![](https://www.gamespot.com/a/uploads/scale_super/1578/15785403/3224304-1366106708-2HEZe.jpg)
How can this following filtered garbage even compete with Gears 4?
![](https://www.gamespot.com/a/uploads/original/1578/15785403/3224305-2831833098-30439.jpg)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Gears 4 looks beautiful at times, even in its multiplayer maps. Zelda I've never played, but by what I've seen it looks meh. That's to be expected though, it's on much weaker hardware. What's the point of this comparison though? Lol
Zelda is hands down a better looking game. This is such a fail. Zeldas world has gorgeous wildlife to where as Gears of War wildlife is void of breath. How you gonna make a world with shit wildlife, wtf were they smoking.
Gears 4 looks beautiful at times, even in its multiplayer maps. Zelda I've never played, but by what I've seen it looks meh. That's to be expected though, it's on much weaker hardware. What's the point of this comparison though? Lol
Exactly, at it's worst Gears of War 4 looks leagues better than Zelda's best.
Gears of War 4 is an unquestionably better looking game, but Breath of the Wild is an unquestionably better game, Gears is still good, but it's no Zelda.
who exactly said Zelda was a looker? On a technical level no Switch game will compare to even low budget PS4/Xbox games.
@nfamouslegend: He just mad Zelda is more realistic than Gears of War. Breath of the Wild destroys this game in detail. Tree texture, rocks, water, food, wildlife, etc. You name it, well compare it. Zelda cant be defeated. The rich diverse textures of Breath of the Wild cant be touched.
Gears of War 4 is a slightly better looking gears of war 3.
Zelda Breath of the Wild changed a lot (likely for the worse)
Still a better game than gears of war 4, gears of war 4 is a 6/10 game.
If I had played neither game, knew nothing of the systems that run them, and had to choose between which of the two is more visually appealing, I'd go with that Zelda pic. Both pics are unflattering representations of those games, but hey, at least you're being fair lol.
But yeah, on a technical level it's obvious that Gears runs circles around Zelda. Much better hardware, much smaller scale. This is about as "no shit" as it gets.
@nfamouslegend: He just mad Zelda is more realistic than Gears of War. Breath of the Wild destroys this game in detail. Tree texture, rocks, water, food, wildlife, etc. You name it, well compare it. Zelda cant be defeated. The rich diverse textures of Breath of the Wild cant be touched.
No way, Gears 4 does all of the following much better.
@godlygamer: Put that money where the mouth is. Lets see it. We can compare wildlife first. Or food, your choice.
Here's a question for you: Who gives a shit?
Zelda gives us a massive, expressive world to exist and experiment in.
Gears gives us the same cuddling up the chest high walls we've played ad infinitum.
Look, I played and enjoyed Gears 4 a lot too. But most people don't get off to the million polygons in Marcus's bicep. They prefer a better playing game, which based on commercial and critical reception, is inarguably Zelda.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment