Gamespy gives Orange Box 3.5?

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

First off when did anyone say it was when everyone knew it was going to be crap since EA is crap. I still don't know why people blame the PS3 when it is a development problem. There are too many games on the PS3 and multiplatform games that are good to keep spitting out this crap.

Grow up and enjoy your game. If you don't like console A or B then just keep the silly comments to yourself.

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

ejstrup

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

[QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Darthmatt

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

If it is so hard to develop for why is it that Insomniac, Grand Turismo Team, Tecmo, Ninja Theory, Infinity Ward, Epic and a bunch of others have no problems with it on much higher quality games?

I dunno, I already have it for PC so it doesnt matter to me. Yeah I think Sony screwed up with the Cell, why go with a new architecture now? Maybe it does have this massive amount of power, but it doesnt matter if it costs too much money to use it.

Then again, it was ported by EA, the crap-master of game development.

If anything I would get it for 360, I really dont like shooters with the PS3 controller, but I will always want to use the PS controller for a GTA game.

the TC may want to state what that 3.5 is out of......GameSpy uses a 5 point rating scale, so it's a 3.5 out of 5, or 70%Eddie5vs1

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

First off when did anyone say it was when everyone knew it was going to be crap since EA is crap. I still don't know why people blame the PS3 when it is a development problem. There are too many games on the PS3 and multiplatform games that are good to keep spitting out this crap.

Grow up and enjoy your game. If you don't like console A or B then just keep the silly comments to yourself.

hiryu3

You really dont understand what a forum is or what system war is if you think people are not going to comment on the consoles.

I agree that it is a development problem. There is some ok multiplatform games on the PS3 but i dont think any PC ported games made it on the PS3 without flaws.Fanboysblame the developers but i would say it Sony fault. They bring out a console that completely different from any other console and computer out there and just expect all the developers to be able to work out how to use this brand new system for a next gen console. Now alot of developers are getting a hang of it but you can see no-one has overcome the problem of porting old games developed for the PC onto the new architecture of the PS3.

[QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

system wars. Where a game below 9.5 is teh suckzors.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

hiryu3

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

If it is so hard to develop for why is it that Insomniac, Grand Turismo Team, Tecmo, Ninja Theory, Infinity Ward, Epic and a bunch of others have no problems with it on much higher quality games?

it a 3.5/5flashattackfina

Yeah.. that's what I was going to say.

It's NOT 3.5 / 10. :lol:

It's like a 75% score

[QUOTE="flashattackfina"]it a 3.5/5blackace

Yeah.. that's what I was going to say.

It's NOT 3.5 / 10. :lol:

It's like a 75% score

[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="Darthmatt"][QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because t

hey are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

hiryu3

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

If it is so hard to develop for why is it that Insomniac, Grand Turismo Team, Tecmo, Ninja Theory, Infinity Ward, Epic and a bunch of others have no problems with it on much higher quality games?

Amazing how hard it is to find gameplay pics. I am sure there is a reason for that.

it a 3.5/5flashattackfina

Yes, and the 360/PC version got a 5/5

[QUOTE="Eltroz"][QUOTE="ejstrup"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Darthmatt

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

ejstrup

right, the PS3 can't handle HL2! rofl

let's face it, there's plenty of good looking multiplats on PS3..

Actually Valve was the company who developed the game and then handed it off to EA late in it's developement. So you should be blaming Valve. There was no way EA was going to fix the mess Valve made of the game in time for release. Also, the game was a PORT and not a "from the ground up" developed title like Ratchet & Clank, GT5, UTIII and all those other games made from the list of developers someone listed above.

If you create a PS3 game from scratch it can be very good. (Heavenly Sword, Uncharted, Ratchet & Clank, Warhawk are good exampled). If you port the game over from the PC or XBox 360, it's going to be not so good. (Madden 08, Rainbow Six: Vegas, Enchanted Arms, Armored Core 4, Kane & Lynch, etc...). That's where the problem lies. Same goes with porting from the PS3 to the XBox 360.

I still don't know why people blame the PS3 when it is a development problem.hiryu3

The PS3 makes life hard on developers. So in reality, both are to blame. Not JUST developers. Not JUST the PS3.

the TC may want to state what that 3.5 is out of......GameSpy uses a 5 point rating scale, so it's a 3.5 out of 5, or 70%Eddie5vs1

I apologize if there was any confusion, I figured most knew they were on a system out of 5. The main thing I wanted to draw attention to is that for 360/PC it recieved a 5/5 and on GR it is at 77%, whereas the 360/PC version is in the top 10 games of all time

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

EA Ports have always been bad and always will remain bad. CoD4 makes your statement false.

