Gaming PC or PS3? (better overall)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gsgdvcbsa
gsgdvcbsa

2094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 gsgdvcbsa
Member since 2005 • 2094 Posts
So i don't normally post on SW forums but since this section is the most popular/active i was hoping to get a quicker response. I already have a 360 but am looking for another system to game on but cant seem to decide between a PS3 or a gaming PC. Both have their pros and cons like with the PS3 i wont have to worry about yearly upgrades to stay up to date and it also has some nice exclusives which the PC doesn't have. But the PC has better graphics and cheaper games ($50). So basically what i want to know is that is the PC worth the hassle? like is it worth spending around a $1000 as apposed to 400 for the PS3? thanx
Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#2 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

since you have a 360 i would say get the PS3, if you didnt have a 360 i would say get the PC. Depends if you want the PC exclusives or the PS3 exclusives more really.

Avatar image for DonPerian
DonPerian

3773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 DonPerian
Member since 2005 • 3773 Posts
Whichever has the games you like.
Avatar image for shadow_hosi
shadow_hosi

9543

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#4 shadow_hosi
Member since 2006 • 9543 Posts
PC has more exclusives and its mutliplats have vast amounts of exclusive content
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

You don't even have to spend $1000 on a gaming PC. For just the tower, you can spend around $500-600 that'll run every game out there on High, at a fairly good resolution. Also if you build right, you won't need to upgrade for a couple years, and that'll just be for the GPU.

Either way, you gotta look at the games library, which interests you more?

Avatar image for svetzenlether
svetzenlether

3082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 svetzenlether
Member since 2003 • 3082 Posts

I have the same choice. I'm choosing a gaming PC, but you do already have a 360 (the PC gets most of the 360's games) so a PS3 may be a little more complimentary for you.

Avatar image for fdgdfgdfgdfg454
fdgdfgdfgdfg454

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 fdgdfgdfgdfg454
Member since 2009 • 63 Posts
pc
Avatar image for gsgdvcbsa
gsgdvcbsa

2094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 gsgdvcbsa
Member since 2005 • 2094 Posts

since you have a 360 i would say get the PS3, if you didnt have a 360 i would say get the PC. Depends if you want the PC exclusives or the PS3 exclusives more really.

zarshack
both have nice exclusives PC is great for RTSs (Empire: Total War, Company of Heroes) while the PS3 has great action games (GOW3, Uncharted)
Avatar image for Franko_3
Franko_3

5729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#9 Franko_3
Member since 2003 • 5729 Posts
gaming pc will give you more bang for your buck. Pc games are *a lot* cheaper than ps3 games, even multiplat one can hit the 20$ in 3 months
Avatar image for deactivated-5b1e62582e305
deactivated-5b1e62582e305

30778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5b1e62582e305
Member since 2004 • 30778 Posts

PC, of course.

This shouldn't even be a question.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#11 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
Since you already have a console to give console experience, get pc to get the pc experience if both are some to you
Avatar image for OPuniverse
OPuniverse

1943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 OPuniverse
Member since 2009 • 1943 Posts

whichever have the games that are more appeal to you. I got a pc and 360:D

Avatar image for Mckenna1845
Mckenna1845

4410

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Mckenna1845
Member since 2005 • 4410 Posts

PC, although i like my ps3, the pc just offers way too much to pass up, it has more games, better controls, more variety in what it can do (office, photoshop, games etc.) and mods/free games.

Yearly upgrades are definitely not required i have an 8800gt and i can pretty much play every game on high, i got it in 2007 and i can see it lasting to late 2010-11. and i'll probably only need to update the graphics card and cpu, as i have 4gb ram and the psu 700w which is plenty, so next time it might only cost me like £200-300 to upgrade, and that depends whether the cpu needs upgrading.

Avatar image for bingbaocao
bingbaocao

1852

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 bingbaocao
Member since 2009 • 1852 Posts
PC > any and all consoles
Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#15 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

I own every console this gen and my gaming PC gets the most time.

Avatar image for b3yondstupidity
b3yondstupidity

12500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#16 b3yondstupidity
Member since 2007 • 12500 Posts
Depends what games libary attacts to you the most I suppose
Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

Go with the PC. It has everything a console has and more. For a good $500 pc check here http://game-central.org/2009/editorials/how-to-build-a-sub-500-gaming-pc/. To just give you an idea why the pc>ps3. Let us take a look at fps and rpg only that are only on that system;

PC

Baldurs Gate

Baldurs Gate II

Fallout

Fallout II

Blood

Shadow Warrior

Icewind Dale

Planescape Torment

Witcher

Diablo II

Titan Quest

Quake Live

Guild Wars

Countless MMOs (the name is MMORPG)

Hexen II

Heretic II

PS3

Killzone 2

Valykria Chronicles

Disgaea 3

Avatar image for dragonpuppy
dragonpuppy

952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 dragonpuppy
Member since 2006 • 952 Posts

Go with the PC. It has everything a console has and more. For a good $500 pc check here http://game-central.org/2009/editorials/how-to-build-a-sub-500-gaming-pc/. To just give you an idea why the pc>ps3. Let us take a look at fps and rpg only that are only on that system;

PC

Baldurs Gate

Baldurs Gate II

Fallout

Fallout II

Blood

Shadow Warrior

Icewind Dale

Planescape Torment

Witcher

Diablo II

Titan Quest

Quake Live

Guild Wars

Countless MMOs (the name is MMORPG)

Hexen II

Heretic II

PS3

Killzone 2

Valykria Chronicles

Disgaea 3

Whiteblade999

That's a bias-looking list...

Avatar image for sikanderahmed
sikanderahmed

5444

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 sikanderahmed
Member since 2007 • 5444 Posts

get ps3, with ps3 you wont have to keep upgrading it every 10 seconds + your ps3 wont eat electricity like pc

Avatar image for zarshack
zarshack

9936

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 149

User Lists: 0

#20 zarshack
Member since 2009 • 9936 Posts

Go with the PC. It has everything a console has and more. For a good $500 pc check here http://game-central.org/2009/editorials/how-to-build-a-sub-500-gaming-pc/. To just give you an idea why the pc>ps3. Let us take a look at fps and rpg only that are only on that system;

PC

Baldurs Gate

Baldurs Gate II

Fallout

Fallout II

Blood

Shadow Warrior

Icewind Dale

Planescape Torment

Witcher

Diablo II

Titan Quest

Quake Live

Guild Wars

Countless MMOs (the name is MMORPG)

Hexen II

Heretic II

PS3

Killzone 2

Valykria Chronicles

Disgaea 3

Whiteblade999

only taking 2 genres into account seems silly. esspeccially seeing as you are including old PC games you might aswell start adding PS1 games onto the PS3 list lol... you missed PS3 titles aswell btw resistance comes to mind straight away.

Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Go with the PC. It has everything a console has and more. For a good $500 pc check here http://game-central.org/2009/editorials/how-to-build-a-sub-500-gaming-pc/. To just give you an idea why the pc>ps3. Let us take a look at fps and rpg only that are only on that system;

PC

Baldurs Gate

Baldurs Gate II

Fallout

Fallout II

Blood

Shadow Warrior

Icewind Dale

Planescape Torment

Witcher

Diablo II

Titan Quest

Quake Live

Guild Wars

Countless MMOs (the name is MMORPG)

Hexen II

Heretic II

PS3

Killzone 2

Valykria Chronicles

Disgaea 3

dragonpuppy

That's a bias-looking list...

Both those lists were made off the top of my head. I am sure if you checked wikipedia you would double each side where the PC still has more then the ps3.
Avatar image for fdgdfgdfgdfg454
fdgdfgdfgdfg454

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 fdgdfgdfgdfg454
Member since 2009 • 63 Posts

get ps3, with ps3 you wont have to keep upgrading it every 10 seconds + your ps3 wont eat electricity like pc

sikanderahmed
you dont have to upgrade at all anymore, there's no games pushing the hardware. crysis just runs crap because it's terriblely optimized.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62031 Posts

get ps3, with ps3 you wont have to keep upgrading it every 10 seconds + your ps3 wont eat electricity like pc

sikanderahmed

lol you're funny.

