How quickly we forget the 360s inferior ports...

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

:lol: the fact that you have to HOPE for Multi plat scores to be the same for Ps3 is just sad in way really....

Except for Madden 07, weren't all of those within the 360's first six months?mjarantilla

and that matters how?? Its not like after 6 months every dev automatically is suppossed to be an expert on the system, each dev has varied experience with a system but after around 12 months most devs have had at least some sort of experience with the system.

[QUOTE="Javy03"]

it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

SpaceDragonMan

:lol: the fact that you have to HOPE for Multi plat scores to be the same for Ps3 is just sad in way really....

That fact that you didnt read is just sad in a way really...I already listed games that have the same score as the 360 or higher. I was saying that further in the future as devs have more time with the system it wont even be a debate anymore that multiplats will be the same on both system.

[QUOTE="mjarantilla"]Except for Madden 07, weren't all of those within the 360's first six months?Javy03

and that matters how?? Its not like after 6 months every dev automatically is suppossed to be an expert on the system, each dev has varied experience with a system but after around 12 months most devs have had at least some sort of experience with the system.

Never mind. I thought for some reason that the PS3 was still getting inferior versions of ports, but I can't tell anymore with the new scoring system, otherwise my point WOULD have been (but now is not) that it's been past six months since the PS3's launch. But never mind.

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

actually the darkness looked worse and rainbow six looked pathetic. this coming from a ps3 ownerDRob69

They looked exactly the same to me. This is coming from a 360 and PS3 owner...

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

if i recall burnout revenge almost got an AAA here, and they stated it look almost nextgen ( taht was 4 months into the 360's life) and looks better than teh ps2 version....all others ( except fifa 07 and madden 06) were at launch.....it's been 11 months after the ps3's launch it's it still gettin inferior ports....killaj2786

The thread is just a bunch of bs actually.

actually the darkness looked worse and rainbow six looked pathetic. this coming from a ps3 ownerDRob69

Well I saw the scores the same and the video comparisons on Gametrailers for the Darkness showed the PS3 looking better and I am a PS3 owner who owns the Darkness.

What the hell was wrong with Burnout Revenge? It was excellent..It sure as hell was better than Ridge Racer 7.

I'll take crappy ports like that anytime.

[QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

kevy619

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

if i recall burnout revenge almost got an AAA here, and they stated it look almost nextgen ( taht was 4 months into the 360's life) and looks better than teh ps2 version....all others ( except fifa 07 and madden 06) were at launch.....it's been 11 months after the ps3's launch it's it still gettin inferior ports....killaj2786

Look at paragraph two, the PS3 is ALSO getting mutliplats just as good or better then the 360 version. Inferior ports are depandant on the devs ability, skill and time put on the game and the system the game is for. These factors vary from dev company to dev company which is why we can have games like Darkness, and Fifa scoring the same on the PS3/360 and then you can have games like Fear.

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

on FFXI he did....

On Burnout Revenge:

"

While Burnout Revenge might not have enough new stuff in it to drag you back in if you've been playing it on other platforms, this is definitely the version to get if you're shopping around (aka teh best version). It delivers solid, fast action, both online and off, and is easily the fastest, most exciting racing game available on the Xbox 360."

U did.

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

[QUOTE="Javy03"][QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

killaj2786

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

on FFXI he did....

On Burnout Revenge:

"

While Burnout Revenge might not have enough new stuff in it to drag you back in if you've been playing it on other platforms, this is definitely the version to get if you're shopping around (aka teh best version). It delivers solid, fast action, both online and off, and is easily the fastest, most exciting racing game available on the Xbox 360."

U did.

The "(aka teh best version)" is your interpretation. Overall the score is in favor of the PS2 version as well as the extra featrues. If you're shopping around is his personal opinion but overall the scores were done differently then and when they weighed the game up to their system it didnt meet the expectations.

Basically the PS2 version was a AAA and the 360 version was an AA.

FFXI for the PS2 and the 360 are two years apart, not 4.

[QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

If you cant see why your logic fails, there is no hope for you.

[QUOTE="killaj2786"][QUOTE="Javy03"][QUOTE="kevy619"][QUOTE="Javy03"]

Burnout Revenge, Madden 07, Madden 06, Fifa 07, FFXI,and Gun are just some examples of how when the 360 first released devs. had a hard time porting games to the 360 because of its new tech. leading to the 360 recieving INFERIOR ports from the PS2s library. Did this mean that the PS2 would always have the best multiplats or that the 360 would always recieve the inferior multiplats, no of course not. Devs just needed time with the new system to optimize games to run with this new hardware and when they did the 360s multiplats began to outshine the PS2 versions very easily.

Fifa 08, NBA Street, Darkness, Tiger Woods, Oblivion, Rainbow six, NBA 2k8, Dirt, NHL 08,and Ghost Recon 2 are also someexamples of games that are either exactly like its 360 counter part or better. Yet for some reason MS fans love ignore these and just claim that the 360 will ALWAYS get the better version of a game and ignore the same exact growing pains their system went through during its early life cycle.

Basically my point is that devs have said time and time again that the PS3 is harder to dev for then the 360 but that doesnt mean that the 360 is EASY to dev for, just EASIER. Devs have also said that the though the PS3 is harder to dev for Sony has offered more helpful tools and the PS3 is easier to dev for then the PS2. And we all know how few good 3rd party games the PS2 got...right. In the end both systems are so similiar power wise that as devs become more familiar with the PS3 like they are slowly becoming it wont be any suprise to see the same score for multiplats between the 360 and PS3.

Javy03

all those ports were superior on the xbox 360, especially Burnout Revenge. You just self-owned yourself.

??? Are you joking or did you just not look at the scores correctly. If I recall the 360 version of Burnout Revenge got an 8.8 and the PS2 version got the editors choice of 9.1. And another more dramatic one was FFXI on the 360 getting a 6.0 while the PS2 version got a 8.0.

Who got self-owned???

on FFXI he did....

On Burnout Revenge:

"

While Burnout Revenge might not have enough new stuff in it to drag you back in if you've been playing it on other platforms, this is definitely the version to get if you're shopping around (aka teh best version). It delivers solid, fast action, both online and off, and is easily the fastest, most exciting racing game available on the Xbox 360."

U did.

The "(aka teh best version)" is your interpretation. Overall the score is in favor of the PS2 version as well as the extra featrues. If you're shopping around is his personal opinion but overall the scores were done differently then and when they weighed the game up to their system it didnt meet the expectations.

Basically the PS2 version was a AAA and the 360 version was an AA.

U said it urself...they're scored differently. Hence the 360 version had higher standards than the ps2 version. Since the score was closer to teh ps2 version, tehy said teh graphics are gameplay were better, beasically tells u if it wasnt fro teh higher standards for the 360, it's teh better version. Seriously if it wasnt why would they say if it's teh version to shop around if u havent played it?