@True_Gamer_ said:
@scartm said:
@True_Gamer_: Did my entire post just go over your head ?
4K pc gaming a norm next year ?.Not really.Not when 33% of the largest PC gaming community cannot even run games at 1080p.
Last-Gen could not do amazing things on mid-range PCs ?.That's arguable.
lol,700$ PCs running 4K + max settings,A single 780Ti cannot manage 4K @max settings,Neither can the upcoming maxwell cards 970 and 980.
700$ PCs couldn't touch the 360 because the PC graphic card market wasn't developed , as I said,you cannot use the state of PCs to determine how long will consoles last.2 Different markets.2 different situations.
EDIT: Corrections
Console centric ports like FIFA can run in 4k on a $700 PC easily....I was talking about those.
And no the 360 just costed ALOT to make and make HUGE losses in revenew to MS.... Loads of cash went into making it.
Can you say the same about the xbone? Heck the PS3 costed $840 to make (BR and all but still) .....Can you imagine a $840 costing PS4? Maxwell powered monster? GTX 980 in PS4? Imagine the possibilities? (The TDP is low the temperatures on stock too)
Goal post shifting already ?.
We went from 700$ PCs running 4K games at @max settings to just running in 4K.
Even so,It depends on your perception of easy.
FIFA is 1080p/60FPS on PS4/X1 now if you are implying that a 700$ PC can run it at 4K,same texture settings (high I think) and 60FPS then I'd like to see some proof.
Also,if you know why PS3 costed 840$ then why do you bring it up.As it was rightly pointed out PS3 would've been 399$ if not for the Blu-Ray player.
And I don't understand the relevance of this discussion.Simply put the condition of PCs cannot determine how long Consoles will last.
The PS3 was 256MB of system memory, 256MB of VRAM , a nerfed 7800GTX and lasted 8 years,even after taking into consideration Moore's law , the upgrade over the last generation of consoles is too big.PS4 and X1 won't break a sweat lasting 10 years.
Log in to comment