Ghostbusters is awesome!

omg this has to be the sleeper hit of the year. 7.5 gamespot? Come on...... This game is an 8.5 no questions asked.

Ghostbusters on 360 kicks freaking butt. It's like playing through a movie, much funnier than the mehtacular 2nd movie. And it's quality. I played through the hotel and library thus far. There have been plenty of mini-bosses and huge bosses. Capturing is really fun. Also, props to Terminal Reality for the Infernal Engine. The best engine/detail I've seen yet used/in a licensed game. Easily an 8.0-8.5 from me.

omg this has to be the sleeper hit of the year. 7.5 gamespot? Come on...... This game is an 8.5 no questions asked.

Walker34

I'm glad you enjoyed it.

I am boycotting the developer.

I can't wait to get this game, for the 360, and it's doing well at metacritic(79% while the PS3 version has 78%, LOL)

If it's the same 7.5 they gave Ratchet & Clank, I'm sold.

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

omg this has to be the sleeper hit of the year. 7.5 gamespot? Come on...... This game is an 8.5 no questions asked.

I'm glad you enjoyed it.

I am boycotting the developer.

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

Why? anyway, I'm gonna give this a rent soon.beast667

Because i over react to shoddy PS3/PC ports and i am stubborn as hell.

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

GabeNewellsPie

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

GabeNewellsPie

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

still the same game expierience in the end right?Animal-Mother

Not if you play on PC.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]still the same game expierience in the end right?Irick_cb

Not if you play on PC.

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

ermacness

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

Why? Bcause of graphics. Is the game still the same in the end or does t have different level designs and extra content?Animal-Mother

You get no DLC and no Multiplayer on the PC.

But they made up for it by requiring you to connect to the internet for DRM checks.

Also, it has higher system requirements then Crysis.

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

mitu123

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

Besides, so do I and love the 360 very much. I just hate it when someone just effortlessly bashes the ps3 for no apparent reason

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="ermacness"]while we play LBP, MGS4, R2, KZ2, Infamous, VC, and many more quality exclusives;)

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

ermacness

Besides, so do I and love the 360 very much. I just hate it when someone just effortlessly bashes the ps3 for no apparent reason

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

Animal-Mother

PS3 owners will have to pay the same price as their 360 owning counterparts for an inferior product,a situation that happens about 90% of the time when dealing with multiplats.

Something isn't right there?This isn't what Sony promised at the beginning of this gen?

Yeah I can just see it now-" 599 USD,oh and you will also have to pay 60 USD for games with diminished or sometimes non-existant graphical effects your 360 owning friends take for granted"

At least they would have been honest that way.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]Why? Bcause of graphics. Is the game still the same in the end or does t have different level designs and extra content?Irick_cb

You get no DLC and no Multiplayer on the PC.

But they made up for it by requiring you to connect to the internet for DRM checks.

Also, it has higher system requirements then Crysis.

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

mitu123

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

Well since I also own both a PS3 and 360 that akes me just as qualified as you to claim anything (by your logic) and I say the PS3 does have superior exlusives, not in terms of the amount of fun i have playing them, but definately in the grapical department. No game on 360 beats Killzone 2, MGS 4 and Uncharted in that respect and E3 showed that the list is soon getting longer .

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

GabeNewellsPie

PS3 owners will have to pay the same price as their 360 owning counterparts for an inferior product,a situation that happens about 90% of the time when dealing with multiplats.

Something isn't right there?This isn't what Sony promised at the beginning of this gen?

Yeah I can just see it now-" 599 USD,oh and you will also have to pay 60 USD for games with diminished or sometimes non-existant graphical effects your 360 owning friends take for granted"

At least they would have been honest that way.

[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"]Why? Bcause of graphics. Is the game still the same in the end or does t have different level designs and extra content?Animal-Mother

You get no DLC and no Multiplayer on the PC.

But they made up for it by requiring you to connect to the internet for DRM checks.

Also, it has higher system requirements then Crysis.

[QUOTE="beast667"]Why? anyway, I'm gonna give this a rent soon.Irick_cb

Because i over react to shoddy PS3/PC ports and i am stubborn as hell.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="ermacness"]while we play LBP, MGS4, R2, KZ2, Infamous, VC, and many more quality exclusives;)

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

NielsNL

Well since I also own both a PS3 and 360 that akes me just as qualified as you to claim anything (by your logic) and I say the PS3 does have superior exlusives, not in terms of the amount of fun i have playing them, but definately in the grapical department. No game on 360 beats Killzone 2, MGS 4 and Uncharted in that respect and E3 showed that the list is soon getting longer .

