[QUOTE="macabalony"][QUOTE="austereh"][QUOTE="austereh"]PS3
see thread - PS3 wins...
for reasons why. AKA Xbox will break 1-2 years down the line and you will be out 100+ dollars. Microsoft will send you another defective system that will break 1-2 years down the line again. If you are willing to spend hundreds of dollars on the console itself, then be my guest.
austereh
Haha...nevermind about that thread, they locked it. See how it works. They don't want you to know how bad the 360 is in terms of failure rate.
Buy a PS3 and thank me later.
Yeah sure Failure rate sucks big time. But you have to think beyond that trouble. It is a great system. I am glad I bought a 360 and not an inexpensive Blu Ray player.
I agree with you if you don't take into consideration failure rate that he 360 is the better system, FOR NOW. But once PS3 actually starts to get a good lineup, who knows. I know I for one played my PS2 more than the Xbox because it just had better games. PS3 was released how much later than the Xbox 360? So for that reason, the 360 just has a much bigger lineup so far which equates to having more good quality games.
But all this doesn't matter when the system itself breaks and you just have a large paperweight.
Granted But who wins the race, the person who gets out of the gate first and consistently puts out great games
OR
the person who gets out way later than the other person, and has only a moderate amount of great games, and the only thing they can give are promises like "We promise that MGS4 will be better than any other 360 game"
I am still specticle on the success of the PS3. Once again I wanted a reliable system that always worked, Hell i would buy a PS3 but for right now, as far games, great online play, and over all great satisfaction i would buy a 360.
Log in to comment