Heavy Rain, in 3D, with Move...

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Pesci1
Pesci1

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Pesci1
Member since 2010 • 31 Posts

Fanboy or not, is that something that would interest you?

Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts
If I didnt need a $2000 tv...I got the game sitting here in its wrapper btw. Still gotta play it.
Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

If I didn't need an expensive tv, and a PS3 wasn't $300 then yah.

Avatar image for felipebo
felipebo

4170

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 felipebo
Member since 2009 • 4170 Posts

If TV+Glasses didn't cost as much as my soul.

Avatar image for TaigaTiger
TaigaTiger

660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 TaigaTiger
Member since 2009 • 660 Posts

if money wasn't an issue i think that would be a lot of fun

Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts
a very expensive combo.
Avatar image for gago-gago
gago-gago

12138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 gago-gago
Member since 2009 • 12138 Posts

I read that the DLC was suppose to come is delayed because of the Move. They wanted to add Move controls to it, and no it doesn't interest me. But I think shaking the Move control while you're in the shower in the game, might be more funny now.

Avatar image for Pesci1
Pesci1

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Pesci1
Member since 2010 • 31 Posts

Is it just me, or are people exaggerating the cost of these 3D tv's? I mean.. HDTV's / flat panels were a grip when they came out.

When the 360 got released in '05, I'm pretty sure the cost of HDTV's were comparable to what the 3D sets are now. Yes? No?

Avatar image for wolverine4262
wolverine4262

20832

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 wolverine4262
Member since 2004 • 20832 Posts

Is it just me, or are people exaggerating the cost of these 3D tv's? I mean.. HDTV's / flat panels were a grip when they came out.

When the 360 got released in '05, I'm pretty sure the cost of HDTV's were comparable to what the 3D sets are now. Yes? No?

Pesci1
The problem is that many of us just bought our HD TVs...
Avatar image for Fuhgeddabouditt
Fuhgeddabouditt

5468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Fuhgeddabouditt
Member since 2010 • 5468 Posts

Is it just me, or are people exaggerating the cost of these 3D tv's? I mean.. HDTV's / flat panels were a grip when they came out.

When the 360 got released in '05, I'm pretty sure the cost of TV's were comparable to what the 3D sets are now. Yes? No?

Pesci1

3D tvs right now is a expensive gimmick. Going to SD to HD was a big deal, not so for yet another 3D surge in the market.

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

Is it just me, or are people exaggerating the cost of these 3D tv's? I mean.. HDTV's / flat panels were a grip when they came out.

When the 360 got released in '05, I'm pretty sure the cost of HDTV's were comparable to what the 3D sets are now. Yes? No?

Pesci1

Nobody is exaggerating.

The reason people dislike the thought of buying a 3D tv is because of the fact that there are millions of people who bought HDTVs within the passed 2-3 years. Why would you want to drop another grand or two for a new tv so soon?

Avatar image for mojito1988
mojito1988

4975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 mojito1988
Member since 2006 • 4975 Posts

Is it just me, or are people exaggerating the cost of these 3D tv's? I mean.. HDTV's / flat panels were a grip when they came out.

When the 360 got released in '05, I'm pretty sure the cost of HDTV's were comparable to what the 3D sets are now. Yes? No?

Pesci1

Ok a video game costs $60 to buy if you ask if something would be cool and it cost way more than the %60 that most games cost to play then it is not exaggeration. Its reality.

Why would people want to spend that much extra just to play a game thats already out that you can get without breaking the bank.

Another way to look at it is this: You could but the 2dtv and Move and Heavy Rain 3d, or you can buy Heavy Rain and about 40 other games that you have wanted at full Reatil Price. Wow i cannot decide what i would rather do with my money! Not.

Avatar image for TacticaI
TacticaI

1366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TacticaI
Member since 2006 • 1366 Posts
I guess is it is just Pesci1. I only recently bought my HDTV and the thought of spending grands more for 3D...well, I don't have to say what's already understood.
Avatar image for mrmusicman247
mrmusicman247

17601

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 mrmusicman247
Member since 2008 • 17601 Posts
Heavy Rain in 3D sounds like it would be kinda cool actually.
Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

welp, looks like its time to upgrade to a 3DTV now

Avatar image for sboyer2
sboyer2

941

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 sboyer2
Member since 2010 • 941 Posts
Nope This motion control and 3D trend to me just seems like failed attempts at some type of VR. VR is great...would welcome it in an instant. But current motion controls aren't realistic enough and 3D is still just watching a little screen with a few images popping out.
Avatar image for Foolio1
Foolio1

7467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#17 Foolio1
Member since 2003 • 7467 Posts

3D you say?!

Avatar image for Timstuff
Timstuff

26840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#18 Timstuff
Member since 2002 • 26840 Posts
If I didnt need a $2000 tv...I got the game sitting here in its wrapper btw. Still gotta play it. wolverine4262
$2000 + a $200 pair of glasses for everyone watching. ;)
Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

i just spent 4200$ last year on my 65" tv... FAIL

Avatar image for ultraking
ultraking

6904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 ultraking
Member since 2004 • 6904 Posts

i just spent 4200$ last year on my 65" tv... FAIL

KBFloYd

fail?on whos part?

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#21 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

[QUOTE="Pesci1"]

Is it just me, or are people exaggerating the cost of these 3D tv's? I mean.. HDTV's / flat panels were a grip when they came out.

When the 360 got released in '05, I'm pretty sure the cost of HDTV's were comparable to what the 3D sets are now. Yes? No?

treedoor

Nobody is exaggerating.

The reason people dislike the thought of buying a 3D tv is because of the fact that there are millions of people who bought HDTVs within the passed 2-3 years. Why would you want to drop another grand or two for a new tv so soon?

This is why I never spend much money on TVs untill I feel it is worth it. Got a 720 2 years ago (less than400 32in) but knew that it would not last long as 1080 HD would come out at less price, then waited, then I heard that 120 Hz would come out and waited. Now with 3D I am going to wait untill the right price for True 240Hz INPUT,unless something else is done. I expect in 2years I will have my 3D 240Hz for around 800.00

Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
that would be awesome, just a little expensive =/

[QUOTE="KBFloYd"]

i just spent 4200$ last year on my 65" tv... FAIL

ultraking

fail?on whos part?

:lol: sig worthy!
Avatar image for aznfool07
aznfool07

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 aznfool07
Member since 2005 • 3552 Posts
No.
Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#24 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

[QUOTE="KBFloYd"]

i just spent 4200$ last year on my 65" tv... FAIL

ultraking

fail?on whos part?

me...and technology :P... if 3d tvs had been out 1 year earlier :(

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

Not really. Don't see the appeal of 3D.

Avatar image for Pesci1
Pesci1

31

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Pesci1
Member since 2010 • 31 Posts

I hear what you're saying.. but I'm not sure that I completely agree.

You say the jump from SD to HD is much bigger than a jump from HD to 3D?

We're talking a whole other dimension here.. not just some extra pixels.