How to save PC Gaming.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#1 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

PC Gaming Alliance?

Killing Cliffy B?

Microsoft?

Standardised hardware?

No, only this guy can save PC Gaming, not that it needs saving. But he will save it anyway.

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
Wait a minute, I thought Duke Nukem Forever was also coming to consoles...
Avatar image for mingo123
mingo123

9005

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 mingo123
Member since 2007 • 9005 Posts
he is coming to consoles as well
Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
Just looked it up and it seems it isn't coming to consoles. But if it is going to look anything like the screenshots you can find on GS it's not going to save anything.
Avatar image for Nagidar
Nagidar

6231

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Nagidar
Member since 2006 • 6231 Posts
God, when are they going to friggin make this damn game, I'm tired of waiting...
Avatar image for ejstrup
ejstrup

2192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 ejstrup
Member since 2005 • 2192 Posts
Hail to the king, baby :D
Avatar image for legol1
legol1

1998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 legol1
Member since 2005 • 1998 Posts
my idea maybe shocking for some but ...what about buying legit copy ?
Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#8 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

my idea maybe shocking for some but ...what about buying legit copy ?legol1

Millions of people do :|

Avatar image for juno84
juno84

1019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 juno84
Member since 2004 • 1019 Posts

Yeah.... how's that development on Duke Nuken Forever coming along? I really doubt Yet Another FPS on PC™ would reinvigorate the platform. Times have sure changed though. If my memory serves me, this website used to cover PC gaming exclusively.

So what do I think would save PCs as you surely have not asked yourself!?

1) New mech game - I don't care if it's mech warrior, starsiege, heavy gear, etc. Really any cutting edge game that isn't FPS would do worlds of good.

2) Adventure games - what happened to these?

3) Space Combat - I have always loved space combat games. Wing Commander, X-wing, Freespace, privateer, etc. I can't believe how long it's been since a decent space combat game has been released by a US developer.

Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

Yeah.... how's that development on Duke Nuken Forever coming along? I really doubt Yet Another FPS on PC™ would reinvigorate the platform. Times have sure changed though. If my memory serves me, this website used to cover PC gaming exclusively.

So what do I think would save PCs as you surely have not asked yourself!?

1) New mech game - I don't care if it's mech warrior, starsiege, heavy gear, etc. Really any cutting edge game that isn't FPS would do worlds of good.

2) Adventure games - what happened to these?

3) Space Combat - I have always loved space combat games. Wing Commander, X-wing, Freespace, privateer, etc. I can't believe how long it's been since a decent space combat game has been released by a US developer.

juno84

PC Gaming is the only place you'll still find these, except maybe the Wii.

Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#11 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts

Yeah.... how's that development on Duke Nuken Forever coming along? I really doubt Yet Another FPS on PC™ would reinvigorate the platform. Times have sure changed though. If my memory serves me, this website used to cover PC gaming exclusively.

So what do I think would save PCs as you surely have not asked yourself!?

1) New mech game - I don't care if it's mech warrior, starsiege, heavy gear, etc. Really any cutting edge game that isn't FPS would do worlds of good.

2) Adventure games - what happened to these?

3) Space Combat - I have always loved space combat games. Wing Commander, X-wing, Freespace, privateer, etc. I can't believe how long it's been since a decent space combat game has been released by a US developer.

juno84

Adventure games are making a neat revival this year on PC. Check AdrianWerner's thread in the PC games forum.

Oh and PC gaming hardly needs saving.

Avatar image for Taloskai
Taloskai

188

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#12 Taloskai
Member since 2006 • 188 Posts
Blizzard is one of the only PC gaming companys that hasn't sold out yet. FTW STARCRAFT 2
Avatar image for juno84
juno84

1019

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 juno84
Member since 2004 • 1019 Posts
[QUOTE="juno84"]

Yeah.... how's that development on Duke Nuken Forever coming along? I really doubt Yet Another FPS on PC™ would reinvigorate the platform. Times have sure changed though. If my memory serves me, this website used to cover PC gaming exclusively.

So what do I think would save PCs as you surely have not asked yourself!?

1) New mech game - I don't care if it's mech warrior, starsiege, heavy gear, etc. Really any cutting edge game that isn't FPS would do worlds of good.

2) Adventure games - what happened to these?

3) Space Combat - I have always loved space combat games. Wing Commander, X-wing, Freespace, privateer, etc. I can't believe how long it's been since a decent space combat game has been released by a US developer.

aliblabla2007

Adventure games are making a neat revival this year on PC. Check AdrianWerner's thread in the PC games forum.

Oh and PC gaming hardly needs saving.

I suppose I should have said "save". PC gaming certainly won't die as there will always be a large install base. I do feel like I was a much more satisfied PC gamer 8 years ago than I am today.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18249 Posts

the big issues are piracy and lack of a voice. in terms of everything else its absolutely brilliant.

on the piracy front...well ive alreat talked loads about that in other threads.

on the voice front...this is where the PCGA becomes very important. the consoles all have a big company backing them and focused on promoting them but the PC doesent. it has 100s of companies kicking the crap out of each other to bring the best hardware to the customer (its one of the things that makes PCs so cool)...but none of them are really toting the PC as a gaming platform. they back their own products of course...but thats not really enough. there needs to be one voice and one message in front of all this...telling ppl about the PC and its strengths as a gaming platform. hopefully the PCGA will take on that role.

a more minor note is the PC would really benefit from a first party. at the mo it basically has no first party but getting one would be helpful.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts

Wait a minute, I thought Duke Nukem Forever was also coming to consoles...NielsNL

It doesn't matter in the end. The PC version will be far superior. Better graphics, better controls, free online, and MODS. Forget the console versions even exist.

Avatar image for NielsNL
NielsNL

4346

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 NielsNL
Member since 2005 • 4346 Posts
Couldn't in game advertising be a good thing for PC gaming? If a game is downloaded it only means more people see the advertising and theoretically that way the advertising income shold also be higher.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#17 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Ugh. franchise that let time pass them by is going to save the PC?

I guess the PC is lucky it doesn't need saving.

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18249 Posts

Couldn't in game advertising be a good thing for PC gaming? If a game is downloaded it only means more people see the advertising and theoretically that way the advertising income shold also be higher. NielsNL

thats one thing some publishers are having a very good look at. EA are going to give funding a game through advertising a shot with battlefield heros. the games free....there is optional stuff u can buy and adds will be shown at loading screens from what i hear. free game...so im not complaining and i think its a very interesting business model. dave perry was talking about taking that a step further even with an MMO. completly free but advertisers can give u stuff for free...but its branded. so u might get a sword thats called something like "Coke long sword of death +1" or something. the game would also support more passive advertisement.

not bad ideas really. the only down side is that the advertising could kill the immersive experience of a game (a pepsi add in oblivion say....disaster) and the game might be more controlled by the advertisers then the developers (though games development is mostly controlled by phil from marketing anyway...so same difference).

however i certainly wouldnt have a problem with a free multiplayer game backed by advertising.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#19 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]Wait a minute, I thought Duke Nukem Forever was also coming to consoles...PandaBear86

It doesn't matter in the end. The PC version will be far superior. Better graphics, better controls, free online, and MODS. Forget the console versions even exist.

what if people don't have a PC powerful enough to play it? Why should they ignore a version that will probably be not much different aside from graphics?
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29843

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29843 Posts

[QUOTE="legol1"]my idea maybe shocking for some but ...what about buying legit copy ?thrones

Millions of people do :|

and millions of people don't. granted, people mod consoles, too, but its not nearly the issue that software piracy has become.

Avatar image for PandaBear86
PandaBear86

3389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 PandaBear86
Member since 2007 • 3389 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]Wait a minute, I thought Duke Nukem Forever was also coming to consoles...heretrix

It doesn't matter in the end. The PC version will be far superior. Better graphics, better controls, free online, and MODS. Forget the console versions even exist.

what if people don't have a PC powerful enough to play it? Why should they ignore a version that will probably be not much different aside from graphics?

