i'm looking foward to both games but i would have to go with halo reach because it will have more to offer online and offline
This topic is locked from further discussion.
i'm looking foward to both games but i would have to go with halo reach because it will have more to offer online and offline
I Would say Reach last of a epic series...... Plays Great ( beta) and since ut's tweaked then illll be hooked
I guess Reach has more to offer but judging from Halo 3, chances of me liking reach are slim.
So I'll ignore the question asked and vote for KZ3 because I'm practically guaranteed to like it more.
Reach obviously. 4 player campaign, 4 player firefight, amazing multiplayer. It annihilates every console game as far as features go.
I like what I see from Killzone 3 (haha rhyme) but if its coming out around Crysis 2 and Bulletstorm, I may pass.
h575309
Bulletstorm looks amazing..
4 years from now: Halo Reach players online: 70,000 Killzone 3 players online: 7 (Cookie if you get the reference)Reach will annihilate KZ3.
waltefmoney
LOLOLOLOL read this: http://kotaku.com/5621058/a-day-with-the-finished-halo-reachBeen hearing nothing but bad things about Reach, they say it's still really slow I can't stand the slowness in an FPS, I need fastness and intense action. Halo is getting stale for me.
Gamtrix
Halo is faster then killzone :|Been hearing nothing but bad things about Reach, they say it's still really slow I can't stand the slowness in an FPS, I need fastness and intense action. Halo is getting stale for me.
Gamtrix
You shouldn't take youtube comments seriouslyBeen hearing nothing but bad things about Reach, they say it's still really slow I can't stand the slowness in an FPS, I need fastness and intense action. Halo is getting stale for me.
Gamtrix
Reach obviously. 4 player campaign, 4 player firefight, amazing multiplayer. It annihilates every console game as far as features go.
I like what I see from Killzone 3 (haha rhyme) but if its coming out around Crysis 2 and Bulletstorm, I may pass.
h575309
Having more features doesn't automatically make a game better,Resistance 2 support 60 player at once,i think Halo has been owned by the old mithology of more is better,wait it also had 8 players co-op can the xbox 360 handle that much people on co-op.?
See that is what your doing more doesn't automatically means better,and by the way you will not get Killzone 3 in favor of picking 2 multiplatform games.?lol
[QUOTE="h575309"]
Reach obviously. 4 player campaign, 4 player firefight, amazing multiplayer. It annihilates every console game as far as features go.
I like what I see from Killzone 3 (haha rhyme) but if its coming out around Crysis 2 and Bulletstorm, I may pass.
Eltormo
Having more features doesn't automatically make a game better,Resistance 2 support 60 player at once,i think Halo has been owned by the old mithology of more is better,wait it also had 8 players co-op can the xbox 360 handle that much people on co-op.?
See that is what your doing more doesn't automatically means better,and by the way you will not get Killzone 3 in favor of picking 2 multiplatform games.?lol
Stop twisting other people's opinions, I'm sure even you know Reach is gonna own KZ3, just like Halo 2 owned the original Killzone and Halo 3 owned Killzone 2. The cycle of life.
[QUOTE="Eltormo"]
[QUOTE="h575309"]
Reach obviously. 4 player campaign, 4 player firefight, amazing multiplayer. It annihilates every console game as far as features go.
I like what I see from Killzone 3 (haha rhyme) but if its coming out around Crysis 2 and Bulletstorm, I may pass.
waltefmoney
Having more features doesn't automatically make a game better,Resistance 2 support 60 player at once,i think Halo has been owned by the old mithology of more is better,wait it also had 8 players co-op can the xbox 360 handle that much people on co-op.?
See that is what your doing more doesn't automatically means better,and by the way you will not get Killzone 3 in favor of picking 2 multiplatform games.?lol
Stop twisting other people's opinions, I'm sure even you know Reach is gonna own KZ3, just like Halo 2 owned the original Killzone and Halo 3 owned Killzone 2. The cycle of life.
no just no..
[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]
[QUOTE="Eltormo"]
Having more features doesn't automatically make a game better,Resistance 2 support 60 player at once,i think Halo has been owned by the old mithology of more is better,wait it also had 8 players co-op can the xbox 360 handle that much people on co-op.?
See that is what your doing more doesn't automatically means better,and by the way you will not get Killzone 3 in favor of picking 2 multiplatform games.?lol
dvalo9
Stop twisting other people's opinions, I'm sure even you know Reach is gonna own KZ3, just like Halo 2 owned the original Killzone and Halo 3 owned Killzone 2. The cycle of life.
no just no..
Yes. It sure did. Even if we're not looking at scores. Feature for feature, Halo 3 has KZ2 beat. And we know which one has more players. Even 3 years after it launched, it's still one of the most played games on XBL.
So yes, more features do make a game better, but only if the dev does them well. And Bungie definitely has in a way that the community really loves.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment