Greenpeace Slams Nintendo WTH?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for gundamdragonque
gundamdragonque

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 gundamdragonque
Member since 2007 • 83 Posts
http://www.gamespot.com/news/6183388.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=newstop&tag=newstop;title;3
Avatar image for nyoroism
nyoroism

3778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 nyoroism
Member since 2007 • 3778 Posts

They are the first ever to score 0 across all fields. Good job, Nintendo.

Avatar image for Sir_Crocidile
Sir_Crocidile

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Sir_Crocidile
Member since 2004 • 389 Posts

Check the source link, Greenpeace gave them all 0's because they couldn't find the information or because Nintendo didn't have the info available to the public.

-edit- Here's a link to the report for those that can't find it

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
Check the source link, Greenpeace gave them all 0's because they couldn't find the information or because Nintendo didn't have the info available to see. Sir_Crocidile
really... interesting. Nintendo said no to greenpeace, news at 11.
Avatar image for Tiefster
Tiefster

14639

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#5 Tiefster
Member since 2005 • 14639 Posts
That's pretty bad since it pretty much means the Wii puts more chemicals into the soil and the like more than anyone else.
Avatar image for Exeed_Orbit
Exeed_Orbit

3472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 Exeed_Orbit
Member since 2005 • 3472 Posts
So what. Who cares, really. They're not saying anything about the quality of the actual system, or its games. They're just saying the production of the system isn't particularly environment friendly. That is of some concern, but sheep shouldn't take it as a direct attack to the Wii.
Avatar image for nyoroism
nyoroism

3778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 nyoroism
Member since 2007 • 3778 Posts
Check the source link, Greenpeace gave them all 0's because they couldn't find the information or because Nintendo didn't have the info available to the public.
Sir_Crocidile
Is that so? I wonder why that is.
Avatar image for Zhengi
Zhengi

8479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Zhengi
Member since 2006 • 8479 Posts

That's pretty bad since it pretty much means the Wii puts more chemicals into the soil and the like more than anyone else.Tiefster

Wrong. It's because Nintendo would give no info to Greenpeace.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

That's pretty bad since it pretty much means the Wii puts more chemicals into the soil and the like more than anyone else.Tiefster

No it just means Greanpeace couldn't find any information about Nintendo... because Nintendo makes Videogames not highend electronics.

Avatar image for Shazenab
Shazenab

3413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Shazenab
Member since 2004 • 3413 Posts

So i was walking through cardiff city center when this good looking woman pops into the corner of my eye waving like a goon and walks up to me.. starting to chat me up. Given my general overall nerdy appearance and the fact i'm a student, my suspicions were raised.

So basicallyshe worked for greenpeace and as Iam prety politically mindedI thought i'd stay there with an open mind and listen towhat she had to say. after she realised I wasn't about to be turned to her point of view because she was simply very good loking she started firing up totally basis propagada, like...

"We aren't allwed to advertise on tv beause the uk govenmenthave banned us from doing so"

"We have no connection to politics or the green party"

And so and so forth. en of story Greenpeace are a bunch of idiots who blindly fight for the planet, but completly ignore other facts, like for example how the poor chinese workers are supposed to GO GREEN and stop using coal, when they can barely affordanything, let alone a wind farm.

Avatar image for Sir_Crocidile
Sir_Crocidile

389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Sir_Crocidile
Member since 2004 • 389 Posts

[QUOTE="Sir_Crocidile"]Check the source link, Greenpeace gave them all 0's because they couldn't find the information or because Nintendo didn't have the info available to the public.
nyoroism
Is that so? I wonder why that is.

I have no idea, you'd think they would put N/A or something instead. Oh well, like the report says, it leaves Nintendo with infinite room for improvement :P.

Avatar image for jimm895
jimm895

7703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 jimm895
Member since 2007 • 7703 Posts

This could be a bad thing for Nintendo once everyone that's concerned with the enviroment learns about it. This also could hurt M$ in the same way. It seems that Sony is not only concerned about delivering a quaility product but they want to help the enviroment at the same time.

