Hardware will not win a console war!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for DarthKalo
DarthKalo

902

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 DarthKalo
Member since 2006 • 902 Posts

I keep seeingalot of peopleposting the PS3 will win because it's superior hardware/graphics.Then how come the SegaDreamcast orX-box didn't win the last generation? They both where capable of better graphics than the PS2. IMO> exclusive games are what made the PS2 the #1 seller last gen. Mostly from GTA III, VC, SA.I don't think thisgen isanydifferent than the last in this regard.So, what are your opinions?

Avatar image for NECR0CHILD313
NECR0CHILD313

7025

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 NECR0CHILD313
Member since 2006 • 7025 Posts
People seem to forget that the Hardware has alot more to it than the processor and graphics output. Don't forget that Gamespot chose the Wii as most impressive Hardware last year.
Avatar image for WeAreToast
WeAreToast

2365

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 WeAreToast
Member since 2006 • 2365 Posts
Consoles are hardware. ;)
Avatar image for 67gt500
67gt500

4627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 67gt500
Member since 2003 • 4627 Posts

You are so right about that... console supremecy will be a combination of AAA software titles and great, reliableonline gaming experiences... all of the presently available consoles have their respective merits, and they're all great in their own ways, but at the end of the day, it's gonna come down to who has the really solid, stellar, creative games that the people want to play...

Avatar image for Cedmln
Cedmln

8802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#5 Cedmln
Member since 2006 • 8802 Posts
Don't try to change the rules. The Wii is winning. Get over it.
Avatar image for greenpyro33
greenpyro33

3872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#6 greenpyro33
Member since 2007 • 3872 Posts
It's all about the games. PS3 will end up with a great library of games.
Avatar image for ZanuffC
ZanuffC

614

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 ZanuffC
Member since 2007 • 614 Posts

Don't try to change the rules. The Wii is winning. Get over it.Cedmln

No, TC is right to an extent, it wasn't sales that won it for PS2, it was the most exclusive good games in combination with sales, if Wii sells 500 million units and somehow has very few AAA exclusives, it still sucks.

Avatar image for usagi704
usagi704

2058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#8 usagi704
Member since 2003 • 2058 Posts

[QUOTE="Cedmln"]Don't try to change the rules. The Wii is winning. Get over it.ZanuffC

No, TC is right to an extent, it wasn't sales that won it for PS2, it was the most exclusive good games in combination with sales, if Wii sells 500 million units and somehow has very few AAA exclusives, it still sucks.

I agree 100%!
Avatar image for xTHExJUICEx
xTHExJUICEx

3126

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 xTHExJUICEx
Member since 2007 • 3126 Posts
The name on a hardware has a lot to do with sales.
Avatar image for Miyabeast
Miyabeast

92

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Miyabeast
Member since 2007 • 92 Posts
because changin dics is wrong !! i gives of a "back in the days" feel on a $300 console ...
Avatar image for -supercharged-
-supercharged-

5820

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 -supercharged-
Member since 2006 • 5820 Posts

I keep seeingalot of peopleposting the PS3 will win because it's superior hardware/graphics.Then how come the Xbox didn't win the last generation? They both where capable of better graphics than the PS2. IMO> exclusive games are what made the PS2 the #1 seller last gen. Mostly from GTA III, VC, SA.I don't think thisgen isanydifferent than the last in this regard.So, what are your opinions?

DarthKalo

d

Too bad the majority of PS2 games were just as goodand alot evenlookedbetter/played betterthan Xbox games.

Avatar image for gingerdivid
gingerdivid

7206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#12 gingerdivid
Member since 2006 • 7206 Posts
Errrrm, the dreamcast was weaker than the PS2 :|
Avatar image for daqua_99
daqua_99

11170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#13 daqua_99
Member since 2005 • 11170 Posts
It's all about the games, really. Hardware, brands ... they don't matter as much as a constant supply of great games ...
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
The Dreamcast was weaker than the PS2 no?
Avatar image for Kritical_Strike
Kritical_Strike

4123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Kritical_Strike
Member since 2006 • 4123 Posts

Those who claim Ps3 is superior because of it's hardware are diluted, just ignore them.

Avatar image for Shazenab
Shazenab

3413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Shazenab
Member since 2004 • 3413 Posts

Errrrm, the dreamcast was weaker than the PS2 :| gingerdivid

Well I'm guessing the TC also thinks the freamcast controller was t3h best controller ever *remembers hand cramp after playing shenmue*

Avatar image for gingerdivid
gingerdivid

7206

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 gingerdivid
Member since 2006 • 7206 Posts

[QUOTE="gingerdivid"]Errrrm, the dreamcast was weaker than the PS2 :| Shazenab

Well I'm guessing the TC also thinks the freamcast controller was t3h best controller ever *remembers hand cramp after playing shenmue*

That always puzzled me, I didn't see what was wrong with the saturn controller.
Avatar image for omgimba
omgimba

2645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 omgimba
Member since 2007 • 2645 Posts
The dreamcast was a little weaker then the PS2.... The Xbox and the geamecube where both stronger then the PS2....
Avatar image for the1stmoonfly
the1stmoonfly

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 the1stmoonfly
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

[QUOTE="gingerdivid"]Errrrm, the dreamcast was weaker than the PS2 :| Shazenab

Well I'm guessing the TC also thinks the freamcast controller was t3h best controller ever *remembers hand cramp after playing shenmue*

I think the point the TC is trying to make, is that when the Dreamcast was launched, it was the most powerful and feature packed console available at that time, but still failed to reign supreme. Same can be said for the Commodore 64, Nintendo 64, Atari Jaguar, Panasonic 3DO, Nintendo Gamecube, Xbox, Sega Game Gear and Atari Lynx.

Even the Atari 2600, when launched was considerably weaker than home computers (at a time when consoles and PC's were still considered to be in the same competetive market) but it proved to be massivley popular, andmost would credit it with giving birth to proper home games consoles.

Avatar image for the1stmoonfly
the1stmoonfly

3293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#20 the1stmoonfly
Member since 2006 • 3293 Posts

I keep seeingalot of peopleposting the PS3 will win because it's superior hardware/graphics.Then how come the SegaDreamcast orX-box didn't win the last generation? They both where capable of better graphics than the PS2. IMO> exclusive games are what made the PS2 the #1 seller last gen. Mostly from GTA III, VC, SA.I don't think thisgen isanydifferent than the last in this regard.So, what are your opinions?

DarthKalo

I personally would say the PS3 is the most powerful console, but only based on its inclusion of Blu-ray, cards readers and in built wi-fi. Take these away till your left with the bear console and then I'd say its not anymore powerful, and so far hasnt proved to be ( Blu-ray isnt even producing longer games at the minute).

The 360 peripherals available can also make it as powerful as the PS3 (depending on how you view the HD format war)which brings its price inline with the PS3 (further evidence of equality,but still at a profit for MS), again making it equal in my eyes. If you further include its connectivity features with reguards to windows I'd say its a better package, but at the end of the day this means absolutley jack without the best SOFTWARE!

Software wise, both have pros and cons.PS3 hassuperior sound processing andmore onboardfeatures (web access, linux etc.) andis betterat playing HD content from disc. 360 on the other handhas a more economic and friendlier programming environment, uses less power for its OS which has more features (XBL)and is better able to utilise media connectivity (MSN, media player connection). As for games, thats down to devs and only the future has the answers.

I agree with the TC's sentiments.