has developers used the full potential of "DA CELL" of the ps3 with Un

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

i have been wunderin this for a long time. Peple have been sayin that the amount of ramm is holdin back the ps3. well im sorry to tell you this but 50 GB of memory on da ps3 blu way disk is way more memory that any amount of Kingston Hyperx memory. so dat shouldnt be a problem. also the ps3 has has the cell wich is 8 cores with is more cores than intel i7 six core processer so the cell is more greater and powerfull than it. also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

Also is it too late in this generation to get a ps3 slim. I have $500 and im deciding between a ps3 slim or a baseline gaming PC? if i get the slim ill have enough money to get extra games too sooo?..

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

i have been wunderin this for a long time. Peple have been sayin that the amount of ramm is holdin back the ps3. well im sorry to tell you this but 50 GB of memory on da ps3 blu way disk is way more memory that any amount of Kingston Hyperx memory. so dat shouldnt be a problem. also the ps3 has has the cell wich is 8 cores with is more cores than intel i7 six core processer so the cell is more greater and powerfull than it. also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

Also is it too late in this generation to get a ps3 slim. I have $500 and im deciding between a ps3 slim or a baseline gaming PC? if i get the slim ill have enough money to get extra games too sooo?..

biggerdjam

fakeboy try harder.

see it's not the cows who are the worst it's the fanboys who hate them so much and try too hard.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#3 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

tc just get a pc.. stop being so jelly of our many gigabytez!!! butthurt can be cured its not something you need to live with lulz

Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]

i have been wunderin this for a long time. Peple have been sayin that the amount of ramm is holdin back the ps3. well im sorry to tell you this but 50 GB of memory on da ps3 blu way disk is way more memory that any amount of Kingston Hyperx memory. so dat shouldnt be a problem. also the ps3 has has the cell wich is 8 cores with is more cores than intel i7 six core processer so the cell is more greater and powerfull than it. also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

Also is it too late in this generation to get a ps3 slim. I have $500 and im deciding between a ps3 slim or a baseline gaming PC? if i get the slim ill have enough money to get extra games too sooo?..

casharmy

fakeboy try harder.

see it's not the cows who are the worst it's the fanboys who hate them so much and try too hard.

so pc or ps3? im new to this site
Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
[QUOTE="biggerdjam"] so pc or ps3? im new to this site

New? No. You've been here 9 months.
Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts
[QUOTE="Badosh"][QUOTE="biggerdjam"] so pc or ps3? im new to this site

New? No. You've been here 9 months.

i dont get onlines that much bro chill out lol
Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#7 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
It's "teh cell!!", and the potential is wasted with the rest of the PS3 hardware, it's a shame. However I think they have done the best they could.
Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]

i have been wunderin this for a long time. Peple have been sayin that the amount of ramm is holdin back the ps3. well im sorry to tell you this but 50 GB of memory on da ps3 blu way disk is way more memory that any amount of Kingston Hyperx memory. so dat shouldnt be a problem. also the ps3 has has the cell wich is 8 cores with is more cores than intel i7 six core processer so the cell is more greater and powerfull than it. also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

Also is it too late in this generation to get a ps3 slim. I have $500 and im deciding between a ps3 slim or a baseline gaming PC? if i get the slim ill have enough money to get extra games too sooo?..

biggerdjam

fakeboy try harder.

see it's not the cows who are the worst it's the fanboys who hate them so much and try too hard.

so pc or ps3? im new to this site

lol, so your title says:

"has developers used the full potential of "DA CELL" of the ps3 with Un"

looks like you ran out of space there you ended with "un.." what were you going to say? let me take a wild guess, "..untapped power/potential!"? ha, yeah I am sure you are new.

Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]fakeboy try harder.

see it's not the cows who are the worst it's the fanboys who hate them so much and try too hard.

Badosh

so pc or ps3? im new to this site

lol, so you title says:

"has developers used the full potential of "DA CELL" of the ps3 with Un"

looks like you ran out of space there you ended with "un.." what were you going to say? let me take a wild guess what you were going to say, "..untapped power/potential!"? ha, yeah I am sure you are new.

no i was going to say with uncharted 3 wtf is wrong with you? gamespot members are really dicks

Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#10 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
[QUOTE="biggerdjam"] i dont get onlines that much bro chill out lol

My chill level is so bro'd to the max, you wouldn't even want to see it, so brohemian, don't talk to me about chillaxtitude, it ain't even legit, ya hear, home-dog. Right?
Avatar image for ShadowMoses900
ShadowMoses900

17081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 48

User Lists: 0

#11 ShadowMoses900
Member since 2010 • 17081 Posts

My God, that grammar!

Now I'm not a grammar nazi or anything and as we all make mild errors from time to time. But this is just terrible, like I don't know how to answer because I don't understand your OP.

Though here is some food for thought:

EA has "maxed out" 360, but not PS3 News ? News ? Eurogamer.net

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Guerrilla - IndustryGamers

There you go!

Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts
It's "teh cell!!", and the potential is wasted with the rest of the PS3 hardware, it's a shame. However I think they have done the best they could.SaltyMeatballs
Kara says hi
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#13 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

My God, that grammar!

Now I'm not a grammar nazi or anything and as we all make mild errors from time to time. But this is just terrible, like I don't know how to answer because I don't understand your OP.

Though here is some food for thought:

EA has "maxed out" 360, but not PS3 News ? News ? Eurogamer.net

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Guerrilla - IndustryGamers

There you go!

ShadowMoses900

naughty dog claimed UC2 maxed out the ps3 lol

Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

My God, that grammar!

Now I'm not a grammar nazi or anything and as we all make mild errors from time to time. But this is just terrible, like I don't know how to answer because I don't understand your OP.

Though here is some food for thought:

EA has "maxed out" 360, but not PS3 News ? News ? Eurogamer.net

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Guerrilla - IndustryGamers

There you go!

ShadowMoses900
thanks man
Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

[QUOTE="Badosh"][QUOTE="biggerdjam"] so pc or ps3? im new to this sitebiggerdjam

lol, so you title says:

"has developers used the full potential of "DA CELL" of the ps3 with Un"

looks like you ran out of space there you ended with "un.." what were you going to say? let me take a wild guess what you were going to say, "..untapped power/potential!"? ha, yeah I am sure you are new.

no i was going to say with uncharted 3 wtf is wrong with you? gamespot members are really dicks

You are level 12, stop acting dumb. and how would any member here know if PS3 reached it's potential with any game, no body here develops games for the PS3.

Avatar image for Vanishandfade
Vanishandfade

98

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Vanishandfade
Member since 2012 • 98 Posts
[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]

i have been wunderin this for a long time. Peple have been sayin that the amount of ramm is holdin back the ps3. well im sorry to tell you this but 50 GB of memory on da ps3 blu way disk is way more memory that any amount of Kingston Hyperx memory. so dat shouldnt be a problem. also the ps3 has has the cell wich is 8 cores with is more cores than intel i7 six core processer so the cell is more greater and powerfull than it. also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

Also is it too late in this generation to get a ps3 slim. I have $500 and im deciding between a ps3 slim or a baseline gaming PC? if i get the slim ill have enough money to get extra games too sooo?..

biggerdjam

fakeboy try harder.

see it's not the cows who are the worst it's the fanboys who hate them so much and try too hard.

so pc or ps3? im new to this site

What the hell?
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

One does not simply reach the full potential of DA CELL

Avatar image for Gue1
Gue1

12171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#18 Gue1
Member since 2004 • 12171 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

My God, that grammar!

Now I'm not a grammar nazi or anything and as we all make mild errors from time to time. But this is just terrible, like I don't know how to answer because I don't understand your OP.

Though here is some food for thought:

EA has "maxed out" 360, but not PS3 News ? News ? Eurogamer.net

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Guerrilla - IndustryGamers

There you go!

ionusX

naughty dog claimed UC2 maxed out the ps3 lol

UC3 is the best looking game on the PS3 and if KZ3 didn't max it out that means that they still have things to do before they can get to Uncharted's level.;)

Avatar image for Jebus213
Jebus213

10056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Jebus213
Member since 2010 • 10056 Posts
They have with another game. It's an FPS with almost no color and is either tinted green or brown. Just take a wild guess....
Avatar image for ShadowDeathX
ShadowDeathX

11699

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 ShadowDeathX
Member since 2006 • 11699 Posts

also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

biggerdjam

What the **** is this crap?

The PS3 can barely run modern games at 30 frames per second at Sub 720p resolution and when compared to a PC game, those graphics are set on low.

On par with a gaming PC hahahahahaha......not even close. Stack up 15 PS3s and make them work in unison and maybe you might have a chance, just maybe.

My computer alone will soon be 42 times more powerful than a PS3.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#21 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="ShadowMoses900"]

My God, that grammar!

Now I'm not a grammar nazi or anything and as we all make mild errors from time to time. But this is just terrible, like I don't know how to answer because I don't understand your OP.

Though here is some food for thought:

EA has "maxed out" 360, but not PS3 News ? News ? Eurogamer.net

PS3 Not Maxed Out By Killzone 3, says Guerrilla - IndustryGamers

There you go!

Gue1

naughty dog claimed UC2 maxed out the ps3 lol

UC3 is the best looking game on the PS3 and if KZ3 didn't max it out that means that they still have things to do before they can get to Uncharted's level.;)

UC3 is basically the same graphically as two. they added some more colors and used some more slight of hand for 720p resolutions. graphically the two are the same. if we wait 1.2years ill happily show you both @ 1080p and proove im right. both will look jsut as ugly as each other @ 1080p.

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Teh Cell gets stronger as time goes by. Its no wonder the US Military uses PS3s as supercomputers

Source

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

Teh Cell gets stronger as time goes by. Its no wonder the US Military uses PS3s as supercomputers

Source

BPoole96

this is because they wanted a unix based machine to load mac onto. and real mac servers are bloody expensive and are horribly out of date vs the ps3. using regular macs also cost alot more than a ps3. its not because teh cell is awesum i assure you.

Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]

also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

ShadowDeathX

What the **** is this crap?

The PS3 can barely run modern games at 30 frames per second at Sub 720p resolution and when compared to a PC game, those graphics are set on low.

On par with a gaming PC hahahahahaha......not even close. Stack up 15 PS3s and make them work in unison and maybe you might have a chance, just maybe.

My computer alone will soon be 42 times more powerful than a PS3.

if you hook ps3 up to PC minitor you will have as much pixels as a pc so you are wrong. god i hate ignorant people and also yea ps3 does run games at 60 fps ummm CALL OF DUTY
Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#25 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

[QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"]

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]

also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

biggerdjam

What the **** is this crap?

The PS3 can barely run modern games at 30 frames per second at Sub 720p resolution and when compared to a PC game, those graphics are set on low.

On par with a gaming PC hahahahahaha......not even close. Stack up 15 PS3s and make them work in unison and maybe you might have a chance, just maybe.

My computer alone will soon be 42 times more powerful than a PS3.

if you hook ps3 up to PC minitor you will have as much pixels as a pc so you are wrong. god i hate ignorant people and also yea ps3 does run games at 60 fps ummm CALL OF DUTY

no hes right pc is superior in every way to a ps3.. and no you cant do cod at 60fps. the recommended requirements of the pc version are equal to a ps3's capabilities. currently playing cod on such a mahcine gets you like 35fps avg

Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"][QUOTE="ShadowDeathX"] What the **** is this crap?

The PS3 can barely run modern games at 30 frames per second at Sub 720p resolution and when compared to a PC game, those graphics are set on low.

On par with a gaming PC hahahahahaha......not even close. Stack up 15 PS3s and make them work in unison and maybe you might have a chance, just maybe.

My computer alone will soon be 42 times more powerful than a PS3.

ionusX

if you hook ps3 up to PC minitor you will have as much pixels as a pc so you are wrong. god i hate ignorant people and also yea ps3 does run games at 60 fps ummm CALL OF DUTY

no hes right pc is superior in every way to a ps3.. and no you cant do cod at 60fps. the recommended requirements of the pc version are equal to a ps3's capabilities. currently playing cod on such a mahcine gets you like 35fps avg

your also wrong becuase not only will the monitor be played at 60fps by the ps3 the setting alone on the monitor will make the PQ better on the ps3.also psn is supieror to da online capabilitys of that of xbox live n pc network
Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"] if you hook ps3 up to PC minitor you will have as much pixels as a pc so you are wrong. god i hate ignorant people and also yea ps3 does run games at 60 fps ummm CALL OF DUTYbiggerdjam

no hes right pc is superior in every way to a ps3.. and no you cant do cod at 60fps. the recommended requirements of the pc version are equal to a ps3's capabilities. currently playing cod on such a mahcine gets you like 35fps avg

your also wrong becuase not only will the monitor be played at 60fps by the ps3 the setting alone on the monitor will make the PQ better on the ps3.also psn is supieror to da online capabilitys of that of xbox live n pc network

Just stop, a monitor will not make a game on the PS3 play at 60 fps, most games are locked at 30 fps, and very few games on the PS3 run above 30 fps that actually stress the system
Avatar image for biggerdjam
biggerdjam

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 biggerdjam
Member since 2011 • 372 Posts

sorry man but 8 cores and 2fps from each core=160fps on the ps3 but you are right they lock it at 30fps so lemmings like you wont get mad at our supior console.also ps3 has more memory becuase of the bluray dick that hold 50gb compared to any amount of kingston hyperx memery.

ATHOTHER REASON WHY TEH CELL is better than PC.......mate your just not smart enough as me so go to bed man

Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Teh Cell gets stronger as time goes by. Its no wonder the US Military uses PS3s as supercomputers

Source

ionusX

this is because they wanted a unix based machine to load mac onto. and real mac servers are bloody expensive and are horribly out of date vs the ps3. using regular macs also cost alot more than a ps3. its not because teh cell is awesum i assure you.

I'm just going to go with teh powah of teh cell

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts

sorry man but 8 cores and 2fps from each core=160fps on the ps3 but you are right they lock it at 30fps so lemmings like you wont get mad at our supior console.also ps3 has more memory becuase of the bluray dick that hold 50gb compared to any amount of kingston hyperx memery.

ATHOTHER REASON WHY TEH CELL is better than PC.......mate your just not smart enough as me so go to bed man

biggerdjam

Im a lemming? and your reasoning.... now that's a laugh :lol:

by that logic my Pc gpu can do 2 fps per shader processor and since I have 336 cores on my gpu it can do 672 fps plus another 2 fps per core on my cpu so thats another 60 fps :P ......so my system can do 732 fps

Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2079 Posts
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I actually laughed when I read this. I'll laugh even more if TC is actually serious about this, though I'm almost certain that it's a troll attempt.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I actually laughed when I read this. I'll laugh even more if TC is actually serious about this, though I'm almost certain that it's a troll attempt.starjet905
reading the replies, it's an obvious fail troll attempt
Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2079 Posts
[QUOTE="starjet905"]:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I actually laughed when I read this. I'll laugh even more if TC is actually serious about this, though I'm almost certain that it's a troll attempt.wis3boi
reading the replies, it's an obvious fail troll attempt

Yeah, looks so. :lol: I really did know someone who thought that PS3 doesn't need much RAM because it has Bluray, though.
Avatar image for HaloinventedFPS
HaloinventedFPS

4738

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 HaloinventedFPS
Member since 2010 • 4738 Posts

PS3 was maxed years ago

look at UC2/UC3, no difference at all, except tiny bit different art style (UC2 is more cartoony and imo, looks better)

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

i have been wunderin this for a long time. Peple have been sayin that the amount of ramm is holdin back the ps3. well im sorry to tell you this but 50 GB of memory on da ps3 blu way disk is way more memory that any amount of Kingston Hyperx memory. so dat shouldnt be a problem. also the ps3 has has the cell wich is 8 cores with is more cores than intel i7 six core processer so the cell is more greater and powerfull than it. also ps3 can be hooked up to an HD monitor like the PC so has just as much pixels as a FULL flegded gaming pc. so im thinking that the ps3 is ATLEAST on par with the gaming PC if not better if hooked up via hdmi through a 50 inch FULL 1080p tv which is better becuase the pixels are bigger giving the ps3 a slight graphic advantage compared to a PC

Also is it too late in this generation to get a ps3 slim. I have $500 and im deciding between a ps3 slim or a baseline gaming PC? if i get the slim ill have enough money to get extra games too sooo?..

biggerdjam

Blu-Ray's memory is not the same as the main RAM. FP_compare-1.jpg

Against IBM's SPEs, AMD and NVIDIA GPUs says Hi

PS; AMD Radeon HD 79x0 has full support with performance for IEEE-754-2008 modes i.e. can replace Intel SSE.

AMD Radeon HD 797021995_24_amd_radeon_hd_7970_launches_red

NVIDIA Geforce GTX680.

GeForce-GTX-680.jpg

Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#36 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

^ why feed the troll?

Avatar image for ronvalencia
ronvalencia

29612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 ronvalencia
Member since 2008 • 29612 Posts

sorry man but 8 cores and 2fps from each core=160fps on the ps3 but you are right they lock it at 30fps so lemmings like you wont get mad at our supior console.also ps3 has more memory becuase of the bluray dick that hold 50gb compared to any amount of kingston hyperx memery.

ATHOTHER REASON WHY TEH CELL is better than PC.......mate your just not smart enough as me so go to bed man

biggerdjam

My AMD Radeon 7950 OC has 1792 stream processor cores and it has X86 CPU IP i.e. it has X86 memory operations.

amd_new_arch_small.jpg

Against AMD's processor technology, IBM PowerPC and it's VMX kitbash(aka SPU/SPE) can go to hell.

Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts

Just let him marinate in his ignorance.

Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

Did'nt read ;)

Anyway, consoles have been maxed for a couple of years; to the extent where sub 30 fps is acceptable, for the sake of "improvements".

Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts

Did'nt read ;)

Anyway, consoles have been maxed for a couple of years; to the extent where sub 30 fps is acceptable, for the sake of "improvements".

MlauTheDaft
I would love to see games go back to 60 FPS as the norm at the cost of graphical fidelity. High FPS just feels good man. A good visual design isn't completely reliant on fillrates, art is too big a part, and art can certainly make up for a lack of super high texture resolutions and overly complex geometry.
Avatar image for MlauTheDaft
MlauTheDaft

5189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 MlauTheDaft
Member since 2011 • 5189 Posts

[QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]

Did'nt read ;)

Anyway, consoles have been maxed for a couple of years; to the extent where sub 30 fps is acceptable, for the sake of "improvements".

PC_Otter

I would love to see games go back to 60 FPS as the norm at the cost of graphical fidelity. High FPS just feels good man. A good visual design isn't completely reliant on fillrates, art is too big a part, and art can certainly make up for a lack of super high texture resolutions and overly complex geometry.

I normally don't off my high horse but performance does indeed come first;) Well, I certainly have my limits, in regards to visuals, but if it can neither run well nor look decent; it's should'nt exist.