[QUOTE="hiryu3"]I still don't know why people blame the PS3 when it is a development problem.Dreams-Visions

The PS3 makes life hard on developers. So in reality, both are to blame. Not JUST developers. Not JUST the PS3.

If developers do not make some breakthroughs in the PS3 technology soon, I can see them backing away from the PS3 in the future. Plus the games they develop for the PS3 sell horribly so there isn't really any incentive.

[QUOTE="Eddie5vs1"]the TC may want to state what that 3.5 is out of......GameSpy uses a 5 point rating scale, so it's a 3.5 out of 5, or 70%Frostbite24

I apologize if there was any confusion, I figured most knew they were on a system out of 5. The main thing I wanted to draw attention to is that for 360/PC it recieved a 5/5 and on GR it is at 77%, whereas the 360/PC version is in the top 10 games of all time

But why, when at the end of the day the ONLY score that will matter is the GS score. Isnt that what system wars is supposed to be about.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Shadow2k6

EA Ports have always been bad and always will remain bad. CoD4 makes your statement false.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Shadow2k6

EA Ports have always been bad and always will remain bad. CoD4 makes your statement false.

So because one multiplat managed to be on par with the other versions that automatically makes it just as easy to make any other multiplat exactly the same? Thinking before posting is a good thing, no?

[QUOTE="Frostbite24"]

[QUOTE="Eddie5vs1"]the TC may want to state what that 3.5 is out of......GameSpy uses a 5 point rating scale, so it's a 3.5 out of 5, or 70%carlisledavid79

I apologize if there was any confusion, I figured most knew they were on a system out of 5. The main thing I wanted to draw attention to is that for 360/PC it recieved a 5/5 and on GR it is at 77%, whereas the 360/PC version is in the top 10 games of all time

But why, when at the end of the day the ONLY score that will matter is the GS score. Isnt that what system wars is supposed to be about.

Until cows stop using other sources for game scores I sure is hell won't stop using them to show scores for their games either. It's how they like it because GS is teh bias. So in actuality I'm doing them a favor .

Psh, all cows play on PC anyway am I right?BreakingPoint8

This man is correct.Don't fret cows, just fire up the old gaming rig and play the superior PC version.

[QUOTE="Shadow2k6"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Eltroz

EA Ports have always been bad and always will remain bad. CoD4 makes your statement false.

I didn't even mention the 360 so take your fanboy BS out of this. I said EA ports (like most ports) suck. Of course not all published EA Games suck (look at Crysis) but most of the time if its developed by EA (which Crysis) isn't it isn't going to be good. Ports are usually worst anyways so it still doesn't matter.

Dont worry cow's will blame other people for there consoles hard development problem :roll:

and 3.5 :lol:

I love how everytime a port happens to be better on the 360 they seem to forget that there have been mulitplats that where on par or better on the PS3. Besides the game was devoloped by EA and we all know how EA is.blackldragon

One day people like you will grow up and stop blaming problems on other people and take responsibility. It may be on your death bed but I'm certain someday... When that day happens and you stop writing every sub par game off as "lazy devs" send me a message, I'll treat you like a grown up.

[QUOTE="Shadow2k6"][QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

Frostbite24

EA Ports have always been bad and always will remain bad. CoD4 makes your statement false.

So because one multiplat managed to be on par with the other versions that automatically makes it just as easy to make any other multiplat exactly the same? Thinking before posting is a good thing, no?

Developers should have all their focus on making a good game. Not trying to figure out how to make something work. MS tries to make it as easy as possible to make games and sony does not. I think it's a waste of time for developers having to "figure out" hardware, when they should spend time on figuring out how to make a good game.

[QUOTE="blackldragon"]I love how everytime a port happens to be better on the 360 they seem to forget that there have been mulitplats that where on par or better on the PS3. Besides the game was devoloped by EA and we all know how EA is.Frostbite24

One day people like you will grow up and stop blaming problems on other people and take responsibility. It may be on your death bed but I'm certain someday... When that day happens and you stop writing every sub par game off as "lazy devs" send me a message, I'll treat you like a grown up.

[QUOTE="Eltroz"]

Please stop blaming EA. There is a reason they were able to become the largest developer company there is. It is because they are able to put out many great games, I mean come on lets face it this is not like the first time a 360 multiplat game looked better then the PS3 version.

liquidsnake1987

EA has a ton of gaming experience....

i hate them as much as the next guy, but if sony can't design hardware that works well with proven game makers then the end result will be subpar...

it's the hardware.... i could see your point from a newer studio or publisher, but EA? c'mon.....