I don't think Duke Nukem will be Crysis by any means in terms of system requirements. If you cannot max it, you can set the detail and resolution to low (it will still look better than Haze graphics which runs at 576p resolution). Oh, and there are many advantages of PC gaming apart from graphics. Great controls, great online, and mods. I think mods are like 500 advantages in one. Check out how many Oblivion mods there are, and try to tell me you still prefer the console versions over the PC version :)

Avatar image for msoftburney
msoftburney

219

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 msoftburney
Member since 2007 • 219 Posts

"Time to kick ass and chew bubble gum... and I'm all out of gum."

Duke Nukem Forever... is taking ... forever.

Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#24 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]Wait a minute, I thought Duke Nukem Forever was also coming to consoles...PandaBear86

It doesn't matter in the end. The PC version will be far superior. Better graphics, better controls, free online, and MODS. Forget the console versions even exist.

what if people don't have a PC powerful enough to play it? Why should they ignore a version that will probably be not much different aside from graphics?

I don't think Duke Nukem will be Crysis by any means in terms of system requirements. If you cannot max it, you can set the detail and resolution to low (it will still look better than Haze graphics which runs at 576p resolution). Oh, and there are many advantages of PC gaming apart from graphics. Great controls, great online, and mods. I think mods are like 500 advantages in one. Check out how many Oblivion mods there are, and try to tell me you still prefer the console versions over the PC version :)

I don't care about mods. I have more than enough games to play on multiple systems. And a lot of people don't feel like messing around with resolutions just to get the game running at a decent framerate.

I have a pretty powerful PC and I like the idea of just putting in a game and playing it without having to deal with all the other mess. I think a lot of people here that are alway trumpeting the PC as the best platform forget that. I'm not saying that it is or isn't, it's just that there are many people who just want to play games and not configure them.

Avatar image for MadExponent
MadExponent

11454

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 MadExponent
Member since 2003 • 11454 Posts
Duke Nukem Forever is really gonna be THE "it" game when it comes out. No matter what comes out the rest of the year Duke Nukem Forever will tower over them all and is IMHO the only guaranteed GOTY to have ever come out.
Avatar image for deactivated-5de2fb6a3a711
deactivated-5de2fb6a3a711

13995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-5de2fb6a3a711
Member since 2004 • 13995 Posts

oh, great. another FPS game. we sure need another one of those.

Avatar image for Iwmyk
Iwmyk

146

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Iwmyk
Member since 2006 • 146 Posts
PC gaming will never die, as long as tehre will be pc's there will be pc games since just about everyone can develop them. What is possible is that it might not be mainstream in the future.
Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#28 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts

it will be a while before pc gaming is even remotely threatened by console gaming

look at the massive starcraft audience in south korea for instance. you think the conformity of a console would ever take hold in that type of audience?

Avatar image for horrowhip
horrowhip

5002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 horrowhip
Member since 2005 • 5002 Posts
he is coming to consoles as wellmingo123
not exactly... 3D Realms said that they PLAN on bring DNF to consoles whenever it gets release but right now they are only focused on finishing the PC version. The console versions will probably follow not too long after, but then again they may not.
Avatar image for terdoo
terdoo

5306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#30 terdoo
Member since 2006 • 5306 Posts

Yeah.... how's that development on Duke Nuken Forever coming along? I really doubt Yet Another FPS on PC™ would reinvigorate the platform. Times have sure changed though. If my memory serves me, this website used to cover PC gaming exclusively.

So what do I think would save PCs as you surely have not asked yourself!?

1) New mech game - I don't care if it's mech warrior, starsiege, heavy gear, etc. Really any cutting edge game that isn't FPS would do worlds of good.

2) Adventure games - what happened to these?

3) Space Combat - I have always loved space combat games. Wing Commander, X-wing, Freespace, privateer, etc. I can't believe how long it's been since a decent space combat game has been released by a US developer.

juno84

Mech Assault was a great game.

Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts
The way to save PC gaming (or gaming in general) is to accept that a) **** happens, and b) things change. Quit *****ing and complaining about the Wii, or pirates, or development costs, and just make some games. For example, Sins of a Solar Empire should have been a massive failure. It's a PC game, a new IP, a "hardcore" "RT4X" without a campaign, made on a small budget by a rookie developer without any marketing or DRM. The general thinking of the gaming community would suggest that every facet of Sins of a Solar Empire would doom it to failure of epic proportions. Instead it's one of the best PC games of the year. And not only is it highly rated, but it's selling extremely well.
Avatar image for smokeydabear076
smokeydabear076

22109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#32 smokeydabear076
Member since 2004 • 22109 Posts

I know how we can save PC gaming, hand it a life jacket!

Problem solved!

Avatar image for screamingdoom
screamingdoom

884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 screamingdoom
Member since 2007 • 884 Posts
I will get this game no matter what. Even if it gets a 2.0 at Gamespot I must hear Duke's one liners again. Imagine if they show it at E3. In fact an IGN writer has played it and he said that it's got enough cool features already to set it apart from the rest of the pack.
Avatar image for Mythbuster4ever
Mythbuster4ever

2846

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Mythbuster4ever
Member since 2007 • 2846 Posts
Yep, in 2019 when PC gaming needs saving, Duke will be there.
Avatar image for thrones
thrones

12178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 thrones
Member since 2004 • 12178 Posts

Yep, in 2019 when PC gaming needs saving, Duke will be there. Mythbuster4ever

I lol'd

Avatar image for mudman91878
mudman91878

740

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 mudman91878
Member since 2003 • 740 Posts
[QUOTE="PandaBear86"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="PandaBear86"]

[QUOTE="NielsNL"]Wait a minute, I thought Duke Nukem Forever was also coming to consoles...heretrix

It doesn't matter in the end. The PC version will be far superior. Better graphics, better controls, free online, and MODS. Forget the console versions even exist.

what if people don't have a PC powerful enough to play it? Why should they ignore a version that will probably be not much different aside from graphics?

I don't think Duke Nukem will be Crysis by any means in terms of system requirements. If you cannot max it, you can set the detail and resolution to low (it will still look better than Haze graphics which runs at 576p resolution). Oh, and there are many advantages of PC gaming apart from graphics. Great controls, great online, and mods. I think mods are like 500 advantages in one. Check out how many Oblivion mods there are, and try to tell me you still prefer the console versions over the PC version :)

I don't care about mods. I have more than enough games to play on multiple systems. And a lot of people don't feel like messing around with resolutions just to get the game running at a decent framerate.

I have a pretty powerful PC and I like the idea of just putting in a game and playing it without having to deal with all the other mess. I think a lot of people here that are alway trumpeting the PC as the best platform forget that. I'm not saying that it is or isn't, it's just that there are many people who just want to play games and not configure them.

Mods are a HUGE advantage for PC. Have fun paying for extra content on consoles.

Why are you acting like customization is a bad thing? I hear this crap all the time from consolites like you. They act like it takes weeks to get the settings right so a game is playable. Total BS.

Customization is another ADVANTAGE of the PC, not a hinderance. With console games if you're pretty much stuck with the way it plays out of the box, with PC games if you want something changed, chances are it can be done. Again, that's an advantage, not a disadvantage.

I also like saving at least $20 per game.

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Why does it need to be saved? They're happy with what they get, and we console players are happy with what we get. Still, it'd be nice to see 3DR put up or shut up after 10 years of smack talk.

Customization is another ADVANTAGE of the PC, not a hinderance. With console games if you're pretty much stuck with the way it plays out of the box, with PC games if you want something changed, chances are it can be done. Again, that's an advantage, not a disadvantage.

mudman91878

Because it absolves the developer of the responsibility to get things right - they wave their hands and say "lower your settings" or "get an updated driver that Nvidia has hacked... er, I mean optimized for our game" or "buy better hardware". If Crytek had to develop for a fixed platform, then they wouldn't have been able to achieve what they did - I'll acknowledge that - but they wouldn't have been able to ignore the game's performance, either. Console developers are responsible for carefully controlling the layout of their levels and objects to consistently hit a target framerate, or you'd better believe they'll be slammed for it in the review.

