Harry Potter Wii looks as good as the PS3 version.

http://media.wii.ign.com/media/842/842199/vid_2029240.html

Look at the video, it looks even better than the pic posted. Because all games look better in motion.

I can't believe a $250 system looks as good as a $600 system.

:roll:

I know graphics aren't everything, but stop claiming ownage over PS3 when Nintendo Wii developers almost never show the actual pics.

This thread is absurd , I'm sorry. Harry Potter , nuff said.

sorry, I love the Wii but I don't buy it. This is a losing battle. You can't win this argument. You're just begging to have some idiot cow/lemming come in here and post pics of MGS4 or something.

"Harry Potter Wii looks as good as the PS3 version."

More like the PS3 version looks as bad as the Wii version.

I guess I was being too subtle here, but I'm making fun of the Wii version.

The video and pics I posted are the real quality of the game, and needless to say, it's no where NEAR the PS3 version, and even the PS3 version isn't exactly some looker either.

But I am impressed by one thing here. The cows show a good level of skepticism when presented with evidence (I mean this as a compliment). When the first pic I posted was posted by a Sheep, every single sheep accepted it without even further checking out the facts. Not one even challenged or questioned it.

So this thread has only made the cows seem more admirable to me. They required further evidence before "jumping to conclusions." That's how it should be done.

I guess I was being too subtle here, but I'm making fun of the Wii version.

The video and pics I posted are the real quality of the game, and needless to say, it's no where NEAR the PS3 version, and even the PS3 version isn't exactly some looker either.

But I am impressed by one thing here. The cows show a good level of skepticism when presented with evidence (I mean this as a compliment). When the first pic I posted was posted by a Sheep, every single sheep accepted it without even further checking out the facts. Not one even challenged or questioned it.

So this thread has only made the cows seem more admirable to me. They required further evidence before "jumping to conclusions." That's how it should be done.

PhoebusFlows

wait, so this was all a test?

hey I'm no cow :evil:

PhoebusFlows

That's actually a comparable screenshot. The only difference I see is the absence of antialiazing, which Wii is capable of doing easily.

I call alpha screenshot.

I guess I was being too subtle here, but I'm making fun of the Wii version.

The video and pics I posted are the real quality of the game, and needless to say, it's no where NEAR the PS3 version, and even the PS3 version isn't exactly some looker either.

But I am impressed by one thing here. The cows show a good level of skepticism when presented with evidence (I mean this as a compliment). When the first pic I posted was posted by a Sheep, every single sheep accepted it without even further checking out the facts. Not one even challenged or questioned it.

So this thread has only made the cows seem more admirable to me. They required further evidence before "jumping to conclusions." That's how it should be done.

PhoebusFlows

I guess I was being too subtle here, but I'm making fun of the Wii version.

The video and pics I posted are the real quality of the game, and needless to say, it's no where NEAR the PS3 version, and even the PS3 version isn't exactly some looker either.

But I am impressed by one thing here. The cows show a good level of skepticism when presented with evidence (I mean this as a compliment). When the first pic I posted was posted by a Sheep, every single sheep accepted it without even further checking out the facts. Not one even challenged or questioned it.

So this thread has only made the cows seem more admirable to me. They required further evidence before "jumping to conclusions." That's how it should be done.

PhoebusFlows

Of course the cows will be skeptical... they're being compared to a Wii game. Seriously... what?

"Harry Potter Wii looks as good as the PS3 version."

More like the PS3 version looks as bad as the Wii version.

MapleGrunt

So True.

The Wii version still look good. Wanderer5

compared to an older ps2 game

Are you trying to say that the Wii can provide the same graphical quality as a PS3? Don't waste my time.Vandalvideo

I think that the point everyone is trying to make is that under no circumstances should any person of sound mind exchange $600 for a Playstation 3.

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Are you trying to say that the Wii can provide the same graphical quality as a PS3? Don't waste my time.Lilac_Benjie

I think that the point everyone is trying to make is that Playstation 3 is not worth $600.

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. DoctorBunny

compared to an older ps2 game

The PS2 version is more sluggish then the Wii. So the Wii version is better in graphics.

Um, TC...I thought we had already established this? You proved sheep and Wii owners including myself wrong in a previous thread focused around that same comparison picture. Is this thread really necessary?TreyoftheDead

Well, they reviewed Harry Potter Wii today on IGN, so there was a new batch of the latest,final screenshots from IGN. So it did make me want to post them again. I thought most people would know this was a sarcastic joke of a thread, but judging from nearly all of the responses it seems not many even know this was debunked a while back. So I guess it surprisingly turned out ot be a sort of education for some sheep today when I didn't even mean it to.

[QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. Wanderer5

compared to an older ps2 game

The PS2 version is more sluggish then the Wii. So the Wii is better in graphics.

For this specific game yes, but comparable to other ps2 games from the screens posted

[QUOTE="Lilac_Benjie"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"]Are you trying to say that the Wii can provide the same graphical quality as a PS3? Don't waste my time.Vandalvideo

I think that the point everyone is trying to make is that Playstation 3 is not worth $600.

Do you want to know what else makes no sense? Killzone being among the most highly anticipated games for a $600 system.

At least Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets for the Playstation 2 scraped a low A.

oh heavens no! the Wii version of Harry Potter looks about as good as the PS3 one allegedly. this is without a doubt doom for PS3.

come on guy don't be stupid. the only reason the graphics are crappy on the PS3, even though they still look better than the Wii version, is because no one is going to give a crap about this game. You wanna compare 2 similar games on Wii and PS3 and see which has better graphics? Try Excite Truck and Motorstorm? Hm. Does Wii still have better graphics?

I guess I was being too subtle here, but I'm making fun of the Wii version.

