GOTY am confirmed?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
I hope not. I enjoyed that the least out of all the halo games. There are alot of other games that deserve it because theyve actually brought new things to the table
new things to the table dont do nothing. natal and move are bringing new things to the table....if the game is still awesome then its still awesome. halo reach is the most content packed game in all of console gaming. it is GOTYI hope not. I enjoyed that the least out of all the halo games. There are alot of other games that deserve it because theyve actually brought new things to the table
VendettaRed07
Shooters never win goty in my opinion. but it does have a really good chance of winning shooter of the year
new things to the table dont do nothing. natal and move are bringing new things to the table....if the game is still awesome then its still awesome. halo reach is the most content packed game in all of console gaming. it is GOTY1. Move and kinect aren't original and 2, the amount content doesn't mean anything.[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]
I hope not. I enjoyed that the least out of all the halo games. There are alot of other games that deserve it because theyve actually brought new things to the table
GrabTheYayo
[QUOTE="max-Emadness"]
Shooters never win goty in my opinion. but it does have a really good chance of winning shooter of the year
pc-ps360
gears won goty
It was a slow yearit has won shooter of the year...Shooters never win goty in my opinion. but it does have a really good chance of winning shooter of the year
max-Emadness
i dont think a fps has ever won goty on this site.. i dont see that changing... especially since its just halo and halo 1 or 3 didnt win it. Just my opinion of coursecampzorIt may change next year. with 6+ awesome shooters coming out. Killzone 3, RAGE, Crysis 2, Resistance 3, Portal 2, Whatever EA's big shooter is, ect. Then again, there are so many amazing games next year it's not even funny 8)
Considering the shooters that have released this year, I find that award to be easily won by any game even remotely competent.
EDIT: I haven't played Reach, but I probably would have given it to MAG for it's strides in MP. Though, usually these rewards are reserved for games that at least have a SP campaign.
Overrated as any other shooter Halo game.kuraimen
And we all know how much you've played it given how you say you'll never touch a Microsoft product 8)
[QUOTE="kuraimen"]Overrated as any other shooter Halo game.Raymundo_Manuel
And we all know how much you've played it given how you say you'll never touch a Microsoft product 8)
I said I'll never buy a Microsoft product, I can touch one as long as I'm not giving them any of my money ;)new things to the table dont do nothing. natal and move are bringing new things to the table....if the game is still awesome then its still awesome. halo reach is the most content packed game in all of console gaming. it is GOTY[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]
I hope not. I enjoyed that the least out of all the halo games. There are alot of other games that deserve it because theyve actually brought new things to the table
GrabTheYayo
Well thats not a hard thing to do when all your doing is taking all your older games and wrapping them up into a more drap, depressing package + a little bit of battlefield.
I laugh at thewhole "bring some thing new to the table/rehash" argument against Halo. It's an FPS, how can shooting in first person be different? What are all these creative minds doing posting on SW, anyway? Make something new, if you can't be quiet....cainetao11
I didn't say that against halo I said that against reach. Each halo before it had done something new, something awesome. Halo CE.. I could make a list a mile long of all the things that did new for console shooters.. Halo 2 invented matchmaking, brought duel weilding and was the biggest and best online shooter yet. Sure the campaign was crap, but the ability to do the custom games, and all the other stuff it did on consoles for the first time was pretty awesome. Then Halo 3 brought the forge, theater system, the crazy game types had awesome map design and so on.
Even though halo reach didnt do anything new thats not even my biggest problem with it. If you are going to make everything the same and really do nothing new, make sure its better than the last games you put out which imo its not. While the weapon balancing is better yeah, the multiplayer maps are all absolute garbage. Just crap they tried to shoehorn to work in both singleplayer and multiplayer and it absolutely killed it for me. Even the old maps they remade, they like made them too large or something because even the maps that were some of my favorites in halo 2 all you do is walk around looking for someone 90% of the time not being able to find anything. The art design is just dull as well, i get how its supposed to be more depressing experience because of how all the humans die and w/e.. but I think its funny how they tone down the look but then at the same time go WOOHOO HERE YA GO GUYZ! JET PACKS!! WOOOO.... lol it just seems like a weird clash in what tone they want the game to be.
[QUOTE="cainetao11"]how can shooting in first person be different? BlbecekBobecekNatural Selection 2 says "Hello!" ;) awesome series that, one of my favourites. its kinda pathetic if u think about it...that natural selection gives more of a 'aliens' vibe/feel then AVP....
This would be sad if it happens! RDR is GTA in the old west nothing more. Got boring fast. Still have yet to finish it entirely myself. IMO Reach, COD BO, ME 2, GOW 3, BfBC 2 all were better.RDR has GOTY in the bag.