Sure, you don't get to choose the balance of resolution, AA, and settings you want. But you don't have to, because the people who made the game have already done that work for you. And that's the way I like it.

Avatar image for Hot_Potato
Hot_Potato

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 Hot_Potato
Member since 2004 • 3422 Posts

Yeah.... how's that development on Duke Nuken Forever coming along? I really doubt Yet Another FPS on PC™ would reinvigorate the platform. Times have sure changed though. If my memory serves me, this website used to cover PC gaming exclusively.

So what do I think would save PCs as you surely have not asked yourself!?

1) New mech game - I don't care if it's mech warrior, starsiege, heavy gear, etc. Really any cutting edge game that isn't FPS would do worlds of good.

2) Adventure games - what happened to these?

3) Space Combat - I have always loved space combat games. Wing Commander, X-wing, Freespace, privateer, etc. I can't believe how long it's been since a decent space combat game has been released by a US developer.

juno84

The 3 genres you listed are very niche. Sins did sell pretty well though but it didn't "save" PC gaming, not that it's really dying.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#39 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

PCgaming is growing double digits each year. It's more profitable than ever and there are more PCgamers than ever before.

I don't see how it needs saving

Avatar image for Sooperhotshiz
Sooperhotshiz

101

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Sooperhotshiz
Member since 2005 • 101 Posts
It will be be multiplat, although the PC version will be cheaper, have better graphics, and have more content(free) than consoles. So basically the PC will save itself even if there are not any PC exclusives.
Avatar image for pieatorium
pieatorium

1012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 pieatorium
Member since 2008 • 1012 Posts

Why does it need to be saved? They're happy with what they get, and we console players are happy with what we get. Still, it'd be nice to see 3DR put up or shut up after 10 years of smack talk.

[QUOTE="mudman91878"]

Customization is another ADVANTAGE of the PC, not a hinderance. With console games if you're pretty much stuck with the way it plays out of the box, with PC games if you want something changed, chances are it can be done. Again, that's an advantage, not a disadvantage.

lowe0

Because it absolves the developer of the responsibility to get things right - they wave their hands and say "lower your settings" or "get an updated driver that Nvidia has hacked... er, I mean optimized for our game" or "buy better hardware". If Crytek had to develop for a fixed platform, then they wouldn't have been able to achieve what they did - I'll acknowledge that - but they wouldn't have been able to ignore the game's performance, either. Console developers are responsible for carefully controlling the layout of their levels and objects to consistently hit a target framerate, or you'd better believe they'll be slammed for it in the review.

Sure, you don't get to choose the balance of resolution, AA, and settings you want. But you don't have to, because the people who made the game have already done that work for you. And that's the way I like it.

I don't see how you can claim they ignored the games performance really, I mean 30fps, lowered res and no AA is pretty much a console standard yet when a PC game has to be played this way it's alll of a sudden a sign of lazy devs.

Avatar image for AdrianWerner
AdrianWerner

28441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 AdrianWerner
Member since 2003 • 28441 Posts

It will be be multiplat, although the PC version will be cheaper, have better graphics, and have more content(free) than consoles. So basically the PC will save itself even if there are not any PC exclusives.Sooperhotzhiz

why would there be no PC exclusives? If anything there will be more than ever before

Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

I don't see how you can claim they ignored the games performance really, I mean 30fps, lowered res and no AA is pretty much a console standard yet when a PC game has to be played this way it's alll of a sudden a sign of lazy devs.pieatorium
Please. I played the beginning of Crysis on my old PC (a bit better than minimum requirements), before I upgraded, and it was only acceptable at minimum settings, 800x600 (a little more than half the pixels of 720p). On my upgraded PC (E6750, and a very disappointing 8800 GT), it's quite a bit better (1280x1024, mix of Medium and High settings) but still not up to the solid 30 fps I'm used to on consoles.