Avatar image for fdgdfgdfgdfg454
fdgdfgdfgdfg454

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 fdgdfgdfgdfg454
Member since 2009 • 63 Posts
Cant wait for idsoftware's Rage Or Doom4 i bet you anything those games run better on my nvidia geforce 8800 GT 512 mb than crysis does.
Avatar image for gsgdvcbsa
gsgdvcbsa

2094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 gsgdvcbsa
Member since 2005 • 2094 Posts
ok thanx everyone, guess ill look into getting a nice PC since i haven't played good a RTS in a while (Halo Wars was such a casual-fest).
Avatar image for hrt_rulz01
hrt_rulz01

22681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 hrt_rulz01
Member since 2006 • 22681 Posts
So i don't normally post on SW forums but since this section is the most popular/active i was hoping to get a quicker response. I already have a 360 but am looking for another system to game on but cant seem to decide between a PS3 or a gaming PC. Both have their pros and cons like with the PS3 i wont have to worry about yearly upgrades to stay up to date and it also has some nice exclusives which the PC doesn't have. But the PC has better graphics and cheaper games ($50). So basically what i want to know is that is the PC worth the hassle? like is it worth spending around a $1000 as apposed to 400 for the PS3? thanxgsgdvcbsa
This is a similar situation to me. I already have a PS3, but I want to get a gaming PC. I used to have one but I sold it a while ago. I had alot of fun on my PC, but I'm not sure if it's worth the cash. I really want to play Sims 3!!!
Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
Depends on the games you want. 360 and PC share a lot of games and have similar ones so the 360 should keep you satisfied. Unless you crave RTS's and MMO's then I'd get a PS3.
Avatar image for fdgdfgdfgdfg454
fdgdfgdfgdfg454

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 fdgdfgdfgdfg454
Member since 2009 • 63 Posts
does killzone2 even look a better than this usermade quake 4 map? http://i43.tinypic.com/2r22etc.jpg
Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

The PS3 would be the better choice for me personally. I am a university student and have a limited budget and the PS3 happens to fit into it while a PC with the primary purpose of playing games maxed out doesn't. What's more, I already have a nice laptop so I cannot justify spending all that money on a gaming PC when all its other functions would already be covered by my laptop, thus meaning that I would have spent a very large sum on a device meant only for gaming.

In addition to that, I have a nice HDTV so playing BRDs would be a nice feature. I also wouldn't have to torture myself about which parts give me the most bang for my buck. The PS3 also has a number of games that I am interested in, perhaps even more so than a gaming PC. It certainly has Bioshock and Dead Space and I am beyond eager to play those games. Despite split screen dying on consoles, it still has a presence and I have friends I would love to have in the same room as me so I can play with them.

The PS3 just seems a lot more simplistic and accessible and those two adjectives have no negative connotation for me. If you have the time, the money and the confidence, then go ahead and get a gaming PC. I myself don't.

Avatar image for urdead18
urdead18

3630

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 urdead18
Member since 2008 • 3630 Posts
[QUOTE="fdgdfgdfgdfg454"]does killzone2 even look a better than this usermade quake 4 map? http://i43.tinypic.com/2r22etc.jpg

Are you serious?
Avatar image for jackandblood
jackandblood

1115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 jackandblood
Member since 2008 • 1115 Posts

The both have great things going for them. Lets not do this

Avatar image for SilverChimera
SilverChimera

9256

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#32 SilverChimera
Member since 2009 • 9256 Posts

i suggest ps3 because most 360 games are on pc. if you want some new games, then ps3 ftw. also pc's have the compatibility issues even though the hardware is up to date.

Avatar image for Ultramarine777
Ultramarine777

1030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#33 Ultramarine777
Member since 2006 • 1030 Posts

PS3 will give you the most variety and new upcoming titles. I truly recommend it.:D

Avatar image for TheGreatOutdoor
TheGreatOutdoor

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 TheGreatOutdoor
Member since 2009 • 3234 Posts

PC all day long.

Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

The PS3 would be the better choice for me personally. I am a university student and have a limited budget and the PS3 happens to fit into it while a PC with the primary purpose of playing games maxed out doesn't. What's more, I already have a nice laptop so I cannot justify spending all that money on a gaming PC when all its other functions would already be covered by my laptop, thus meaning that I would have spent a very large sum on a device meant only for gaming.

In addition to that, I have a nice HDTV so playing BRDs would be a nice feature. I also wouldn't have to torture myself about which parts give me the most bang for my buck. The PS3 also has a number of games that I am interested in, perhaps even more so than a gaming PC. It certainly has Bioshock and Dead Space and I am beyond eager to play those games. Despite split screen dying on consoles, it still has a presence and I have friends I would love to have in the same room as me so I can play with them.

The PS3 just seems a lot more simplistic and accessible and those two adjectives have no negative connotation for me. If you have the time, the money and the confidence, then go ahead and get a gaming PC. I myself don't.

Hexagon_777

I see this comment lots of times but it doesn't really make any sense. I mean, people are perfectly happy to play games on a PS3 at 720p, 30fps, 0xAA. However, when thinking about PC gaming, the same people immediatelly imply that you have to game at 1080p, 60fps, 4xAA (or whatever). If you're happy playing games at low resolutions, aliasing, low framerates, you can buy a PC for 400$ or less.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

The PS3 would be the better choice for me personally. I am a university student and have a limited budget and the PS3 happens to fit into it while a PC with the primary purpose of playing games maxed out doesn't. What's more, I already have a nice laptop so I cannot justify spending all that money on a gaming PC when all its other functions would already be covered by my laptop, thus meaning that I would have spent a very large sum on a device meant only for gaming.

In addition to that, I have a nice HDTV so playing BRDs would be a nice feature. I also wouldn't have to torture myself about which parts give me the most bang for my buck. The PS3 also has a number of games that I am interested in, perhaps even more so than a gaming PC. It certainly has Bioshock and Dead Space and I am beyond eager to play those games. Despite split screen dying on consoles, it still has a presence and I have friends I would love to have in the same room as me so I can play with them.

The PS3 just seems a lot more simplistic and accessible and those two adjectives have no negative connotation for me. If you have the time, the money and the confidence, then go ahead and get a gaming PC. I myself don't.

nunovlopes

I see this comment lots of times but it doesn't really make any sense. I mean, people are perfectly happy to play games on a PS3 at 720p, 30fps, 0xAA. However, when thinking about PC gaming, the same people immediatelly imply that you have to game at 1080p, 60fps, 4xAA (or whatever). If you're happy playing games at low resolutions, aliasing, low framerates, you can buy a PC for 400$ or less.

The thing is, with the PS3, you have no other option. You can't go any higher. It's fixed. The PC is a more flexible platform, however, and people like me would want to utilize everything it has to offer but simply wouldn't be able to. I love playing around with options and such but would hate to see that some are simply unreachable. It's an inane desire, I know.

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
You already have a PC............get a PS3 and set aside $200 here and there and you can upgrade your current PC.
Avatar image for nunovlopes
nunovlopes

2638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 nunovlopes
Member since 2009 • 2638 Posts

[QUOTE="nunovlopes"]

[QUOTE="Hexagon_777"]

The PS3 would be the better choice for me personally. I am a university student and have a limited budget and the PS3 happens to fit into it while a PC with the primary purpose of playing games maxed out doesn't. What's more, I already have a nice laptop so I cannot justify spending all that money on a gaming PC when all its other functions would already be covered by my laptop, thus meaning that I would have spent a very large sum on a device meant only for gaming.

In addition to that, I have a nice HDTV so playing BRDs would be a nice feature. I also wouldn't have to torture myself about which parts give me the most bang for my buck. The PS3 also has a number of games that I am interested in, perhaps even more so than a gaming PC. It certainly has Bioshock and Dead Space and I am beyond eager to play those games. Despite split screen dying on consoles, it still has a presence and I have friends I would love to have in the same room as me so I can play with them.

The PS3 just seems a lot more simplistic and accessible and those two adjectives have no negative connotation for me. If you have the time, the money and the confidence, then go ahead and get a gaming PC. I myself don't.

Hexagon_777

I see this comment lots of times but it doesn't really make any sense. I mean, people are perfectly happy to play games on a PS3 at 720p, 30fps, 0xAA. However, when thinking about PC gaming, the same people immediatelly imply that you have to game at 1080p, 60fps, 4xAA (or whatever). If you're happy playing games at low resolutions, aliasing, low framerates, you can buy a PC for 400$ or less.

The thing is, with the PS3, you have no other option. You can't go any higher. It's fixed. The PC is a more flexible platform, however, and people like me would want to utilize everything it has to offer but simply wouldn't be able to. I love playing around with options and such but would hate to see that some are simply unreachable. It's an inane desire, I know.

I can relate to what you're saying. With a PC if you're not playing games maxed out (or close) you feel frustrated. It's a psychological thing I guess. Still, I played Crysis at 1440x900, High, 0xAA, about 30-35 fps and had a blast :)

Avatar image for anshul89
anshul89

5705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 anshul89
Member since 2006 • 5705 Posts

Gaming PC. Most AA+ exclusives, best graphics, controls, mods, free dlc, etc etc

Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

The PC has a vastly larger library, counting backwards-compatibility or not.

Doesn't matter if you don't draw enough games from that library to interest you, though. I did, the vast majority of my games from my collection are PC games.

Avatar image for Hexagon_777
Hexagon_777

20348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Hexagon_777
Member since 2007 • 20348 Posts

ok thanx everyone, guess ill look into getting a nice PC since i haven't played good a RTS in a while (Halo Wars was such a casual-fest). gsgdvcbsa

Good luck, then! Make sure to compare prices before buying stuff off Steam. Games tend to be cheaper on Amazon.com, for example.

Also, you seem to be from the US. Why does it seem easier to find PC components for great prices there than when compared with the EU?

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

[QUOTE="Whiteblade999"]

Go with the PC. It has everything a console has and more. For a good $500 pc check here http://game-central.org/2009/editorials/how-to-build-a-sub-500-gaming-pc/. To just give you an idea why the pc>ps3. Let us take a look at fps and rpg only that are only on that system;

PC

Baldurs Gate

Baldurs Gate II

Fallout

Fallout II

Blood

Shadow Warrior

Icewind Dale

Planescape Torment

Witcher

Diablo II

Titan Quest

Quake Live

Guild Wars

Countless MMOs (the name is MMORPG)

Hexen II

Heretic II

PS3

Killzone 2

Valykria Chronicles

Disgaea 3

zarshack

only taking 2 genres into account seems silly. esspeccially seeing as you are including old PC games you might aswell start adding PS1 games onto the PS3 list lol... you missed PS3 titles aswell btw resistance comes to mind straight away.

PS1 games arn't compatible with all PS3s though ;) The fact that they're old dosn't matter, they're still great fun
Avatar image for sammysalsa
sammysalsa

1832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 sammysalsa
Member since 2004 • 1832 Posts

It depends if you like online multiplayer, if this takes up the majority of your time then PC hands down.

Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

It depends if you like online multiplayer, if this takes up the majority of your time then PC hands down.

sammysalsa

As someone who doesn't play any multiplayer games I don't have any problems finding games to enjoy on PC.

Avatar image for GTR2addict
GTR2addict

11863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 GTR2addict
Member since 2007 • 11863 Posts
the pc will serve you alot better
Avatar image for iki080
iki080

1085

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 iki080
Member since 2008 • 1085 Posts

pc

Avatar image for TheGreatOutdoor
TheGreatOutdoor

3234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 TheGreatOutdoor
Member since 2009 • 3234 Posts

[QUOTE="sammysalsa"]

It depends if you like online multiplayer, if this takes up the majority of your time then PC hands down.

AnnoyedDragon

As someone who doesn't play any multiplayer games I don't have any problems finding games to enjoy on PC.

Yea I :lol:ed when I read his post as well.