To me this is very important because I have health problems from sources of dangerous materials.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

[QUOTE="Sir_Crocidile"]Check the source link, Greenpeace gave them all 0's because they couldn't find the information or because Nintendo didn't have the info available to the public.
nyoroism
Is that so? I wonder why that is.

Because Nintendo isn't a Major Electronics Producer. They just make the Wii and DS... lot's of them, but it's not like they produce tons of diffrent TV's or Zunes or anything else. They probly don't publish info because they didn't know they had to.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

So what. Who cares, really. They're not saying anything about the quality of the actual system, or its games. They're just saying the production of the system isn't particularly environment friendly. That is of some concern, but sheep shouldn't take it as a direct attack to the Wii.Exeed_Orbit

Wii owners are causing pollution. j/k

This reminds me of a story a couple of months back (have no idea why, not really similiar at all, and has zero to do with this) A banana company was funding terroists to protect their banana intrests in some country. I found that funny for some reason.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts

This could be a bad thing for Nintendo once everyone that's concerned with the enviroment learns about it. This also could hurt M$ in the same way. It seems that Sony is not only concerned about delivering a quaility product but they want to help the enviroment at the same time.

To me this is very important because I have health problems from sources of dangerous materials.

jimm895
lol. They gave Nintendo a 0 due to no information, apparently.
Avatar image for Zhengi
Zhengi

8479

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Zhengi
Member since 2006 • 8479 Posts

Here's their reasoning. Plus, Greenpeace is basing this on info found on the manufacturers' websites rather than any solid facts.

Avatar image for GundamGuy0
GundamGuy0

10970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 GundamGuy0
Member since 2003 • 10970 Posts

This could be a bad thing for Nintendo once everyone that's concerned with the enviroment learns about it. This also could hurt M$ in the same way. It seems that Sony is not only concerned about delivering a quaility product but they want to help the enviroment at the same time.

To me this is very important because I have health problems from sources of dangerous materials.

jimm895

Read the source, it's not that Nintendo had dangerous chemicals or stuff, it's that it doesn't have the data. It might have already adopted the pratices decribed, but Greanpeace didn't know because Nintendo doesn't have all the info for them.

Avatar image for astiop
astiop

3582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 astiop
Member since 2005 • 3582 Posts

So now the wii is ruining gaming AND the environment!

Sheesh, g/j ninty!

Avatar image for Shazenab
Shazenab

3413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Shazenab
Member since 2004 • 3413 Posts
Oh but in all honesty (this is an isue that wasn't brought up.. even by grenpeace) but the five year console cycle is TERRIBLE. It would be great if Sony, Nintendo and MS got together to make console parts at least re-usable for pc use (or something) but we live in the kind of world where that will never happen ='[
Avatar image for _Pedro_
_Pedro_

6829

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 _Pedro_
Member since 2004 • 6829 Posts

And so and so forth. en of story Greenpeace are a bunch of idiots who blindly fight for the planet, but completly ignore other facts, like for example how the poor chinese workers are supposed to GO GREEN and stop using coal, when they can barely affordanything, let alone a wind farm.

Shazenab

Greenpeace are the amongst the biggest idiots in the world, They should stick to pushing whales back into the see and leave the enviroment to the people smart enough to come with solutions to our problems. Anyone can identify the problems.

Avatar image for TreyoftheDead
TreyoftheDead

7982

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 TreyoftheDead
Member since 2007 • 7982 Posts

Eh, screw Greenpeace.

I'm failing to understand why they are slamming Nintendo with low scores when for all they know Nintendo could be taking strong steps towards environmental protection in manufacturing their products.

Avatar image for louislegros
louislegros

11530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 louislegros
Member since 2005 • 11530 Posts
They couldn't find info so they just gave Nintendo zeros across the board. Isn't that great journalism?
Avatar image for Hoffgod
Hoffgod

12229

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Hoffgod
Member since 2006 • 12229 Posts
Green Peace: fanboys for mother nature. I say we treat them like we treat other fanboys here in SW.
Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts
Stupid reason to give them all 0s IMO, but Nintendo really should have given some info if just to avoid that.
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
Why are these organizations even going after these businesses? Why don't they actually make them selves useful and go after the fossil fuel industry..
Avatar image for Aidenfury19
Aidenfury19

2488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 Aidenfury19
Member since 2007 • 2488 Posts

Why are these organizations even going after these businesses? Why don't they actually make them selves useful and go after the fossil fuel industry..sSubZerOo

Because carbon emissions are hardly the only environmental issue out there, mercury and lead getting into the groundwater and oceans is a more immediate problem in fact.

Avatar image for RK-Mara
RK-Mara

11489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#27 RK-Mara
Member since 2006 • 11489 Posts
That's funny. Wii uses almost ten times less power than PS3 and 360 after all. At least according to biggest finnish electronics magazine.
Avatar image for Warfust
Warfust

3046

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#28 Warfust
Member since 2005 • 3046 Posts

They couldn't find info so they just gave Nintendo zeros across the board. Isn't that great journalism?louislegros

Add to taht their known love of sensationalism and you see why I never bother paying attention to them. Another pure crap report from Greenpeace. If only they actually tried to do good, instead of get attention.

Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts
When the insults towards greenpeace in this thread are instead referred to the weight and/or intellect of a certain country's population in the world, it's ToU violation. I am, of course, speaking about the... bee land.
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts
interesting cause the wii actually uses less power than the other 2 consoles also i like how they didnt say what the problem with the console was
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
bee land.Xolver
huh?
Avatar image for Xolver
Xolver

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Xolver
Member since 2005 • 2052 Posts

[QUOTE="Xolver"]bee land.Jandurin
huh?

Gamespot mods lately mod me for sneezing, so.

Avatar image for Truewiseblade
Truewiseblade

2607

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#33 Truewiseblade
Member since 2005 • 2607 Posts
After Reading GS's article and Greenpeace's own report, I'm dissapointed... in Greenpeace for being so sloppy. The source for their Information comes form some throwaway texton the NoA website dating back to at least before the DS was released, and possibly even earlier. Why anyone would expect to get detailed information on the manufacturing processes on what is basicially a big advert is beyond me. At least IMO, this pretty much puts into question the validity of all the other assessments, for better or for worse.
Avatar image for m_machine024
m_machine024

15874

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 m_machine024
Member since 2006 • 15874 Posts

So now the wii is ruining gaming AND the environment!

Sheesh, g/j ninty!astiop

lol nice.

Avatar image for TalesofRaGnArOk
TalesofRaGnArOk

3189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 TalesofRaGnArOk
Member since 2007 • 3189 Posts
If you look at the actual grading chart, all the reasons for why they got all Zeros are bull. For instance, it has no procedure for chemicals. If you read the small print it also says that they don't have any chemicals to remove anyway cough* microsoft*. Again, for more than half of the answers, they put "not enough information." To hell with greenpeace. I like the environment and all liitle furry creatures, but this is pathetic.
Avatar image for Netherscourge
Netherscourge

16364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 Netherscourge
Member since 2003 • 16364 Posts
Damn tree huggers...
Avatar image for Kalel559
Kalel559

9621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -8

User Lists: 0

#37 Kalel559
Member since 2003 • 9621 Posts

The thing that made me laugh the most was the study doesn't take in consideration the energy consumption of these devices.

The Nintendo Wii uses substantially less compared to the 360 and PS3. Power consumption was one of the main things taken into account for its development. So factor in all the new pollutants Microsoft and Sony are creating by having these huge machines that demand large amounts of electricity compared to the Wii.