Avatar image for PC_Otter
PC_Otter

1623

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 PC_Otter
Member since 2010 • 1623 Posts

[QUOTE="PC_Otter"][QUOTE="MlauTheDaft"]

Did'nt read ;)

Anyway, consoles have been maxed for a couple of years; to the extent where sub 30 fps is acceptable, for the sake of "improvements".

MlauTheDaft

I would love to see games go back to 60 FPS as the norm at the cost of graphical fidelity. High FPS just feels good man. A good visual design isn't completely reliant on fillrates, art is too big a part, and art can certainly make up for a lack of super high texture resolutions and overly complex geometry.

I normally don't off my high horse but performance does indeed come first;) Well, I certainly have my limits, in regards to visuals, but if it can neither run well nor look decent; it's should'nt exist.

Well like I said, I think art is such a big part of visual fidelity, hence why some games age well and others terribly. A game like the original FEAR I think has aged quite well and while the visuals are a bit simple compared to today's latest and greatest in rendering techniques, I think they do the job well and the game itself is still loads of fun. The second FEAR game is of course more graphically advanced, but the addition of SSAO I think actually ruined the feeling the first game had (along with the various gameplay changes). It's just sad though that games are so reliable on visuals (beyond the actual artistic value of it) in order to garner interest.

Hell, BF3 may be gorgeous (but prone to some extreme artifacting), but I still prefer BF2. Visually my only real complaint about BF2 these days is the draw distance.

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#43 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

Just let him marinate in his ignorance.

PC_Otter

then we cook him him on teh omgwtfbbq out back

Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

i think they did, but wasnt it hobbled by the RSX and the split memory setup?

Avatar image for Hatiko
Hatiko

4669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Hatiko
Member since 2006 • 4669 Posts

First ugly people thread, now this?

Avatar image for ebrezzy1
ebrezzy1

1427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 ebrezzy1
Member since 2012 • 1427 Posts

Get a PS3

Its what I am trying to do

Bias statement but whatever pc gaming sucks outside of Blizzard made games

Avatar image for nameless12345
nameless12345

15125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 nameless12345
Member since 2010 • 15125 Posts

futurama-fry-not-sure-if-trolling-or-jus

Also, define "full potential". Cell probably couldn't handle Arma 2's complex AI and hundreds of units on a map while a decent quad core PC CPU can.

But to answer your question - we'll see what it can really do in Last Guardian (if it ever get released).

Avatar image for HalcyonScarlet
HalcyonScarlet

13838

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 HalcyonScarlet
Member since 2011 • 13838 Posts

[QUOTE="biggerdjam"]

[QUOTE="Badosh"]

lol, so you title says:

"has developers used the full potential of "DA CELL" of the ps3 with Un"

looks like you ran out of space there you ended with "un.." what were you going to say? let me take a wild guess what you were going to say, "..untapped power/potential!"? ha, yeah I am sure you are new.

casharmy

no i was going to say with uncharted 3 wtf is wrong with you? gamespot members are really dicks

You are level 12, stop acting dumb. and how would any member here know if PS3 reached it's potential with any game, no body here develops games for the PS3.

Yet everyone (every group) here talks about console hardware like they could design the things.

Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="ionusX"]

[QUOTE="BPoole96"]

Teh Cell gets stronger as time goes by. Its no wonder the US Military uses PS3s as supercomputers

Source

this is because they wanted a unix based machine to load mac onto. and real mac servers are bloody expensive and are horribly out of date vs the ps3. using regular macs also cost alot more than a ps3. its not because teh cell is awesum i assure you.

assure yourself, they use if for the reliability of the cell as well.... you think they care for RROD?
Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts
[QUOTE="ebrezzy1"]

Get a PS3

Its what I am trying to do

Bias statement but whatever pc gaming sucks outside of Blizzard made games

im pretty sure everyone tries to get a ps3, its the successful ones who actually get one that are winner