This topic is locked from further discussion.
You just made a thread about this. First it was halo's amazing, then it was UC2 will kill Halo. And now here's another identical thread.
-
Sigh...
But I really think it's a possibility.You just made a thread about this. First it was halo's amazing, then it was UC2 will kill Halo. And now here's another identical thread.
-
Sigh...
WINDWAKER1
[QUOTE="WINDWAKER1"]But I really think it's a possibility.You just made a thread about this. First it was halo's amazing, then it was UC2 will kill Halo. And now here's another identical thread.
-
Sigh...
LegendaryCake
It's not.
[QUOTE="LegendaryCake"][QUOTE="WINDWAKER1"]But I really think it's a possibility. Please stop the self ownage. 9.5/10 is bad now? Stop it yourself.You just made a thread about this. First it was halo's amazing, then it was UC2 will kill Halo. And now here's another identical thread.
-
Sigh...
Isalien
Because they're happy if a lot of people are posting here. They couldn't care less whether most of the people posting/making threads are trolls.Please stop.
I don't understand why GS don't have a minimum level to start threads.
Chutebox
You just made a thread about this. First it was halo's amazing, then it was UC2 will kill Halo. And now here's another identical thread.
-
Sigh...
But I really think it's a possibility. your just making the cow look bad now. your clearly a fakeboyAlright let's shed some light on this baffling debate.
Bungie had a little bit over a year, probably 1/4 the budget of NDand their passion for video games , and already proven shooting mechanics.
ND had about 3 or 4 years, twice or maybe triple Bungie's budget for ODST, and a full staff, compared to Bungie's split team.
It would be surprising if Uncharted 2 WASN'T better than ODST. :|
What's funny is cows bash ODST nonstop for being an "expansion" and now they are comparing their "guaranteed GOTY" to it, acting as if all the sudden ODST is a full fledged, hype machine on the same level as U2. Which is it? Maybe you should stick to comparing comparable things.DeadMagazinesI thought everyone knew it was a full game now?
What's funny is cows bash ODST nonstop for being an "expansion" and now they are comparing their "guaranteed GOTY" to it, acting as if all the sudden ODST is a full fledged, hype machine on the same level as U2. Which is it? Maybe you should stick to comparing comparable things.DeadMagazinesWell whether it's enough to be "considered" a full game or not really doesn't matter... since the devs are charging us $60 for it! The fact that all the online is Halo 3 maps is kind of lame. And the six hour campaign sounds a lil weak as well... BUT I've heard that the game was really designed for it's co-op, and that's an area that it shines in. Still... I probably wouldn't spend $60 on it.
U2 didn't have 3 or 4 years...it had 2 yers of developmentAlright let's shed some light on this baffling debate.
Bungie had a little bit over a year, probably 1/4 the budget of NDand their passion for video games , and already proven shooting mechanics.
ND had about 3 or 4 years, twice or maybe triple Bungie's budget for ODST, and a full staff, compared to Bungie's split team.
It would be surprising if Uncharted 2 WASN'T better than ODST. :|
Dead-Memories
Lol, how in the hell did they have 3-4 years??? You're not very good at math are you? Both teams had the same amount of time... as far as budgets & team sizes, no one knows.Alright let's shed some light on this baffling debate.
Bungie had a little bit over a year, probably 1/4 the budget of NDand their passion for video games , and already proven shooting mechanics.
ND had about 3 or 4 years, twice or maybe triple Bungie's budget for ODST, and a full staff, compared to Bungie's split team.
It would be surprising if Uncharted 2 WASN'T better than ODST. :|
Dead-Memories
[QUOTE="DeadMagazines"]What's funny is cows bash ODST nonstop for being an "expansion" and now they are comparing their "guaranteed GOTY" to it, acting as if all the sudden ODST is a full fledged, hype machine on the same level as U2. Which is it? Maybe you should stick to comparing comparable things.haze_blazeWell whether it's enough to be "considered" a full game or not really doesn't matter... since the devs are charging us $60 for it! The fact that all the online is Halo 3 maps is kind of lame. And the six hour campaign sounds a lil weak as well... BUT I've heard that the game was really designed for it's co-op, and that's an area that it shines in. Still... I probably wouldn't spend $60 on it. It does, firefight is pretty fun though i don't really get it's point once you have the 200,000 points achievement as there isn't really a level count for you to compare with your friends. The lack of matchmaking sucks a bit too. The campaign was fun but a bit easy and short.
[QUOTE="DeadMagazines"]What's funny is cows bash ODST nonstop for being an "expansion" and now they are comparing their "guaranteed GOTY" to it, acting as if all the sudden ODST is a full fledged, hype machine on the same level as U2. Which is it? Maybe you should stick to comparing comparable things.hoosier7I thought everyone knew it was a full game now? It's not. It's an expansion pack. :)
[QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]Lol, how in the hell did they have 3-4 years??? You're not very good at math are you? Both teams had the same amount of time... as far as budgets & team sizes, no one knows. I read in an article somewhere it had actually started a bit before UC 1 :|Alright let's shed some light on this baffling debate.
Bungie had a little bit over a year, probably 1/4 the budget of NDand their passion for video games , and already proven shooting mechanics.
ND had about 3 or 4 years, twice or maybe triple Bungie's budget for ODST, and a full staff, compared to Bungie's split team.
It would be surprising if Uncharted 2 WASN'T better than ODST. :|
haze_blaze
So 2-3 years not 3 or 4 excuse my hangover.
Still twice the time of ODST, which was done in a little over a year.
[QUOTE="hoosier7"][QUOTE="DeadMagazines"]What's funny is cows bash ODST nonstop for being an "expansion" and now they are comparing their "guaranteed GOTY" to it, acting as if all the sudden ODST is a full fledged, hype machine on the same level as U2. Which is it? Maybe you should stick to comparing comparable things.LegendaryCakeI thought everyone knew it was a full game now? It's not. It's an expansion pack. :) Then why are you trying to compare this "expansion pack" to your so called "Goty" that had 10x more development ? Maybe you should wait until Reach comes out and try comparing it? But i doubt you will, Uncharted will be forgotten by then probably.
[QUOTE="LegendaryCake"][QUOTE="hoosier7"] I thought everyone knew it was a full game now?DeadMagazinesIt's not. It's an expansion pack. :) Then why are you trying to compare this "expansion pack" to your so called "Goty" that had 10x more development ? Maybe you should wait until Reach comes out and try comparing it? But i doubt you will, Uncharted will be forgotten by then probably. I never compared ODST to uncharted 2, and i never said it would be Goty, but development should mean nothing. I'd never excuse the fact that something is worse than something else because of it's development time.
Lol, how in the hell did they have 3-4 years??? You're not very good at math are you? Both teams had the same amount of time... as far as budgets & team sizes, no one knows. I read in an article somewhere it had actually started a bit before UC 1 :|[QUOTE="haze_blaze"][QUOTE="Dead-Memories"]
Alright let's shed some light on this baffling debate.
Bungie had a little bit over a year, probably 1/4 the budget of NDand their passion for video games , and already proven shooting mechanics.
ND had about 3 or 4 years, twice or maybe triple Bungie's budget for ODST, and a full staff, compared to Bungie's split team.
It would be surprising if Uncharted 2 WASN'T better than ODST. :|
Dead-Memories
So 2-3 years not 3 or 4 excuse my hangover.
Still twice the time of ODST, which was done in a little over a year.
Dude, it's been about 2 yrs for both... Are you 8 yrs old??? How would they have started on the sequel before the original???For one thing one is a fps and the other 3rd person totally different games and should not be compared.
The how term halo killer is an other FPS of the same type that actually does better than halo. gameplay,Story,Multiplayer.ect
so far we haven't had a console fps with a whole complete package as halo.
you
talking about?This is one very interesting day - the battle between Halo and Uncharted. Imagine Halo 3: ODST scoring less than 9.5... That means that Uncharted officially beat Halo... :) Something games such as Killzone 2, Resistance and others have failed it - which made Halo grow. Would this, however, mean that Halo as a franchise would be done? That Microsoft fans wouldn't be able to brag about Halo anymore? They would only be able to brag about its sales, but once Gran Turismo 5 is released, it ends there. Do you think this can happen? I think this can be a turning point in gaming. I think once the Halo 3: ODST review is up on IGN, Halo is done. Its future has been damaged...LegendaryCake
How do you expect to kill Halo if people keep making threads about Halo and playing it.
Your only contributing more towards everything that is gloriously Halo;)
If you respond to this that means you can't get Halo out of you system.:twisted:
Lol, how in the hell did they have 3-4 years??? You're not very good at math are you? Both teams had the same amount of time... as far as budgets & team sizes, no one knows. haze_blazeI read in an article somewhere it had actually started a bit before UC 1 :|
So 2-3 years not 3 or 4 excuse my hangover.
Still twice the time of ODST, which was done in a little over a year.
Dude, it's been about 2 yrs for both... Are you 8 yrs old??? How would they have started on the sequel before the original??? We are assuming age now :? It happens quite often actually.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment