Have we started to see the PS3 difference???

  • 76 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Escobahr
Escobahr

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Escobahr
Member since 2007 • 133 Posts

We've all seen and heard the mulitple reviewers atesting to the fact that overall, the PS3 has slight graphical advantages over the 360 when it comes to GTA4. for example

IGN stated that the ps3 has

"far less pop-in,Texture pop, and frame rate issues than the 360 version"

we know that sam houser from rockstar has even said himself, that he prefers the way that the PS3 renders.

today weve heard from devs at pandemic who stated " But it sounds like PS3 might actually get the better looking version in the end. Zamkoff reckons that PlayStation 3 is better than Xbox 360 at anti-aliasing"

so what do you guys think, i own both consoles so i am cool either way.....am i just off base here?

Avatar image for shaggygrosser
shaggygrosser

5871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 shaggygrosser
Member since 2003 • 5871 Posts

My feeling is that Sony set an unrealistic expectation pre-PS3 release that the PS3 would be far & beyond better at graphics than the competition at launch. It's not really the hardware's fault, but more of PR BS.

Honestly, I love the look of Ratchet & Clank:ToD, but it's not lightyears ahead of games like Gears.

Avatar image for TOAO_Cyrus1
TOAO_Cyrus1

2895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 TOAO_Cyrus1
Member since 2004 • 2895 Posts
Well less pop in comes from an obvious advantage (standard hard drive) so I doubt it will go much farther then that.
Avatar image for killadread
killadread

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 killadread
Member since 2008 • 498 Posts
In short, the developers are finally starting to learn how to develop for the PS3 and cell. But the fact remains that PS3 was always the more powerful console.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop ins
Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts
there ios only a minor differecne, im sick of people claiming 360 ownage over this fact. its not like they are different enough to effect the score so why bother at all? some games look better on the 360, should we declare a 360 victory over those? no. this really needs to stop, its the install that makes the game have less pop in not 'teh power of teh cell'
Avatar image for jessie5788
jessie5788

972

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 jessie5788
Member since 2007 • 972 Posts
dev are finally learning how to work on the ps3. if you expected the best in the first 6-112months you were expecting to much. the ps2 games of its first year look like crap to it games now. games will just keep getting better for the ps3.
Avatar image for killadread
killadread

498

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 killadread
Member since 2008 • 498 Posts

My feeling is that Sony set an unrealistic expectation pre-PS3 release that the PS3 would be far & beyond better at graphics than the competition at launch. It's not really the hardware's fault, but more of PR BS.

Honestly, I love the look of Ratchet & Clank:ToD, but it's not lightyears ahead of games like Gears.

shaggygrosser

True.

But they haven't exactly mislead people on what PS3 might eventually do. When I look at the Killzine II 06 CGI trailer I go "WOW"...and then I look at the Killzone II 07 realtime/gameplay trailer I go "WOW...doesen't really look that much diffrent"

Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts
put it in the sticky, im so sick of seeing this when none of you have never even played the game.
Avatar image for yetiboy15
yetiboy15

406

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 yetiboy15
Member since 2005 • 406 Posts
better performance is due to the install i think cause the big deal about the 360 was not everyone had a hard drive
Avatar image for niall077
niall077

1729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 niall077
Member since 2006 • 1729 Posts

Devs are getting how the PS3 works now. the first year is always rough for a system, the 360 got HD ps2 ports its first year

DMC4, Burnout P, GTA4. the 3 biggest multiplat releases SO FAR this year run better on ps3.

Im sure we will see the bad ps3 port now and again (EA sports) but it is looking bright for ps3 games

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

I don't think it was much of a secret that eventually the PS3 would begin to pull ahead. The problem is that I'm not going to choose a slight gfx advantange over playing games with my rl friends and the majority of them only own 360's.

Avatar image for Gaara79
Gaara79

4476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Gaara79
Member since 2005 • 4476 Posts
Nope. So far the only differences are because of installs. not "teh Cell"
Avatar image for Escobahr
Escobahr

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 Escobahr
Member since 2007 • 133 Posts

i disagree on the comparison between gears and rathcet and clank tho.....

the fidelity between the two is kore in the favor of R&C

but ultimately what people need to remember is that the PS3 is newer better tech...just like the difference between the PS2 and the xbox.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

i disagree on the comparison between gears and rathcet and clank tho.....

the fidelity between the two is kore in the favor of R&C

but ultimately what people need to remember is that the PS3 is newer better tech...just like the difference between the PS2 and the xbox.