I like it better than prototype. Prototype got an 8.5 and this got a 7.5. This is closer to infamous and a good fix for 360 owners. I'd say Infamous 9, Ghostbusters 8.5, Prototype 7.5. Thats how they should be rated. Gamespot overrated Prototype and underrated Ghostbusters imo. Infamous has more choices and more of an open world. Ghostbusters has multiplayer.

PS3 owners will have to pay the same price as their 360 owning counterparts for an inferior product,a situation that happens about 90% of the time when dealing with multiplats.

Something isn't right there?This isn't what Sony promised at the beginning of this gen?

Yeah I can just see it now-" 599 USD,oh and you will also have to pay 60 USD for games with diminished or sometimes non-existant graphical effects your 360 owning friends take for granted"

At least they would have been honest that way.

GabeNewellsPie

You mean like how Microsoft admitted their console would constantly be rivaled by the PS3 in terms of gameplay, have the majority of its games shared with the PC, and be surpassed in sales by a repackaged gamecube with a 2x OC and a Wiimote?

Because corporations. They know the future.

Also, know that most of my resentment is toward the Ghostbusters' dev and the LIEING FACE IN YOUR AVATAR.

*pant pant*

I feel better now.

I like it better than prototype. Prototype got an 8.5 and this got a 7.5. This is closer to infamous and a good fix for 360 owners. I'd say Infamous 9, Ghostbusters 8.5, Prototype 7.5. Thats how they should be rated. Gamespot overrated Prototype and underrated Ghostbusters imo. Infamous has more choices and more of an open world. Ghostbusters has multiplayer.

Walker34

I'm not calling a conspiracy here, but I've been paying attention to it for quite a while now andnoticed that GS reviews seem to score games that are advertised a lot structurally higher.

[QUOTE="Animal-Mother"][QUOTE="Irick_cb"]

You get no DLC and no Multiplayer on the PC.

But they made up for it by requiring you to connect to the internet for DRM checks.

Also, it has higher system requirements then Crysis.

REforever101

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

I like it better than prototype. Prototype got an 8.5 and this got a 7.5. This is closer to infamous and a good fix for 360 owners. I'd say Infamous 9, Ghostbusters 8.5, Prototype 7.5. Thats how they should be rated. Gamespot overrated Prototype and underrated Ghostbusters imo. Infamous has more choices and more of an open world. Ghostbusters has multiplayer.

NielsNL

I'm not calling a conspiracy here, but I've been paying attention to it for quite a while now andnoticed that GS reviews seem to score games that are advertised a lot structurally higher.

Thats been happening for a while I suspect.If their honest, I doubt anybody really takes GS reviews that seriously anymore except for "ownage purposes".

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]

[QUOTE="Walker34"]

I like it better than prototype. Prototype got an 8.5 and this got a 7.5. This is closer to infamous and a good fix for 360 owners. I'd say Infamous 9, Ghostbusters 8.5, Prototype 7.5. Thats how they should be rated. Gamespot overrated Prototype and underrated Ghostbusters imo. Infamous has more choices and more of an open world. Ghostbusters has multiplayer.

stvee101

I'm not calling a conspiracy here, but I've been paying attention to it for quite a while now andnoticed that GS reviews seem to score games that are advertised a lot structurally higher.

Thats been happening for a while I suspect.If their honest, I doubt anybody really takes GS reviews that seriously anymore except for "ownage purposes".

Well I personally got a bit sceptical after what happened with Kane and Lynch, but basically now I´m just careful when it comes to reviews of games that I see advertised all over the place.

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

Yep Ghosbusters is indeed awsome...if you have the 360 version that is.

Cows will have to make do with yetanother inferior multiplat unfortunately. :(

ermacness

Why must your post alway be pro 360 anti ps3 is beyond me

Resistance 2, ew, that shouldn't had been AAA. PS3 and 360 have equal quality exclusives, I know this because I have both systems, unlike most fanboys.mitu123

Sadly I will not play it until the dry spells of next year, the terrible decision to sell limited exclusivity means they ruined a lot of sales here in Europe, it's now coming out in October, and whilst this looks like a great game it's just not gonna be high on many peoples lists with games like MW2, Left 4 Dead 2 and Assassins Creed 2 coming out around that time.bobbetybob

[QUOTE="bobbetybob"]Sadly I will not play it until the dry spells of next year, the terrible decision to sell limited exclusivity means they ruined a lot of sales here in Europe, it's now coming out in October, and whilst this looks like a great game it's just not gonna be high on many peoples lists with games like MW2, Left 4 Dead 2 and Assassins Creed 2 coming out around that time.clone01

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Resistance 2, ew, that shouldn't had been AAA. PS3 and 360 have equal quality exclusives, I know this because I have both systems, unlike most fanboys.clone01

[QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="bobbetybob"]Sadly I will not play it until the dry spells of next year, the terrible decision to sell limited exclusivity means they ruined a lot of sales here in Europe, it's now coming out in October, and whilst this looks like a great game it's just not gonna be high on many peoples lists with games like MW2, Left 4 Dead 2 and Assassins Creed 2 coming out around that time.bobbetybob

[QUOTE="clone01"]

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Resistance 2, ew, that shouldn't had been AAA. PS3 and 360 have equal quality exclusives, I know this because I have both systems, unlike most fanboys.mitu123

I don't know. Shooting the water was fun as hell.

[QUOTE="GabeNewellsPie"]

PS3 owners will have to pay the same price as their 360 owning counterparts for an inferior product,a situation that happens about 90% of the time when dealing with multiplats.

Something isn't right there?This isn't what Sony promised at the beginning of this gen?

Yeah I can just see it now-" 599 USD,oh and you will also have to pay 60 USD for games with diminished or sometimes non-existant graphical effects your 360 owning friends take for granted"

At least they would have been honest that way.

Irick_cb

You mean like how Microsoft admitted their console would constantly be rivaled by the PS3 in terms of gameplay, have the majority of its games shared with the PC, and be surpassed in sales by a repackaged gamecube with a 2x OC and a Wiimote?

Because corporations. They know the future.

Also, know that most of my resentment is toward the Ghostbusters' dev and the LIEING FACE IN YOUR AVATAR.

*pant pant*

I feel better now.

[QUOTE="mitu123"][QUOTE="clone01"] really, Mitu? believe me, you're not the first to say that. i found R2 to be a lot of fun.

Irick_cb

I don't know. Shooting the water was fun as hell.

They new the majority of games they had were going to be on windows, if you remember correclty they were going to try to bring pc gamers closer to console owners with games for windows live and then create a larger network of gamers across platforms.

savagetwinkie

Lies.

They made the Xbox * in hopes of making a crap load of money off royalties.

"Bringing PC gamers and console gamers together" is all lies too. I don't know a single game that allows multiplayer between the two platforms.

Microsoft as never said the Xbox * would be the poor man's PC.

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

They new the majority of games they had were going to be on windows, if you remember correclty they were going to try to bring pc gamers closer to console owners with games for windows live and then create a larger network of gamers across platforms.

Irick_cb

Shadowrun.

mitu123

I now know of a single game that allows PC and Console interaction over live.

Is it any good?

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

They new the majority of games they had were going to be on windows, if you remember correclty they were going to try to bring pc gamers closer to console owners with games for windows live and then create a larger network of gamers across platforms.

Irick_cb

Lies.

They made the Xbox * in hopes of making a crap load of money off royalties.

"Bringing PC gamers and console gamers together" is all lies too. I don't know a single game that allows multiplayer between the two platforms.

Microsoft as never said the Xbox * would be the poor man's PC.

the gameplay was amazing but the content was so small it was terrible, 12 maps foran online game with no singleplayer... fail

Resistance 2, ew, that shouldn't had been AAA. PS3 and 360 have equal quality exclusives, I know this because I have both systems, unlike most fanboys.mitu123

Well since I also own both a PS3 and 360 that akes me just as qualified as you to claim anything (by your logic) and I say the PS3 does have superior exlusives, not in terms of the amount of fun i have playing them, but definately in the grapical department. No game on 360 beats Killzone 2, MGS 4 and Uncharted in that respect and E3 showed that the list is soon getting longer .

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Shadowrun.

Irick_cb

I now know of a single game that allows PC and Console interaction over live.

Is it any good?

It's decent, nothing more.

But still, he proved that argument to be an incorrect one, as Shadowrun joins PC and consoles through XBL/GFWL.

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

Shadowrun.

Irick_cb

I now know of a single game that allows PC and Console interaction over live.

Is it any good?

[QUOTE="Irick_cb"]

[QUOTE="savagetwinkie"]

They new the majority of games they had were going to be on windows, if you remember correclty they were going to try to bring pc gamers closer to console owners with games for windows live and then create a larger network of gamers across platforms.

Lies.

They made the Xbox * in hopes of making a crap load of money off royalties.

"Bringing PC gamers and console gamers together" is all lies too. I don't know a single game that allows multiplayer between the two platforms.

Microsoft as never said the Xbox * would be the poor man's PC.