How much better would 360,ps3 games look with 1gb ram?

Would there be a big difference in graphics? Or not much?

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

super600

You are stupid, you know nothing about Computers, leave. Ram does not help with Textures, VRAM does, AA is not Ram Dependent, its GPU dependent,, Resolution depends again on VRAM.

Games wouldn't look better, more memory might allow for larger worlds or smaller load times. Less pop-in too, but more RAM won't do much with the petty amount of VRAM in the consoles GPUs.

[QUOTE="super600"]

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

Maneil99

You are stupid, you know nothing about Computers, leave. Ram does not help with Textures, VRAM does, AA is not Ram Dependent, its GPU dependent,, Resolution depends again on VRAM.

Doesn't the 360 have a unified RAM architecture?

It has also has dedicated 10MB RAM for the AA so more could be helpful.

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

super600

[QUOTE="super600"]

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

Maneil99

You are stupid, you know nothing about Computers, leave. Ram does not help with Textures, VRAM does, AA is not Ram Dependent, its GPU dependent,, Resolution depends again on VRAM.

And if the RAM was a shared pool... :roll:

Shows you know nothing about console design. :shock:

[QUOTE="Maneil99"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

hexashadow13

You are stupid, you know nothing about Computers, leave. Ram does not help with Textures, VRAM does, AA is not Ram Dependent, its GPU dependent,, Resolution depends again on VRAM.

Doesn't the 360 have a unified RAM architecture?

It has also has dedicated 10MB RAM for the AA so more could be helpful.

PS3/360 have same amount of VRAM, but 360 has a unified 512mb while PS3 has split 256mb's of RAM. That means developers have less RAM available to them on PS3, that was a terrible move on Sony's part, I have no idea why they did that.

I'm not sure how the memory works on the consoles but it would probably only really offer less pop-ins and improved data loading.

[QUOTE="super600"]

You woud get better textures,better AA and more games will have a resolution of 720P and maybe 60fps.That's all that will probably happen.

Maneil99

You are stupid, you know nothing about Computers, leave. Ram does not help with Textures, VRAM does, AA is not Ram Dependent, its GPU dependent,, Resolution depends again on VRAM.

no, you're the one that is wrong, super600 is actually right.

How do you think that integrated cards work on the PC with no Vram? They use the Ram on your computer. Vram is a name to specify that the Ram is dedicated to the GPU, sometimes they come in different variation of speed and stuff but Ram is all the same and have the same uses.

From what i know. (no pro)

Ram is used more to run more tasks at once at a faster speed without slowing down. processor and ram works hand and hand but processor speeds come first.

so more ram games/ the console it self would maybe increase the demanding task for more things. There is limits, has the cpu comes before ram

console is little less ram demanding unlike a pc because there is less muti tasking then pc where a pc user will be running far more programs at once

Mabe ps3 would have a better xmb? cross game chat might b possible

edit - then again, i have no idea what im talking about