J-man45
Black Ops is a prime example of rehashI thought Reach was pretty overrated. Felt like the same game rehashed. My buddies all agreed with me. Firefight online is entertaining, but I prefer CoD online for everything else. Story in Reach was definitely the best.
lild1425
Black Ops is a prime example of rehashI thought Reach was pretty overrated. Felt like the same game rehashed. My buddies all agreed with me. Firefight online is entertaining, but I prefer CoD online for everything else. Story in Reach was definitely the best.
lild1425
..
Multiplayer was good, but thats it, just good. Its not about being the same thats the issue, I am afterall I am more then happy to go out and buy every iteration of CoD, but that the gameplay has gotten stale. It does feel similar and the armour abilities do not do enough for me to feel like it is a big step away from its predecessor. I played Halo 2 to death over lan and then Halo 3 online and pretty much got my fill. I would argue its a testament to CoD that I am still not bored of the basic gameplay...
But to be on topic no I dont think this game is game of the year material. As far as the overall branch of "shooters" goes I would give that crown easily to Vanquish. Which is fun start to finish, left me wanting more and was just an amazing experience. As far as FPS are concerned, then I would give that crown to Black Ops. The formula (at least to me) has not gotten stale, so the perfections made in the game do not feel stale but rather feel like a great way to make the game more balanced. The customization is fun and generally it does provide me with a lot of consistent fun...
Also. Good job and providing absolutely nothing with your starting statement. Your a very persuasive arguer.....
Multiplayer was good, but thats it, just good. Its not about being the same thats the issue, I am afterall I am more then happy to go out and buy every iteration of CoD, but that the gameplay has gotten stale. It does feel similar and the armour abilities do not do enough for me to feel like it is a big step away from its predecessor. I played Halo 2 to death over lan and then Halo 3 online and pretty much got my fill. I would argue its a testament to CoD that I am still not bored of the basic gameplay...
But to be on topic no I dont think this game is game of the year material. As far as the overall branch of "shooters" goes I would give that crown easily to Vanquish. Which is fun start to finish, left me wanting more and was just an amazing experience. As far as FPS are concerned, then I would give that crown to Black Ops. The formula (at least to me) has not gotten stale, so the perfections made in the game do not feel stale but rather feel like a great way to make the game more balanced. The customization is fun and generally it does provide me with a lot of consistent fun...
Also. Good job and providing absolutely nothing with your starting statement. Your a very persuasive arguer... Reach is a much better game in my opinion than black ops,much more complete,polish,clean and stable,something BO miss big time,part of the fun in online gaming is been able to enjoy the game,and BO has to many prblems and glitches to be enjoy,the only thing I gave it over reach is kill streaks...
As far as personal experience goes I am not to sure what glitches you speak of. The game has been quite solid in my experience and while you may site any number of opinions to counter this I would think that any rational argument would just shine light in the weakness of your own...
Games are games. They are not often quantifiable though marketing will do their best to make them so. if you do not enjoy CoD and you do so not from some predisposed disposition but honestly feel this way then who am I to tell you that you are wrong. I can not tell what is fun and not fun to you. That being said on an average, based on numbers of sale, the people agree with me that this game is worth a purchase. As in this game is a lot of fun.I know I'm in the minority on this but I think it should have had a great shot at GOTY but even more so for shooter of the year and multiplayer game of the year so.... just saying. :P
[QUOTE="lild1425"]Black Ops is a prime example of rehashI thought Reach was pretty overrated. Felt like the same game rehashed. My buddies all agreed with me. Firefight online is entertaining, but I prefer CoD online for everything else. Story in Reach was definitely the best.
worldsworstgame
Agreed. I don't think anyone could argue otherwise, but the online is still far more fun. I like the leveling system and having an unbalanced game every now and then.
[QUOTE="GrabTheYayo"]
[QUOTE="VendettaRed07"]
I hope not. I enjoyed that the least out of all the halo games. There are alot of other games that deserve it because theyve actually brought new things to the table
new things to the table dont do nothing. natal and move are bringing new things to the table....if the game is still awesome then its still awesome. halo reach is the most content packed game in all of console gaming. it is GOTYWell thats not a hard thing to do when all your doing is taking all your older games and wrapping them up into a more drap, depressing package + a little bit of battlefield.
Ok and could that be said for almost every game that has come out in the past few years? RDR in my opinion was a good game, but no different then GTA with a western custume on. Some people dig that atmosphere and don't put them both together which is fine, but at the end of RDR is like GTA except without cars and skyscrapers.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment