how is ea any worse than ubi, thq, activison etc?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

why does everyone hate ea so much more when they are no different than all the other big publishers?

what innovative thing has ubi done recently? r6v2 is just like the first one

thq? when did they last do something new? or how about activison? cod4 is just cod2 in modern and a new class system hardly anything amazing. bf2 is just as good and has many thing cod4 lacks.

Avatar image for -GhostMLD-
-GhostMLD-

3282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 -GhostMLD-
Member since 2008 • 3282 Posts

EA pumps out the most games.

WHile good for the industry as they all sell many X million copies, gamers dont like them cause their games get an average score of 7. Not great, but not shovelware either.

thats why.

Avatar image for Kahuna_1
Kahuna_1

7948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Kahuna_1
Member since 2006 • 7948 Posts
Well..I have played more EA and Ubisoft games so I tend to rip on them only...they suck.
Avatar image for Virus214
Virus214

2052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Virus214
Member since 2007 • 2052 Posts
i dunno what you guys are about. but i think EA kicks so much ass. i wanna work their. i dun care what you guys think.
Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts

EA charges for guns in a game.

EA charges for things already on the disk.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

EA pumps out the most games.

WHile good for the industry as they all sell many X million copies, gamers dont like them cause their games get an average score of 7. Not great, but not shovelware either.

thats why.

-GhostMLD-

hardly, ubi just about does splinter cell, r6 every year. when did battlefield 2 come out? oh 2005 or what about c&c2 -C&c3 its olny nfs and sport games that are every year. while ubi's main games are on 12-16 month cycle

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

EA charges for guns in a game.

EA charges for things already on the disk.

II-FBIsniper-II

oh yeah, I can win all those cars in nfs that you can buy so point being?

Avatar image for TBoogy
TBoogy

4382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TBoogy
Member since 2007 • 4382 Posts

why does everyone hate ea so much more when they are no different than all the other big publishers?

what innovative thing has ubi done recently? r6v2 is just like the first one

thq? when did they last do something new? or how about activison? cod4 is just cod2 in modern and a new class system hardly anything amazing. bf2 is just as good and has many thing cod4 lacks.

imprezawrx500

Well, compared to Ubi, Ea sucks. Ubi was getting so good that EA had to go and buy part of the company. I don't have much to say about THQ or Activision though.

Whenever I thought Iwould forgive EA and buy one of their games (I've been boycotting them since 1999, although I probably hadn't bought one of their games for years before that), the game would come out and end of sucking.

Can't think of which EA games in particular, but as a Harry Potter fan, I was hoping for something good on that one (especially the one with the Tri-Wizard tournament. That could have been good). I also thought Catwoman could have been good (even if the movie was mediocre), but they messed that up too.

Besides sports, EA games always rate low. Ubi games almost always score 8.5 and up. And even in sports, Sega/Visual Concepts/2k Sports was often kicking their butts.

Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts
Because EA made a bad rep for themselves first :P. Not like ubi or activision are any better but when EA was building up thier bad rep these guys weren't.
Avatar image for TDLlama
TDLlama

2779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 TDLlama
Member since 2006 • 2779 Posts

EA is the worst, but they all have their share of problems.

Ubisoft loves quick cash-in games. Remember the cheap Wii ports? They're also trying to cash in on the training game craze and those horsey games. Still, I find them to be respectable... they published No More Heroes after-all.

THQ is the king of the movie/TV franchise games. Spongebob, Disney, Bratz, etc, etc.

Activision is becoming as bad as EA now that they're as big as EA. Expect a yearly Guitar Hero game along with more Tony Hawk and their own crappy movie games.

EA has its share of awesome games, but they milk franchises to death (Sims, Need for Speed, Madden, Battlefield, C&C, Burnout, Medal of Honor). EA is too big for its own good.

Avatar image for Andrew_Xavier
Andrew_Xavier

9625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 Andrew_Xavier
Member since 2007 • 9625 Posts
It's cooler to insult EA, so, most people insult them,
next week, when a new publisher becomes the target, they'll completely forget about their hardcore rage towards EA, and move it to whichever group is the new cool one to hate.
Avatar image for catlin_czirr
catlin_czirr

2545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 catlin_czirr
Member since 2007 • 2545 Posts
Their games usually have no soul (not literally, DUH!), they are just quick cash makers.
Avatar image for gasmaskman
gasmaskman

3463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 gasmaskman
Member since 2005 • 3463 Posts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ea_games#Criticism" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ea_games#Criticism">This might help.

They buy great companies (Origin, Westwood Studios, and Bullfrog), then shut them down when they don't produce results the same results as when they were indy.

They rehash games yearly, with minimal change (I'm not saying Activision, etc. don't do the same thing), and then they put a full price on it.

They buy their competition. They're going to purchase Take-2 (for Rockstar), they have purchased Pandemic, BioWare, Mythic, etc. They shut down support from games that are still played.

I'm sorry, but I like it when my games are polished and take long to develop. I don't like buggy rehashes or games making deadlines. I'd much rather have MGS4 in 2010 than have some **** buggy version. Expect more Midnight Club and GTA games, especially from different devs, if the Take-2 deal goes through.

Avatar image for Raijinko
Raijinko

306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Raijinko
Member since 2007 • 306 Posts
[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

EA pumps out the most games.

WHile good for the industry as they all sell many X million copies, gamers dont like them cause their games get an average score of 7. Not great, but not shovelware either.

thats why.

imprezawrx500

hardly, ubi just about does splinter cell, r6 every year. when did battlefield 2 come out? oh 2005 or what about c&c2 -C&c3 its olny nfs and sport games that are every year. while ubi's main games are on 12-16 month cycle

Lol battlefield did come out in 05, but then battlefield 2142 came in 06, pluse battlefield modern combat ps2 and then 360 Now Battlefield bad company. thats alot of of battlefields for 3 years... Then they make a need for speed every year, a burnout every year, thats what they do so would people buy their garbage. I was a idiot that use to buy all burnouts till B revenge. They release the same BS every year and dont change anything half the time. they also had 2 other battlefieilds that came out in 06 Euro and Amored fury.

Avatar image for t3hTwinky
t3hTwinky

3701

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 t3hTwinky
Member since 2005 • 3701 Posts

When it comes to crap, EA has the quantity, but Ubisoft has feindish subtle quality.

It takes a specail kind of evil to do what they did to Rainbow Six, whereas EA would have just made the same game every year until the franchise was dead from exhaustion.

Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

EA is hated because :

(1) They have destroyed lots of talented dev houses they acquired

(2) They milk their franchises tremedously most of the time releasing mediocre games(this year i heard things were a bit better)

(3) Charge for small things like guns in games etc

Avatar image for TOTAL_DEFENSE_0
TOTAL_DEFENSE_0

1192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#17 TOTAL_DEFENSE_0
Member since 2007 • 1192 Posts
I dont frankly dislike EA. they made Rock Band, Burnout Paradise, and Orange Box. can't complain. and the DLC for Rock Band is awesome. I really dislike Activision. once they got hold of one of my favorite franchises (GH), the series started to be milked and suck like crazy.
Avatar image for BK-Sleeper
BK-Sleeper

2686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#18 BK-Sleeper
Member since 2006 • 2686 Posts
EA rehashes crap and sticks a bigger number on the name.
Avatar image for yoshi_64
yoshi_64

25261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#19 yoshi_64
Member since 2003 • 25261 Posts

Have the others planned on charging me for guns in games? Next thing you know Madden will require one to buy a football and ref! Or the team...

I don't know, but sadly if this does take off, the others will likely follow suit....

Avatar image for gasmaskman
gasmaskman

3463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 gasmaskman
Member since 2005 • 3463 Posts

I dont frankly dislike EA. they made Rock Band, Burnout Paradise, and Orange Box. can't complain. and the DLC for Rock Band is awesome. I really dislike Activision. once they got hold of one of my favorite franchises (GH), the series started to be milked and suck like crazy. TOTAL_DEFENSE_0

LOL, no, they PUBLISHED Orange Box and Rock Band. They don't own any part of Harmonix OR Valve.

Avatar image for jangojay
jangojay

4044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 jangojay
Member since 2007 • 4044 Posts

EA is hated because :

(1) They have destroyed lots of talented dev houses they acquired

(2) They milk their franchises tremedously most of the time releasing mediocre games(this year i heard things were a bit better)

(3) Charge for small things like guns in games etc

naval

Oh yea that's another one. RIP Westwood.

Avatar image for vashkey
vashkey

33781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 135

User Lists: 25

#22 vashkey
Member since 2005 • 33781 Posts

THQ isn't bad in the same way as the rest, mostly because they just don't do jack. And thats why their bad. They just don't do jack.

EA isn't that bad though. People just over react.

My voce for worst game company right now though would be SEGA. Boy have they really fallen from grace.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="imprezawrx500"][QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

EA pumps out the most games.

WHile good for the industry as they all sell many X million copies, gamers dont like them cause their games get an average score of 7. Not great, but not shovelware either.

thats why.

Raijinko

hardly, ubi just about does splinter cell, r6 every year. when did battlefield 2 come out? oh 2005 or what about c&c2 -C&c3 its olny nfs and sport games that are every year. while ubi's main games are on 12-16 month cycle

Lol battlefield did come out in 05, but then battlefield 2142 came in 06, pluse battlefield modern combat ps2 and then 360 Now Battlefield bad company. thats alot of of battlefields for 3 years... Then they make a need for speed every year, a burnout every year, thats what they do so would people buy their garbage. I was a idiot that use to buy all burnouts till B revenge. They release the same BS every year and dont change anything half the time. they also had 2 other battlefieilds that came out in 06 Euro and Amored fury.

well true the milk nfs but burnout revenge came out 2005, that was the last console burnout, the console battlefields aren't bf3 and bf2142 was 1.5 years after bf2 and its now been over a year with no new pc bf