Gears 2 Multiplayer Preview by IGN (56k out)

Video:

http://xbox360.ign.com/dor/objects/14232680/gears-of-war-2/videos/gears2_multiplayer_101408.html

Screenshots:

my crystal ball predictions: multiplayer goty + shooter of the year

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

how many of these are in game? o0_L0st_B0y_0o

um.... all of them except for the landscape pics.

Great find Mephisto!!!

The best exclusive shooter game of the year confirmed.

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

5v5

i dont have much money and i realy want lbp fable 2 resistance and endwar so i'll proberly skip this

edited to make it more clear

how many of these are in game? o0_L0st_B0y_0o

Not all i think, only the ones with players in them and 3rd person view, right?

meh lbp and resistance look better and i dont have much money so i'll proberly skip this or buy it when its cheaptoast_burner

No.

The 13th picture in the rain is from Gears 1.

But the level of detail is immense, just look at Marcus' character model in picture 2. Each part accurately textured and modeled. The character models are amazing, look at the attention to detail.

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

ogvampire

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]meh lbp and resistance look better and i dont have much money so i'll proberly skip this or buy it when its cheapWhenTheTwoFace

No.

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

[QUOTE="toast_burner"]meh lbp and resistance look better and i dont have much money so i'll proberly skip this or buy it when its cheaptoast_burner

No.

"meh lbp and resistance look better" No.

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

pretty much. although the number of players doesnt mean that one is better than another

Holy, look at those screens. I can't wait to play this on my 50" in 1080p :D

This game will most likely be my GOTY.

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

Like cows said "try 40vs40" instaed of 4vs4 when Gears stomped on REsistance??

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

Holy, look at those screens. I can't wait to play this on my 50" in 1080p :D

This game will most likely be my GOTY.

sargentbotk

DROL!

"meh lbp and resistance look better" No.

WhenTheTwoFace

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Snowboarder99

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

True, true

[QUOTE="o0_L0st_B0y_0o"]how many of these are in game? ogvampire

um.... all of them except for the landscape pics.

hmm really? i thought only one was, never seen the people be at those angles before if that makes sense u have always been just behind the guy etc

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

"meh lbp and resistance look better" No.

toast_burner

Cry as much as you can, but it doesn't change the fact that saying "meh lbp and resistance look better" means IT'S a FACT.

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Snowboarder99

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

there's no point no matter how many times you tell people this they will not listen because they've never played it. even 6 v 6 would completely ruin gears

[QUOTE="sargentbotk"]

Holy, look at those screens. I can't wait to play this on my 50" in 1080p :D

This game will most likely be my GOTY.

WhenTheTwoFace

DROL!

What's a drol? o.o Or did you mean drool? lol

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Snowboarder99

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

highest should go in gears, oh and if it is a big map i wouldn't mind having more player, the more players, the more CARNAGE!!!

[QUOTE="Snowboarder99"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

mephisto_11

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

there's no point no matter how many times you tell people this they will not listen because they've never played it. even 6 v 6 would completely ruin gears

Maybe it would work, with big maps and respawn after dead. but 5v5 seems pretty perfect

[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

"meh lbp and resistance look better" No.

WhenTheTwoFace

Cry as much as you can, but it doesn't change the fact that saying "meh lbp and resistance look better" means IT'S a FACT.

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="sargentbotk"]

Holy, look at those screens. I can't wait to play this on my 50" in 1080p :D

This game will most likely be my GOTY.

sargentbotk

DROL!

What's a drol? o.o Or did you mean drool? lol

I droled when you wrote o play this on my 50" in 1080p ;)

[QUOTE="Snowboarder99"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

mephisto_11

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

there's no point no matter how many times you tell people this they will not listen because they've never played it. even 6 v 6 would completely ruin gears

You're saying i never played gears?:lol:

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

"meh lbp and resistance look better" No.

toast_burner

Cry as much as you can, but it doesn't change the fact that saying "meh lbp and resistance look better" means IT'S a FACT.

It, in no way, seems like it! I find LBP to look better or RE 2 looks better, in my point of view would be much better

[QUOTE="sargentbotk"][QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="sargentbotk"]

Holy, look at those screens. I can't wait to play this on my 50" in 1080p :D

This game will most likely be my GOTY.

WhenTheTwoFace

DROL!

What's a drol? o.o Or did you mean drool? lol

I droled when you wrote o play this on my 50" in 1080p ;)

Oh lol. Yeah, I can't wait! Nov. 7 is right around the corner though.

[QUOTE="Snowboarder99"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

highest should go in gears, oh and if it is a big map i wouldn't mind having more player, the more players, the more CARNAGE!!!

N _ O. Not in gears. Stick to RE or BF, then.

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]

[QUOTE="o0_L0st_B0y_0o"]how many of these are in game? o0_L0st_B0y_0o

um.... all of them except for the landscape pics.

hmm really? i thought only one was, never seen the people be at those angles before if that makes sense u have always been just behind the guy etc

of the non-landscape pics, there are 4 where you have the 3rd person view, not one.

the other 2 im assuming are using the in-game engine. its multiplayer, so there are no cutscenes, and they seem to have the same quality as the other pics

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="sargentbotk"][QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="sargentbotk"]

Holy, look at those screens. I can't wait to play this on my 50" in 1080p :D

This game will most likely be my GOTY.

sargentbotk

DROL!

What's a drol? o.o Or did you mean drool? lol

I droled when you wrote o play this on my 50" in 1080p ;)

Oh lol. Yeah, I can't wait! Nov. 7 is right around the corner though.

Maybe it's spelled "drooled", I don't know

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="Snowboarder99"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

WhenTheTwoFace

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

highest should go in gears, oh and if it is a big map i wouldn't mind having more player, the more players, the more CARNAGE!!!

N _ O. Not in gears. Stick to RE or BF, then.

I didn't say 60vs60 IN GEARS, i said ur right,5v5should be the highest in gears :P

The 13th picture in the rain is from Gears 1.

But the level of detail is immense, just look at Marcus' character model in picture 2. Each part accurately textured and modeled. The character models are amazing, look at the attention to detail.

Commando3200

Yup, that made gears 1 shine. the details, the graphics

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

[QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="Snowboarder99"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

Al3x_n90

5v5

Same thing :P try 60vs60(r2) or erm...( how many will socom have) ...whatever :P

60v60 in Gears of War would be the stupidest idea ever. 5v5 is the highest it should go.

highest should go in gears, oh and if it is a big map i wouldn't mind having more player, the more players, the more CARNAGE!!!

N _ O. Not in gears. Stick to RE or BF, then.

I didn't say 60vs60 IN GEARS, i said ur right,5v5should be the highest in gears :P

Oh, by highest should go in gears , I thought you believed that as high as possible players should be in multiplayer mode (that'd mean huge amount of pl.), but now, I see what u meant :)

[QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"][QUOTE="toast_burner"][QUOTE="WhenTheTwoFace"]

"meh lbp and resistance look better" No.

WhenTheTwoFace

Cry as much as you can, but it doesn't change the fact that saying "meh lbp and resistance look better" means IT'S a FACT.

It, in no way, seems like it! I find LBP to look better or RE 2 looks better, in my point of view would be much better

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"]

Cool

i really wouldn't give it multiplayer of the year since it's nothing special, 4pvs4p, the only way it could win against a dedicated mp game like socom would be super quality and no lag what so ever :P

MojondeVACA

Yes :D i came back with a time machine that teleported me back naked :evil:

Seriously now... idk if it will have lag but i was saying, in order to win MP of the year it shouldn't have any lag, or have but so little that you wouldn't notice