Gamespt:Overlord in developmnt 1 yr longer on PS3, still inferior to 360 version

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for BayCitytRollers
BayCitytRollers

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 BayCitytRollers
Member since 2007 • 96 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/overlord/review.html

Highlights:

Inconsistent frame rate.

the visuals approach something nearing a slide-show performance

Split-screen multiplayer on the PS3 is at times almost unplayable as a result of the poor frame rate

Overlord for the PS3 is a frustrating experience

you could pick up the technically superior Xbox 360 version

Avatar image for VoxteX
VoxteX

463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 VoxteX
Member since 2004 • 463 Posts
1 year porting != 1 more year of development.
Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts
Dang. I bought this too based on another review I read somewhere. Hopefully its not broken bad, and they're exagerrating somewhat.
Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
Wow, slide-show performance.
Avatar image for johan1986
johan1986

4764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 johan1986
Member since 2003 • 4764 Posts
It is harder and more time is needed to create a good game on the ps3 as simple as that which I quess it didnt have
Avatar image for MacaroniMoses
MacaroniMoses

682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MacaroniMoses
Member since 2003 • 682 Posts
Those stupid devs can't understand how to work with the greatness that is PS3.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18251 Posts

as some devs have been saying...porting from the 360 to the PS3 seems to be a real hassle but the other way round doesent seem to be too much of a bother. overlord was built as a 360 game.

still that only really effects games being released on both platforms at the same time. im surprised that after a year of porting..they still couldnt sort it out on the PS3. bethesda did a great job of porting oblivion from a 360/PC code base to the PS3 from what i hear...and they spent a year at that also.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts
Still doesn't change the fact that Xbox family once again took a great PC devs and brought them down into mediocrity :(
Avatar image for BigDizz
BigDizz

2592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 BigDizz
Member since 2004 • 2592 Posts

Was Overlord hyped big?

I played it on my 360 and i thought it was mediocre at best....

Avatar image for ball_of_air
ball_of_air

2105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ball_of_air
Member since 2007 • 2105 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/overlord/review.html

Highlights:

Inconsistent frame rate.

the visuals approach something nearing a slide-show performance

Split-screen multiplayer on the PS3 is at times almost unplayable as a result of the poor frame rate

Overlord for the PS3 is a frustrating experience

you could pick up the technically superior Xbox 360 version

BayCitytRollers

http://uk.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26462219

Stop spamming.

Avatar image for angelkimne
angelkimne

14037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 angelkimne
Member since 2006 • 14037 Posts

Looks like they didn't do a very good job progamming for the Cell.

Those are all CPU based problems i think.

Avatar image for GARRYTH
GARRYTH

6870

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 GARRYTH
Member since 2005 • 6870 Posts
you forgot to had the pros like better graphics and more content that is free. plus it took them a year to port it not one year longer. you really think they were working on the ps 3 version at the sametime as the 360 version .
Avatar image for bigLLL
bigLLL

3688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 bigLLL
Member since 2005 • 3688 Posts
because overlord is more graphically demanding than mgs4 right??? damn flopstation cant run overlord cause of the floppy hardware and not because of a cheap port job by the developers right???
Avatar image for deactivated-5dd711115e664
deactivated-5dd711115e664

8956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 deactivated-5dd711115e664
Member since 2005 • 8956 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/overlord/review.html

Highlights:

Inconsistent frame rate.

the visuals approach something nearing a slide-show performance

Split-screen multiplayer on the PS3 is at times almost unplayable as a result of the poor frame rate

Overlord for the PS3 is a frustrating experience

you could pick up the technically superior Xbox 360 version

BayCitytRollers

THe very first paragraph of the GS review says that these were problems in the original game that should have been fixed by now but weren't. THey also say that because the game is old, the visuals look dated and old.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#15 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
The cows that were hyping Overload AAA will be so depressed....
Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts

Was Overlord hyped big?

I played it on my 360 and i thought it was mediocre at best....

BigDizz

360 reviews were pretty low too. The premise still sounded interesting to me in the Play magazine review though.

Avatar image for BayCitytRollers
BayCitytRollers

96

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 BayCitytRollers
Member since 2007 • 96 Posts
[QUOTE="BayCitytRollers"]

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/overlord/review.html

Highlights:

Inconsistent frame rate.

the visuals approach something nearing a slide-show performance

Split-screen multiplayer on the PS3 is at times almost unplayable as a result of the poor frame rate

Overlord for the PS3 is a frustrating experience

you could pick up the technically superior Xbox 360 version

ball_of_air

http://uk.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=26462219

Stop spamming.

That was based on IGNs review. This is Gamespots. Learn to read.

Stop crybabying/tattletelling.

Avatar image for johnnyblazed88
johnnyblazed88

4240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 johnnyblazed88
Member since 2008 • 4240 Posts
This is a big problem for the PS3, especially if thats the only system you own. I think id get sick of having inferior multiplats and sooner or later id jump over to 360
Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts
Not trying to troll but the same thing could be said about Supreme Commander on the 360
Avatar image for mbrockway
mbrockway

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 mbrockway
Member since 2007 • 3560 Posts

Not trying to troll but the same thing could be said about Supreme Commander on the 360Evz0rz

Zing. Glad I bought a cheaper used copy at least. Don't want to try to reward devs putting out that kind of halfhearted effort.

Avatar image for jknight5422
jknight5422

1992

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 jknight5422
Member since 2003 • 1992 Posts

Those stupid devs can't understand how to work with the greatness that is PS3.MacaroniMoses

LOL! :lol: It's just another case of Copystation getting 360 leavings.

Avatar image for megaton3k
megaton3k

515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 megaton3k
Member since 2007 • 515 Posts

http://www.gamespot.com/ps3/action/overlord/review.html

Highlights:

Inconsistent frame rate.

the visuals approach something nearing a slide-show performance

Split-screen multiplayer on the PS3 is at times almost unplayable as a result of the poor frame rate

Overlord for the PS3 is a frustrating experience

you could pick up the technically superior Xbox 360 version

BayCitytRollers

Is this what lemmings post when their 360 is in the shop, comparing a bad turd to a really bad turd? I guess they can take any points they can get.

Avatar image for Mau-Justice
Mau-Justice

4907

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Mau-Justice
Member since 2008 • 4907 Posts

Sucks, I was going to wait to pick this game up for PS3 hoping they would fix it. Looks like I'll take the crappy yet superior 360 version for $14.99 :(

The best part is, that they are charging $59.99 again for the PS3 version.

Avatar image for dontvoteobama
dontvoteobama

47

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 dontvoteobama
Member since 2008 • 47 Posts

it's a port isnt it? overlord sucks anyway