Gamepost Dragon Age Origins comparison!

  • 97 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

See where the 8.5 came from and haters/doubters be humbled!

link

I guess the staff at GS had to prove their claims about the 360 version because the lems were in uproar.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#2 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
yus. the colors are much better on the PS3 it would seem. The PC has fantastic character models :o Is that the right word? :P
Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts
Something tells me the lemmings won't calm down even with this comparison.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

The colors were different and the cobblestone looked better on the PS3 but really besides that I didn't see much else.

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#6 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

Good thing my laptop can run it maxed out :D, beats the crap out of the console versions, and also, i have the power of mouse and keyboard :P

Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.aaronmullan

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#8 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.spinecaton

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

textures on armors are sharper, good on the ps3 but better on the pc

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#9 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.spinecaton

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

Colours, lighting, textures etc. Yeah, it's better looking.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.aaronmullan

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

Colours, lighting, textures etc. Yeah, it's better looking.

The colors are effected by the lighting only, everything is just darker. And the only texture that is better is the cobblestone. Unless I am completely blind which is a possibility.

Avatar image for lusitanogamer
lusitanogamer

9338

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 lusitanogamer
Member since 2006 • 9338 Posts
The PS3 version looks noticeably better than the 360 version. Hopefully this will put the GS review doubters to rest. It's time to let go of this and move on to other stuff here in SW.
Avatar image for Sollet
Sollet

8287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Sollet
Member since 2003 • 8287 Posts
The PS3 version does look better indeed, better colors, lightning and textures overall.. However PC crushes em both :)
Avatar image for 50u1r34v3r
50u1r34v3r

1560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 50u1r34v3r
Member since 2006 • 1560 Posts

Yeah, the difference looks pretty big.

Doesn't make me enjoy the game (360 only owner :( )any less though :P

Avatar image for PearlOfHeaven
PearlOfHeaven

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 PearlOfHeaven
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts

i feel bad for bioware fans that are forced to play with the 360 version,i don't feel bad for microsoft fanboys. Theyall have high end gaming laptops

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#15 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

PS3 version is indeed a bit more crisp. However, in a lot of those 360 shots it simply looks like the contrast is tweaked up a bit too high as well. At any rate, I have a 360 collector's edition on the way and I will get to compare it with the PS3 version I already own first hand. From what I am seeing here, the difference is certainly not big enough to get worked up over and I am almost certain that the contrast needed to be turned down on the 360 shots.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
Maybe I'm not checking the right threads at the right times, but are many lems actually denying that DA:O looks better on the PS3? I'm not really seeing the DC that cows are claiming....
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

PS3 version is indeed a bit more crisp. However, in a lot of those 360 shots it simply looks like the contrast is tweaked up a bit too high as well. At any rate, I have a 360 collector's edition on the way and I will get to compare it with the PS3 version I already own first hand. From what I am seeing here, the difference is certainly not big enough to get worked up over and I am almost certain that the contrast needed to be turned down on the 360 shots.

ironcreed

Alright, I am not the only one who sees this!

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.spinecaton

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

instead of looking washed out, it looks rather good. That's the difference.
Avatar image for RedruM_I
RedruM_I

3051

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 RedruM_I
Member since 2009 • 3051 Posts
Maybe I'm not checking the right threads at the right times, but are many lems actually denying that DA:O looks better on the PS3? I'm not really seeing the DC that cows are claiming....dsmccracken
huh? Didn't you read the DA:O sticky? It was filled with outraged lemmings searching the internetz for something that will save them. They only could find a 2 minute long video though :P
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="aaronmullan"]Woah. The difference is pretty big. The PS3 version is quite alot better looking than the 360 version. PC wins again, though.Jandurin

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

instead of looking washed out, it looks rather good. That's the difference.

Meh, just looks like a contrast issue/lighting

The textures for the most part are identical.

