Halo 3 >> Legend of Zelda: OOT

Mastur chief is bigger icon than Link, nintendo fanboys. ok?SalesAnalyst

OoT came out over 10 years ago, of course it's going to be technologically inferior to Halo 3. :roll:

I know tons of games that I think are better than Ocarina of Time. :|

This was my reaction to the topic

and yet i would rather play OoT anyday than play with emo/raging 12 year olds on halo 3:|killa4lyfe

This was my reaction to the topic

Nonstop-Madness

I became a socialist when I read the first post as well :(

Um, no. OOT has the highest score of any videogame in history on metacritic, and is one of 4 games on GS that has a perfect 10 (along with GTA IV, MGS4, and THPS3).

Um, no. OOT has the highest score of any videogame in history on metacritic, and is one of 4 games on GS that has a perfect 10 (along with GTA IV, MGS4, and THPS3).

SPYDER0416

Um, no. OOT has the highest score of any videogame in history on metacritic, and is one of 4 games on GS that has a perfect 10 (along with GTA IV, MGS4, and THPS3).

SPYDER0416

[QUOTE="killa4lyfe"]and yet i would rather play OoT anyday than play with emo/raging 12 year olds on halo 3:|EazyD91

I love when people type out something like this and imagine it will change anyone elses opinion.

Fail thread fails. Also, no matter how hard you believe it, Halo 3 isn't half the game OoT is.

Better graphics. No kidding. If a game came out over 10 years ago, a newer game will obviously have better graphics.

Better soundtrack. Umm......Heck no. OoT has one of the best soundtracks in gaming history.

Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) Since when are either of them superheroes?And Link owns Master Chief any day.

More impressive and epic storyline. Epic fail.

Much better bosses (scarabs). Fail.

Smoother controls. That is because the N64 controller is bad.

10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) I agree.

Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Again, it was 10 years ago on a console with a lot less power.

Cortana >> Princess zelda. Nope.

Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 No, not at all.

Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 million. The N64 OoT sold 7.6 million, and there were three rereleases, so your wrong.SalesAnalyst

Halo 3 isn't half the game Ocarina of Time is. Fail thread.

Better graphics. Better soundtrack.Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) More impressive and epic storyline. Much better bosses (scarabs). Smoother controls. 10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Cortana >> Princess zelda. Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 millionSalesAnalyst

[QUOTE="EazyD91"]

[QUOTE="killa4lyfe"]and yet i would rather play OoT anyday than play with emo/raging 12 year olds on halo 3:|killa4lyfe

Isn't garbage, You claim to like the MP, yet the game is still garbage? Make up your mind.

You don't speak for everyone, I know alot of people that enjoy playing through the single player co-op which is fun.

Yea, the irony

Just no....Halo3 is nowhere near close to this.Also im guessing you never grew up in that gen cause you brought up graphics which dont always make the best game i really find the arguements within the OP pathetic and more so because both games are incomparable as they are totally diffrent genre's of game.

[QUOTE="SalesAnalyst"]Better graphics. No kidding. If a game came out over 10 years ago, a newer game will obviously have better graphics.

Better soundtrack. Umm......Heck no. OoT has one of the best soundtracks in gaming history.

Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) Since when are either of them superheroes?And Link owns Master Chief any day.

More impressive and epic storyline. Epic fail.

Much better bosses (scarabs). Fail.

Smoother controls. That is because the N64 controller is bad.

10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) I agree.

Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Again, it was 10 years ago on a console with a lot less power.

Cortana >> Princess zelda. Nope.

Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 No, not at all.

Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 million. The N64 OoT sold 7.6 million, and there were three rereleases, so your wrong.randomwiiplayer

Halo 3 isn't half the game Ocarina of Time is. Fail thread.

when was OOT even released? Last century? Ratchet_Fan8

Zelda destroys halo3. both are good games, but ill take zelda anyday. what an epic game,....

Fail thread fails. Also, no matter how hard you believe it, Halo 3 isn't half the game OoT is.