The video and pics I posted are the real quality of the game, and needless to say, it's no where NEAR the PS3 version, and even the PS3 version isn't exactly some looker either.

But I am impressed by one thing here. The cows show a good level of skepticism when presented with evidence (I mean this as a compliment). When the first pic I posted was posted by a Sheep, every single sheep accepted it without even further checking out the facts. Not one even challenged or questioned it.

So this thread has only made the cows seem more admirable to me. They required further evidence before "jumping to conclusions." That's how it should be done.

PhoebusFlows

Are you seriously that...I would like to call you something nasty but I don't enjoy being banned. OBVIOUSLY the cows wouldn't automatically agree - it makes their system look like it doesn't have great graphics! It would be the exact same if the positions were switched.

The Wii version still look good. Wanderer5

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"][QUOTE="DoctorBunny"]

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. DoctorBunny

compared to an older ps2 game

The PS2 version is more sluggish then the Wii. So the Wii is better in graphics.

For this specific game yes, but comparable to other ps2 games from the screens posted

I will agree with that. But at least OotP look better then Spiderman 3, At World's End, Tranformers, and Shrek 3(the wii versions), and it has very few loading times.

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. Dualshockin

I know it not as good looking as the PS3 and 360 version, but it still look good. Watch the Video Review for the wii version at IGN.

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. Wanderer5

I know it not as good looking as the PS3 and 360 version, but it still look good. Watch the Video Review for the wii version at IGN.

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. Dualshockin

I know it not as good looking as the PS3 and 360 version, but it still look good. Watch the Video Review for the wii version at IGN.

Hogwarts look great to me. The only thing which look kinda bad it the character models(mostly their faces).

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]Um, TC...I thought we had already established this? You proved sheep and Wii owners including myself wrong in a previous thread focused around that same comparison picture. Is this thread really necessary?PhoebusFlows

Well, they reviewed Harry Potter Wii today on IGN, so there was a new batch of the latest,final screenshots from IGN. So it did make me want to post them again. I thought most people would know this was a sarcastic joke of a thread, but judging from nearly all of the responses it seems not many even know this was debunked a while back. So I guess it surprisingly turned out ot be a sort of education for some sheep today when I didn't even mean it to.

:lol: Not one person said that was true, cows and sheeps together...

[QUOTE="PhoebusFlows"]

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]Um, TC...I thought we had already established this? You proved sheep and Wii owners including myself wrong in a previous thread focused around that same comparison picture. Is this thread really necessary?Homesrfan

Well, they reviewed Harry Potter Wii today on IGN, so there was a new batch of the latest,final screenshots from IGN. So it did make me want to post them again. I thought most people would know this was a sarcastic joke of a thread, but judging from nearly all of the responses it seems not many even know this was debunked a while back. So I guess it surprisingly turned out ot be a sort of education for some sheep today when I didn't even mean it to.

:lol: Not one person said that was true, cows and sheeps together...

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25707363

You have a bad memory :|

"IGN has the final game. That's what it looks like." -- Sheep

:roll: I like how he just makes stuff up without further researching the matter.

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]

[QUOTE="Dualshockin"][QUOTE="Wanderer5"]The Wii version still look good. Wanderer5

I know it not as good looking as the PS3 and 360 version, but it still look good. Watch the Video Review for the wii version at IGN.

Hogwarts look great to me. The only thing which look kinda bad it the character models(mostly their faces).

[QUOTE="Homesrfan"][QUOTE="PhoebusFlows"]

[QUOTE="TreyoftheDead"]Um, TC...I thought we had already established this? You proved sheep and Wii owners including myself wrong in a previous thread focused around that same comparison picture. Is this thread really necessary?PhoebusFlows

Well, they reviewed Harry Potter Wii today on IGN, so there was a new batch of the latest,final screenshots from IGN. So it did make me want to post them again. I thought most people would know this was a sarcastic joke of a thread, but judging from nearly all of the responses it seems not many even know this was debunked a while back. So I guess it surprisingly turned out ot be a sort of education for some sheep today when I didn't even mean it to.

:lol: Not one person said that was true, cows and sheeps together...

http://www.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25707363

You have a bad memory :|

"IGN has the final game. That's what it looks like." -- Sheep

:roll: I like how he just makes stuff up without further researching the matter.

I'm talking about in this thread...

TC no just noTnasty11

Ihavebeenseingthiseverywhere...whatdoes"TC"standfor?It'smeaning?

I guess I was being too subtle here, but I'm making fun of the Wii version.

The video and pics I posted are the real quality of the game, and needless to say, it's no where NEAR the PS3 version, and even the PS3 version isn't exactly some looker either.

But I am impressed by one thing here. The cows show a good level of skepticism when presented with evidence (I mean this as a compliment). When the first pic I posted was posted by a Sheep, every single sheep accepted it without even further checking out the facts. Not one even challenged or questioned it.

So this thread has only made the cows seem more admirable to me. They required further evidence before "jumping to conclusions." That's how it should be done.

PhoebusFlows

:lol: You take system wars too seriously! You do realise that cows, sheep etc. are the same species right.

um wtf, both those screens look exactly the same graphic wise, and they both look beyond what I've seen for the Wii so far, unless of course they just high res from a devkit of something.

Far as I can tell the original poster took 2 PS3 pics of the game and claimed one was Wii and one PS3... wtf?

isnt the common damage control of the sheep a little adage that goes "its not the console fault, its the devs fault for not making the game look good"

in this situation, even if the wii version does look as good as the ps3's, that has no bearing on the console itself.

in conclusion, consider yourself owned and /thread.

if thats real then the wii is more powerful than we have seenkruesader

the irony of ur sig...