[QUOTE="lettuceman44"][QUOTE="MADVLAD123"][QUOTE="Unstoppable_1"] It's not secret that many people on the Gamespot staff are heavily biased toward the Xbox 360. Specifically that unhealthy review person who gave Zelda such a low score. He also gave Halo 2 a piece of crap game, two and a half years old ,50$ game, which is pushing monopolistic measure, an above average score.
If it hasn't became evident, it is so evident now. Gamespot is biased toward Xbox 360, by far.
MADVLAD123
Halo 2 on PC was given a very good score (what it deserved). saying it's a piece of crap is just your opinion. Its a great game but nothing was really changed.
Also, Zelda: TPwas basically the same game as Ocarina of Time because of the way the dungeons, the weapons, and plot progression was all the same. It just felt like Ocarina of Time but with a different story and better graphics. It's still a great game though. Just not AAA.
yea, but every single other site gave it AAA, every site except GS. But AA is still a great score.
Well GS is pretty strict. They analyse everything. Most other review sites just don't look deep enough into the games really. They're more forgiving.
But yea, Zelda: TP got a geat score none-the-less.
I agree
GS gives like all other ports crappy scores because they dont add enough new stuff but a 2+ year old game that added like 2 new maps got a good score.
I wouldnt say they are biased towards the 360 but microsoft in general
Log in to comment