GT 5 damage really needed?

is GT 5 not having damage a big deal? i mean it's just a game, and i've seen alot of you ppl saying gameplay is more important than graphic. yet when sony brings gameplay over graphics everyone is saying a flop. GT 5 has no damage it's true and sad but it's not a flop lol. i mean not everyone game has to have everything implemented or else we be playing the same game over and over agian. also it's not because PS3 is weak if u want to crash your car well play motorstorm u can destroy your car as much as possible or else u can play killzone 2 with the a destructible enrivonment, i mean there is alot of games coming out with damages, and if one game doens't have it everyone calls sony a flop.

ask your self u want a game with few cars? and damages and not alot of gameplay?

or

u want a game with TONS OF cars? and huge amount of gameplay and custimization? but with no damage

your choice but don't play sony if one developer decides not to put something in their game.

I think it is,after all isn't "The real driving simulator"?.IMO I believe Sony is releasing the game without the Car damage so they can release at the end of this year.The DLC will probably fix this,I hope.

I could care less about damage in a driving sim. I want to drive, not crash.

I'll play Burnout when I want to crash.

Also, I'd rather have modeled interiors.

well you have to hope cosmetic damage is the one being left out... otherwise it will be very lame.

that's why i play forza 2 now, and forza 3 then

I think its pretty lame

and last-gen if you ask me

Forza has it, Project Gotham has it. Why can't Gran Turismo have it?nyoroism

beacuse it will be the same game if it has the exac same things as other games have.

Gamespot's review for Gran Turismo 4:

http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/driving/granturismo4/review.html?om_act=convert&om_clk=gssummary&tag=summary;review

The Bad:

Lack of damage modeling encourages sloppy driving

I won't completely write off GT5 unless they announce no online.

I could care less about damage in a driving sim. I want to drive, not crash.

I'll play Burnout when I want to crash.

Also, I'd rather have modeled interiors.

purplemidgets

So, you play a sim....yet you don't want it to be realistic? Makes sense. :|

Yes. This is a generation further now and last generation should have had damage already. So, if you still can't manage to do it a whole generation further, something is just wrong.

It's like if GT5 wouldn't have online play. It's just something that should be standard nowadays. For good reasons.

[QUOTE="purplemidgets"]

I could care less about damage in a driving sim. I want to drive, not crash.

I'll play Burnout when I want to crash.

Also, I'd rather have modeled interiors.

BioShockOwnz

So, you play a sim....yet you don't want it to be realistic? Makes sense. :|

And Burnout is realistically a racing game rather than a "please crash the car" game.

[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="purplemidgets"]

I could care less about damage in a driving sim. I want to drive, not crash.

I'll play Burnout when I want to crash.

Also, I'd rather have modeled interiors.

NobuoMusicMaker

So, you play a sim....yet you don't want it to be realistic? Makes sense. :|

And Burnout is realistically a racing game rather than a "please crash the car" game.

Lol, excuses, excuses. :D

It's not really a sim if crashing does nothing to your car...

if it was an arcade racer it might be acceptable

Yes. This is a generation further now and last generation should have had damage already. So, if you still can't manage to do it a whole generation further, something is just wrong.

It's like if GT5 wouldn't have online play. It's just something that should be standard nowadays. For good reasons.

RogueEdge

I agree 100%

it should be standard and there is no reason it shouldn't be in the game with the hardware now a days

[QUOTE="nyoroism"]Forza has it, Project Gotham has it. Why can't Gran Turismo have it?pminooei

beacuse it will be the same game if it has the exac same things as other games have.

Yes that pisses me off really pisses me off.

polyphony is putting so much commitment into making beautiful cars with awsome graphics, and realistic DRIVING. sometimes, there just isn't enough time or money to have EVERYTHING fully fleshed out in a simulator. They have an incredible attention to detail, so that should be appreciated. The DLC should make everyone happy, because it will be fully realized as damage patch, not a rushed afterthought. They just don't want to rush the game, why are people mad at a developer that iscommited to quality?Mordred19

Hater3000

polyphony is putting so much commitment into making beautiful cars with awsome graphics, and realistic DRIVING. sometimes, there just isn't enough time or money to have EVERYTHING fully fleshed out in a simulator. They have an incredible attention to detail, so that should be appreciated. The DLC should make everyone happy, because it will be fully realized as damage patch, not a rushed afterthought. They just don't want to rush the game, why are people mad at a developer that iscommited to quality?Mordred19

Because they are not. They were so 'comitted' to bringing GT4 online that they delayed that game more then once for that reason. And then they went out and told people; well, yeah, it's not going online. Just because they couldn't get it done.

I think Polyphony is over-estimated. They made mistakes. They promised things and couldn't get them done. I don't call that quality. And now they scrap a standard concept with the idea of bringing it in the game later. Yeah, I'm sure we will ever see that patch, sarcasm intended.

[QUOTE="pminooei"]

[QUOTE="nyoroism"]Forza has it, Project Gotham has it. Why can't Gran Turismo have it?BuryMe

beacuse it will be the same game if it has the exac same things as other games have.

Owned.

This news provoked great damage control :p

[QUOTE="BuryMe"][QUOTE="pminooei"]

[QUOTE="nyoroism"]Forza has it, Project Gotham has it. Why can't Gran Turismo have it?cabjnico

beacuse it will be the same game if it has the exac same things as other games have.

Owned.

This news provoked great damage control :p

I enjoy games that have no damage modelling in them more than games with it. It's just what I'm used to. I don't give a crap really.Trading_Zoner

thanks for your opinion though ;)

Defeats the object of making a realistic driving sim doesn't it?
It can be done easily these days, in my opinion lazy devs.martin_f