Escobahr

not at all the difference between the ps2 and xbox was large you could of even seen it with launch xbox games like halo

the difference between the ps3 and 360 this gen are so close that arguing about it is a moot point and only left to the fanboys

Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts

you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insParadiddleFill

same thing buddy. ;)

Avatar image for Chipp
Chipp

1897

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Chipp
Member since 2003 • 1897 Posts
You PS3 fans are delusional, those aren't differences that should even be worth mentioning. And it only exists because PS3 was the lead platform. The same thing happens when 360 is the lead platform. Lost planet and Turok anyone? There will never ever be a drastic difference between the two systems. They are roughly equal in terms of power.
Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

no not same thing buddy

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insParadiddleFill

same thing buddy. ;)

no not same thing buddy

bad frame rate leads to pop ups.

and I'm not your buddy, guy! lol

Avatar image for meischris39
meischris39

5432

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 39

User Lists: 0

#21 meischris39
Member since 2004 • 5432 Posts
Wasn't this obvious, the only people denying this was the Xbox fanboys who were and still are adamant that their system has the better graphics. Games...Online...Features these are all things that are debatable, graphics on the other hand are not. Multiplatform games are becoming better looking on the PS3, because they are understanding the SDK's which are complicated to learn thats all. I bet you in a few years time aswell the gap will have widened due to the PS3 being such a complicated system to program for.
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

no not same thing buddy

bad frame rate leads to pop ups.

and I'm not your buddy, guy! lol

Again, no it doesn't.

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts
If GTA is the end of the graphics curve, then..woah. The upgrade to HD was NOT worth it.
Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insNagidar

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

exactly! the lower the frames per second, the more things magically pop up when a new frame is introduced.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

no not same thing buddy

bad frame rate leads to pop ups.

and I'm not your buddy, guy! lol

framerate and popins are two diffrent things please think before typing

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

exactly! the lower the frames per second, the more things magically pop up when a new frame is introduced.

no they have nothing to do with each other

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

exactly! the lower the frames per second, the more things magically pop up when a new frame is introduced.

No, thats not how it works, pop-in can be when an object appears in the distance, frame rate is how many FPS the game runs at.

Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insParadiddleFill

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

exactly! the lower the frames per second, the more things magically pop up when a new frame is introduced.

no they have nothing to do with each other

w/e you say. GTA4 still looks better on PS3, regardless.

Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

exactly! the lower the frames per second, the more things magically pop up when a new frame is introduced.

no they have nothing to do with each other

w/e you say. GTA4 still looks better on PS3, regardless.

And now it comes out, it was the fanboy talking.

Avatar image for ParadiddleFill
ParadiddleFill

3506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 ParadiddleFill
Member since 2007 • 3506 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

icarus212001

no they have nothing to do with each other

w/e you say. GTA4 still looks better on PS3, regardless.

what are you 12?

Avatar image for MortalDecay
MortalDecay

4298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 MortalDecay
Member since 2005 • 4298 Posts
[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insicarus212001

same thing buddy. ;)

no not same thing buddy

bad frame rate leads to pop ups.

and I'm not your buddy, guy! lol

Frame rate, and pop ups are two totally different things. The frame rate has nothng to do with how the console draws objects on the screen. Frame rate is how fast the animations on the screen runs. I suggest you do some research on the subject.

Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

ParadiddleFill

no they have nothing to do with each other

w/e you say. GTA4 still looks better on PS3, regardless.

what are you 12?

nope. 18. :D but i do think of myself as more childlike than most people my age. oh well. beats being a stiff.

Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"][QUOTE="icarus212001"][QUOTE="Nagidar"][QUOTE="icarus212001"]

[QUOTE="ParadiddleFill"]you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insNagidar

same thing buddy. ;)

No, its not, pop-in is when objects appear on the screen, framerate is how many Frames Per Second the game runs at.

exactly! the lower the frames per second, the more things magically pop up when a new frame is introduced.

no they have nothing to do with each other

w/e you say. GTA4 still looks better on PS3, regardless.

