AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA :D
What EDGE is for 360,HHG is for ps3.What a fanboy...look at this link,and then down at carmacks version :)
http://www.hiphopgamershow.com/2009/08/john-carmack-words-the-truth-the-hype-and-the-pr-its-on-now/
"Rage has also been in the light of controversy considering that John Carmack himself said that the Playstation 3 version will be the better version simply cause of the blu-ray benefit and the raw calculating power of the Cell processor but, it will be harder to develop on. The industry goes into shock again considering what we've witnessed this generation when it comes down to multi-platform games, we're all use to seeing the Playstation 3 get the short end of the stick but finally especially for fanboys out there the Cell finally wins over the competition."
"The Truth, The Hype And The PR in this situation is that even though Xbox360 is easier the PS3 can perform better with more work hours put into it but, why work harder when you can settle for what's easy and then spread the love across the board including the PC version as well."
"That's The Conclusion."
Above is HHG version.
And here is real,Carmacks.
http://www.destructoid.com/blogs/ReclusiveSpirit/john-carmack-unplugged-xbox-360-ps3-98107.phtml
"Yeah, I mean that's our position that it's almost unequivocal across the board that the 360 is a better platform to develop for. When you get down into actual comparisons on the hardware performance characteristics, it's not quite an apples to apples comparison. On almost anything on the strictly graphical side, in terms of pushing vertexes and triangles on there, the 360 hardware is superior to the PS3's RSX on there."
"...and we're trying to say pretty plainly that this is going to be the one thing that the PS3 version is gonna be better at, and in fact it's almost the worst sort of thing for Microsoft there because we are having to work twice as hard on the PS3 to bring it up to spec. But in the end it's going to be 60fps game, and it's going to wind up looking just like the 360, we just had to sweat lot more for it. And if it winds up getting a benefit because of the blu-ray and having the better compression on there, then it's going to wind up looking like the PS3 was the better machine, even though it really wasn't..."
"And the other major difference is the memory partitioning. Where they're both 512mb machines, but on the PS3 it's partitioned into 256mb of video and 256mb of main. And one of the biggest things that Sony does poorly for developers is their system stuff sucks up a lot more resources than it does, than Microsoft's does on the 360. So memory is much more painful on the PS3. We spend a lot more time trying to crunch down the memory for that..."
Does anyone,anyone takes him seriously? :)
Log in to comment