Halo 3 doesn't deserve to do well

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average

NickyJo

as a Killzone fan it pains me to say this, but killzone 2 is crap

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.NickyJo

I tell you what, you name an area of Halo 3 that you think is sub-par and I will show you that it is not. So, what is first on your mind?

anyone else think that expectations in the graphics department have gone way way out of control i am sorry but games don't look like crysis crysis is the exception.

As to bioshock, cod4, and gears of war thats an opinion the color variation is a lot better in halo 3 than those games imo and the environment look better to me in halo 3

lazy? they added a map editor, and four player co-op,

and what do you mean does nothing new? i mean COD4 is cool but nothing i have seen is innovative yet you dont bash it for that(and it has no co-op), and bioshock is an rpg/fps hybrid thats the only thing making it different do you want halo 3 to be a rpg/fps hybrid that would be a total different game(no co-op either but i mean it might not make sense in the story)

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

NickyJo

on noes its not the best looking game ver :cry:

Seriously, the only bad thing you mentioned about Halo 3 is the graphics. :|

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

NickyJo

this is the worst halo bashing thread i have seen yet.

1. the game looks just as good as those games and will run smoother too.

2. is halo 3 out yet? how do you know how it will score? not smart

3. this is the most ridiculous statement i have ever seen. do you think bungie would put out a crappy product of their most elite and coveted franchise? do you really think all bungie cares about is money? its about respect too man. respected developers dont put out crappy games. they have reputations.

I mean 3 friends, I forgot I'll be playing!

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

NickyJo

wow, I never knew you played the retail version. Your saying lazy upgrade over Halo 2 when the game was clearly in the works for 3 years. Well, I think Killzone 2 deserves to flop because it doesnt look anything special that I havent seen before. You sir cannot be a Halo fan if you want the game to flop

Just because it has the Halo name doesn't mean it deserves to sell 6 million copies, I haven't seen one damn thing that has made me say WOW about Halo 3, 4 player co-op is nice, but as a game that will be the biggest selling 360 game or possibly the biggest selling game of this generation, I'm left thinking meh, what's so good about it.

Other games look better, are more original and will score better, (Bioshock) stop hyping Halo 3, it deserves none of it.

Any game that the developers have been slaving away for 3 years deserves a high score. Ifa talentedgroup of developers that havemade 4 AAA games before nowthen is should get a high score, unless they have been lazy. Bungie have been anything but lazy. They have (imo) added a load of new features while still trying to keep the core gameplay the same. That is what a sequal does. They could have added a few new weapons and MP maps. Instead they have done a lot more.

And to your last reply. How does a fun game with exelent online play thatspredecessor still has around 60000 unique players online at any one time deserve nothing? Thats just being a troll.

Just because it has the Halo name doesn't mean it deserves to sell 6 million copies, I haven't seen one damn thing that has made me say WOW about Halo 3, 4 player co-op is nice, but as a game that will be the biggest selling 360 game or possibly the biggest selling game of this generation, I'm left thinking meh, what's so good about it.

Other games look better, are more original and will score better, (Bioshock) stop hyping Halo 3, it deserves none of it.

NickyJo

thats your opinion and your entitled to it. But unlike you, alot of people are pumped for this game. Millions of people to be more accurate. If you dont care about Halo 3, then why make a thread about it bashing it? Why not hype a game that your looking forward to instead? Lame.

[QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

Farzan777

wow, I never knew you played the retail version. Your saying lazy upgrade over Halo 2 when the game was clearly in the works for 3 years. Well, I think Killzone 2 deserves to flop because it doesnt look anything special that I havent seen before. You sir cannot be a Halo fan if you want the game to flop

I didn't know you played the retail version of the game already. Stop b*tching and go play your games. Also its not like anyone is forcing you to buy it. demon565

I still wanna know why my thread got locked mods? It was the same as this, except "Halo 3" was replaced with "Metroid Prime 3"
catlin_czirr

Because Metroid Prime is untouchable. ;)

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

NickyJo

I hate people like you, firstly dont even say that your a fan of halo, your not, your a n00b - a TRUE fan wouldn't even talk about the graphics of halo BECAUSE THAT IS NOT WHAT MAKES HALO GREAT YOU FOOOOOOOOOL!

Jeez,

[QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

TurboGuru

I hate people like you, firstly dont even say that your a fan of halo, your not, your a n00b - a TRUE fan wouldn't even talk about the graphics of halo BECAUSE THAT IS NOT WHAT MAKES HALO GREAT YOU FOOOOOOOOOL!

Jeez,

Yea the TC definitely isn't a halo fan. He's more like a fakeboy.

Oh wait, what's this? It sucks because the graphics are apparently bad? Oh, sweet Jesus.....

A) It looks pretty damn good.

B) Graphics don't make a game.

[QUOTE="Farzan777"][QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

catlin_czirr

wow, I never knew you played the retail version. Your saying lazy upgrade over Halo 2 when the game was clearly in the works for 3 years. Well, I think Killzone 2 deserves to flop because it doesnt look anything special that I havent seen before. You sir cannot be a Halo fan if you want the game to flop

That has nothing to do with the topic smart one:roll:. The only way Ill ever go Blu Ray is if Universal goes Blu Ray. They have all my moives I want

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

NickyJo

thank you compaired to KZ2 halo 3 is nothing

btw new pre-alpha build pics...VERY colourful

and heres an old 1 for you to compaire to

lol EVERY GAME OWNED

[QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

JAMES_L_BROOKS

thank you compaired to KZ2 halo 3 is nothing

btw new pre-alpha build pics...VERY colourful

and heres an old 1 for you to compaire to

lol EVERY GAME OWNED

Wait, colour???

Oh goddamnit. Get the Killzone pictures out of the thread, nothing good can come of it.

All that really needs to be said is, Halo isn't Bioshock. Halo doesn't need to be, it's got it's own formula and Bungie is improving on that to make the best Halo game that can.

I was quite surprised though, Ctrl+F "Generic". Phrase not found. O:

[QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

JAMES_L_BROOKS

thank you compaired to KZ2 halo 3 is nothing

btw new pre-alpha build pics...VERY colourful

and heres an old 1 for you to compaire to

lol EVERY GAME OWNED

First of all, you just posted concept art (although KZ2 does look great). Second of all, KZ2 could receive a 10 from every source that reviews it, and it still wouldn't deserve the blind hype it's getting. Relax, wait until next year, and then go enjoy your Killzone 2. Until then, watch 360 owners play Halo 3.

smells like flamebait...

i completely disagree with you..especially since NOONE has played the final game...

be reasonable...

[QUOTE="JAMES_L_BROOKS"][QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

SeanBond

thank you compaired to KZ2 halo 3 is nothing

btw new pre-alpha build pics...VERY colourful

and heres an old 1 for you to compaire to

lol EVERY GAME OWNED

First of all, you just posted concept art (although KZ2 does look great). Second of all, KZ2 could receive a 10 from every source that reviews it, and it still wouldn't deserve the blind hype it's getting. Relax, wait until next year, and then go enjoy your Killzone 2. Until then, watch 360 owners play Halo 3.

lol concept art?? what are you smoking

[QUOTE="SeanBond"]First of all, you just posted concept art (although KZ2 does look great). Second of all, KZ2 could receive a 10 from every source that reviews it, and it still wouldn't deserve the blind hype it's getting. Relax, wait until next year, and then go enjoy your Killzone 2. Until then, watch 360 owners play Halo 3.

JAMES_L_BROOKS

lol concept art?? what are you smoking

Ignore that, why are you hyping Killzone 2? Where is it coming from?

Ignore that, why are you hyping Killzone 2? Where is it coming from?

everywhere lol. neways i just wanna go and say IN YOUR FACE HALO 3 IS NOT BETTER THAN KILLZONE 2... neways halo 3 is not an amazing game it has more hype than killzone 2. matter a fact im pretty sure haze will be better than halo 3

alo you messed up the quotes beyond repair lol

[QUOTE="NickyJo"]

As a fan of Halo it pains me to say this, but Halo 3 looks average, I mean the least it should do is look as good as games like Gears of war, Bioshock, COD4. But it doesn't, it looks worse.

As 360's biggest game it should surpass those games and be challenging Crysis, Killzone 2 in the graphics department, but it's a million miles away from those games. Why is this? Are Bungie lazy?, Bioshock has stolen Halo 3's thunder, it's not Halo 3 scoring the perfect 10's, it's Bioshock.

Halo 3 seems like a lazy upgraded version of Halo 2 with bad graphics in comparison to the originality and stunning world of Bioshock. Bungie don't deserve to have a hit on their hands with Halo 3 as they never even tried to raise the bar for what next gen games can do.

All Bungie and MS care about is getting Halo 3 on the side of Burger king cups and mountain dew cans, they don't care if Halo 3 raises the bar for video games or is even good. They know you'll buy it no matter what, the only thing that matters is money, trying to make a genre defining game, or even one that pushed the 360 was never on their minds. Bioshock will sell only a quarter of the copies of Halo 3, yet it will be twice the game that this lazy cash in will be.

Halo 3 deserves to flop because it does nothing new and looks average.

JAMES_L_BROOKS

thank you compaired to KZ2 halo 3 is nothing

btw new pre-alpha build pics...VERY colourful

and heres an old 1 for you to compaire to

lol EVERY GAME OWNED

Crysis and RE5 look way better than KZ2.

everywhere lol. neways i just wanna go and say IN YOUR FACE HALO 3 IS NOT BETTER THAN KILLZONE 2... neways halo 3 is not an amazing game it has more hype than killzone 2. matter a fact im pretty sure haze will be better than halo 3JAMES_L_BROOKS

Did you answer my question? I don't know...what is "neways"? What about the game appeals to you, more then graphics I hope.

theres a difference between looking realistic and looking good halo looks good, just not realistic, sometimes, realism isnt a main focus, does that mean it looks worse? just cus its less real? noshadow_hosi

Hell, there's a difference between looking good and playing good. If the game plays well (Halo), graphics are secondary. When a game doesn't play well (Killzone 1), the graphics are all people have to cling to.

Besides, millions of gamers want to finish the main Halo story, so isn't that reason enough to buy the game? No everyone thinks Halo 3 is going to be the greatest game ever, but plenty of people are at least interested in it. For that reason alone, Halo 3 deserves to do well.