Oakfront

Better graphics. Better soundtrack. Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) More impressive and epic storyline. Much better bosses (scarabs). Smoother controls. 10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Cortana >> Princess zelda. Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 millionSalesAnalyst

You're comparing a game that came out in 2007 and a game that came out in 1998. It seems what you're trying to say is that even though it came out a good 9-10 years ago, it still holds up against current gen games like halo 3 which is pretty impressive and sad at the same time if you ask me.

BTW, in the greatest games of all time thread, you said CSS is more popular than CS 1.5 so it's better...after I replied to that joke of a statement, you have yet to reply back?

ROFL! good day sir!

well since we are doing this...

Banjo Tooie>>>Both of them. AMazing graphics (for its time) awesome soundtrack, great length, awesome multiplayer, amazing gameplay, good story, humourous, unique.

FTR that wasnt me being serious, that was for somone to quote me and say :Oh I see wat u did thar."

because although I perfer Tooie to OOT I wont be ridiculous and say its BETTER then it.

[QUOTE="Ratchet_Fan8"]when was OOT even released? Last century? Willy105

[QUOTE="SalesAnalyst"]Better graphics. Better soundtrack. Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) More impressive and epic storyline. Much better bosses (scarabs). Smoother controls. 10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Cortana >> Princess zelda. Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 millionSome-Mist

You're comparing a game that came out in 2007 and a game that came out in 1998. It seems what you're trying to say is that even though it came out a good 9-10 years ago, it still holds up against current gen games like halo 3 which is pretty impressive and sad at the same time if you ask me.

BTW, in the greatest games of all time thread, you said CSS is more popular than CS 1.5 so it's better...after I replied to that joke of a statement, you have yet to reply back?

Better graphics. Better soundtrack. Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) More impressive and epic storyline. Much better bosses (scarabs). Smoother controls. 10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Cortana >> Princess zelda. Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 millionSalesAnalyst

Really?

Even if you had remotely reasonable arguements, good luck trying to convince gamers that their icon of 1998 -- often considered the best year in video game history -- is inferior to a game like Halo 3.

[QUOTE="SalesAnalyst"]Better graphics. No kidding. If a game came out over 10 years ago, a newer game will obviously have better graphics.

Better soundtrack. Umm......Heck no. OoT has one of the best soundtracks in gaming history.

Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) Since when are either of them superheroes?And Link owns Master Chief any day.

More impressive and epic storyline. Epic fail.

Much better bosses (scarabs). Fail.

Smoother controls. That is because the N64 controller is bad.

10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) I agree.

Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Again, it was 10 years ago on a console with a lot less power.

Cortana >> Princess zelda. Nope.

Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 No, not at all.

Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 million. The N64 OoT sold 7.6 million, and there were three rereleases, so your wrong.randomwiiplayer

Halo 3 isn't half the game Ocarina of Time is. Fail thread.

Better graphics. Better soundtrack. Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) More impressive and epic storyline. Much better bosses (scarabs). Smoother controls. 10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Cortana >> Princess zelda. Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 millionSalesAnalyst

Actually this the better "super hero:

And he was in one of the worst games to ever grace the N64

[QUOTE="Some-Mist"]

[QUOTE="SalesAnalyst"]Better graphics. Better soundtrack. Better superhero (Master Chief owns Link.) More impressive and epic storyline. Much better bosses (scarabs). Smoother controls. 10x the replayability (MP, Forge, theater etc.) Enemy AI: Halo 3 stomps easily. Cortana >> Princess zelda. Overall adventure winner: Halo 3 Sales: Halo 3 over 10 million. Zelda: 6 millionPannicAtack

You're comparing a game that came out in 2007 and a game that came out in 1998. It seems what you're trying to say is that even though it came out a good 9-10 years ago, it still holds up against current gen games like halo 3 which is pretty impressive and sad at the same time if you ask me.

BTW, in the greatest games of all time thread, you said CSS is more popular than CS 1.5 so it's better...after I replied to that joke of a statement, you have yet to reply back?

I like CSS as well, but I wouldn't say it's better because of popularity. It's definitely more casualized, but what this TC does is he makes bogus remarks and he doesn't know how to reply back, so he doesn't. just another very unoriginal troll if you ask me.

Eh really doesn't.