were improved, you could now pull up on ledges, there were no load screens during gameplay, YOU COULD ACTUALLY SWIM, not only that you could submerge etc.
Some closed minded people just don't want to give San Andreas it's credit because of the gangsta/hood thing. The game is much more than that..
so with VC you didn't like the cool soundtrack, planes, helicopters or new missions then?
I agree with your SA comment, very true that people are quick to diss the hood vibe and pass GTA off as casual trash.
No no no.
Don't get me wrong my friend. I loved VC's soundtrack.
The aircrafts were a nice addition too.
I'm just stressing the sheer improvements in gameplay and technology in SA, and how it doesn't get the credit thats due.
I agree. If you didn't like the theme of the game, that's fine. But don't knock the gameplay because it was by far the best of all the series.
[QUOTE="Agamespotingboy"][QUOTE="krp008"][QUOTE="OmegaOrtega"][QUOTE="Weslii"][QUOTE="Silenthps"]i think san andreas is the best. it brought alot more new things to the series than vice city did. but alot of people dont like it cause of the hood/gangsta theme which i think they pulled off quite well.OmegaOrtega
Meh, it lacked the mobster feel and replaced it with the "gangsta" crap or w/e.
Still doesn't make it a bad game. And is still currently the best GTA.
"gangstas" think they are "harder" than the mob, but its only because they watch too much BET.
i wonder if u guys would feel th same if san andreas had a caucasian protagonist instead of a black one, yes bringin it out there because a lot of people i know dont like it simply cause u have to play as an african american character.
Yeah I ran into a few people who didn't like San Andreas just because of that.
Pretty silly.
You'd actually be really surprised that a large portion of caucasians are like that.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment