How many "Halo-haters" out there can stand up and admit they were wron

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#1 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts

No pictures or videos here, they're splattered across a multitude of threads and don't need reposting for the nth time...

But I was wondering... Who out there has the guts to come stand up, admit they were bashing Halo's graphics, and have now been owned?

Surely at least a few of you must have the courage to admit it. Maybe even some Halo fans will admit they were apprehensive about the graphics and didn't like them but are now convinced...

So. Start fessin' up, boys.

Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts
dont bother. they'll just claim they never bashed. but i was here, i know.

and i remember all the claiming of the e306 trailer was CGI, and that the beta was final graphics :lol:

THHBO (Haters)
Avatar image for plat1num913
plat1num913

603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 plat1num913
Member since 2006 • 603 Posts
if they r haters why would they praise it now?
Avatar image for D0013ER
D0013ER

3765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 D0013ER
Member since 2007 • 3765 Posts

dont bother. they'll just claim they never bashed. but i was here, i know.

and i remember all the claiming of the e306 trailer was CGI, and that the beta was final graphics :lol:

THHBO (Haters)
THE_Rob_Himself

Oh God yes...

"What you see is what you get," remember that about the Beta?

Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
I never had a problem with them. Who can complain when they're playing CSS( 3 year old engine :P)?
Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts

if they r haters why would they praise it now?plat1num913

Because not everyone is a completely rabid fanboy, and some of them may no longer be haters. They may be "converts". ;)

I just thought it'd be interesting to see if any responded...

Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts
Still not very impressed. Most of what we saw was off screen video. (which BTW makes the game look much better) The graphics still have a long way to go before they match/beat other amazing looking games...
Avatar image for wok7
wok7

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 wok7
Member since 2003 • 2034 Posts
Seems they are too busy praising KillZone 2, which is bad because so far all hyped PS3 games have flopped.
Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts

[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]dont bother. they'll just claim they never bashed. but i was here, i know.

and i remember all the claiming of the e306 trailer was CGI, and that the beta was final graphics :lol:

THHBO (Haters)
D0013ER

Oh God yes...

"What you see is what you get," remember that about the Beta?



yup, quite vividly. and i just sat back and waited for the day they would be owned, and it has come. :D

but its not that satisfying because they are in their damage control hideouts.
Avatar image for DivergeUnify
DivergeUnify

15150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 DivergeUnify
Member since 2007 • 15150 Posts
Still not very impressed. Most of what we saw was off screen video. (which BTW makes the game look much better) The graphics still have a long way to go before they match/beat other amazing looking games...munu9
He's got a point.
Avatar image for Orange_Mist
Orange_Mist

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Orange_Mist
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts
Halo 3: Downgrade Complete
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
I would say halo 3 graphics are not as bad as i first thought, but then again i never bashed halo for graphics but becasue i find it completely uninteresting
Avatar image for EntwineX
EntwineX

5858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#13 EntwineX
Member since 2005 • 5858 Posts
Well I dunno what it looked like before, but right now it looks visually pretty average for an upcoming game. If you think it looks somehow amazing you need to take the fanboy-goggles off, it ain't THAT good looking.
Avatar image for Frozzik
Frozzik

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Frozzik
Member since 2006 • 3914 Posts

I don't think the graphics in Halo 3 look that special. They are nice but there are many games in developement that make them look rather ordinary.

I am not a fan of Halo, never have been, as much as i tried to like em. Halo for me is one of those games thats hyped up so much its as if people are brainwashed into believing its going to be the greatest game of all time.

Chances are it will be nothing more than an update of the others with good hi res graphics. Although i do think the multiplayer will be fantastic.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#16 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts

Well I dunno what it looked like before, but right now it looks visually pretty average for an upcoming game. If you think it looks somehow amazing you need to take the fanboy-goggles off, it ain't THAT good looking.EntwineX

before it use to look alomost like halo 2, now that it has imporved and become as you said pretty average compared to current games, lemmings are jumping with joy at the improvement

Avatar image for Orange_Mist
Orange_Mist

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Orange_Mist
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

Wow, just looking at those new Halo 3 single player videos, you can see how downgraded the graphics got from the CGI showing at E3 2006. It looks like crap compared to the target video.

I mean, the game now looks worst than most 1st person shooters coming out this fall. And it only runs at 30fps. WTF? This is next gen, 30 fps is unacceptable. Even Bioshock looks better.

Crysis>Bioshock>Haze>Metroid Prime 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo 3.

Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts

Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...Ibacai

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...THE_Rob_Himself

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

The draw distance, particle effects, and polygons are not anywhere near the 05 trailer.
Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts

Wow, just looking at those new Halo 3 single player videos, you can see how downgraded the graphics got from the CGI showing at E3 2006. It looks like crap compared to the target video.

I mean, the game now looks worst than most 1st person shooters coming out this fall. And it only runs at 30fps. WTF? This is next gen, 30 fps is unacceptable. Even Bioshock looks better.

Crysis>Bioshock>Haze>Metroid Prime 3>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Halo 3.

Orange_Mist

stop ban dodging, and trolling, and go away.

guess whats also 30FPS KZ 2 :lol: :lol: :lol:

most FPS are 30. and i guarantee you that Haze wont be locked 60 FPS.

Halo 3 has better graphics than any wii game. please dont even mention MP: 3. every relatively decent 360 game has better visuals than it.

and Bioshock? i own that game, it glitches. and the character models are garbage compared to H 3.

Avatar image for frankeyser
frankeyser

5667

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 29

User Lists: 0

#21 frankeyser
Member since 2004 • 5667 Posts
i stand by my bashing of halo. i still think it is a mediocre FPS. I never thought the graphics were bad though. it is the rest of the game that sucks in my opinion. I hope bungie starts a new marathon series!
Avatar image for thejakel11225
thejakel11225

2217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#22 thejakel11225
Member since 2005 • 2217 Posts
Never played halo 2, but IMO halo CE was crap, the story was crap, along with the colorful enemies and everything else. I do give it this though, the online is simply incredible, very addicting and fun to play.
Avatar image for Driftwood111
Driftwood111

577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Driftwood111
Member since 2005 • 577 Posts

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...THE_Rob_Himself

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

I know? Idiotic isnt it?

I wouldn't say I was a hater as such, but yes it has much improved since the Beta and all the previous haters have been owned.

It may not be the greatest looking game nearing release - Crysis -, but if you expected it to be then you're overly optimistic...

They're more than adequate though and will help establish its AAA status.

Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...Ibacai

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

The draw distance, particle effects, and polygons are not anywhere near the 05 trailer.




the draw distance is still the exact same, 10 miles. and he polygons are the exact same. the clouds have improved and look better. gotta link to say otherwise? cause i can dig up the weekly update that confirms every one of my points.
Avatar image for casey7672
casey7672

5348

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 casey7672
Member since 2006 • 5348 Posts
I've never bashed Halo 3's graphics. Infact I think that's about all that's different from the 2nd one. Halo 2 with shiney new graphics.
Avatar image for Gamersince81
Gamersince81

1787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Gamersince81
Member since 2007 • 1787 Posts

Seems they are too busy praising KillZone 2, which is bad because so far all hyped PS3 games have flopped.wok7

Why?? Because the pencil pushers say so? No game is a flop until i judge it a flop!! For instance Halo 2 is a flop in my eyes.. (i beaten it). Halo 1 isnt a fliop, you see? I play the game.. i'll judgeafter i beat the game. Same with KZ2, MGS4, etc... I JUDGE THEM AFTER I BEAT THE GAME.. You guys will jump off a bridge if a "reviewer" says a game sucks, lol!! Think for yourselves..

Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts

I've never bashed Halo 3's graphics. Infact I think that's about all that's different from the 2nd one. Halo 2 with shiney new graphics. casey7672

Somewhere, someone is flooded under hundreds of Memo's addressed to you, detailing forge, 4 player co op (online), the new multiplayer system, new rankings, saved films feature, equipment, new third person weapons and map features such as the Man cannons and elephants...

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...THE_Rob_Himself

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

The draw distance, particle effects, and polygons are not anywhere near the 05 trailer.




the draw distance is still the exact same, 10 miles. and he polygons are the exact same. the clouds have improved and look better. gotta link to say otherwise? cause i can dig up the weekly update that confirms every one of my points.

Oh, I can get links with developers saying a lot of things that make their games sound great. Just going by what I see. Just like KZ doesn't meet it's initial trailer, neither does Halo 3.
Avatar image for THE_Rob_Himself
THE_Rob_Himself

942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 THE_Rob_Himself
Member since 2007 • 942 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...Ibacai

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

The draw distance, particle effects, and polygons are not anywhere near the 05 trailer.




the draw distance is still the exact same, 10 miles. and he polygons are the exact same. the clouds have improved and look better. gotta link to say otherwise? cause i can dig up the weekly update that confirms every one of my points.

Oh, I can get links with developers saying a lot of things that make their games sound great. Just going by what I see. Just like KZ doesn't meet it's initial trailer, neither does Halo 3.

k how bout this?

"I doubted that they would meet the expectations of the E3 trailer but after playing Tsavo Highway I have no doubt they have exceeded it!" - Brian Cencrete (Kotaku)

gotta link to prove otherwise?

Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#30 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts
[QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...Ibacai

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

The draw distance, particle effects, and polygons are not anywhere near the 05 trailer.




the draw distance is still the exact same, 10 miles. and he polygons are the exact same. the clouds have improved and look better. gotta link to say otherwise? cause i can dig up the weekly update that confirms every one of my points.

Oh, I can get links with developers saying a lot of things that make their games sound great. Just going by what I see. Just like KZ doesn't meet it's initial trailer, neither does Halo 3.

That would be all well and good if the Halo 3 trailer was just a trailer. But it isn't.

It's a cutscene. It's in the game. And, as always, Halo cutscenes are in engine. So, the texture for the chief will probably have changed, but that "trailer" is still in the game (as far as we know. May have been cut now, but seems unlikely) and for all intents and purposes going to blend in.

Your eyes and decieving you. Ever hear that old wives tale about doing a certain something a little too much?

Avatar image for wok7
wok7

2034

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 wok7
Member since 2003 • 2034 Posts

[QUOTE="wok7"]Seems they are too busy praising KillZone 2, which is bad because so far all hyped PS3 games have flopped.Gamersince81

Why?? Because the pencil pushers say so? No game is a flop until i judge it a flop!! For instance Halo 2 is a flop in my eyes.. (i beaten it). Halo 1 isnt a fliop, you see? I play the game.. i'll judgeafter i beat the game. Same with KZ2, MGS4, etc... I JUDGE THEM AFTER I BEAT THE GAME.. You guys will jump off a bridge if a "reviewer" says a game sucks, lol!! Think for yourselves..

I also use Gamerankings instead of just single sources to be unbiased about games.

Avatar image for smurf999
smurf999

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 smurf999
Member since 2006 • 204 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="THE_Rob_Himself"]

[QUOTE="Ibacai"]Halo 3's graphics are indeed good but when the dev said it equaled the 05 trailer........yeah...THE_Rob_Himself

every piece of geometry on the cheif is the exact same as the e3 trailer, same with the lighting, draw distance etc.

the only change was the textures on the cheif, which was a design choice because they didnt want him looking like he was made of concrete. :|

The draw distance, particle effects, and polygons are not anywhere near the 05 trailer.




the draw distance is still the exact same, 10 miles. and he polygons are the exact same. the clouds have improved and look better. gotta link to say otherwise? cause i can dig up the weekly update that confirms every one of my points.

Oh, I can get links with developers saying a lot of things that make their games sound great. Just going by what I see. Just like KZ doesn't meet it's initial trailer, neither does Halo 3.

k how bout this?

"I doubted that they would meet the expectations of the E3 trailer but after playing Tsavo Highway I have no doubt they have exceeded it!" - Brian Cencrete (Kotaku)

gotta link to prove otherwise?

Of course he dosn't dont be foolish fanboys never have proof to back up what they say.

Avatar image for SUD123456
SUD123456

7054

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 SUD123456
Member since 2007 • 7054 Posts

[QUOTE="casey7672"]I've never bashed Halo 3's graphics. Infact I think that's about all that's different from the 2nd one. Halo 2 with shiney new graphics. Newnab

Somewhere, someone is flooded under hundreds of Memo's addressed to you, detailing forge, 4 player co op (online), the new multiplayer system, new rankings, saved films feature, equipment, new third person weapons and map features such as the Man cannons and elephants...

LMAO. Exactly. Whether you like the franchise or not, you should be man or woman enough to admit that an astonishing attention to gameplay detail and features has been paid by the developers. This thing has been very, very well thought out and it seems like every second day another interesting little detail is released. LMAO. Master marketing. Hopefully it will all add up to one great game.

Avatar image for shaggymcp
shaggymcp

2896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#34 shaggymcp
Member since 2003 • 2896 Posts
I don't care what the dev's have to say the bottom line is that the E3 target render looks about 10X better than the latest batch of shots they have shown. I don't need links, or some website editor to tell me what i belive... I use my own eye's, and the target render >>>>>>>>>>> Current Halo 3 pics. Now granted reguardless of how the game looks, ( and it still looks really good ) I will be getting this game on day one ! I simply can't wait to play this game 4 player co-op !
Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#35 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts

I don't care what the dev's have to say the bottom line is that the E3 target render looks about 10X better than the latest batch of shots they have shown. I don't need links, or some website editor to tell me what i belive... I use my own eye's, and the target render >>>>>>>>>>> Current Halo 3 pics. Now granted reguardless of how the game looks, ( and it still looks really good ) I will be getting this game on day one ! I simply can't wait to play this game 4 player co-op !shaggymcp

Once more, seeing as no one seems to get it.

It wasn't CGI.

It wasn't a target render.

It wasn't even really a "trailer".

It's a cutscene. From 3 quarters of the way into the campaign. And as far as we know it's still there. It's in engine, and despite the texture change on the chief's armour well documented... It's the same.

Logic > Stupid eyes.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
Yes indeed, Brian obviously sees Halo 3 as exceeding the trailer. Having not played it (sp) I guess I'm being a little close-minded.
Avatar image for nintendofreak_2
nintendofreak_2

25896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#37 nintendofreak_2
Member since 2005 • 25896 Posts
I don't remember ever bashing H3 (maybe earlier like a few months ago) but if I did I'll accept my ownage.
Avatar image for shaggymcp
shaggymcp

2896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#38 shaggymcp
Member since 2003 • 2896 Posts

[QUOTE="shaggymcp"]I don't care what the dev's have to say the bottom line is that the E3 target render looks about 10X better than the latest batch of shots they have shown. I don't need links, or some website editor to tell me what i belive... I use my own eye's, and the target render >>>>>>>>>>> Current Halo 3 pics. Now granted reguardless of how the game looks, ( and it still looks really good ) I will be getting this game on day one ! I simply can't wait to play this game 4 player co-op !Newnab

Once more, seeing as no one seems to get it.

It wasn't CGI.

It wasn't a target render.

It wasn't even really a "trailer".

It's a cutscene. From 3 quarters of the way into the campaign. And as far as we know it's still there. It's in engine, and despite the texture change on the chief's armour well documented... It's the same.

Logic > Stupid eyes.

Maybe you don't get it... read my post again. its IMO and others share the same.... logic ? stupid eye's ? wow so you come down to the lowest of low by insulting me because I disagree with your opinion ? your pathetic :roll: " And once again " i don't care what the dev's said about the master chief's armor.......... IMO and others.... it looked better in the old version. Maybe you did not read that part. you whining is not gonna change my mind or many other peoples opinions that the demo / target rendor/ trailer / what ever the hell you wanna call it, looked better. Therefore you = cry while the rest agree that current release looks worse than e3 of 05 or 06 what ever year the demo / trailer / target rendor / what ever the hell you wanna call it got released. Insulting gets you know where, and just makes you look like a fool.
Avatar image for lettuceman44
lettuceman44

7971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#40 lettuceman44
Member since 2005 • 7971 Posts
I admit I bashed Halo graphics, and I admit I am now wrong. Halo looks great(maybe not amazing, but still great)
Avatar image for shaggymcp
shaggymcp

2896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 shaggymcp
Member since 2003 • 2896 Posts
Well genius :roll: if they were identical no one would be having this conversation. And why would bungie dev's make a comment about the master chiefs armor and changing it, if it looked identical ? o wait ? you just contradicted yourself, you fail :lol:
Avatar image for HoldThePhone
HoldThePhone

3364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 HoldThePhone
Member since 2007 • 3364 Posts

No pictures or videos here, they're splattered across a multitude of threads and don't need reposting for the nth time...

But I was wondering... Who out there has the guts to come stand up, admit they were bashing Halo's graphics, and have now been owned?

Surely at least a few of you must have the courage to admit it. Maybe even some Halo fans will admit they were apprehensive about the graphics and didn't like them but are now convinced...

So. Start fessin' up, boys.

Newnab

Half-Life 2 looks better. Looks good though, I hope you enjoy it.

Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts

Well genius :roll: if they were identical no one would be having this conversation. And why would bungie dev's make a comment about the master chiefs armor and changing it, if it looked identical ? o wait ? you just contradicted yourself, you fail :lol:shaggymcp

Aside from swapping a texture, it's the same. So Ok, you can say "Hm. I liked the old texture for the master chief better"...

What YOU were saying was "Oh man that totally doesn't live up to that target render they made" in which you not only got confused as to what it even was, failed to specify what exactly you meant. So I can only assume you meant everything. And everything else is the same.

But I can definitely see how you posting "you fail" and a smiley is a much better tool for discussion than logical, thought out, reasonable posting... Congratulations.

Avatar image for shaggymcp
shaggymcp

2896

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#44 shaggymcp
Member since 2003 • 2896 Posts
yea beacuse " logic > stupid eye's " is so much better right ? :roll: O by the way nice method of adverting the attention from you contradicting yourself I guess you don't like the taste of your own medicine :lol:
Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#45 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts

I've never bashed Halo 3's graphics. Infact I think that's about all that's different from the 2nd one. Halo 2 with shiney new graphics. casey7672

But Killzone is awesome, right? :roll:

Avatar image for Newnab
Newnab

3081

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#46 Newnab
Member since 2006 • 3081 Posts

yea beacuse " logic > stupid eye's " is so much better right ? :roll: O by the way nice method of adverting the attention from you contradicting yourself I guess you don't like the taste of your own medicine :lol:shaggymcp

I hate to inform you but... YES. Making a reasonable arguement and concluding with that is MUCH better than simply going "u fail! LOL!". Do you even understand communication at all?

Adverting the attention? Assuming you mean diverting the attention, how did I divert attention from it? I DESTROYED you saying that because I pointed out that you didn't specify the character model, just the cutscene (Which you called a target render) in general. In which I was correct in saying the technical specs and features were identical.

I'm having serious concern for your health. Might I suggest you... I dunno. See your high school psychiatrist or something.

Avatar image for Ninja-Vox
Ninja-Vox

16314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#47 Ninja-Vox
Member since 2006 • 16314 Posts

yea beacuse " logic > stupid eye's " is so much better right ? :roll: O by the way nice method of adverting the attention from you contradicting yourself I guess you don't like the taste of your own medicine :lol:shaggymcp

He didn't contradict himself. I'm not even talking to either of you and i can see that he was clearly talking about quality. In terms of graphical fidelity, he thinks the two are identical.

Dont be a fanboy please. :|

Avatar image for Impex
Impex

5532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#48 Impex
Member since 2005 • 5532 Posts
I still don't get why people bash this game. They're just going to get owned. You'd think looking at previous scores that it would give some indication that Bungie can pull off quite amazing games, but no, some just refuse to ignore it. Now, if you just don't like the way Halo plays, that's a different story, but all of you bashing it are just going to get it rubbed in your face after it scores AAA.