If they had been honest with themselves, established a hardware target, and said "the game has to run 30 fps rock-solid start to finish on this PC, or we don't ship", then performance would have been a lot less choppy. That's an unreasonable demand on a PC, but it's expected on a console. The only people who seem to get away with breaking it are Rockstar.

Avatar image for True_Gamer_
True_Gamer_

6750

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 True_Gamer_
Member since 2006 • 6750 Posts

[QUOTE="pieatorium"]I don't see how you can claim they ignored the games performance really, I mean 30fps, lowered res and no AA is pretty much a console standard yet when a PC game has to be played this way it's alll of a sudden a sign of lazy devs.lowe0

Please. I played the beginning of Crysis on my old PC (a bit better than minimum requirements), before I upgraded, and it was only acceptable at minimum settings, 800x600 (a little more than half the pixels of 720p). On my upgraded PC (E6750, and a very disappointing 8800 GT), it's quite a bit better (1280x1024, mix of Medium and High settings) but still not up to the solid 30 fps I'm used to on consoles.

If they had been honest with themselves, established a hardware target, and said "the game has to run 30 fps rock-solid start to finish on this PC, or we don't ship", then performance would have been a lot less choppy. That's an unreasonable demand on a PC, but it's expected on a console. The only people who seem to get away with breaking it are Rockstar.

What about 600p CoD4? Haze 576p? Jaggies of War? Are you serious?

Avatar image for horrowhip
horrowhip

5002

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 horrowhip
Member since 2005 • 5002 Posts

[QUOTE="pieatorium"]I don't see how you can claim they ignored the games performance really, I mean 30fps, lowered res and no AA is pretty much a console standard yet when a PC game has to be played this way it's alll of a sudden a sign of lazy devs.lowe0

Please. I played the beginning of Crysis on my old PC (a bit better than minimum requirements), before I upgraded, and it was only acceptable at minimum settings, 800x600 (a little more than half the pixels of 720p). On my upgraded PC (E6750, and a very disappointing 8800 GT), it's quite a bit better (1280x1024, mix of Medium and High settings) but still not up to the solid 30 fps I'm used to on consoles.

If they had been honest with themselves, established a hardware target, and said "the game has to run 30 fps rock-solid start to finish on this PC, or we don't ship", then performance would have been a lot less choppy. That's an unreasonable demand on a PC, but it's expected on a console. The only people who seem to get away with breaking it are Rockstar.

you don't even know how rediculously crazy the tech in CryENGINE 2 is do you?

I am a programmer and I will tell you RIGHT NOW that the fact that the game even runs at 30 FPS is a miracle because there is so much power being eaten by the game, even on low settings.

Also, something is wrong on YOUR end if you can't get 40+ FPS on High settings with your supposed rig.

Because my work computer which is a E6600, 8800 GTS 640 MB, 3GB of RAM can pull 40 FPS on High settings... Heck, it pulls 25 FPS on Very High settings with that resolution

Avatar image for 6matt6
6matt6

9726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 6matt6
Member since 2005 • 9726 Posts
my childhood hero will return to save the day.
Avatar image for lowe0
lowe0

13692

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 lowe0
Member since 2004 • 13692 Posts

Also, something is wrong on YOUR end if you can't get 40+ FPS on High settings with your supposed rig.

Because my work computer which is a E6600, 8800 GTS 640 MB, 3GB of RAM can pull 40 FPS on High settings... Heck, it pulls 25 FPS on Very High settings with that resolution

horrowhip
I'll admit, I haven't put a lot of effort into solving that particular problem. The new official Nvidia drivers helped a LOT - I can set more stuff to High and pull 30 fps avg., without the weird sleep problem I had with the betas. In the end, though, I have plenty of other games that run just fine, and Crysis just isn't worth the effort to me - it was okay, but I don't feel like replaying it.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#49 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
How to save PC gaming? By realizing that it doesn't need to be "saved."