Gamespot, where is ICO and Shadow of the colossus review?

suppose its halo remasterd edition, im certain review will be out even b4 release...just post the review already...

Gamespot doesn't review most PS3 exclusives and if they do score is always lower than average

They didn't review Ar tonelico Qoga: Knell of Ar Ciel and Atelier Totori: The Adventurer of Arland this year

Gamespot doesn't review most PS3 exclusives and if they do score is always lower than average

They didn't review Ar tonelico Qoga: Knell of Ar Ciel and Atelier Totori: The Adventurer of Arland this year

suppose its halo remasterd edition, im certain review will be out even b4 release...just post the review already...

zomba1986

Gamespot doesn't review most PS3 exclusives and if they do score is always lower than average

They didn't review Ar tonelico Qoga: Knell of Ar Ciel and Atelier Totori: The Adventurer of Arland this year

Zurrur

They don't review many collections. For example, see Metroid Prime Trilogy, and that easily deserves a 10.

Where is it? 10 years ago when it originally came out :lol:

Gamespot are not going to waste their time reviewing a game that has already been reviewed for what the game originally was, no matter how many remastered editions it gets. The core game is still intact and so should the score. Besides There are better games coming out that are more worthy of attention. If you want a review, go look at the reviews for the original games. They are more than enough to give you an idea of these two games.

Here's ICO.

http://au.gamespot.com/ps2/adventure/ico/review.html?tag=summary%3Bread-review

Shadow of the colossus

http://au.gamespot.com/ps2/adventure/wandaandthecolossus/review.html?tag=summary%3Bread-review

IGN reviewed it and gave it 8.5 disappointing, but still a great AA for PS3 :)

GS don't review niche titles.

GS don't review niche titles.

Gxgear

I don't see the point in re-reviewing them.

Let them focus on bigger reviews/ones that matter.

[QUOTE="Gxgear"]

GS don't review niche titles.

Mozelleple112

Don't assume that I meant it for all the games that did not get reviewed. There's a clear distinction to what I'm saying and what you're implying that I'm saying, if you just read more carefully.

Other factors can contribute to produce the same result. That is, games not getting reviewed.

They did, in 2001 and 2005.foxhound_fox

Gamespot doesn't review most PS3 exclusives and if they do score is always lower than averageZurrur

it's an collection of titles that were already reviewed..why should they have to do another review?lawlessx

It's been upscaled and the frame rate drops are gone. If you want to know about the games, just read the old reviews and take that s*** into account.

This isn't rocket science, people.

Go to the search bar above and subsequently type ICO and Shadow of the Colossus. There you go.

Unless you really want to see a score for SW purposes, the experience has pretty much been touched upon already by reviewers. The only thing you're waiting for is a review adding that the framerate is better, along a few other graphical details.

If GameSpot reviewed such a masterpiece they'd only end up flopping it so it's best that this is left untouched :P.

It doesn't need to be reviewed.

Strange thing is, it was in the "Under Review" section for a while - so I guess they just decided on a blog post rather than an actual review. :?

[...] they'd only end up flopping it so it's best that this is left untouched :P.XVision84

All the other sites reviewed it so Gamespot didn't have to.Floppy_Jim

Is the guy in your sig playing kinect?

[QUOTE="XVision84"][...] they'd only end up flopping it so it's best that this is left untouched :P.foxhound_fox

Well, that was on the PS2. They won't make the same mistake on the PS3 ;)

[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]All the other sites reviewed it so Gamespot didn't have to.Slashless

Is the guy in your sig playing kinect?

It's a collection of games already made it will not get a review score I am guessing. Look at the God of War collection. HarlockJC

Meh, who cares? Apparently a few, nvm :P

Still, the games have been classics to this day, so no doubt they'll still be good (though not up to todays graphical standards).

[QUOTE="HarlockJC"]It's a collection of games already made it will not get a review score I am guessing. Look at the God of War collection. AtariKidX

You clearly don't understand how GS works. All the largely hyped games get a review (think Skyrim, UC3, BF3, Dark Souls, etc) and the rest are drawn from this:

SOTC: 8.7

http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/adventure/wandaandthecolossus/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B1

ICO: 8.5

http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/adventure/ico/index.html?tag=result%3Btitle%3B2

total Average.

8.6

which would be....

an 8.5.

that is if you want the score.

If you want a written one of how it fairs compared to the originals you're going to have to fair with User Reviews.

IGN reviewed it and gave it 8.5 disappointing, but still a great AA for PS3 :)

Mozelleple112

Gamespot doesn't review most PS3 exclusives and if they do score is always lower than average

They didn't review Ar tonelico Qoga: Knell of Ar Ciel and Atelier Totori: The Adventurer of Arland this year

Zurrur

I know that's a real game, but you ARE joking right?

Go look at the Metacritic rating, about 50 people reviewed the ICO/SOTC Collection and it has about a 92

So if you're having doubts about it, just go out and buy it, they say it improves every performance issue that the Ico and SoTC had

Gamespot has never been credible so they should not be your end all review source before you buy games....I'm 100% sure that they'll review the Halo: Anniversary game so everyone saying that they don't review remasters or collections aren't making any sense

Here's a review for ya 5/10. ICO=Awesome, SOTC=Junk

Gamespot doesn't review most PS3 exclusives

Zurrur