Avatar image for ironcreed
ironcreed

14195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#21 ironcreed
Member since 2005 • 14195 Posts

[QUOTE="ironcreed"]

PS3 version is indeed a bit more crisp. However, in a lot of those 360 shots it simply looks like the contrast is tweaked up a bit too high as well. At any rate, I have a 360 collector's edition on the way and I will get to compare it with the PS3 version I already own first hand. From what I am seeing here, the difference is certainly not big enough to get worked up over and I am almost certain that the contrast needed to be turned down on the 360 shots.

spinecaton

Alright, I am not the only one who sees this!

Yeah, a little adjustment on the tv set will brighten the colors up. The contrast is most definitely too high and is giving it a more washed out look as a result. PS3 has some noticeably better textures, such as on the cobblestone roads, trees, ect, but I am not so sure the difference warrants a .5 advantage beings the 360 version supposedly runs a bit better. Seems to even the score, in my opinion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="spinecaton"]

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

instead of looking washed out, it looks rather good. That's the difference.

Meh, just looks like a contrast issue/lighting

The textures for the most part are identical.

You must be looking at a different screenshot comparison than I. I will agree the difference is not that significant in terms of textures. But the color difference is huge and the texture difference IS obvious.
Avatar image for PearlOfHeaven
PearlOfHeaven

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 PearlOfHeaven
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="spinecaton"]

Please explain the "quite a lot better looking" besides the cobblestone.

instead of looking washed out, it looks rather good. That's the difference.

Meh, just looks like a contrast issue/lighting

The textures for the most part are identical.

Nice avatar. You'll just need to remove that fanboy shade off and it'll be a very cute avatar.
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="Jandurin"] instead of looking washed out, it looks rather good. That's the difference.PearlOfHeaven

Meh, just looks like a contrast issue/lighting

The textures for the most part are identical.

Nice avatar. You'll just need to remove that fanboy shade off and it'll be a very cute avatar.

Oh sorry, I am just a huge fanboy this morning :P I said I see the difference in lighting and the cobblestone but not much else. I don't really see how that makes me a fanboy.

Avatar image for PearlOfHeaven
PearlOfHeaven

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PearlOfHeaven
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="spinecaton"]

Meh, just looks like a contrast issue/lighting

The textures for the most part are identical.

Nice avatar. You'll just need to remove that fanboy shade off and it'll be a very cute avatar.

Oh sorry, I am just a huge fanboy this morning :P I said I see the difference in lighting and the cobblestone but not much else. I don't really see how that makes me a fanboy.

Who said you were a fanboy?
Avatar image for spinecaton
spinecaton

8986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 spinecaton
Member since 2003 • 8986 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] Nice avatar. You'll just need to remove that fanboy shade off and it'll be a very cute avatar.PearlOfHeaven

Oh sorry, I am just a huge fanboy this morning :P I said I see the difference in lighting and the cobblestone but not much else. I don't really see how that makes me a fanboy.

Who said you were a fanboy?

Me, I did because I imagine that is what others are thinking.

Avatar image for PearlOfHeaven
PearlOfHeaven

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 PearlOfHeaven
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts
[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"][QUOTE="spinecaton"]

Oh sorry, I am just a huge fanboy this morning :P I said I see the difference in lighting and the cobblestone but not much else. I don't really see how that makes me a fanboy.

Who said you were a fanboy?

Me, I did because I imagine that is what others are thinking.

Why would you think that?
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="dsmccracken"]Maybe I'm not checking the right threads at the right times, but are many lems actually denying that DA:O looks better on the PS3? I'm not really seeing the DC that cows are claiming....RedruM_I
huh? Didn't you read the DA:O sticky? It was filled with outraged lemmings searching the internetz for something that will save them. They only could find a 2 minute long video though :P

No, I saw a couple, not the entire lem hive mind filling it with denial.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Maybe I'm not checking the right threads at the right times, but are many lems actually denying that DA:O looks better on the PS3? I'm not really seeing the DC that cows are claiming....dsmccracken

It was in the sticky! and I'm no cow.. they were even citing other review sources as their proof.

Avatar image for Adrian_Cloud
Adrian_Cloud

7169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Adrian_Cloud
Member since 2006 • 7169 Posts
Any pictures not from the first 10 minutes of the game, with some actual action going on? There is a slight difference, but the PS3 version has really bad lag. The draw distance, textures, and geometry are bad in both the 360 and PS3 versions.
Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts

If anything the comparison just shows the PC is miles ahead of the consoles. Too bad the game wasn't made exclusively for the PC. Bioware could then really up the visuals without having the consoles hold them down.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

If anything the comparison just shows the PC is miles ahead of the consoles. Too bad the game wasn't made exclusively for the PC. Bioware could then really up the visuals without having the consoles hold them down.

sleepingzzz
Always an excuse.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62013 Posts

Yeah, I saw the other thread on this. It does seem to go PC>>>>PS3>360. Differences aren't huge, but they're there.

Hopefully we'll get a much more in depth comparison.

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#34 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts
[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"]

If anything the comparison just shows the PC is miles ahead of the consoles. Too bad the game wasn't made exclusively for the PC. Bioware could then really up the visuals without having the consoles hold them down.

Jandurin
Always an excuse.

It's hardly an excuse.
Avatar image for DoomZaW
DoomZaW

6475

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#35 DoomZaW
Member since 2007 • 6475 Posts

[QUOTE="spinecaton"]

[QUOTE="PearlOfHeaven"] Who said you were a fanboy?PearlOfHeaven

Me, I did because I imagine that is what others are thinking.

Why would you think that?

This is system wars, if you don't agree with one person you are automatically a fanboy of another system :P

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"][QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="sleepingzzz"]

If anything the comparison just shows the PC is miles ahead of the consoles. Too bad the game wasn't made exclusively for the PC. Bioware could then really up the visuals without having the consoles hold them down.

Always an excuse.

It's hardly an excuse.

That doesn't make sense. They released it as they did on the PC and ported it to the consoles with console specific controls, not the other way, and yet you think the consoles held the PC back? It's just as easy to say the PC held the console versions back.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Yeah, I saw the other thread on this. It does seem to go PC>>>>PS3>360. Differences aren't huge, but they're there.

Hopefully we'll get a much more in depth comparison.

lundy86_4

There was another thread? =/ .. I would have just used that one if I saw it.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62013 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

Yeah, I saw the other thread on this. It does seem to go PC>>>>PS3>360. Differences aren't huge, but they're there.

Hopefully we'll get a much more in depth comparison.

Espada12

There was another thread? =/ .. I would have just used that one if I saw it.

Late last night, but it seems to have dropped down pretty far. I don't think it's a big deal.

Either way, it's going to be a popular subject :P

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#39 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts
[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] Always an excuse.Jandurin
It's hardly an excuse.

That doesn't make sense. They released it as they did on the PC and ported it to the consoles with console specific controls, not the other way, and yet you think the consoles held the PC back? It's just as easy to say the PC held the console versions back.

xbox360 look awful. The PS3 is barely running at 30 fps. Hell even if the 360 was given multiple DVDs to up the visuals it would probably run no better than the PS3. And you are claiming it could easily be the other way around. That PC is holding back the consoles? Well, if that's what you want to believe go right on ahead.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="sleepingzzz"] It's hardly an excuse.sleepingzzz
That doesn't make sense. They released it as they did on the PC and ported it to the consoles with console specific controls, not the other way, and yet you think the consoles held the PC back? It's just as easy to say the PC held the console versions back.

xbox360 look awful. The PS3 is barely running at 30 fps. Hell even if the 360 was given multiple DVDs to up the visuals it would probably run no better than the PS3. And you are claiming it could easily be the other way around. That PC is holding back the consoles? Well, if that's what you want to believe go right on ahead.

you don't think if they'd focused on the consoles then the console version would be better than it is?
Avatar image for JediRiff
JediRiff

2159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 JediRiff
Member since 2007 • 2159 Posts
The textures are roughly the same with the 360 and the PS3, whereas its way better on PC. But the PS3 version does look better than the 360 version, judging from the screenshots. The way I see it, the PS3 has been crapped on as far as ports go for the longest time, its about time they got to have something a little nice, too. :) Do I wish my 360 version looked as good as the PC version? Of course I do. Does it stop me from enjoying this absolutely phenomenal game in the slightest? Not at all. :D
Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#42 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts
[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] That doesn't make sense. They released it as they did on the PC and ported it to the consoles with console specific controls, not the other way, and yet you think the consoles held the PC back? It's just as easy to say the PC held the console versions back.Jandurin
xbox360 look awful. The PS3 is barely running at 30 fps. Hell even if the 360 was given multiple DVDs to up the visuals it would probably run no better than the PS3. And you are claiming it could easily be the other way around. That PC is holding back the consoles? Well, if that's what you want to believe go right on ahead.

you don't think if they'd focused on the consoles then the console version would be better than it is?

So you think they didn't focus on the consoles? Looks like they tried to squeeze everything they could out of the consoles.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
[QUOTE="Jandurin"][QUOTE="sleepingzzz"] xbox360 look awful. The PS3 is barely running at 30 fps. Hell even if the 360 was given multiple DVDs to up the visuals it would probably run no better than the PS3. And you are claiming it could easily be the other way around. That PC is holding back the consoles? Well, if that's what you want to believe go right on ahead.sleepingzzz
you don't think if they'd focused on the consoles then the console version would be better than it is?

So you think they didn't focus on the consoles? Looks like they tried to squeeze everything they could out of the consoles.

You obviously don't play many console games. The game is definitely NOT optimized.
Avatar image for JediRiff
JediRiff

2159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 JediRiff
Member since 2007 • 2159 Posts
I think you are wasting your time with him, Jandurin. :)
Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#45 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts
[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"][QUOTE="Jandurin"] you don't think if they'd focused on the consoles then the console version would be better than it is?Jandurin
So you think they didn't focus on the consoles? Looks like they tried to squeeze everything they could out of the consoles.

You obviously don't play many console games. The game is definitely NOT optimized.

Maybe that's true, but even if they did spend another 5 years on it there is still no way it would look as good as it could be on a newer PC. At some point there is just no getting around the limits of the hardware on the consoles.
Avatar image for djsifer01
djsifer01

7238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 djsifer01
Member since 2005 • 7238 Posts
Looks miles better on the PS3 than the 360. Color saturation, shading,textures and lighting are all much better on the PS3. PC screens look by far the best of course.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Maybe that's true, but even if they did spend another 5 years on it there is still no way it would look as good as it could be on a newer PC. At some point there is just no getting around the limits of the hardware on the consoles. sleepingzzz
Well... okay?
Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#48 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts
This annoys me. I was going with the 360, now I'll wait for the PS3 version (Europe still has to wait an extra 2 weeks).
Avatar image for dragonfly110
dragonfly110

27955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#49 dragonfly110
Member since 2008 • 27955 Posts

tbh other then the PS3 version being a bit darker I dont see much difference, the PC version is better then both 360 and PS3 version tho.

Avatar image for sleepingzzz
sleepingzzz

2263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#50 sleepingzzz
Member since 2006 • 2263 Posts
[QUOTE="sleepingzzz"]Maybe that's true, but even if they did spend another 5 years on it there is still no way it would look as good as it could be on a newer PC. At some point there is just no getting around the limits of the hardware on the consoles. Jandurin
Well... okay?

Look I don't mean to come off as an a PC elitist. My favorite games are still on my old consoles. That still doesn't change the facts that the consoles are using hardware from 3 years ago. It's pretty common knowledge that in 3 years time technology has more than doubled in speed/power.