And now it comes out, it was the fanboy talking.

dont even have a PS3, friend. i have a Wii. but i have played it a little on the 360 (friend's house) and the PS3 (cousin's house). since I actually have eyes, i saw for myself that the PS3 version ran smoother with less clipping and less pop ups. the frame rate was a bit slower on the 360 but its nothing that would cause multiple heart attacks to 360 owners (at least, i hope not :|) .

Avatar image for iamanoobkillme
iamanoobkillme

1166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 iamanoobkillme
Member since 2005 • 1166 Posts
the cell is 22 times after then intels super chips . ps3 should have a big advantage . but its s shame ps3 always loses to 360 .
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#35 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Well the PS3 is the more powerful console. How much more powerful is still up in the air. We have seen a few games on the PS3 look and run better than games on the 360. Though not to many.

Pretty much they are equal in power. It really comes down to how the developers program the games on the systems.

Avatar image for Cute_Red_Panda
Cute_Red_Panda

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Cute_Red_Panda
Member since 2008 • 1734 Posts
I personally thought God of War 2 and Chronicles of Riddick were the best looking games last gen. That said, both came out around the end of the console cycle. I expect the same thing to happen with the PS3 and 360. How much of a difference will there be between the both? The difference will be noticeable from a casual perspective, IMO.
Avatar image for proninjas
proninjas

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 proninjas
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Devs are getting how the PS3 works now. the first year is always rough for a system, the 360 got HD ps2 ports its first year

DMC4, Burnout P, GTA4. the 3 biggest multiplat releases SO FAR this year run better on ps3.

Im sure we will see the bad ps3 port now and again (EA sports) but it is looking bright for ps3 games

niall077

Actually, DMC4 is well known to look better on the 360 - see eurogamer comparison - and GTA4 runs at a lower res on the ps3 and suffers from, according to IGN, more framerate issues than the 360 version - all this despite a 5 gig install!!!

And the ps3 is pulling ahead how???

Avatar image for icarus212001
icarus212001

2744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 icarus212001
Member since 2007 • 2744 Posts
[QUOTE="niall077"]

Devs are getting how the PS3 works now. the first year is always rough for a system, the 360 got HD ps2 ports its first year

DMC4, Burnout P, GTA4. the 3 biggest multiplat releases SO FAR this year run better on ps3.

Im sure we will see the bad ps3 port now and again (EA sports) but it is looking bright for ps3 games

proninjas

Actually, DMC4 is well known to look better on the 360 - see eurogamer comparison - and GTA4 runs at a lower res on the ps3 and suffers from, according to IGN, more framerate issues than the 360 version - all this despite a 5 gig install!!!

And the ps3 is pulling ahead how???

by seeing that you are a troll! *casts Ultima*

Avatar image for proninjas
proninjas

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 proninjas
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="proninjas"][QUOTE="niall077"]

Devs are getting how the PS3 works now. the first year is always rough for a system, the 360 got HD ps2 ports its first year

DMC4, Burnout P, GTA4. the 3 biggest multiplat releases SO FAR this year run better on ps3.

Im sure we will see the bad ps3 port now and again (EA sports) but it is looking bright for ps3 games

icarus212001

Actually, DMC4 is well known to look better on the 360 - see eurogamer comparison - and GTA4 runs at a lower res on the ps3 and suffers from, according to IGN, more framerate issues than the 360 version - all this despite a 5 gig install!!!

And the ps3 is pulling ahead how???

by seeing that you are a troll! *casts Ultima*

Umm.. I can back up everything I said with links to well known websites. For comparisons just search for eurogamer DMC4 comparison - the 360 version wins.

Just read the IGN review to see that GTA on ps3 suffers from more framerate issues.

Unlike some people here, I based my posts on reality... not dreams.

Avatar image for Shensolidus
Shensolidus

931

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 Shensolidus
Member since 2003 • 931 Posts
[QUOTE="niall077"]

Devs are getting how the PS3 works now. the first year is always rough for a system, the 360 got HD ps2 ports its first year

DMC4, Burnout P, GTA4. the 3 biggest multiplat releases SO FAR this year run better on ps3.

Im sure we will see the bad ps3 port now and again (EA sports) but it is looking bright for ps3 games

proninjas

Actually, DMC4 is well known to look better on the 360 - see eurogamer comparison - and GTA4 runs at a lower res on the ps3 and suffers from, according to IGN, more framerate issues than the 360 version - all this despite a 5 gig install!!!

And the ps3 is pulling ahead how???

Did you read the IGN review? It clearly stated the PS3 version had less frame rate issues and pop-in than the 360 version. This were sentiments that EGM/1UP backed up as well. The only review that stated the PS3 had more frame-rate hiccups was Kotaku, and in the end they still gave the graphical/performance edge to the PS3 version.

And yes, those are all things a 5 gig install allowed to be possible.

Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#41 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

Well the PS3 is the more powerful console. How much more powerful is still up in the air. We have seen a few games on the PS3 look and run better than games on the 360. Though not to many.

Pretty much they are equal in power. It really comes down to how the developers program the games on the systems.

Wasdie

Always good to hear from you wasdie, your right it really is a matter of programming. scince both consoles are bottle-necked where it hurts i doubt very much the gap between the ps3 and 360 is as big as some would like to believe

Avatar image for Phazevariance
Phazevariance

12356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Phazevariance
Member since 2003 • 12356 Posts

you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more pop insParadiddleFill

This is true

Avatar image for thegame1980
thegame1980

2194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 thegame1980
Member since 2006 • 2194 Posts

Couldn't really give a *****! This arguement is getting tired and old and people STILL just bring forth the same old BS day in and day out.

Getting GTA IV for 360 because of the achievements, better online, more of my friends own a 360 and simply the PS3 is a piece of crap better textures and all.

Avatar image for thegame1980
thegame1980

2194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#44 thegame1980
Member since 2006 • 2194 Posts

Devs are getting how the PS3 works now. the first year is always rough for a system, the 360 got HD ps2 ports its first year

DMC4, Burnout P, GTA4. the 3 biggest multiplat releases SO FAR this year run better on ps3.

Im sure we will see the bad ps3 port now and again (EA sports) but it is looking bright for ps3 games

niall077

Might wanna rethink that Devil May Cry 4 one. Did you play it on 360? I have and my friend did on PS3. Guess what? BOTH RUN THE SAME! No slowdowns, no pop ins, and EXACT same loading. 2 seconds MAX! Get off the written internet reviews and do your own research you'll be surprised at what's misleading out there on the interwebs.

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10941 Posts

you have misquoted ign they never said 360 version has worse frame rate actually if you read the kotaku review they say the 360 has better framerate and beter AA, the ign just said that the 360 version has more popinsParadiddleFill

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/869/869381p5.html

Avatar image for smooothe
smooothe

312

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 smooothe
Member since 2006 • 312 Posts

You PS3 fans are delusional, those aren't differences that should even be worth mentioning. And it only exists because PS3 was the lead platform. The same thing happens when 360 is the lead platform. Lost planet and Turok anyone? There will never ever be a drastic difference between the two systems. They are roughly equal in terms of power.Ramadear

Actually, the 360 was the lead platform for GTA IV. Get your facts straight.

Avatar image for cosmostein77
cosmostein77

7043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 102

User Lists: 0

#47 cosmostein77
Member since 2004 • 7043 Posts

While PS3 games should look better then 360 games as the console is a year newer,

To expect the same sort of difference we saw between the Original Xbox and the PS2 is just not realistic, the PS3 will look better but only to trained eyes.

Avatar image for crunchUK
crunchUK

3050

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 crunchUK
Member since 2007 • 3050 Posts

Nope. So far the only differences are because of installs. not "teh Cell"
Gaara79

dude, you have to INSTALL ps3 games?????????????????? :D ridiculous.

Avatar image for Tragic_Kingdom7
Tragic_Kingdom7

4011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Tragic_Kingdom7
Member since 2008 • 4011 Posts

You PS3 fans are delusional, those aren't differences that should even be worth mentioning. And it only exists because PS3 was the lead platform. The same thing happens when 360 is the lead platform. Lost planet and Turok anyone? There will never ever be a drastic difference between the two systems. They are roughly equal in terms of power.Ramadear

As far as GTA is concerned, the 360 was the lead platform.

Avatar image for shaggygrosser
shaggygrosser

5871

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 shaggygrosser
Member since 2003 • 5871 Posts

[QUOTE="Gaara79"]Nope. So far the only differences are because of installs. not "teh Cell"
crunchUK

dude, you have to INSTALL ps3 games?????????????????? :D ridiculous.

Most ps3 games make the install optional to improve performance. But you have to install PS3 demos, which I DO find ridiculous.